• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare and contrast Hitler's and Stalin's roads to power.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Compare and contrast Hitler's and Stalin's roads to power. First and foremost, the inter-war years 1919-1939 were a period of dictators in Europe. Many historians consider tyrants - Hitler and Stalin - and their ideologies to be quite similar. These two despots were the most famous and probably the most bloody dictators in this period. No wonder these two are compared to one another. In addition, the scheme of taking power by any autocrat seems to be very simple: dissatisfaction from contemporary rules or death of the leader and skilful takeover by a person with some horrific vision of the future. But historic events are never as simple as that. Now, arises the interesting question if Hitler's and Stalin's roads to power were similar or different or maybe both options are true to same extent. Nevertheless, Hitler tried twice to gain power in a period 1923-1934 while Stalin only once in years 1924-1929. Firstly, similarities in consolidating oppressor's position will be discussed. ...read more.

Middle

and were not prepared to compromise and left beyond personal intrigues. What is more, left wing was divided itself - Zinoviev with Kamenev argued with Trotsky and KPD considered SPD as its main enemy. Besides in the Weimar Republic workers were weakened by unemployment and could not afford to strike against the Nazis. Moreover, there were almost no supporters of democracy and liberalism thanks to long authoritarian tradition. It might also be mentioned that in both countries Hitler and Stalin were underestimated. Austrian corporal was expected to be a puppet in the hands of the Right who would not last long, especially that there were only three Nazis in the government. Nobody remembered that he managed to bring party members together after the failure of the M´┐Żnich Putsch and breaking the law in the Night of the Long Knives did not open the eyes of ordinary Germans. In the same way, 'Tovarishch Kartotekov' was considered as 'the grey blur', mediocre intellectual who is not able to win the contest for power. ...read more.

Conclusion

To sum up, both autocrats had the same aim - creating an image of themselves - using propaganda machine. Similarly, these tyrants appealed to the complaints and needs of majorities. In addition, Hitler had total control over his party, likewise Stalin. What is more, both despots made concessions and alliances. These dictators were respected, especially that they used terror and intimidation. Furthermore, they faced divided, weak and not having power to pose real threat opposition. Above all, their opponents - Kamenev, Zinoviev, Trotsky, Papen and others - underestimated these future tyrants and respected legal actions although they led to gaining power by Stalin or Hitler. However, on the contrary to Stalin, Hitler two times tried to gain power in the Weimar Republic and made people join a huge range of different organisations for everybody. Equally important is the fact that Hitler did not have strong position in the government and he had to act very carefully in order to become all-powerful leader of Germany. Taking everything into account, Hitler's and Stalin's roads to power are quite analogous and differences between these routes are caused by circumstances in which these two found themselves. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. In order to achieve and retain power a leader of a single-party state needed ...

    o While Stalin's Five Year Plan encouraged greater industrialization, it eventually led to the near destruction of the Russian Agriculture which in part led to uncontrollable famine throughout Russia. * Stalin's system of Collectivization resulted in the death of millions, especially kulaks who were sent to labour camps.

  2. Can the period between 1924-1929 really be called the Golden period for the Weimar ...

    even in terms of disarmament where in 1926 the Inter-Allied Military Control Commission withdrew from Germany. Moreover, he even used this to raise the issue of German minorities in its lost lands. Along with this, Stresemann manipulated the Treaty of Berlin to not only improve relations with USSR but to

  1. Compare and Contrast the rise to power of Hitler and Lenin

    Hitler won support on a programme of job creation, which he sincerely implemented (partly by removing the Jewish placeholders); Lenin promised all land to the peasants, which was the opposite of his real intentions. Hitler took care to have the owners of the means of production and exchange (Thyssen, Krupp et al.)

  2. Bolsheviks In Power

    In addition, when Lenin became the leader, his country had to deal and face with two wars: the World War 1 and the Russian Civil War. In order to mitigate the problems in Russia, Lenin signed the Treaty of Brest Litovsk in March 1918.

  1. Bolsheviks in Power Essay

    been unpopular with the peasants who, seeing no point in working hard to produce food which was taken away from them without compensation, simply produced enough for their own needs. This caused severe food shortages aggravated by droughts in 1920."

  2. How similar were Hitler and Stalin ?

    Propaganda was a way for them to further their ideas and so to gain the backing of the people in their countries. Hitler was a man who did many speeches. He has also been described as the world?s greatest propagandist, saying that he was nearly able to brainwash people with his words.

  1. Which of indoctrination and repression proved most effective for consolidating Hitler's power (1933-1939)?

    by 1933. Thus the Nazi were forced to make a move so that most of the household could afford it. That’s how mass production of cheap radio rapidly increased. Progressively most of the households started to acquire radios and by 1939 over 70 percent of them (16 million) possessed (Volksempfänger)

  2. Peron's Consolidation of Power

    disposal, newspaper size was limited to a certain number of printed pages, and distribution was hindered. At the same time, Perón and his party used the chain of newspapers they owned to disseminate propaganda in quantity. Papers such as La Razón, Critica, El Mundo, and Democracia, as well as various

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work