• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare and Contrast the rise to power of Hitler and Lenin

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The regimes of Hitler and Lenin were both products of war. For Hitler the war gave his life purpose, and the defeat and the Treaty gave him a grudge. The army, which shared his feelings, gave him the work which led to his joining the Nazi party, and got him out of his little problem after the Munich putsch. For Lenin the War was the last convulsion of imperialism, and though he did not predict the combination of circumstances which provoked the February Revolution, these circumstances were indeed exactly the kind of thing which his analysis of imperialist war would have involved (shortages, casualties etc). Ironically Lenin, like Hitler, owed much to the German army, whose intelligence department brought him to St Petersburg on the famous sealed train. The Bolshevik USP was Peace, the Nazis were supported for promising to revise a Peace. On the face of it Hitler and Lenin were impelled by precisely opposite ideas. Adapting Low's famous cartoon Lenin was to Hitler 'the scum of the earth' and Hitler to Lenin 'the bloody assassin of the workers'1. ...read more.

Middle

on his side, and Lenin, too, for a crucial moment in the Spring of 1917 benefitted from the careful efficiency of the imperialists. Thereafter he gained some credibility by disavowing his former helpers, or at least he managed to fight off the accusation that he was their stooge. Lenin benefitted from the inability of Kerensky to improve social conditions, and Hitler benefitted from the incapacity of the Weimar governments after Stresemann. The vast social gulf in Russia which Peter the Great had not been able to bridge was part of the context in which the Bolshevik revolution was practical politics. The continuation of Wilhelmine or Bismarckian social attitudes in Germany, on the other hand, made Hitler's revolution in this sense a counter-revolution. Lenin emerged from the collapse of a social order widely and deeply detested by the Russian people, Hitler profited from the determination that a social order should continue, a determination that went equally widely and deeply into German society. Lenin's rise was too private, and then too meteoric to be marked by any particular cultural programme, whereas Hitler gained a lot of credence by rejecting the 'degenerate' Bauhaus and modernism in all its forms. ...read more.

Conclusion

Von Papen was one of the 'useful idiots' who facilitated Hitler's rise; Lenin benefitted from the delusions of millions of peasants that he supported their property holding aspirations. Lenin benefitted from the problems of the Kerensky and the Czar, whereas Hitler benefitted from the problems of Lenin and Stalin, not to mention those of Ebert, Bruning, von Papen, von Schleicher and Hindenburg. Neither the Bolsheviks nor the Nazis were one-man bands. Lenin had his loyal 'Old Bolsheviks' like Stalin, Zinoviev and Kamenev and, more recently, Trotsky. Hitler had crucial 'assists' from Röhm, Ludendorff, Goebbels, Goering, Himmler and, more recently, Schacht. It is a moot point how important the Reichstag Fire was, but certainly Nazi propaganda did not make much of it, preferring to emphasize the alleged comradeship between Hitler and Hindenburg. Thus the headmaster's son and the customs official's son reached in varying ways their primary goal of power. 1 Allowing for the fact that Lenin died too soon to have made the judgement. ?? ?? ?? ?? Compare and contrast the Rise to Power of Hitler and Lenin H.D.J.Nicklin for DAIS April 2008. Page 1 of 3 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. Compare and contrast Mussolini's and Hitler's rise to power

    Similarly, Thompson relates that Salandra (an ex-prime minister) advised the King to appoint Mussolini as prime minister because of his own anti-communist views. This demonstrates the power Hitler and Mussolini acquired by Communist opposition. However, for Italy, a Communist revolution was never the very serious threat that it was in Germany, as the highly Catholic nature of the country would arguably not allow it.

  2. French Revolution and the rise of Napoleon - revision notes

    On 11 th July 1789 -> Louis XVI dismissed Jacques Necker. Parisians read this as a signal of beginning the Revolution. 14 th July 1789-> Revolution began in Paris. A large crowd invaded the Hotel des Invalides (Palac Inwalidów) in which was stored weapon. The crowd seized thousands of riffles.

  1. Stalin's Rise to Power2

    While acknowledging the significance of his administrative power, "No matter how competent he [Stalin] might be as a technician of power, he had to prove himself as a political and ideological leader in the Lenin tradition."22 Tucker shows how Stalin's pamphlets The Foundations of Leninism and Socialism in One Country

  2. Castro's rise to power

    for his regime was characterized by the ruthlessness with which it was being conducted. This, of course made people want to have another leader; someone who would actually defend their country, fight for them: Fidel Castro. The fact that Batista favored economic interests of American industries and the Cuban elite

  1. History Investigation - Hitler

    The first key issue was how the Nazi party was developed from 1920-29. The party was formed in 1920 but struggled to make a real impact. The Nazis developed their beliefs regarding "race, anti-Semitism, anti-communism, and Lebensraum."11 In 1923, the Munich Putsch agreement was made, giving Hitler a platform to voice his ideas.

  2. Stalin's rise to power, his policies and how he consolidated his grip on power.

    * However he was seriously underestimated as he had skills that whilst being less obvious, were very deadly. * He was able to put across a primitive appeal- to Russian self-reliance, even isolationism. This provided a solution to one of Stalin's major problems- his intellectual inferiority to most of his contemporaries.

  1. IB History HL, Extended Notes: Russia, the Tsars, the Provisional Govenment and the Revolution.

    1912 compulsory insurance for industrial workers. Cannot be seen as a step forward because 1. Fundamentally, Nicholas still regarded the Duma with contempt and not something he should have to cooperate with. Still autocratic worldview. 2. Government and Nicholas could still block legislative proposals they opposed.

  2. Assess the methods and conditions which enabled Hitler to rise to power.

    Goebbels, minister of propaganda, also helped Hitler rise to power by his use of 'saturation' propaganda. The use of rallies, speeches, lectures and 'airplane campaigns' in certain areas were highly effective in raising the profile of the party. It also increased their votes in the elections, especially during the years

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work