• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare and contrast Hitler's and Stalin's roads to power.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Compare and contrast Hitler's and Stalin's roads to power. First and foremost, the inter-war years 1919-1939 were a period of dictators in Europe. Many historians consider tyrants - Hitler and Stalin - and their ideologies to be quite similar. These two despots were the most famous and probably the most bloody dictators in this period. No wonder these two are compared to one another. In addition, the scheme of taking power by any autocrat seems to be very simple: dissatisfaction from contemporary rules or death of the leader and skilful takeover by a person with some horrific vision of the future. But historic events are never as simple as that. Now, arises the interesting question if Hitler's and Stalin's roads to power were similar or different or maybe both options are true to same extent. Nevertheless, Hitler tried twice to gain power in a period 1923-1934 while Stalin only once in years 1924-1929. Firstly, similarities in consolidating oppressor's position will be discussed. ...read more.

Middle

and were not prepared to compromise and left beyond personal intrigues. What is more, left wing was divided itself - Zinoviev with Kamenev argued with Trotsky and KPD considered SPD as its main enemy. Besides in the Weimar Republic workers were weakened by unemployment and could not afford to strike against the Nazis. Moreover, there were almost no supporters of democracy and liberalism thanks to long authoritarian tradition. It might also be mentioned that in both countries Hitler and Stalin were underestimated. Austrian corporal was expected to be a puppet in the hands of the Right who would not last long, especially that there were only three Nazis in the government. Nobody remembered that he managed to bring party members together after the failure of the Münich Putsch and breaking the law in the Night of the Long Knives did not open the eyes of ordinary Germans. In the same way, 'Tovarishch Kartotekov' was considered as 'the grey blur', mediocre intellectual who is not able to win the contest for power. ...read more.

Conclusion

To sum up, both autocrats had the same aim - creating an image of themselves - using propaganda machine. Similarly, these tyrants appealed to the complaints and needs of majorities. In addition, Hitler had total control over his party, likewise Stalin. What is more, both despots made concessions and alliances. These dictators were respected, especially that they used terror and intimidation. Furthermore, they faced divided, weak and not having power to pose real threat opposition. Above all, their opponents - Kamenev, Zinoviev, Trotsky, Papen and others - underestimated these future tyrants and respected legal actions although they led to gaining power by Stalin or Hitler. However, on the contrary to Stalin, Hitler two times tried to gain power in the Weimar Republic and made people join a huge range of different organisations for everybody. Equally important is the fact that Hitler did not have strong position in the government and he had to act very carefully in order to become all-powerful leader of Germany. Taking everything into account, Hitler's and Stalin's roads to power are quite analogous and differences between these routes are caused by circumstances in which these two found themselves. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. Compare and Contrast the foreign/domestic policies of one right wing and one left wing ...

    strong nation o This did not work out for very long at all, as other countries deemed Italy's currency decree invalid and refused to honour it o However, the move did show the authority of the regime and boost prestige o On the other hand, it harmed the economy by

  2. Can the period between 1924-1929 really be called the Golden period for the Weimar ...

    put pressure on the west to support Germany with the threat of getting close to the Soviet Union. Furthermore, the Treaty of Berlin allowed Germany to receive armaments in exchange for providing economic expertise to the USSR. With international relations improving, internally the Weimar Republic was gaining support as well.

  1. Compare and Contrast the rise to power of Hitler and Lenin

    and anti-semitism, such ideas publicly-stated played a much less important role in Lenin's rise than Hitler's. On the other hand profound study of Marxism was a marked feature of Lenin's career and a reason for his supremacy among the Bolsheviks, whereas Hitler had spent more time in doss-houses and trenches than in libraries.

  2. History Investigation - Hitler

    The first key issue describes how the Nazi party was developed from 1920 to 1929. The second issue reveals how the Great Depression helped bring Hitler to power. Thirdly and lastly, how Hitler established a dictatorship between 1933 and 1934.

  1. Bolsheviks In Power

    Also, the allies were infuriated by Russia's signing of the treaty; the allies felt betrayed. The Treaty of Brest Litovsk allowed Germany to focus and concentrate its war efforts only on the western front since the eastern front no longer existed.

  2. In order to achieve and retain power a leader of a single-party state needed ...

    * In 1917, Lenin created the Cheka which was used as a tool to manage the Red Terror. * With the used of the Red Army and Cheka Lenin exe Conquest, Robert. Reflections on a Ravaged Century. New York: W.W.

  1. Which of indoctrination and repression proved most effective for consolidating Hitler's power (1933-1939)?

    Its role was to assure the development and spread of the Nazi culture. This organization was composed of seven sub-chambers dealing with various aspects of culture. All subversive or degenerate art was to be destroyed thatâs how the first books containing Jewish, (left-wing, liberal etc)

  2. How similar were Hitler and Stalin ?

    Their political beliefs generated totalitarianism. Secondly, they were at first underestimated by others, and difficult circumstances didnât help for their rise to power. Stalin had to face the 1917th revolution followed by Lennins death in 1924. Moreover, the future of communism was uncertain, which split the party between Trotsky and Bukharin.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work