• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare and Contrast the rise to power of Hitler and Lenin

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The regimes of Hitler and Lenin were both products of war. For Hitler the war gave his life purpose, and the defeat and the Treaty gave him a grudge. The army, which shared his feelings, gave him the work which led to his joining the Nazi party, and got him out of his little problem after the Munich putsch. For Lenin the War was the last convulsion of imperialism, and though he did not predict the combination of circumstances which provoked the February Revolution, these circumstances were indeed exactly the kind of thing which his analysis of imperialist war would have involved (shortages, casualties etc). Ironically Lenin, like Hitler, owed much to the German army, whose intelligence department brought him to St Petersburg on the famous sealed train. The Bolshevik USP was Peace, the Nazis were supported for promising to revise a Peace. On the face of it Hitler and Lenin were impelled by precisely opposite ideas. Adapting Low's famous cartoon Lenin was to Hitler 'the scum of the earth' and Hitler to Lenin 'the bloody assassin of the workers'1. ...read more.

Middle

on his side, and Lenin, too, for a crucial moment in the Spring of 1917 benefitted from the careful efficiency of the imperialists. Thereafter he gained some credibility by disavowing his former helpers, or at least he managed to fight off the accusation that he was their stooge. Lenin benefitted from the inability of Kerensky to improve social conditions, and Hitler benefitted from the incapacity of the Weimar governments after Stresemann. The vast social gulf in Russia which Peter the Great had not been able to bridge was part of the context in which the Bolshevik revolution was practical politics. The continuation of Wilhelmine or Bismarckian social attitudes in Germany, on the other hand, made Hitler's revolution in this sense a counter-revolution. Lenin emerged from the collapse of a social order widely and deeply detested by the Russian people, Hitler profited from the determination that a social order should continue, a determination that went equally widely and deeply into German society. Lenin's rise was too private, and then too meteoric to be marked by any particular cultural programme, whereas Hitler gained a lot of credence by rejecting the 'degenerate' Bauhaus and modernism in all its forms. ...read more.

Conclusion

Von Papen was one of the 'useful idiots' who facilitated Hitler's rise; Lenin benefitted from the delusions of millions of peasants that he supported their property holding aspirations. Lenin benefitted from the problems of the Kerensky and the Czar, whereas Hitler benefitted from the problems of Lenin and Stalin, not to mention those of Ebert, Bruning, von Papen, von Schleicher and Hindenburg. Neither the Bolsheviks nor the Nazis were one-man bands. Lenin had his loyal 'Old Bolsheviks' like Stalin, Zinoviev and Kamenev and, more recently, Trotsky. Hitler had crucial 'assists' from Röhm, Ludendorff, Goebbels, Goering, Himmler and, more recently, Schacht. It is a moot point how important the Reichstag Fire was, but certainly Nazi propaganda did not make much of it, preferring to emphasize the alleged comradeship between Hitler and Hindenburg. Thus the headmaster's son and the customs official's son reached in varying ways their primary goal of power. 1 Allowing for the fact that Lenin died too soon to have made the judgement. ?? ?? ?? ?? Compare and contrast the Rise to Power of Hitler and Lenin H.D.J.Nicklin for DAIS April 2008. Page 1 of 3 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. Compare and contrast Mussolini's and Hitler's rise to power

    feared a communist revolution and fascist hostilities against communists became a method by which both leaders acquired power in their respective countries. Whitlam describes the dramatic increase in support for the Italian Fascist party after the communist uprisings of the Biennio Rosso and the violence the party employed against them.

  2. French Revolution and the rise of Napoleon - revision notes

    They also hoped to introduce the one-man one-vote rule. After the opening Estates General: 17 th June 1789 -> Deputies of the Third estate declared themselves as National Assembly and they were supported by parish priests. They occupied king's court, because royal officials locked the meetings. Louis XVI -> gave in and urged the nobles and clergy to join the National Constituent Assembly on 9 th July 1789.

  1. Castro's rise to power

    In this way, it can be said that the dependence on the USA created certain economic and political circumstances under which Castro's rise to power, was made possible. This political and economic context was then aggravated by Batista's regime6 which awoke feelings of resentment, anger and fear among the Cubans

  2. Stalin's Rise to Power2

    This interpretation, though definitely part of the greater equation, is superficial, partly because Conquest's book focuses on other aspects of Stalin. More complexly, Robert Tucker agrees with Conquest and goes into greater detail regarding Stalin's exploits in the theoretical field.

  1. The rise of Hitler and the Nazi party

    Hitler provided emotional relief for the people blaming Jews and communist for the 'betrayal' and consequent defeat of Germany in the war and for the consequent suffering of the people; including the turmoil and the Treaty of Versailles. Shirer also writes of how this method of shifting the blame allowed

  2. Stalin's rise to power, his policies and how he consolidated his grip on power.

    * Stalin accused them of plotting against the party's agreed strategy and forced them to resign from the Politburo. So why was he successful? * Stalin seemed to be the least impressive of all the candidates, having been totally eclipsed by Trotsky in the October revolution and having never gained the friendship or confidence of Lenin.

  1. IB History HL, Extended Notes: Russia, the Tsars, the Provisional Govenment and the Revolution.

    Extremists used it for propaganda causing a loud and disruptive session. 3.5 months before government closed it down. 3. Further retreat from October Manifesto after 1907 Tsar and Stolypin had recovered from 1905. Elections rigged to favor conservative landowners (50% of the vote landowners 2% workers) much more conservative Dumas.

  2. Assess the methods and conditions which enabled Hitler to rise to power.

    I saw that his magnetism was holding these thousand ones.â This is to show how the German population was drawn by Hitler's charisma, his remarkable will power and tremendous energy. Hitler's use of propaganda, intimidation and political skills, vastly contributed to his rise to power.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work