• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare and Contrast the rise to power of Hitler and Lenin

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The regimes of Hitler and Lenin were both products of war. For Hitler the war gave his life purpose, and the defeat and the Treaty gave him a grudge. The army, which shared his feelings, gave him the work which led to his joining the Nazi party, and got him out of his little problem after the Munich putsch. For Lenin the War was the last convulsion of imperialism, and though he did not predict the combination of circumstances which provoked the February Revolution, these circumstances were indeed exactly the kind of thing which his analysis of imperialist war would have involved (shortages, casualties etc). Ironically Lenin, like Hitler, owed much to the German army, whose intelligence department brought him to St Petersburg on the famous sealed train. The Bolshevik USP was Peace, the Nazis were supported for promising to revise a Peace. On the face of it Hitler and Lenin were impelled by precisely opposite ideas. Adapting Low's famous cartoon Lenin was to Hitler 'the scum of the earth' and Hitler to Lenin 'the bloody assassin of the workers'1. ...read more.

Middle

on his side, and Lenin, too, for a crucial moment in the Spring of 1917 benefitted from the careful efficiency of the imperialists. Thereafter he gained some credibility by disavowing his former helpers, or at least he managed to fight off the accusation that he was their stooge. Lenin benefitted from the inability of Kerensky to improve social conditions, and Hitler benefitted from the incapacity of the Weimar governments after Stresemann. The vast social gulf in Russia which Peter the Great had not been able to bridge was part of the context in which the Bolshevik revolution was practical politics. The continuation of Wilhelmine or Bismarckian social attitudes in Germany, on the other hand, made Hitler's revolution in this sense a counter-revolution. Lenin emerged from the collapse of a social order widely and deeply detested by the Russian people, Hitler profited from the determination that a social order should continue, a determination that went equally widely and deeply into German society. Lenin's rise was too private, and then too meteoric to be marked by any particular cultural programme, whereas Hitler gained a lot of credence by rejecting the 'degenerate' Bauhaus and modernism in all its forms. ...read more.

Conclusion

Von Papen was one of the 'useful idiots' who facilitated Hitler's rise; Lenin benefitted from the delusions of millions of peasants that he supported their property holding aspirations. Lenin benefitted from the problems of the Kerensky and the Czar, whereas Hitler benefitted from the problems of Lenin and Stalin, not to mention those of Ebert, Bruning, von Papen, von Schleicher and Hindenburg. Neither the Bolsheviks nor the Nazis were one-man bands. Lenin had his loyal 'Old Bolsheviks' like Stalin, Zinoviev and Kamenev and, more recently, Trotsky. Hitler had crucial 'assists' from Röhm, Ludendorff, Goebbels, Goering, Himmler and, more recently, Schacht. It is a moot point how important the Reichstag Fire was, but certainly Nazi propaganda did not make much of it, preferring to emphasize the alleged comradeship between Hitler and Hindenburg. Thus the headmaster's son and the customs official's son reached in varying ways their primary goal of power. 1 Allowing for the fact that Lenin died too soon to have made the judgement. ?? ?? ?? ?? Compare and contrast the Rise to Power of Hitler and Lenin H.D.J.Nicklin for DAIS April 2008. Page 1 of 3 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. Compare and contrast Mussolini's and Hitler's rise to power

    Similarly, Thompson relates that Salandra (an ex-prime minister) advised the King to appoint Mussolini as prime minister because of his own anti-communist views. This demonstrates the power Hitler and Mussolini acquired by Communist opposition. However, for Italy, a Communist revolution was never the very serious threat that it was in Germany, as the highly Catholic nature of the country would arguably not allow it.

  2. Stalin's Rise to Power2

    allowed him to gain a significant ideological following with the growing party, while suggesting that this was all part of Stalin's cunning plan. Stalin's version of Leninism, the classification of the great leader's ideas, best fit the new post-1917 members, not hardcore revolutionaries, greatly strengthening his control over the party.23

  1. French Revolution and the rise of Napoleon - revision notes

    * -The Third Estate refused to do a service. Deputies of The Third estate were merchants, lawyers, intellectualists, bankers and entrepreneurs. They wanted all deputies to debate together (but they were divided). They also hoped to introduce the one-man one-vote rule.

  2. Castro's rise to power

    In order to win support, he proposed programmes and social reforms, showing people he cared about them, when they skimped (for example, during Batista's government).

  1. The rise of Hitler and the Nazi party

    promises and policies of the Nazi Party, and consequently their rise to power. The people, in shock with the deterioration of their country, needed somebody upon which to place the blame. As with the 'stab-in-the-back' legend- blaming socialist, pacifist, war profiteers and men who had initiated the armistice (November criminals)-

  2. Stalin's rise to power, his policies and how he consolidated his grip on power.

    * However he was seriously underestimated as he had skills that whilst being less obvious, were very deadly. * He was able to put across a primitive appeal- to Russian self-reliance, even isolationism. This provided a solution to one of Stalin's major problems- his intellectual inferiority to most of his contemporaries.

  1. IB History HL, Extended Notes: Russia, the Tsars, the Provisional Govenment and the Revolution.

    Composition of the Dumas 1. First Duma 1906 made up of mostly liberals and centrists (Kadets and Octobrists) as left-wing groups refused to participate. Hostile to the government and made major demands regarding land reforms and release of prisoners. Dissolved after 73 days. 2. Second Duma 1907 was more representative because it included members of extreme right and left.

  2. Assess the methods and conditions which enabled Hitler to rise to power.

    of strong rule which had been missing since the Kaiser and offered hope for the future. Hitler was a brilliant speaker, a good organizer and politician. He was a driven, unstable man, who believed he had been called by God to become dictator of Germany and rule the world.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work