• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare and Contrast the rise to power of Hitler and Lenin

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The regimes of Hitler and Lenin were both products of war. For Hitler the war gave his life purpose, and the defeat and the Treaty gave him a grudge. The army, which shared his feelings, gave him the work which led to his joining the Nazi party, and got him out of his little problem after the Munich putsch. For Lenin the War was the last convulsion of imperialism, and though he did not predict the combination of circumstances which provoked the February Revolution, these circumstances were indeed exactly the kind of thing which his analysis of imperialist war would have involved (shortages, casualties etc). Ironically Lenin, like Hitler, owed much to the German army, whose intelligence department brought him to St Petersburg on the famous sealed train. The Bolshevik USP was Peace, the Nazis were supported for promising to revise a Peace. On the face of it Hitler and Lenin were impelled by precisely opposite ideas. Adapting Low's famous cartoon Lenin was to Hitler 'the scum of the earth' and Hitler to Lenin 'the bloody assassin of the workers'1. ...read more.

Middle

on his side, and Lenin, too, for a crucial moment in the Spring of 1917 benefitted from the careful efficiency of the imperialists. Thereafter he gained some credibility by disavowing his former helpers, or at least he managed to fight off the accusation that he was their stooge. Lenin benefitted from the inability of Kerensky to improve social conditions, and Hitler benefitted from the incapacity of the Weimar governments after Stresemann. The vast social gulf in Russia which Peter the Great had not been able to bridge was part of the context in which the Bolshevik revolution was practical politics. The continuation of Wilhelmine or Bismarckian social attitudes in Germany, on the other hand, made Hitler's revolution in this sense a counter-revolution. Lenin emerged from the collapse of a social order widely and deeply detested by the Russian people, Hitler profited from the determination that a social order should continue, a determination that went equally widely and deeply into German society. Lenin's rise was too private, and then too meteoric to be marked by any particular cultural programme, whereas Hitler gained a lot of credence by rejecting the 'degenerate' Bauhaus and modernism in all its forms. ...read more.

Conclusion

Von Papen was one of the 'useful idiots' who facilitated Hitler's rise; Lenin benefitted from the delusions of millions of peasants that he supported their property holding aspirations. Lenin benefitted from the problems of the Kerensky and the Czar, whereas Hitler benefitted from the problems of Lenin and Stalin, not to mention those of Ebert, Bruning, von Papen, von Schleicher and Hindenburg. Neither the Bolsheviks nor the Nazis were one-man bands. Lenin had his loyal 'Old Bolsheviks' like Stalin, Zinoviev and Kamenev and, more recently, Trotsky. Hitler had crucial 'assists' from R�hm, Ludendorff, Goebbels, Goering, Himmler and, more recently, Schacht. It is a moot point how important the Reichstag Fire was, but certainly Nazi propaganda did not make much of it, preferring to emphasize the alleged comradeship between Hitler and Hindenburg. Thus the headmaster's son and the customs official's son reached in varying ways their primary goal of power. 1 Allowing for the fact that Lenin died too soon to have made the judgement. ?? ?? ?? ?? Compare and contrast the Rise to Power of Hitler and Lenin H.D.J.Nicklin for DAIS April 2008. Page 1 of 3 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. History Investigation - Hitler

    Hitler then called a further election in hopes of gaining more support towards his party. Right before the vote was to be held, it was burned to the ground. Hitler quickly blamed the fire his prime competitor for power, the Communist Party.

  2. Castro's rise to power

    What is more, Batista's regime continued being politically dependant on the USA because the Americans saw him as an ally against communism. For Batista and the USA it was a win-win situation. The USA kept Cuba under control and Batista's economic interests were fulfilled; but what about Cuban people?

  1. Compare and contrast Mussolini's and Hitler's rise to power

    feared a communist revolution and fascist hostilities against communists became a method by which both leaders acquired power in their respective countries. Whitlam describes the dramatic increase in support for the Italian Fascist party after the communist uprisings of the Biennio Rosso and the violence the party employed against them.

  2. The rise of Hitler and the Nazi party

    The SA was disbanded and many members killed by the SS on the Night of Long Knives. Kershaw writes of how, in one move, Hitler removed the threat of the SA and satisfied the army, thus strengthening and increasing his powerbase.

  1. French Revolution and the rise of Napoleon - revision notes

    popular was wrote by Joseph Emanuel Sieyes : ''What is the Third Estate'' - ''what is the Third Estet? Nothing. But it want to be something.'') * Elections to the Estates General were held between January and April 1789, elected: 300 deputies for the clergy 600 deputies for the Third Estate 300 for the nobility So generally - 1200 deputies.

  2. Stalin's rise to power, his policies and how he consolidated his grip on power.

    * He had a profoundly Western attitude, but after Lenin's death, few Bolshevik leaders had any Western experience and were therefore more sympathetic towards Stalin's pro-Slavic line. * Trotsky was seen as an intruder as he had previously been sympathetic towards the Mensheviks and did not join the Bolsheviks until 1917.

  1. IB History HL, Extended Notes: Russia, the Tsars, the Provisional Govenment and the Revolution.

    Harvests remained normal and exports had ended, distribution was the problem. Cities got 25% of grain harvests in 1914 15% in 1917. 3. Food, fuel, and goods shortage, high prices, inflation, unemployment. Workers opposed regime, peasants opposed loss of men. Kulaks profited through all of this Tsarina and Rasputin 1.

  2. Factors That Helped The Rise of the Nazis

    Propaganda did, however, become one of the most successful tactics Hitler used during Nazi rise. Hitler?s propaganda ministry under Goebbels, as well as locally generated propaganda, the use of centrally orchestrated ?campaign slogans, themes, speakers and publicity? (Kershaw, 53) and the utilization of simple messages made the propaganda so successful.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work