• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Cold war

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Luke Rogers 5-1-00 "Why have historians found it difficult to reach agreement in assessing responsibility for the Cold War?" The Cold War is a product of the combined folly of both the United States and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. However, historians have seen both sides making mistakes, acting aggressively, and pushing one and other to make further mistakes throughout the years. Furthermore, it is human nature to wish to assign blame to one side or the other. Meanwhile, it has been difficult to tell what one side has been doing as neither the US or the USSR has wished to point out the other side what they had been doing. Of course, no issue in recent history has sparked quite so much discussion in historical circles. Assessing not only the blame but also the damage caused by the Cold War has given rise to many a book and historians have often argued quite aggressively for either side. Nevertheless, historians such as Thomas A. Bailey have argued that the US was reacting to Soviet expansionism and attempting to stem the tide of Soviet aggression. ...read more.

Middle

the Soviets couldn't accept the aid for fear that in checking on where the aid went, the US would discover the amount of devastation, which had befallen the Soviets. The Soviets could hardly be charged with coming up with and maintaining an aggressive policy when it was all they could do keep their country together. Furthermore, the Soviets attempted time and time again to reach for shielding form the economic might of the US only to discover the Americans fighting them back. In the Yalta Peace Conference, Stalin agreed to hold free elections in Poland, a promise, which he didn't keep. Similarly, in Iran, the Soviets were supposed to withdraw their troops on March 2, 1946, but didn't. This time, however, Harry Truman wouldn't give the country up as he had with Poland, and pressured the Soviets to withdraw their troops under the threat of US military and economic might, as well as their ever-present atomic bomb. In May of 1946, the Soviets withdrew, and the US signed a 25- year friendship with Iran as well as began to trade arms with them. ...read more.

Conclusion

The Soviets were entirely too defeated by the Second World War to bring about an aggressive policy of expansion and were blinded by their wounds to the true intentions of the allied powers. The US, on the other hand, had their own reasons for their actions. While Harry Truman was restricted by the American System of Government and public opinion, it was still by far and away the Americans who were in the driver's seat in the Cold War. Nevertheless, they were still blameless for the simple follies they made in watching Soviet policy. The Americans saw a Red boogey man in every corner while they felt that they had tried to be as civil as possible to the Soviets. They had helped to defeat the enemy, which had injured the Soviets (through Truman couldn't have imagined quite how injured), they had offered aid to the Soviets and the Eastern European countries, and they had tried to extend a hand of friendship despite highly to undermine their government and very way of life. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. The cold war - the conferences and the start of the cCold War

    Churchill's Iron Curtain Speech; March 5, 1946 - Churchill makes a speech where he talks about an iron curtain descending within Europe from the (Stettin) Baltic in the North and to Trieste in the South - The speech was agreed with the state department in advance and President Truman was

  2. Investigation: The Cuban Missile Crisis as a Thaw in the Cold War

    DEAR MR. PRESIDENT I have studied with great satisfaction your reply to Mr. Thant concerning measures that should be taken to avoid contact between our vessels and thereby avoid irreparable and fatal consequences. This reasonable step on your part strengthens my belief that you are showing concern for the preservation of peace, which I note with satisfaction.

  1. Why Did War Time Friends Become Cold War Enemies?

    war was the new feeling in politics across the globe, Churchill reflected the poor relations between the East and West in a speech. In March 1946, Churchill made a speech at Fulton, Missouri in which he said, "From Stettin in the Baltic to Trieste in the Adriatic, an iron curtain has descended across the continent....

  2. The Cold War

    Potsdam ended agreeably enough, however, since all controversial issues were still left open and unsettled, on the understanding that they would be dealt with by the Council of Foreign Ministers, which was to meet regularly from now on. [12] Another part of the early Cold War that focused on Germany was the division of Germany into four occupation zones.

  1. What were the intentions of President Harry S. Truman and General Douglas MacArthur regarding ...

    to eliminate the last remaining anti-Communist bridgehead in northern Asia. As National Security Council Report 68 of 1950 stated, Truman was determined to reinforce the American containment of communism without question. While the North Korean Army was well-armed with 133,000 soldiers, weapons and tanks such as T-34, the ROK Army

  2. Did Truman really save 500,000 American live through dropping the Hiroshima atomic bomb?

    Finally the Emperor intervened and made a sacred decision for surrender on August 14th, which overrode the opinions of the disagreeing cabinet26. B. Evaluation of Sources (Word Count:415) "Hiroshima in History" is a collection of essays by prominent military and diplomatic historians which addresses the controversy over the use of

  1. The Impact of the Manhattan Project on the Cold War

    This topic is worthy of investigation given that the Cold War showed the importance of technological advantage that the powers of the world had to have to ensure security to the homeland. It is interesting that The Manhattan Project had a much longer, more evident impact than the use of

  2. Notes on the History and Development of the Arab-Israeli Conflict

    The Gulf War - The Iran-Iraq War (180-1988) significantly weakened the Iraqi economy. Saddam Hussein believed Kuwait and the United Arab Emirates were partly responsibly by flooding the oil market. Hussein also accused Kuwait of stealing oil from a field on the common border.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work