• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Collapse of the League of Nations

Extracts from this document...


How important were appeasement and the collapse of the League of Nations as causes of the Second World War? The appeasement policy in 1933-1939 towards Nazi Germany introduced by the British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain and also supported by France together with the collapse of the League of Nations were crucial for the start of the Second World War in September 1939 when A. Hitler invaded Poland. These were the two factors that contributed greatly to the cause of the war as the appeasement policy constantly gave opportunities for Hitler to seize power in Europe and convinced him that Britain and France were not yet ready start a war against Germany and feared the Reich. Further, the numerous failures of the League of Nations to keep peace both in Europe and in Asia through the objective of collective security, encouraged Hitler to take an open aggressive foreign policy and break the terms of the Treaty of Versailles by starting to rearm in 1933 and invading the territories taken by the treaty from her in the period of 1936-39 which eventually lead to a war. The importance of the policy of appeasement for the start of the Second World War has always been debatable among historians. Some historians such as R.J. Overy in the "Origins of the Second World War" published in 1987 take the view that the policy of appeasement made sense in the context of the atmosphere in the mid 1930s when Europe's economy was devastated by ...read more.


Hence, in 1938 with the Munich agreement he received control over the Sudetenland. In this way the British Prime Minister satisfied Hitler's ambitions by preventing a military confrontation. The policy of appeasement encouraged Hitler's actions even more and made him seize opportunities to add more land to German territory without starting a war. In 1939 when he signed a Non-Aggression Pact with the Soviet Union and secretly divided Poland in two among themselves Hitler insured that Germany would not fight a war on two fronts. Therefore, as he knew the Soviet Union would not attack her Germany invaded Poland in 1939. Hitler believed that Britain and France would not do anything and take again a peaceful approach but he miscalculated the consequences of this invasion as they did declare war on Germany two days after. It can be clearly seen that Britain and France encouraged Hitler's expansionist ambitions trough their appeasement policy as they breed in him the belief they would do anything in order to avoid a conflict. Hitler then decided to play on their wish to escape war in any costs and continuously demand territories that previously belonged to Germany till Britain and France understood after the Munich crises that he could not be trusted and decided to stop their appeasement policy when Hitler invaded Poland which led to war. Hence, their appeasement policy since 1933 only delayed the beginning of the future war as it allowed Germany to grow bigger and build up strength. ...read more.


However, the League's second failure to help Abyssinia from Mussolini's invasion in 1935 totally proved Hitler the League's incompetence to keep peace as well as insignificance in foreign affairs. Therefore, this encouraged him further and gave strong grounds for his future attacks on the Rhineland, Austria and Sudetenland. The League's inefficient organization, communication as well as lack of commitment and participation of world powers contributed to her collapse and therefore, cause of the WWII. Due that the League could not keep peace and stop the hostile actions of relevantly less powerful countries such as Japan and Italy her reputation was ruined and opened a door to Germany to begin her aggression in Europe which eventually led to war. Both the appeasement policy and the collapse of the League of Nations were long-term causes of the Second World War. They encouraged and gave Hitler opportunity to begin an aggressive foreign policy in Europe and to demand all the territories taken away from Germany by the Versailles Treaty. It is often said by historians that Hitler was an opportunist by nature, which made him so successful in building a strong Reich he knew how to use each chance that opened to him to achieve his aims. Hence, both Churchill's appeasement policy and the League's weaknesses to keep peace due to inefficiency and lack of its member's commitment convinced him of Europe's inability to stop his policies as well as gave him various opportunities to add land to Germany without war and exactly his exploitation of this opportunities led to the start of the Second World War in 1939. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. Notes on Italian unification - background and main events

    --> he wasn't happy about the unification of Italy seeing as there was too much foreign help involved 1870; Rome and the Papacy - Both Mazzini and Victor Emmanuel hoped to bring about uprisings in Rome. Nothing much came of this - In 1867, Garibaldi raised a force of 3000 men and marched on Rome.

  2. Why did the policy of Collective Security established by the League of Nations fail ...

    Perhaps this, initially well intended, over ambitiousness of the League of Nations was the most detrimental factor leading to its ultimate failure. The change in atmosphere between the 20�s and the 30�s is truly remarkable. It begs the question: why?

  1. Notes on German unification - main events

    It was a huge infantry battle; o 400, 000 men were involved o 24, 000 Austrians killed or wounded o 13, 000 prisoners - Grenville: "Prussian ascendancy in Germany had been decided on the battlefield" - The Austrians were successful against in Italy in the battles of Custozza (June 24)

  2. Free essay

    May the League of Nations be considered a complete failure? Answer this question and ...

    However, the first to disagree to the protocol was the British Conservative government, which resented the idea of risking greatly to defend all the frontiers. Similarly, the World Disarmament Conference a decade later, resulted in another failure. According to Wilson's "14 Points" and previous international agreements, it was necessary that

  1. Analyse the political factors involved in the unification of Italy up to 1861

    Simpson and Jones call this the 'Battle of Volturno' on the 1st of October. Garibaldi had two choices attack Victor Emanuel or welcome him. Garibaldi greeted Victor Emmanuel as 'the first king of Italy'. And handed over Sicily and Naples to him.

  2. The League of Nations was a failure. How far do you agree with this ...

    This shows that countries found their self-interest more important that world peace. The consequences of the Abyssinian Crisis began the 'emotional preparation' among the democratic countries for a war, and Hitler realised that he would be likely to get away with aggression.

  1. How did collective security develop, in particular between WWI and WWII?

    ("League of Nations") The League was supposed to be a fair organization promoting peace talks and its members to take collective decisions, however its validity and legitimacy was questionable because 3 Great powers were not involved. The League seemed more as an agency to enforce the Treaty of Versailles than an impartial arbiter.

  2. Why did collective security fail to keep the peace between 1920 and 1935?

    Japan (a permanent state) had violated the sovereign rights of China who was a member state. China appealed for assistance against Japan under the terms of collective security. The League agreed with china but did not forcibly act against Japan.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work