• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare and contrast Hitler's and Stalin's roads to power.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Compare and contrast Hitler's and Stalin's roads to power. First and foremost, the inter-war years 1919-1939 were a period of dictators in Europe. Many historians consider tyrants - Hitler and Stalin - and their ideologies to be quite similar. These two despots were the most famous and probably the most bloody dictators in this period. No wonder these two are compared to one another. In addition, the scheme of taking power by any autocrat seems to be very simple: dissatisfaction from contemporary rules or death of the leader and skilful takeover by a person with some horrific vision of the future. But historic events are never as simple as that. Now, arises the interesting question if Hitler's and Stalin's roads to power were similar or different or maybe both options are true to same extent. Nevertheless, Hitler tried twice to gain power in a period 1923-1934 while Stalin only once in years 1924-1929. Firstly, similarities in consolidating oppressor's position will be discussed. ...read more.

Middle

and were not prepared to compromise and left beyond personal intrigues. What is more, left wing was divided itself - Zinoviev with Kamenev argued with Trotsky and KPD considered SPD as its main enemy. Besides in the Weimar Republic workers were weakened by unemployment and could not afford to strike against the Nazis. Moreover, there were almost no supporters of democracy and liberalism thanks to long authoritarian tradition. It might also be mentioned that in both countries Hitler and Stalin were underestimated. Austrian corporal was expected to be a puppet in the hands of the Right who would not last long, especially that there were only three Nazis in the government. Nobody remembered that he managed to bring party members together after the failure of the M´┐Żnich Putsch and breaking the law in the Night of the Long Knives did not open the eyes of ordinary Germans. In the same way, 'Tovarishch Kartotekov' was considered as 'the grey blur', mediocre intellectual who is not able to win the contest for power. ...read more.

Conclusion

To sum up, both autocrats had the same aim - creating an image of themselves - using propaganda machine. Similarly, these tyrants appealed to the complaints and needs of majorities. In addition, Hitler had total control over his party, likewise Stalin. What is more, both despots made concessions and alliances. These dictators were respected, especially that they used terror and intimidation. Furthermore, they faced divided, weak and not having power to pose real threat opposition. Above all, their opponents - Kamenev, Zinoviev, Trotsky, Papen and others - underestimated these future tyrants and respected legal actions although they led to gaining power by Stalin or Hitler. However, on the contrary to Stalin, Hitler two times tried to gain power in the Weimar Republic and made people join a huge range of different organisations for everybody. Equally important is the fact that Hitler did not have strong position in the government and he had to act very carefully in order to become all-powerful leader of Germany. Taking everything into account, Hitler's and Stalin's roads to power are quite analogous and differences between these routes are caused by circumstances in which these two found themselves. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. Compare and Contrast the rise to power of Hitler and Lenin

    'Peace, Bread and Land' burst out of a clear sky, whereas the Nazi programme was well trailed in German universities and youth movements in the 20s. The constitutional platform which Lenin appeared to support was, as has been said, entirely insincere.

  2. Hitler vs. Stalin: Who is a more destructive leader in terms of religious groups?

    social decomposition, or as capitalists pulling the strings of the world market, or as a biological challenge to the purity of blood, Jews and Jewishness became for Hitler a historical metaphor explaining Germany's crisis." (Overy, 19) . For Hitler, the Jews represented everything that went bad in his country.

  1. Can the period between 1924-1929 really be called the Golden period for the Weimar ...

    This meant that the Weimar government could without any restriction spend time on reconstructing the country. Furthermore, the sudden boost in the economy made Weimar Germany a magnet for foreign investments, reducing unemployment rates, which fell from 5 per cent in 1924 to approximately 3 per cent in 1925.

  2. Bolsheviks in Power Essay

    Indeed, Leninist economics began with a colossal failure known as War Communism introduced in 1918. War Communism was a drastically strict approach, which put severe centralized control of all forms of economic production and distribution, Money was printed excessively, causing rapid hyperinflation and shortages in the countryside, "War communism had

  1. Bolsheviks In Power

    In addition, when Lenin became the leader, his country had to deal and face with two wars: the World War 1 and the Russian Civil War. In order to mitigate the problems in Russia, Lenin signed the Treaty of Brest Litovsk in March 1918.

  2. How similar were Hitler and Stalin ?

    Propaganda was a way for them to further their ideas and so to gain the backing of the people in their countries. Hitler was a man who did many speeches. He has also been described as the world?s greatest propagandist, saying that he was nearly able to brainwash people with his words.

  1. Peron's Consolidation of Power

    Part D: Analysis Since Peron?s inauguration to his downfall, Peron diligently worked towards personalizing power in both the political and social sectors of Argentina. Peron effectively reorganized the government and fought any opposition that expressed anti-Peronism. First and foremost, Peron was successfully able to centralize Argentina under one party that

  2. Which of indoctrination and repression proved most effective for consolidating Hitler's power (1933-1939)?

    “There were about 4.500 daily newspaper in Germany”[4]. Which included national newspapers and regional papers in different Länder. The problem with these was that most of them were privately owned and identified themselves with political parties or religious beliefs, which wasn’t good for a government which wanted people to be united under the same ideology.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work