• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare and Contrast the rise to power of Hitler and Lenin

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The regimes of Hitler and Lenin were both products of war. For Hitler the war gave his life purpose, and the defeat and the Treaty gave him a grudge. The army, which shared his feelings, gave him the work which led to his joining the Nazi party, and got him out of his little problem after the Munich putsch. For Lenin the War was the last convulsion of imperialism, and though he did not predict the combination of circumstances which provoked the February Revolution, these circumstances were indeed exactly the kind of thing which his analysis of imperialist war would have involved (shortages, casualties etc). Ironically Lenin, like Hitler, owed much to the German army, whose intelligence department brought him to St Petersburg on the famous sealed train. The Bolshevik USP was Peace, the Nazis were supported for promising to revise a Peace. On the face of it Hitler and Lenin were impelled by precisely opposite ideas. Adapting Low's famous cartoon Lenin was to Hitler 'the scum of the earth' and Hitler to Lenin 'the bloody assassin of the workers'1. ...read more.

Middle

on his side, and Lenin, too, for a crucial moment in the Spring of 1917 benefitted from the careful efficiency of the imperialists. Thereafter he gained some credibility by disavowing his former helpers, or at least he managed to fight off the accusation that he was their stooge. Lenin benefitted from the inability of Kerensky to improve social conditions, and Hitler benefitted from the incapacity of the Weimar governments after Stresemann. The vast social gulf in Russia which Peter the Great had not been able to bridge was part of the context in which the Bolshevik revolution was practical politics. The continuation of Wilhelmine or Bismarckian social attitudes in Germany, on the other hand, made Hitler's revolution in this sense a counter-revolution. Lenin emerged from the collapse of a social order widely and deeply detested by the Russian people, Hitler profited from the determination that a social order should continue, a determination that went equally widely and deeply into German society. Lenin's rise was too private, and then too meteoric to be marked by any particular cultural programme, whereas Hitler gained a lot of credence by rejecting the 'degenerate' Bauhaus and modernism in all its forms. ...read more.

Conclusion

Von Papen was one of the 'useful idiots' who facilitated Hitler's rise; Lenin benefitted from the delusions of millions of peasants that he supported their property holding aspirations. Lenin benefitted from the problems of the Kerensky and the Czar, whereas Hitler benefitted from the problems of Lenin and Stalin, not to mention those of Ebert, Bruning, von Papen, von Schleicher and Hindenburg. Neither the Bolsheviks nor the Nazis were one-man bands. Lenin had his loyal 'Old Bolsheviks' like Stalin, Zinoviev and Kamenev and, more recently, Trotsky. Hitler had crucial 'assists' from R�hm, Ludendorff, Goebbels, Goering, Himmler and, more recently, Schacht. It is a moot point how important the Reichstag Fire was, but certainly Nazi propaganda did not make much of it, preferring to emphasize the alleged comradeship between Hitler and Hindenburg. Thus the headmaster's son and the customs official's son reached in varying ways their primary goal of power. 1 Allowing for the fact that Lenin died too soon to have made the judgement. ?? ?? ?? ?? Compare and contrast the Rise to Power of Hitler and Lenin H.D.J.Nicklin for DAIS April 2008. Page 1 of 3 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. French Revolution and the rise of Napoleon - revision notes

    This is known as a Great Fear (20 th July 6 th August 1789) * Deputies of the National Assembly on the night of 4 th August 1789 decreed the abolition of feudalism and Church tithe (dziesiecina). By sweeping away the old privileges the August 4 th Decree permitted The Assembly to construct the new regime.

  2. Compare and contrast Mussolini's and Hitler's rise to power

    feared a communist revolution and fascist hostilities against communists became a method by which both leaders acquired power in their respective countries. Whitlam describes the dramatic increase in support for the Italian Fascist party after the communist uprisings of the Biennio Rosso and the violence the party employed against them.

  1. The rise of Hitler and the Nazi party

    and flags of the swastika in each city, under which the national anthem and Wagner music (an icon of Nazism) would be sung. Kershaw also describes how verbally, Hitler's speeches were simple, easy to understand; emotive and passionate, enhanced by his personal magnetism.

  2. Castro's rise to power

    This can definitely be studied as a significant skill in his path to power, because as we know, many times, support is the key factor to get to power and then of course manage to keep it. So, the idea of sovereignty and the right of Cuba to pursue its

  1. History Investigation - Hitler

    The second key issue that led to Hitler's rise in power was the Depression experienced throughout Germany. The Weimer Republic was unable to fix the problem, thus weakening and dividing the government. The Nazi party, effectively using propaganda to convey their message, promised an end to the Depression.

  2. Stalin's Rise to Power2

    of the party."9 This marked the beginning of Stalin's ability to appear as a disciple of Lenin "to an extent where people believed he belonged alongside the leader."10 Later, Stalin published his defining pamphlet Socialism in One Country in late 1924, which not only "was a powerful appeal to national

  1. IB History HL, Extended Notes: Russia, the Tsars, the Provisional Govenment and the Revolution.

    Rasputin murdered in 1916 by someone hoping to reduce damage to Tsar. 4. Support from the army and high society faded, few willing to defend him in 1917. Failure to continue political reforms and compromise 1. Allowing the Progressive Bloc more input in running the country might have reduced the pressure for Russia to become a constitutional monarchy.

  2. Account for the Rise of Power of Mao Zedong

    PLA were a very different force to the Nationalist Army, viewed from a peasant perspective as an army just as dangerous and conflicting with their interests as that of Japan. By treating the peasants with respect, the PLA were able to become a much more successful army which increased five-fold

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work