• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare and contrast Hitler's and Stalin's roads to power.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Compare and contrast Hitler's and Stalin's roads to power. First and foremost, the inter-war years 1919-1939 were a period of dictators in Europe. Many historians consider tyrants - Hitler and Stalin - and their ideologies to be quite similar. These two despots were the most famous and probably the most bloody dictators in this period. No wonder these two are compared to one another. In addition, the scheme of taking power by any autocrat seems to be very simple: dissatisfaction from contemporary rules or death of the leader and skilful takeover by a person with some horrific vision of the future. But historic events are never as simple as that. Now, arises the interesting question if Hitler's and Stalin's roads to power were similar or different or maybe both options are true to same extent. Nevertheless, Hitler tried twice to gain power in a period 1923-1934 while Stalin only once in years 1924-1929. Firstly, similarities in consolidating oppressor's position will be discussed. ...read more.

Middle

and were not prepared to compromise and left beyond personal intrigues. What is more, left wing was divided itself - Zinoviev with Kamenev argued with Trotsky and KPD considered SPD as its main enemy. Besides in the Weimar Republic workers were weakened by unemployment and could not afford to strike against the Nazis. Moreover, there were almost no supporters of democracy and liberalism thanks to long authoritarian tradition. It might also be mentioned that in both countries Hitler and Stalin were underestimated. Austrian corporal was expected to be a puppet in the hands of the Right who would not last long, especially that there were only three Nazis in the government. Nobody remembered that he managed to bring party members together after the failure of the M´┐Żnich Putsch and breaking the law in the Night of the Long Knives did not open the eyes of ordinary Germans. In the same way, 'Tovarishch Kartotekov' was considered as 'the grey blur', mediocre intellectual who is not able to win the contest for power. ...read more.

Conclusion

To sum up, both autocrats had the same aim - creating an image of themselves - using propaganda machine. Similarly, these tyrants appealed to the complaints and needs of majorities. In addition, Hitler had total control over his party, likewise Stalin. What is more, both despots made concessions and alliances. These dictators were respected, especially that they used terror and intimidation. Furthermore, they faced divided, weak and not having power to pose real threat opposition. Above all, their opponents - Kamenev, Zinoviev, Trotsky, Papen and others - underestimated these future tyrants and respected legal actions although they led to gaining power by Stalin or Hitler. However, on the contrary to Stalin, Hitler two times tried to gain power in the Weimar Republic and made people join a huge range of different organisations for everybody. Equally important is the fact that Hitler did not have strong position in the government and he had to act very carefully in order to become all-powerful leader of Germany. Taking everything into account, Hitler's and Stalin's roads to power are quite analogous and differences between these routes are caused by circumstances in which these two found themselves. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. Can the period between 1924-1929 really be called the Golden period for the Weimar ...

    This meant that the Weimar government could without any restriction spend time on reconstructing the country. Furthermore, the sudden boost in the economy made Weimar Germany a magnet for foreign investments, reducing unemployment rates, which fell from 5 per cent in 1924 to approximately 3 per cent in 1925.

  2. Bolsheviks in Power Essay

    (Lee, 37) War Communism had been essentially a social issue, which exploited upon the lives of the Russian people and had damaging long-term effects, "This was successful at first, in that it enabled the government to survive the civil war, but it had disastrous results later."

  1. Bolsheviks In Power

    In addition, when Lenin became the leader, his country had to deal and face with two wars: the World War 1 and the Russian Civil War. In order to mitigate the problems in Russia, Lenin signed the Treaty of Brest Litovsk in March 1918.

  2. Hitler vs. Stalin: Who is a more destructive leader in terms of religious groups?

    Stalin (1090 094) 5 Hitler and Stalin reigned. The information found on this topic will be discussed in terms of effects and specific events that took place. The events will be found in journals and articles relating to specific examples of death or the effects on a person due to Hitler or Stalin's reign.

  1. In order to achieve and retain power a leader of a single-party state needed ...

    * "One Party Unity", using this policy Lenin was able to kick out any party members that questioned the authority of Lenin. Gellately, Robert. Lenin, Stalin, and Hitler. New York: Knopf, 2007. * In 1918, during Lenin's rule the Red Terror was initiated as a reply to the White terror.

  2. Which of indoctrination and repression proved most effective for consolidating Hitler's power (1933-1939)?

    Goebbels introduced the mass rallies (Nuremberg annual rallies). The results of this propaganda varied. Although the sales of books increased, the quality of the artistic production is to be questioned, as the plays that were tolerated by the Nazis were musical and tend to prone the nazi politics, those plays didn?t have much success.

  1. Peron's Consolidation of Power

    media, which therefore increased his power to influence the thoughts of the Argentine citizens. Censorship reduced the power of opposition to gain support as it restricted them from voicing their opinions, thus disallowing the public to question any of the policies or decisions made by Peron and his government.

  2. How similar were Hitler and Stalin ?

    Indeed, they were capable of using their own words to twist and manipulate people?s minds so as to make them believe that what they were saying was the only truth. And with this, they would get people to do anything for them, what clearly proves their amorality.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work