• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare and Contrast the rise to power of Hitler and Lenin

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The regimes of Hitler and Lenin were both products of war. For Hitler the war gave his life purpose, and the defeat and the Treaty gave him a grudge. The army, which shared his feelings, gave him the work which led to his joining the Nazi party, and got him out of his little problem after the Munich putsch. For Lenin the War was the last convulsion of imperialism, and though he did not predict the combination of circumstances which provoked the February Revolution, these circumstances were indeed exactly the kind of thing which his analysis of imperialist war would have involved (shortages, casualties etc). Ironically Lenin, like Hitler, owed much to the German army, whose intelligence department brought him to St Petersburg on the famous sealed train. The Bolshevik USP was Peace, the Nazis were supported for promising to revise a Peace. On the face of it Hitler and Lenin were impelled by precisely opposite ideas. Adapting Low's famous cartoon Lenin was to Hitler 'the scum of the earth' and Hitler to Lenin 'the bloody assassin of the workers'1. ...read more.

Middle

on his side, and Lenin, too, for a crucial moment in the Spring of 1917 benefitted from the careful efficiency of the imperialists. Thereafter he gained some credibility by disavowing his former helpers, or at least he managed to fight off the accusation that he was their stooge. Lenin benefitted from the inability of Kerensky to improve social conditions, and Hitler benefitted from the incapacity of the Weimar governments after Stresemann. The vast social gulf in Russia which Peter the Great had not been able to bridge was part of the context in which the Bolshevik revolution was practical politics. The continuation of Wilhelmine or Bismarckian social attitudes in Germany, on the other hand, made Hitler's revolution in this sense a counter-revolution. Lenin emerged from the collapse of a social order widely and deeply detested by the Russian people, Hitler profited from the determination that a social order should continue, a determination that went equally widely and deeply into German society. Lenin's rise was too private, and then too meteoric to be marked by any particular cultural programme, whereas Hitler gained a lot of credence by rejecting the 'degenerate' Bauhaus and modernism in all its forms. ...read more.

Conclusion

Von Papen was one of the 'useful idiots' who facilitated Hitler's rise; Lenin benefitted from the delusions of millions of peasants that he supported their property holding aspirations. Lenin benefitted from the problems of the Kerensky and the Czar, whereas Hitler benefitted from the problems of Lenin and Stalin, not to mention those of Ebert, Bruning, von Papen, von Schleicher and Hindenburg. Neither the Bolsheviks nor the Nazis were one-man bands. Lenin had his loyal 'Old Bolsheviks' like Stalin, Zinoviev and Kamenev and, more recently, Trotsky. Hitler had crucial 'assists' from R�hm, Ludendorff, Goebbels, Goering, Himmler and, more recently, Schacht. It is a moot point how important the Reichstag Fire was, but certainly Nazi propaganda did not make much of it, preferring to emphasize the alleged comradeship between Hitler and Hindenburg. Thus the headmaster's son and the customs official's son reached in varying ways their primary goal of power. 1 Allowing for the fact that Lenin died too soon to have made the judgement. ?? ?? ?? ?? Compare and contrast the Rise to Power of Hitler and Lenin H.D.J.Nicklin for DAIS April 2008. Page 1 of 3 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. French Revolution and the rise of Napoleon - revision notes

    These 3 colors became the national flag. * In the countryside peasants carried their own kind of rebellion. Their revolt was autonomous and reinforced (wsparlo) urban uprising to the benefit of the National Assembly. * In July peasants in many regions of France abandoned the castles of nobles and burned the documents of feudal obligation.

  2. The rise of Hitler and the Nazi party

    The SA was disbanded and many members killed by the SS on the Night of Long Knives. Kershaw writes of how, in one move, Hitler removed the threat of the SA and satisfied the army, thus strengthening and increasing his powerbase.

  1. History Investigation - Hitler

    The Weimar Republic appeared to have no clue how to solve the Great Depression problem. Yet the Nazis promised a solution, promising most people what they wanted. Hitler used the Jews, and other sections of societies as scapegoats to blame problems on.

  2. Compare and contrast Mussolini's and Hitler's rise to power

    In 1932 after increased Nazi violence, voting for the party almost doubled and Sassoon relates that the Squadristi violence of the Biennio Rosso was responsible for the Italian fascist party winning 35 seats. Civilians of both states saw this violence as proactive opposition to the threat of communism and authoritative leadership, a situation that increased the political power of Fascism.

  1. Stalin's Rise to Power2

    allowing him to switch sides and attack the Bukharinists position with his new party majority. Throughout the contest, "Stalin's success...was substantially facilitated by Trotsky's political ineptitude".14 Trotksy "not only underrated Stalin's will and intellect, but by his endless attacks, discussions and polemical articles ...

  2. Castro's rise to power

    The trial was regarded as a sensation. Another example where we can clearly see his ability to use mass media to transmit his ideas and increase his popularity was when he let the American Journalist, Herbert Matthews, interview him for the New York Times; while in Sierra Maestra in 19571.

  1. IB History HL, Extended Notes: Russia, the Tsars, the Provisional Govenment and the Revolution.

    Duma and zemstva set up their own organizations for the war effort and aiding those affected by the war. 3. ?Dogmatic devotion to autocracy? prevented a greater role for representative bodies, Alexander to answer personally for Russia?s state. Progressive Bloc 1.

  2. Factors That Helped The Rise of the Nazis

    He set up organizations for women, students, the youth, and low-income workers, as well as the Nazi Welfare Organization, which provided services such as soup kitchens, ?putting into practice their idea of Volkgemeinschaft?, a sense of national community (Hite and Hinton, 114).

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work