• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare and Contrast the Policies of Alexander II and Alexander III

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Abhishek Puri History- HL 20/08/2009 Compare and Contrast the policies of Alexander II and Alexander III Tsar's Alexander II and his son, Alexander III had different an entirely different ideology when it came to the question of reform. On one hand, Alexander II was a liberalist, this reflects in his reforms which include the Emancipation of the Serfs in 1861- where twenty to thirty million serfs were emancipated on private estates and also domestic households and also the abolishment of capital punishment. Other reforms of Alexander II included the founding of the Zemstva- a system of local self-government. On the other hand, successor Alexander III had a conservative ideology. He believed in the doctrines of Nationalism, Eastern Orthodoxy and autocracy. Alexander III often questioned his father's reforms, which he thought were too liberal and diminish the power of autocratic leadership of the country. After his accession of the throne, Alexander III started a wave of "anti-reforms", as he reversed his father's liberal reforms. ...read more.

Middle

However, under Alexander III, the power under the Zemstva was acutely restricted. These administrative powers held previously by the Zemstva were handed to the Ministry of Interior in 1889. Thus, Alexander III restricted what people could do in Russia and accumulated that power in his own hands. Another contrasting policy between the Tsars was that of Education. Previously, education was only affordable to the very wealthy. However, Alexander II began a new era in terms of who could receive education. In order to increase literacy in Russia, Primary and Secondary Education was available for all citizens of the empire by 1863. Alexander II also permitted the discussion of sensitive topics in universities such as government and law. This liberalization of the education system resulted in much higher literacy rates and the ability for students to express themselves. However, Alexander III saw this universal education coverage as a threat to Russian autocracy. Therefore, the high schools could not allow admissions for all social classes; Grammar schools were restricted only for the elite. ...read more.

Conclusion

Thus, the policy of promoting Russian ethnicity and suppressing other ethnicities was shared by both Tsars, but Alexander III pushed his father's policies to a further level due to his belief that it was the ethnic minorities who were responsible for Alexander II's death. Alexander II had envisioned a modern Russia and thus, implemented his liberal Judicial and Educational policies. However, Alexander III viewed these policies as a threat to Russia autocracy and immediately began reversing them when he accessed the throne. Russia had a lot to gain from Alexander II's policies such as, high literacy rates and a modern perspective. However, Alexander III made sure his policies concentrated as much power towards him and restricted the power given to the common man. At the same time, Alexander III was more a more responsible leader in terms of Foreign policy as he had to secure the country's economy- waging war and conquests for annexation only strain economic growth. The Russian Empire was vast and comprised of numerous ethnicities; both Tsar's created policies which sponsored the belief that the empire should be "Russified" and the influence of ethnic minorities must be kept to a bare minimum. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

3 star(s)

**/***
There are some good contrasts in this essay but there is a tendency for them to read as simple, implicit differences. The essay would benefit from better organisation and rigorous, critical analysis when discussing these two Tsars. There are many areas of comparison - both were Tsars with a divine right to rule. They both wanted the same goal for Russia but came at the problem from two different angles. Create a compare/contrast table before approaching an essay such as this and look at such factors as; political, economic, religious, social intellectual etc this will help organise your ideas more clearly and gives you a framework to follow in your answer. It also helps you work on a thesis which you can hang your argument off. Overall, some good points but a little one sided in favour of differences.

Marked by teacher Natalie Stanley 09/04/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. Notes on German unification - main events

    own right; and in this period, the Parliament made an attempt at Unifying Germany o People attending the Parliament --> professors, teachers, lawyers, etc... --> the middle class people --> mainly liberals and democrats o There were two ideas of Germany; 1)

  2. Compare and contrast Mussolini's and Hitler's rise to power

    The use of paramilitary volunteer groups was a vital method in the acquisition of power for Hitler and Mussolini as they not only demonstrated an authoritarian rule, but also served to eliminate of rivals. Bullock relates that the first of these fascist groups in Germany was the Friekorps, out of which rose the S.A and the S.S.

  1. To what extent was Stalin's rise to power due to his opponents' mistakes?

    When Lenin died, the Russian population went in to mourning and wanted to honour him as much as possible. His funeral therefore became an important political event for the Party members to gain the people's support. Trotsky, who had been Lenin's right hand man throughout his career, failed to show up at the funeral (MacDonald 66).

  2. IB History HL, Extended Notes: Russia, the Tsars, the Provisional Govenment and the Revolution.

    Revealed army leadership?s weakness and corruption. 2. Army depended on the loyalty of the serfs who had been conscripted; the hardship encouraged a more critical attitude among serfs. Expressed though an increasing number of agricultural disturbances. 3. Called into question the efficiency of the Russian army which had now become inferior to the French and English armies.

  1. The Effects of the Great Depression on Canada.

    ?The number of Immigrants into Canada dropped from 169 000 in 1929 to fewer than 12 000 in 1935 and for the rest of the thirties it did not rise about 17 000?. Due to illness and unemployment, some 30,000 immigrants were forced to go back to their home country.

  2. Analyse the causes of the Spanish Civil War

    Due to Spain's imperial past, the army had a great political power, which permitted it to interfere in politics during the crisis. The army intervened several times, but it's most important intervention was in 1936, aiming to lead to a civil war.

  1. Explain the USAs policy of containment. How successful was this in Korea, Vietnam and ...

    This cannot be defended by the policy of containment, and therefore shows that USA had changed the supposed goal of the war from containment to a rollback strategy. The USA?s strategy of containment could be seen as a success in the Korean War, because after the North invaded the south

  2. Why did World War I last so long?

    had to be deployed to the eastern front because Russia had mobilized sooner than expected, thus she could not successfully carry out her plan to encircle Paris. French reservists were quickly brought to the Marne and the famous ?miracle of the Marne? ensued on September 14, where the French managed

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work