• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare and Contrast the rise to power of Hitler and Lenin

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The regimes of Hitler and Lenin were both products of war. For Hitler the war gave his life purpose, and the defeat and the Treaty gave him a grudge. The army, which shared his feelings, gave him the work which led to his joining the Nazi party, and got him out of his little problem after the Munich putsch. For Lenin the War was the last convulsion of imperialism, and though he did not predict the combination of circumstances which provoked the February Revolution, these circumstances were indeed exactly the kind of thing which his analysis of imperialist war would have involved (shortages, casualties etc). Ironically Lenin, like Hitler, owed much to the German army, whose intelligence department brought him to St Petersburg on the famous sealed train. The Bolshevik USP was Peace, the Nazis were supported for promising to revise a Peace. On the face of it Hitler and Lenin were impelled by precisely opposite ideas. Adapting Low's famous cartoon Lenin was to Hitler 'the scum of the earth' and Hitler to Lenin 'the bloody assassin of the workers'1. ...read more.

Middle

on his side, and Lenin, too, for a crucial moment in the Spring of 1917 benefitted from the careful efficiency of the imperialists. Thereafter he gained some credibility by disavowing his former helpers, or at least he managed to fight off the accusation that he was their stooge. Lenin benefitted from the inability of Kerensky to improve social conditions, and Hitler benefitted from the incapacity of the Weimar governments after Stresemann. The vast social gulf in Russia which Peter the Great had not been able to bridge was part of the context in which the Bolshevik revolution was practical politics. The continuation of Wilhelmine or Bismarckian social attitudes in Germany, on the other hand, made Hitler's revolution in this sense a counter-revolution. Lenin emerged from the collapse of a social order widely and deeply detested by the Russian people, Hitler profited from the determination that a social order should continue, a determination that went equally widely and deeply into German society. Lenin's rise was too private, and then too meteoric to be marked by any particular cultural programme, whereas Hitler gained a lot of credence by rejecting the 'degenerate' Bauhaus and modernism in all its forms. ...read more.

Conclusion

Von Papen was one of the 'useful idiots' who facilitated Hitler's rise; Lenin benefitted from the delusions of millions of peasants that he supported their property holding aspirations. Lenin benefitted from the problems of the Kerensky and the Czar, whereas Hitler benefitted from the problems of Lenin and Stalin, not to mention those of Ebert, Bruning, von Papen, von Schleicher and Hindenburg. Neither the Bolsheviks nor the Nazis were one-man bands. Lenin had his loyal 'Old Bolsheviks' like Stalin, Zinoviev and Kamenev and, more recently, Trotsky. Hitler had crucial 'assists' from Röhm, Ludendorff, Goebbels, Goering, Himmler and, more recently, Schacht. It is a moot point how important the Reichstag Fire was, but certainly Nazi propaganda did not make much of it, preferring to emphasize the alleged comradeship between Hitler and Hindenburg. Thus the headmaster's son and the customs official's son reached in varying ways their primary goal of power. 1 Allowing for the fact that Lenin died too soon to have made the judgement. ?? ?? ?? ?? Compare and contrast the Rise to Power of Hitler and Lenin H.D.J.Nicklin for DAIS April 2008. Page 1 of 3 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. History Investigation - Hitler

    It is believed that the Nazis had set the entire thing up and blamed the communists. This was done so that Hitler could then pass new laws giving him supreme power, and this was precisely what he did. Hitler right away demanded a new law that basically outlawed the Communist Party and, thus, his competition for the next election.

  2. French Revolution and the rise of Napoleon - revision notes

    On 11 th July 1789 -> Louis XVI dismissed Jacques Necker. Parisians read this as a signal of beginning the Revolution. 14 th July 1789-> Revolution began in Paris. A large crowd invaded the Hotel des Invalides (Palac Inwalidów) in which was stored weapon. The crowd seized thousands of riffles.

  1. The rise of Hitler and the Nazi party

    The S.A played a significant role in the Beer Hall Putsch, (1923), which acted as Hitler's first action, with the aim to take the Bavarian government and trigger national revolution and remove the Berlin government. The attempt of the government to in place some provisions of the Treaty had endangered

  2. Stalin's Rise to Power2

    Volkolgonov was a member of the Soviet military, and later became a professor of Military History with the army.18 His unique access to many of Stalin's own personal documents as well as other previously unanalyzed archival material give us valuable new insight into Stalin's personality and actions.

  1. Hitler and Munich Agreement

    area of his interest should be evacuated by Czechs and handed over to Germans by 1st of October, 1938 instead of period of few months.15 Such demands seemed impossible to be forced upon Czechs and Britain refused to negotiate such conditions. The probability of war seemed tremendous at that time.

  2. Compare and contrast Mussolini's and Hitler's rise to power

    As such, in their respective countries, Hitler and Mussolini faced little or no military resistance in their violence against these political rivals. However, Lee explains that the early acquisition and consolidation of power for both fascist states relied primarily on fascist militia groups, rather than state military forces.

  1. IB History HL, Extended Notes: Russia, the Tsars, the Provisional Govenment and the Revolution.

    1912 compulsory insurance for industrial workers. Cannot be seen as a step forward because 1. Fundamentally, Nicholas still regarded the Duma with contempt and not something he should have to cooperate with. Still autocratic worldview. 2. Government and Nicholas could still block legislative proposals they opposed.

  2. Factors That Helped The Rise of the Nazis

    Propaganda did, however, become one of the most successful tactics Hitler used during Nazi rise. Hitlerâs propaganda ministry under Goebbels, as well as locally generated propaganda, the use of centrally orchestrated âcampaign slogans, themes, speakers and publicityâ (Kershaw, 53) and the utilization of simple messages made the propaganda so successful.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work