• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare and Contrast the Policies of Alexander II and Alexander III

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Abhishek Puri History- HL 20/08/2009 Compare and Contrast the policies of Alexander II and Alexander III Tsar's Alexander II and his son, Alexander III had different an entirely different ideology when it came to the question of reform. On one hand, Alexander II was a liberalist, this reflects in his reforms which include the Emancipation of the Serfs in 1861- where twenty to thirty million serfs were emancipated on private estates and also domestic households and also the abolishment of capital punishment. Other reforms of Alexander II included the founding of the Zemstva- a system of local self-government. On the other hand, successor Alexander III had a conservative ideology. He believed in the doctrines of Nationalism, Eastern Orthodoxy and autocracy. Alexander III often questioned his father's reforms, which he thought were too liberal and diminish the power of autocratic leadership of the country. After his accession of the throne, Alexander III started a wave of "anti-reforms", as he reversed his father's liberal reforms. ...read more.

Middle

However, under Alexander III, the power under the Zemstva was acutely restricted. These administrative powers held previously by the Zemstva were handed to the Ministry of Interior in 1889. Thus, Alexander III restricted what people could do in Russia and accumulated that power in his own hands. Another contrasting policy between the Tsars was that of Education. Previously, education was only affordable to the very wealthy. However, Alexander II began a new era in terms of who could receive education. In order to increase literacy in Russia, Primary and Secondary Education was available for all citizens of the empire by 1863. Alexander II also permitted the discussion of sensitive topics in universities such as government and law. This liberalization of the education system resulted in much higher literacy rates and the ability for students to express themselves. However, Alexander III saw this universal education coverage as a threat to Russian autocracy. Therefore, the high schools could not allow admissions for all social classes; Grammar schools were restricted only for the elite. ...read more.

Conclusion

Thus, the policy of promoting Russian ethnicity and suppressing other ethnicities was shared by both Tsars, but Alexander III pushed his father's policies to a further level due to his belief that it was the ethnic minorities who were responsible for Alexander II's death. Alexander II had envisioned a modern Russia and thus, implemented his liberal Judicial and Educational policies. However, Alexander III viewed these policies as a threat to Russia autocracy and immediately began reversing them when he accessed the throne. Russia had a lot to gain from Alexander II's policies such as, high literacy rates and a modern perspective. However, Alexander III made sure his policies concentrated as much power towards him and restricted the power given to the common man. At the same time, Alexander III was more a more responsible leader in terms of Foreign policy as he had to secure the country's economy- waging war and conquests for annexation only strain economic growth. The Russian Empire was vast and comprised of numerous ethnicities; both Tsar's created policies which sponsored the belief that the empire should be "Russified" and the influence of ethnic minorities must be kept to a bare minimum. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

3 star(s)

**/***
There are some good contrasts in this essay but there is a tendency for them to read as simple, implicit differences. The essay would benefit from better organisation and rigorous, critical analysis when discussing these two Tsars. There are many areas of comparison - both were Tsars with a divine right to rule. They both wanted the same goal for Russia but came at the problem from two different angles. Create a compare/contrast table before approaching an essay such as this and look at such factors as; political, economic, religious, social intellectual etc this will help organise your ideas more clearly and gives you a framework to follow in your answer. It also helps you work on a thesis which you can hang your argument off. Overall, some good points but a little one sided in favour of differences.

Marked by teacher Natalie Stanley 09/04/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. Compare and contrast Mussolini's and Hitler's rise to power

    The use of paramilitary volunteer groups was a vital method in the acquisition of power for Hitler and Mussolini as they not only demonstrated an authoritarian rule, but also served to eliminate of rivals. Bullock relates that the first of these fascist groups in Germany was the Friekorps, out of which rose the S.A and the S.S.

  2. Notes on German unification - main events

    had to leave Berlin --> he only really left because he did want to use his artillery in Berlin and damage any buildings (the revolution was quite mild) - Austria is far more affected by the revolutions of 1848-9 than Prussia - The Frankfurt Parliament; o The Assembly or Diet

  1. The Domestic Policies of Stalin

    In 1941 just before the end of the "Third Five Year Plan" Hitler invaded the USSR and interrupted the industrial output. During the years 1934-36 Stalin relinquished his grip upon the poppulation of the USSR slightly, he ended food rationing and the pressure on the peasants and workers was lowered.

  2. The Civil War was not inevitable; it was the result of extremism and failures ...

    Hence, the North experienced higher number of European immigrants and birth rates than the South. Unfortunately, the North's population growth ruined Southern attempts to maintain a balanced federal government as it meant the future addition of more free states. Extremism about slavery came from politicians in both the Senate and

  1. Comparing the Causes of the French and Russian Revolutions

    Bad weather struck France during the 1780's and caused a bad harvest of bread. Bread supply decreased and bread prices sky-rocketed. By 1789, bread prices were doubled and the lower class workers, who usually had to buy their own bread, couldn't afford the prices and faced starvation (Beck 219).

  2. To what extent did the reforms of Alexander II achieve his aims

    They formed the lowest social class of the Russian society. Apart from executing them, the landowner could treat his serfs as he liked. The serfs lived in dreadful condition; the majority of them lived on the edge of starvation. However after the Crimean War, things started to change.

  1. IB History HL, Extended Notes: Russia, the Tsars, the Provisional Govenment and the Revolution.

    Revealed army leadership?s weakness and corruption. 2. Army depended on the loyalty of the serfs who had been conscripted; the hardship encouraged a more critical attitude among serfs. Expressed though an increasing number of agricultural disturbances. 3. Called into question the efficiency of the Russian army which had now become inferior to the French and English armies.

  2. Review Marwick's article "The Fundamentals of History", in so doing, defining what he regards ...

    The existence of history depends on the relics and traces left from the past. Primary and secondary sources are one of the most vital factors to understand history. According to Marwick, primary sources are basic raw materials that came and are created during the period being investigated and secondary sources

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work