• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Causes of WW1. How valid is the claim that in 1914, states went to war due to fear rather than motives for gain.

Extracts from this document...


Celeste Ngooi P1 Question: How valid is the claim that "in 1914, states went to war due to fear rather than motives for gain. -Timeline: 1888-1914 (End of Franco-Prussian War) The European States at that time went to war due to many factors. Such as, territorial gains, the assassination of Franz Ferdinand, the various Alliances and the Naval Race. However, in the majority of the factors, they have stemmed from fear or have led to fear in the European States leading them to participate in World War 1. Thus, it can be seen that the claim that the states went to war due to fear rather than motives for gain is valid. Territorial gains was one of the most important reasons that have led France, Germany, Serbia and Austria-Hungary to participate in the war. France wanted the territory of Alsace-Lorraine back from Germany and desired revenge, this had increased tension between Germany and France. With the Ottoman Empire in decline, it created a power vacuum with many states clamoring to seize control of the states in the now declining Ottoman Empire. ...read more.


Another important factor of the events leading up to World War 1 was the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand and his wife by a member of the Serbian Black Hand as he wanted to bring Serbia into Austria-Hungary. The Serbs thus assassinated him due to the fear of Serbia being integrated into Austria-Hungary. This obviously caused uproar in Austria-Hungary and the Austrians saw this as an opportunity to crush Serbia. The Austro-Hungarian government sent Serbia an ultimatum detailing 10 demands for them to meet. If Serbia failed to meet all of these demands, Austria Hungary would declare war on Serbia. Austria-Hungary expected Serbia to reject the ultimatum, which would give Austria-Hungary an excuse to invade. However, the Serb government did not reject the ultimatum. Instead the Serbian government agreed to everything except part of demand 6, Austria-Hungary at this point wanted any reason to attack Serbia and saw this as one and thus declared war on Serbia. Therefore, this factor was as a result of fear and played an important role in the beginning of World War 1. ...read more.


Britain also responded to this threat to their naval supremacy by allying with Japan and forming an entente with France. Which increased tensions between Britain and Germany. The Germans soon followed suit by introducing their own battleships. However, the reason for Britain wanting to weaken Germany's power was motivated by fear. Britain was fearful of Germany's rapidly expanding fleet and military power. They then ordered the construction of more battleships which again increased tensions between Britain and Germany. As said before, with the introduction of the 'Deadnought' a battleship that rendered others obsolete, it nullified their historical advantage which resulted in a 'naval scare' in Britain. Britain's willingness to go to war owed a lot to the tensions and fear caused by the naval race. This indicates that the reason for the naval race and in turn B's participation in the war was motivated by fear. As seen through some of the various factors leading up to World War 1, the major motivator for the majority of the States to go to war was largely due to fear stemming from tensions between the various European states rather than motives for gain. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. Causes of WW1

    Most people throughout history have all been in accordance with what they view as being the trigger. The shooting of the Archduke Franz Ferdinand is the event that is blamed the most. This event led to Austria-Hungary sending an ultimatum to Serbia, and when Serbia failed to agree, declaring war on Serbia.

  2. Assess critically the causes of world war I

    Militarism refers to a rise in military expenditure, an increase in military and naval forces, and a preference for force as a solution to problems. After 1871, secret alliances led to an arms race between the powers.

  1. How valid is to claim that "Europe stumbled into a war in 1914"?

    This granted Austria "permission" to follow an aggressive behaviour that would knowingly create a conflict with Russia, the protector of the Serbs. What is more, in the verge of war, Germany made no diplomatic attempts to negotiate with the other countries , and gave ultimatums demanding Russia to stop mobilization and France to remain neutral.

  2. The Causes of World War 1

    It also reignited, and displayed, the fierce rivalry between Serbia and Austria-Hungary. This rivalry had a huge part in starting World War 1. In 1912, countries started emerging from the rubble of the Ottoman Empire and they created the Balkan League. This league consisted of Serbia, Greece, Bulgaria and Montenegro.

  1. World War 1 Information

    only Liberia and Ethiopia remained independent (Liberia was created by US in the send slaves back to Africa movement) > First Moroccan Crisis > France wants to make Morocco a French colony, but Germany objects > Britain agrees with France that Morocco was in French sphere of control > German

  2. cause of WW1

    So this led the main European powers more than doubled their spending on their armed forces, in the period 1900-1914. For example, Germany's spending on armaments from the year 1872 to 1912 increased over 300%. The Militarism does not only mean arms race, but also a government's attitude of mind.

  1. IB History HL, Extended Notes: Russia, the Tsars, the Provisional Govenment and the Revolution.

    Course of events 1. Preliminary events started when soldiers and sailors from the naval base together with workers were (disputably) called out by Petrograd Soviet activists to overthrow the PG ?all power to the Soviets.? 2.

  2. Notes on the History and Development of the Arab-Israeli Conflict

    - Egypt rejected this proposal as it indirectly implied Israel's right to exist. - SU and several Eastern bloc countries severed ties with Israel in the aftermath of war. - US became even more the guarantor of Israel's survival. - In the late 1980s Israel would have to cope with

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work