Compare and contrast Hitler's and Stalin's roads to power.

Extracts from this essay...

Introduction

Compare and contrast Hitler's and Stalin's roads to power. First and foremost, the inter-war years 1919-1939 were a period of dictators in Europe. Many historians consider tyrants - Hitler and Stalin - and their ideologies to be quite similar. These two despots were the most famous and probably the most bloody dictators in this period. No wonder these two are compared to one another. In addition, the scheme of taking power by any autocrat seems to be very simple: dissatisfaction from contemporary rules or death of the leader and skilful takeover by a person with some horrific vision of the future. But historic events are never as simple as that. Now, arises the interesting question if Hitler's and Stalin's roads to power were similar or different or maybe both options are true to same extent. Nevertheless, Hitler tried twice to gain power in a period 1923-1934 while Stalin only once in years 1924-1929. Firstly, similarities in consolidating oppressor's position will be discussed.

Middle

and were not prepared to compromise and left beyond personal intrigues. What is more, left wing was divided itself - Zinoviev with Kamenev argued with Trotsky and KPD considered SPD as its main enemy. Besides in the Weimar Republic workers were weakened by unemployment and could not afford to strike against the Nazis. Moreover, there were almost no supporters of democracy and liberalism thanks to long authoritarian tradition. It might also be mentioned that in both countries Hitler and Stalin were underestimated. Austrian corporal was expected to be a puppet in the hands of the Right who would not last long, especially that there were only three Nazis in the government. Nobody remembered that he managed to bring party members together after the failure of the Münich Putsch and breaking the law in the Night of the Long Knives did not open the eyes of ordinary Germans. In the same way, 'Tovarishch Kartotekov' was considered as 'the grey blur', mediocre intellectual who is not able to win the contest for power.

Conclusion

To sum up, both autocrats had the same aim - creating an image of themselves - using propaganda machine. Similarly, these tyrants appealed to the complaints and needs of majorities. In addition, Hitler had total control over his party, likewise Stalin. What is more, both despots made concessions and alliances. These dictators were respected, especially that they used terror and intimidation. Furthermore, they faced divided, weak and not having power to pose real threat opposition. Above all, their opponents - Kamenev, Zinoviev, Trotsky, Papen and others - underestimated these future tyrants and respected legal actions although they led to gaining power by Stalin or Hitler. However, on the contrary to Stalin, Hitler two times tried to gain power in the Weimar Republic and made people join a huge range of different organisations for everybody. Equally important is the fact that Hitler did not have strong position in the government and he had to act very carefully in order to become all-powerful leader of Germany. Taking everything into account, Hitler's and Stalin's roads to power are quite analogous and differences between these routes are caused by circumstances in which these two found themselves.

The above preview is unformatted text

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • Over 150,000 essays available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Over 180,000 student essays
  • Every subject and level covered
  • Thousands of essays marked by teachers

Related International Baccalaureate History

  1. Can the period between 1924-1929 really be called the Golden period for the Weimar ...

    Literature too developed with writers like Grottfried Benn and Erich Maria Remarque's anti- war novel, which challenged the 'stab in the back' view. This created a sense of freedom of speech and thought, accelerating advances in these fields. Music and art also developed with Schoenberg's use of atonality and the coming up of modernising architects like Bauhaus.

  2. Which of indoctrination and repression proved most effective for consolidating Hitler's power (1933-1939)?

    The right played a big role into the legal access to power of Hitler. What the right (Hindenburg/Von Papen) wanted was to remove the Weimar republic, restore the monarchy and to build back Germanyâs military force. The only way to accomplish this was to gain a majority at the Reichstag.

  1. Compare and Contrast the rise to power of Hitler and Lenin

    and anti-semitism, such ideas publicly-stated played a much less important role in Lenin's rise than Hitler's. On the other hand profound study of Marxism was a marked feature of Lenin's career and a reason for his supremacy among the Bolsheviks, whereas Hitler had spent more time in doss-houses and trenches than in libraries.

  2. Compare and Contrast the foreign/domestic policies of one right wing and one left wing ...

    o Although grain imports feel by 75%, every other crop and animal import rose o As a result the Italian diet suffered o And overall all it was partly a success, as Italy became self-sufficient in cereals, but not on fertilisers * Domestic Battle of the Lira o Mussolini decided

  1. How similar were Hitler and Stalin ?

    Indeed, they were capable of using their own words to twist and manipulate peopleâs minds so as to make them believe that what they were saying was the only truth. And with this, they would get people to do anything for them, what clearly proves their amorality.

  2. In order to achieve and retain power a leader of a single-party state needed ...

    * In 1917, Lenin created the Cheka which was used as a tool to manage the Red Terror. * With the used of the Red Army and Cheka Lenin exe Conquest, Robert. Reflections on a Ravaged Century. New York: W.W.

  1. Peron's Consolidation of Power

    Peron established, âin February 1948, a separate, independent education ministry, the Consejo Nacional de Educación (National Education CouncilâCNE), headed by Oscar Ivanissevich[10].â[11] This ministry was henceforth to coordinate the supervisory boards of educational institutions at all levels and institute infrastructural changes in the education system, which included the construction of

  2. Bolsheviks In Power

    In addition, when Lenin became the leader, his country had to deal and face with two wars: the World War 1 and the Russian Civil War. In order to mitigate the problems in Russia, Lenin signed the Treaty of Brest Litovsk in March 1918.

  • Over 180,000 essays
    written by students
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to write
    your own great essays

Marked by a teacher

This essay has been marked by one of our great teachers. You can read the full teachers notes when you download the essay.

Peer reviewed

This essay has been reviewed by one of our specialist student essay reviewing squad. Read the full review on the essay page.

Peer reviewed

This essay has been reviewed by one of our specialist student essay reviewing squad. Read the full review under the essay preview on this page.