• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare and contrast Hitler's and Stalin's roads to power.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Compare and contrast Hitler's and Stalin's roads to power. First and foremost, the inter-war years 1919-1939 were a period of dictators in Europe. Many historians consider tyrants - Hitler and Stalin - and their ideologies to be quite similar. These two despots were the most famous and probably the most bloody dictators in this period. No wonder these two are compared to one another. In addition, the scheme of taking power by any autocrat seems to be very simple: dissatisfaction from contemporary rules or death of the leader and skilful takeover by a person with some horrific vision of the future. But historic events are never as simple as that. Now, arises the interesting question if Hitler's and Stalin's roads to power were similar or different or maybe both options are true to same extent. Nevertheless, Hitler tried twice to gain power in a period 1923-1934 while Stalin only once in years 1924-1929. Firstly, similarities in consolidating oppressor's position will be discussed. ...read more.

Middle

and were not prepared to compromise and left beyond personal intrigues. What is more, left wing was divided itself - Zinoviev with Kamenev argued with Trotsky and KPD considered SPD as its main enemy. Besides in the Weimar Republic workers were weakened by unemployment and could not afford to strike against the Nazis. Moreover, there were almost no supporters of democracy and liberalism thanks to long authoritarian tradition. It might also be mentioned that in both countries Hitler and Stalin were underestimated. Austrian corporal was expected to be a puppet in the hands of the Right who would not last long, especially that there were only three Nazis in the government. Nobody remembered that he managed to bring party members together after the failure of the M´┐Żnich Putsch and breaking the law in the Night of the Long Knives did not open the eyes of ordinary Germans. In the same way, 'Tovarishch Kartotekov' was considered as 'the grey blur', mediocre intellectual who is not able to win the contest for power. ...read more.

Conclusion

To sum up, both autocrats had the same aim - creating an image of themselves - using propaganda machine. Similarly, these tyrants appealed to the complaints and needs of majorities. In addition, Hitler had total control over his party, likewise Stalin. What is more, both despots made concessions and alliances. These dictators were respected, especially that they used terror and intimidation. Furthermore, they faced divided, weak and not having power to pose real threat opposition. Above all, their opponents - Kamenev, Zinoviev, Trotsky, Papen and others - underestimated these future tyrants and respected legal actions although they led to gaining power by Stalin or Hitler. However, on the contrary to Stalin, Hitler two times tried to gain power in the Weimar Republic and made people join a huge range of different organisations for everybody. Equally important is the fact that Hitler did not have strong position in the government and he had to act very carefully in order to become all-powerful leader of Germany. Taking everything into account, Hitler's and Stalin's roads to power are quite analogous and differences between these routes are caused by circumstances in which these two found themselves. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. Compare and Contrast the rise to power of Hitler and Lenin

    Economic dislocation was a crucial factor in the rise of both men. For Hitler the post-war difficulties culminating in the hyper-inflation, and then the effects of the Slump were powerful influences, and for Lenin the Bread crisis of February and the question of landownership were equally important in winning support pre-November.

  2. History Investigation - Hitler

    Hitler then called a further election in hopes of gaining more support towards his party. Right before the vote was to be held, it was burned to the ground. Hitler quickly blamed the fire his prime competitor for power, the Communist Party.

  1. Can the period between 1924-1929 really be called the Golden period for the Weimar ...

    This meant that the Weimar government could without any restriction spend time on reconstructing the country. Furthermore, the sudden boost in the economy made Weimar Germany a magnet for foreign investments, reducing unemployment rates, which fell from 5 per cent in 1924 to approximately 3 per cent in 1925.

  2. Bolsheviks in Power Essay

    Under the NEP, private ownership of small industries was allowed and confiscation of surplus goods in the countryside was banned. Also, although the government still had control over heavy industry and foreign trade, the NEP legalized free trade, and restored the stability of the soviet currency.

  1. Hitler vs. Stalin: Who is a more destructive leader in terms of religious groups?

    (Harris, Joseph Stalin). These statistics show the drastic nature of Stalin's reign. This paper will investigate both Hitler and Stalin to conclude who was a more destructive leader in relation to religious groups. Hitler vs. Stalin (1090 094) 7 Argument Hitler and Stalin were both men who were very destructive leaders to religious groups that were surrounding them.

  2. Which of indoctrination and repression proved most effective for consolidating Hitler's power (1933-1939)?

    Radio wardens were also appointed to inform people of incoming speeches. Hitler made 50 broadcasts in his first year in office. Showing how important it was for Hitler to have the control over mass media. The control of the press wasn?t as easy to obtain, however Hitler still managed to have some control on what was published.

  1. How similar were Hitler and Stalin ?

    Their political beliefs generated totalitarianism. Secondly, they were at first underestimated by others, and difficult circumstances didn?t help for their rise to power. Stalin had to face the 1917th revolution followed by Lennins death in 1924. Moreover, the future of communism was uncertain, which split the party between Trotsky and Bukharin.

  2. Peron's Consolidation of Power

    disposal, newspaper size was limited to a certain number of printed pages, and distribution was hindered. At the same time, Perón and his party used the chain of newspapers they owned to disseminate propaganda in quantity. Papers such as La Razón, Critica, El Mundo, and Democracia, as well as various

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work