• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare and contrast Hitler's and Stalin's roads to power.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Compare and contrast Hitler's and Stalin's roads to power. First and foremost, the inter-war years 1919-1939 were a period of dictators in Europe. Many historians consider tyrants - Hitler and Stalin - and their ideologies to be quite similar. These two despots were the most famous and probably the most bloody dictators in this period. No wonder these two are compared to one another. In addition, the scheme of taking power by any autocrat seems to be very simple: dissatisfaction from contemporary rules or death of the leader and skilful takeover by a person with some horrific vision of the future. But historic events are never as simple as that. Now, arises the interesting question if Hitler's and Stalin's roads to power were similar or different or maybe both options are true to same extent. Nevertheless, Hitler tried twice to gain power in a period 1923-1934 while Stalin only once in years 1924-1929. Firstly, similarities in consolidating oppressor's position will be discussed. ...read more.

Middle

and were not prepared to compromise and left beyond personal intrigues. What is more, left wing was divided itself - Zinoviev with Kamenev argued with Trotsky and KPD considered SPD as its main enemy. Besides in the Weimar Republic workers were weakened by unemployment and could not afford to strike against the Nazis. Moreover, there were almost no supporters of democracy and liberalism thanks to long authoritarian tradition. It might also be mentioned that in both countries Hitler and Stalin were underestimated. Austrian corporal was expected to be a puppet in the hands of the Right who would not last long, especially that there were only three Nazis in the government. Nobody remembered that he managed to bring party members together after the failure of the Münich Putsch and breaking the law in the Night of the Long Knives did not open the eyes of ordinary Germans. In the same way, 'Tovarishch Kartotekov' was considered as 'the grey blur', mediocre intellectual who is not able to win the contest for power. ...read more.

Conclusion

To sum up, both autocrats had the same aim - creating an image of themselves - using propaganda machine. Similarly, these tyrants appealed to the complaints and needs of majorities. In addition, Hitler had total control over his party, likewise Stalin. What is more, both despots made concessions and alliances. These dictators were respected, especially that they used terror and intimidation. Furthermore, they faced divided, weak and not having power to pose real threat opposition. Above all, their opponents - Kamenev, Zinoviev, Trotsky, Papen and others - underestimated these future tyrants and respected legal actions although they led to gaining power by Stalin or Hitler. However, on the contrary to Stalin, Hitler two times tried to gain power in the Weimar Republic and made people join a huge range of different organisations for everybody. Equally important is the fact that Hitler did not have strong position in the government and he had to act very carefully in order to become all-powerful leader of Germany. Taking everything into account, Hitler's and Stalin's roads to power are quite analogous and differences between these routes are caused by circumstances in which these two found themselves. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. Can the period between 1924-1929 really be called the Golden period for the Weimar ...

    Literature too developed with writers like Grottfried Benn and Erich Maria Remarque's anti- war novel, which challenged the 'stab in the back' view. This created a sense of freedom of speech and thought, accelerating advances in these fields. Music and art also developed with Schoenberg's use of atonality and the coming up of modernising architects like Bauhaus.

  2. Compare and Contrast the foreign/domestic policies of one right wing and one left wing ...

    decided to pronounce Italy's currency, the Lira, automatically worth more than its value in relation to world markets o Mussolini hoped this would reduce inflation and show that Fascism could bring stability o Mussolini also hoped this would show that Italy had a strong currency because of it was a

  1. Compare and Contrast the rise to power of Hitler and Lenin

    and anti-semitism, such ideas publicly-stated played a much less important role in Lenin's rise than Hitler's. On the other hand profound study of Marxism was a marked feature of Lenin's career and a reason for his supremacy among the Bolsheviks, whereas Hitler had spent more time in doss-houses and trenches than in libraries.

  2. Bolsheviks In Power

    Also, Russia's thirty-three percent of manufacturing industry, thirty-two percent of arable land, and seventy-five percent of coal and iron resources were deteriorated, decimated and destructed; these losses left Russia in destitute (Morris 200). Moreover, Russians were discontent and incensed about Lenin's decision of pulling Russia out of war because they felt that Russia left the war in humiliation.

  1. History Investigation - Hitler

    The first key issue was how the Nazi party was developed from 1920-29. The party was formed in 1920 but struggled to make a real impact. The Nazis developed their beliefs regarding "race, anti-Semitism, anti-communism, and Lebensraum."11 In 1923, the Munich Putsch agreement was made, giving Hitler a platform to voice his ideas.

  2. In order to achieve and retain power a leader of a single-party state needed ...

    Reflections on a Ravaged Century. New York: W.W. Norton, 2000. * Clearly Lenin was a ruthless individual and believed that mass annihilation was the answer to the achievement and retaining of power. o Lenin: "To overcome of our enemies we must have our own socialist militarism. We must carry along with us 90 million out of the 100 million of Soviet Russia's population.

  1. Which of indoctrination and repression proved most effective for consolidating Hitler's power (1933-1939)?

    Goebbels introduced the mass rallies (Nuremberg annual rallies). The results of this propaganda varied. Although the sales of books increased, the quality of the artistic production is to be questioned, as the plays that were tolerated by the Nazis were musical and tend to prone the nazi politics, those plays didnât have much success.

  2. How similar were Hitler and Stalin ?

    Propaganda was a way for them to further their ideas and so to gain the backing of the people in their countries. Hitler was a man who did many speeches. He has also been described as the worldâs greatest propagandist, saying that he was nearly able to brainwash people with his words.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work