• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare and Contrast the rise to power of Hitler and Lenin

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The regimes of Hitler and Lenin were both products of war. For Hitler the war gave his life purpose, and the defeat and the Treaty gave him a grudge. The army, which shared his feelings, gave him the work which led to his joining the Nazi party, and got him out of his little problem after the Munich putsch. For Lenin the War was the last convulsion of imperialism, and though he did not predict the combination of circumstances which provoked the February Revolution, these circumstances were indeed exactly the kind of thing which his analysis of imperialist war would have involved (shortages, casualties etc). Ironically Lenin, like Hitler, owed much to the German army, whose intelligence department brought him to St Petersburg on the famous sealed train. The Bolshevik USP was Peace, the Nazis were supported for promising to revise a Peace. On the face of it Hitler and Lenin were impelled by precisely opposite ideas. Adapting Low's famous cartoon Lenin was to Hitler 'the scum of the earth' and Hitler to Lenin 'the bloody assassin of the workers'1. ...read more.

Middle

on his side, and Lenin, too, for a crucial moment in the Spring of 1917 benefitted from the careful efficiency of the imperialists. Thereafter he gained some credibility by disavowing his former helpers, or at least he managed to fight off the accusation that he was their stooge. Lenin benefitted from the inability of Kerensky to improve social conditions, and Hitler benefitted from the incapacity of the Weimar governments after Stresemann. The vast social gulf in Russia which Peter the Great had not been able to bridge was part of the context in which the Bolshevik revolution was practical politics. The continuation of Wilhelmine or Bismarckian social attitudes in Germany, on the other hand, made Hitler's revolution in this sense a counter-revolution. Lenin emerged from the collapse of a social order widely and deeply detested by the Russian people, Hitler profited from the determination that a social order should continue, a determination that went equally widely and deeply into German society. Lenin's rise was too private, and then too meteoric to be marked by any particular cultural programme, whereas Hitler gained a lot of credence by rejecting the 'degenerate' Bauhaus and modernism in all its forms. ...read more.

Conclusion

Von Papen was one of the 'useful idiots' who facilitated Hitler's rise; Lenin benefitted from the delusions of millions of peasants that he supported their property holding aspirations. Lenin benefitted from the problems of the Kerensky and the Czar, whereas Hitler benefitted from the problems of Lenin and Stalin, not to mention those of Ebert, Bruning, von Papen, von Schleicher and Hindenburg. Neither the Bolsheviks nor the Nazis were one-man bands. Lenin had his loyal 'Old Bolsheviks' like Stalin, Zinoviev and Kamenev and, more recently, Trotsky. Hitler had crucial 'assists' from Röhm, Ludendorff, Goebbels, Goering, Himmler and, more recently, Schacht. It is a moot point how important the Reichstag Fire was, but certainly Nazi propaganda did not make much of it, preferring to emphasize the alleged comradeship between Hitler and Hindenburg. Thus the headmaster's son and the customs official's son reached in varying ways their primary goal of power. 1 Allowing for the fact that Lenin died too soon to have made the judgement. ?? ?? ?? ?? Compare and contrast the Rise to Power of Hitler and Lenin H.D.J.Nicklin for DAIS April 2008. Page 1 of 3 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. Stalin's rise to power, his policies and how he consolidated his grip on power.

    Russian people under his complete control so that he would carry out his policies without question. * A downturn of the USSR economy in 1936 saw the need for scapegoats and this led to workers often identifying managers and officials as failures, though these changes were dubious.

  2. Compare and contrast Mussolini's and Hitler's rise to power

    feared a communist revolution and fascist hostilities against communists became a method by which both leaders acquired power in their respective countries. Whitlam describes the dramatic increase in support for the Italian Fascist party after the communist uprisings of the Biennio Rosso and the violence the party employed against them.

  1. History Investigation - Hitler

    "Over the next 2 years he destroyed democracy in Germany and created a Nazi dictatorship with himself as Fuhrer."13 The Reichstag Fire allowed Hitler to blame the Communists and turn people against them. Through the Enabling Act, Hitler was able to destroy the Weimar Republic.

  2. The rise of Hitler and the Nazi party

    Hitler provided emotional relief for the people blaming Jews and communist for the 'betrayal' and consequent defeat of Germany in the war and for the consequent suffering of the people; including the turmoil and the Treaty of Versailles. Shirer also writes of how this method of shifting the blame allowed

  1. French Revolution and the rise of Napoleon - revision notes

    and gossips at court. They wanted to increase their income and play higher political role. b) The Provincial Nobility (szlachta prowincjonalna) - they were extremely diverse in economic terms. Some of them lived a life of ease (dostatnie zycie) in their chateaux (zamek na wsi).

  2. The influence of socialism on the development of universal human rights

    Despite these efforts, the French Assembly sent the National Guard to crush the Paris Commune, which resulted in a heavy bloodbath. The reason why socialism did not get the chance to develop human rights was mainly the liberalist thinking which was still in France.

  1. The Rise of Julius Caesar

    After receiving a triumph, something that he dreamed of attaining, Caesar sacrificed it immediately to reach consulship.[12] For this sacrifice to have been worthwhile, he needed to embark on greater military adventures following the completion of his year of office.

  2. Factors That Helped The Rise of the Nazis

    As unemployment increased from 1930 to 1932, many of the unemployed being students, Hitlerâs support among youth groups rose (Johnson, 281). Kershaw, disagreeing with Shirerâs opinion that âHitler was an organizer as well as a spell-binderâ (Shirer, 170), stated that âwithout the Depression, the worsening crisis of the government and

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work