• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare and Contrast the rise to power of Hitler and Lenin

Extracts from this document...


The regimes of Hitler and Lenin were both products of war. For Hitler the war gave his life purpose, and the defeat and the Treaty gave him a grudge. The army, which shared his feelings, gave him the work which led to his joining the Nazi party, and got him out of his little problem after the Munich putsch. For Lenin the War was the last convulsion of imperialism, and though he did not predict the combination of circumstances which provoked the February Revolution, these circumstances were indeed exactly the kind of thing which his analysis of imperialist war would have involved (shortages, casualties etc). Ironically Lenin, like Hitler, owed much to the German army, whose intelligence department brought him to St Petersburg on the famous sealed train. The Bolshevik USP was Peace, the Nazis were supported for promising to revise a Peace. On the face of it Hitler and Lenin were impelled by precisely opposite ideas. Adapting Low's famous cartoon Lenin was to Hitler 'the scum of the earth' and Hitler to Lenin 'the bloody assassin of the workers'1. ...read more.


on his side, and Lenin, too, for a crucial moment in the Spring of 1917 benefitted from the careful efficiency of the imperialists. Thereafter he gained some credibility by disavowing his former helpers, or at least he managed to fight off the accusation that he was their stooge. Lenin benefitted from the inability of Kerensky to improve social conditions, and Hitler benefitted from the incapacity of the Weimar governments after Stresemann. The vast social gulf in Russia which Peter the Great had not been able to bridge was part of the context in which the Bolshevik revolution was practical politics. The continuation of Wilhelmine or Bismarckian social attitudes in Germany, on the other hand, made Hitler's revolution in this sense a counter-revolution. Lenin emerged from the collapse of a social order widely and deeply detested by the Russian people, Hitler profited from the determination that a social order should continue, a determination that went equally widely and deeply into German society. Lenin's rise was too private, and then too meteoric to be marked by any particular cultural programme, whereas Hitler gained a lot of credence by rejecting the 'degenerate' Bauhaus and modernism in all its forms. ...read more.


Von Papen was one of the 'useful idiots' who facilitated Hitler's rise; Lenin benefitted from the delusions of millions of peasants that he supported their property holding aspirations. Lenin benefitted from the problems of the Kerensky and the Czar, whereas Hitler benefitted from the problems of Lenin and Stalin, not to mention those of Ebert, Bruning, von Papen, von Schleicher and Hindenburg. Neither the Bolsheviks nor the Nazis were one-man bands. Lenin had his loyal 'Old Bolsheviks' like Stalin, Zinoviev and Kamenev and, more recently, Trotsky. Hitler had crucial 'assists' from Röhm, Ludendorff, Goebbels, Goering, Himmler and, more recently, Schacht. It is a moot point how important the Reichstag Fire was, but certainly Nazi propaganda did not make much of it, preferring to emphasize the alleged comradeship between Hitler and Hindenburg. Thus the headmaster's son and the customs official's son reached in varying ways their primary goal of power. 1 Allowing for the fact that Lenin died too soon to have made the judgement. ?? ?? ?? ?? Compare and contrast the Rise to Power of Hitler and Lenin H.D.J.Nicklin for DAIS April 2008. Page 1 of 3 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. Compare and contrast Mussolini's and Hitler's rise to power

    Similarly, Thompson relates that Salandra (an ex-prime minister) advised the King to appoint Mussolini as prime minister because of his own anti-communist views. This demonstrates the power Hitler and Mussolini acquired by Communist opposition. However, for Italy, a Communist revolution was never the very serious threat that it was in Germany, as the highly Catholic nature of the country would arguably not allow it.

  2. Stalin's rise to power, his policies and how he consolidated his grip on power.

    Russian people under his complete control so that he would carry out his policies without question. * A downturn of the USSR economy in 1936 saw the need for scapegoats and this led to workers often identifying managers and officials as failures, though these changes were dubious.

  1. French Revolution and the rise of Napoleon - revision notes

    14 th July 1789 -> Parisian insurrection, it had a violent dimension and charged the course of the Revolution. 17 th July 1789 -> the Town Hall (Hotel de Ville)

  2. Castro's rise to power

    generated resentment and a deep sense of nationalism among the Cuban society. The majority of the population in Cuba was ignored and did not profit from any of the government's decisions. Gambling establishments, encouraged by Batista, in Cuba led to a moral degradation of the regime.

  1. Stalin's Rise to Power2

    Volkolgonov was a member of the Soviet military, and later became a professor of Military History with the army.18 His unique access to many of Stalin's own personal documents as well as other previously unanalyzed archival material give us valuable new insight into Stalin's personality and actions.

  2. The rise of Hitler and the Nazi party

    people to fell good about themselves; planted the dislike of other races and of communism and encouraged the growth of unity and nationalist views that Hitler wanted for his fascist reign- Germany strong as a nation, individualism discouraged. Hitler's perception, (crucial to the rise of the Nazi Party), of the wants of the people is clearly displayed by his promises.

  1. IB History HL, Extended Notes: Russia, the Tsars, the Provisional Govenment and the Revolution.

    Representative nature of the Dumas limited though the 1906 Fundamental Laws and the 1907 change in the electoral laws. Conservatives overrepresented and peasants and especially industrial workers underrepresented. Strengthen Nicholas? position after 1905 or contribute to 1917? How far did the Dumas solve long-term political problems?

  2. Assess the methods and conditions which enabled Hitler to rise to power.

    Goebbels, minister of propaganda, also helped Hitler rise to power by his use of 'saturation' propaganda. The use of rallies, speeches, lectures and 'airplane campaigns' in certain areas were highly effective in raising the profile of the party. It also increased their votes in the elections, especially during the years

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work