• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare and contrast Hitler's and Stalin's roads to power.

Extracts from this document...


Compare and contrast Hitler's and Stalin's roads to power. First and foremost, the inter-war years 1919-1939 were a period of dictators in Europe. Many historians consider tyrants - Hitler and Stalin - and their ideologies to be quite similar. These two despots were the most famous and probably the most bloody dictators in this period. No wonder these two are compared to one another. In addition, the scheme of taking power by any autocrat seems to be very simple: dissatisfaction from contemporary rules or death of the leader and skilful takeover by a person with some horrific vision of the future. But historic events are never as simple as that. Now, arises the interesting question if Hitler's and Stalin's roads to power were similar or different or maybe both options are true to same extent. Nevertheless, Hitler tried twice to gain power in a period 1923-1934 while Stalin only once in years 1924-1929. Firstly, similarities in consolidating oppressor's position will be discussed. ...read more.


and were not prepared to compromise and left beyond personal intrigues. What is more, left wing was divided itself - Zinoviev with Kamenev argued with Trotsky and KPD considered SPD as its main enemy. Besides in the Weimar Republic workers were weakened by unemployment and could not afford to strike against the Nazis. Moreover, there were almost no supporters of democracy and liberalism thanks to long authoritarian tradition. It might also be mentioned that in both countries Hitler and Stalin were underestimated. Austrian corporal was expected to be a puppet in the hands of the Right who would not last long, especially that there were only three Nazis in the government. Nobody remembered that he managed to bring party members together after the failure of the Münich Putsch and breaking the law in the Night of the Long Knives did not open the eyes of ordinary Germans. In the same way, 'Tovarishch Kartotekov' was considered as 'the grey blur', mediocre intellectual who is not able to win the contest for power. ...read more.


To sum up, both autocrats had the same aim - creating an image of themselves - using propaganda machine. Similarly, these tyrants appealed to the complaints and needs of majorities. In addition, Hitler had total control over his party, likewise Stalin. What is more, both despots made concessions and alliances. These dictators were respected, especially that they used terror and intimidation. Furthermore, they faced divided, weak and not having power to pose real threat opposition. Above all, their opponents - Kamenev, Zinoviev, Trotsky, Papen and others - underestimated these future tyrants and respected legal actions although they led to gaining power by Stalin or Hitler. However, on the contrary to Stalin, Hitler two times tried to gain power in the Weimar Republic and made people join a huge range of different organisations for everybody. Equally important is the fact that Hitler did not have strong position in the government and he had to act very carefully in order to become all-powerful leader of Germany. Taking everything into account, Hitler's and Stalin's roads to power are quite analogous and differences between these routes are caused by circumstances in which these two found themselves. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. Compare and Contrast the foreign/domestic policies of one right wing and one left wing ...

    hitting exports as now Italian goods cost more money abroad o This policy also undermined smaller firms, which were taken over by larger ones o The Battle for the Lira helped industries such as chemical and steel which were dependent on imports and caused deflation o The government was forced

  2. Can the period between 1924-1929 really be called the Golden period for the Weimar ...

    put pressure on the west to support Germany with the threat of getting close to the Soviet Union. Furthermore, the Treaty of Berlin allowed Germany to receive armaments in exchange for providing economic expertise to the USSR. With international relations improving, internally the Weimar Republic was gaining support as well.

  1. History Investigation - Hitler

    Leading to the Nazis becoming the largest party in the Reichstag in 1932, "receiving 13 million votes"12. Then in 1933, Hitler was appointed as Chancellor. The third key issue that contributed to Hitler becoming dictator was how he established a Nazi dictatorship in 1933-34.

  2. Compare and Contrast the rise to power of Hitler and Lenin

    (Instead he went through a short charade of supporting the Constituent Assembly). Not many Russians had seen Lenin's ideas in print before 1917, whereas 'Mein Kampf' was a best seller long before Hitler became Chancellor. For this reason, though we can contrast Lenin's advocacy of international brotherhood, with Hitler's nationalism

  1. Bolsheviks In Power

    Also, Russia's thirty-three percent of manufacturing industry, thirty-two percent of arable land, and seventy-five percent of coal and iron resources were deteriorated, decimated and destructed; these losses left Russia in destitute (Morris 200). Moreover, Russians were discontent and incensed about Lenin's decision of pulling Russia out of war because they felt that Russia left the war in humiliation.

  2. USSR under Stalin

    The importance of the source is that it comes directly from Stalin so the style of his rule can be examined as well as his attitude towards the kulaks who he claims to be enemies of the state as they oppose collectivisation and do not want to give up their land.

  1. Which of indoctrination and repression proved most effective for consolidating Hitler's power (1933-1939)?

    âThere were about 4.500 daily newspaper in Germanyâ[4]. Which included national newspapers and regional papers in different Länder. The problem with these was that most of them were privately owned and identified themselves with political parties or religious beliefs, which wasnât good for a government which wanted people to be united under the same ideology.

  2. How similar were Hitler and Stalin ?

    Indeed, they were capable of using their own words to twist and manipulate peopleâs minds so as to make them believe that what they were saying was the only truth. And with this, they would get people to do anything for them, what clearly proves their amorality.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work