• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Despite his apparently liberal policies, Alexander II was just as conservative as Alexander III. To what extent do you agree with this statement?

Extracts from this document...


?Despite his apparently liberal policies, Alexander II was just as conservative as Alexander III.? To what extent do you agree with this statement? Alexander II and Alexander III had very different approaches in the way they ruled Russia. Alexander II attempted to put a number of reforms in place, some of which were very successful. His ruling style highly contrasted that of Alexander III who was very repressive. I would therefore argue that Alexander II was much less conservative than his son, Alexander III, and that he was therefore a fairly liberal leader. On of Alexander II?s major reforms was that of the serf emancipation. This reform sought to free the peasants in Russia in order to improve the economy through the hypothetical improvement in farming, to end peasant revolts and most importantly, to create an efficient and effective army after the humiliating defeat in the Crimean War. At the time it was seen to be hugely reformist because in theory it gave the serfs freedom. ...read more.


After the first attempt on Alexander II?s life, he chose to return to a more conservative government that put in place a policy of repression that opposed many of his previous reforms, particularly those in education. For example, he eliminated subjects such as History which encouraged people to think for themselves, in fear of another attempt on his life being made. He did this because his Education Minister blamed the western education children were receiving for spread of revolutionary ideas, These new policies paved the way for Alexander III?s educational counter-reforms and it could therefore be said based on this particular factor that Alexander II was incredibly conservative, much like his son. Despite these two repressive policies, Alexander II put in place a number of reformist policies, one example being the censorship reform. This reform was hugely radical and massively different from anything that Russia had seen before because it allowed people to exercise freedom of speech slightly more than they had previously been able to. ...read more.


This reform under Alexander II?s reign was particularly liberal and on this factor alone it would be said that Alexander II was very dissimilar to his conservative son because this new policy instilled massive change. The educational reform seen under the reign of Alexander II was highly radical and differed highly from the conservative policies put in place after his assassination by his son. Westernised university education was begun to be taught and females now received traditional, non-vocational education. These new policies were perhaps the most dramatically different changes that were enlisted by Alexander II because these changes paved the way for a new way of thinking amongst Russian students. This therefore shows Alexander II to be a liberal rather than a conservative. In conclusion, I believe that although some policies Alexander II put in place could be considered as highly conservative, particularly those after the attempt on his life. However, I believe that especially in comparison with the conservative policies that preceded and succeeded him, Alexander II was a liberal ruler as opposed to a conservative one because his policies differed so dramatically to those of the conservative rulers. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Compare and Contrast the Policies of Alexander II and Alexander III

    3 star(s)

    stopped any conquests or waging of wars by the Russian Empire, unlike his paternal predecessor, Alexander II. Thus, Alexander III Foreign Policy played more of a peacemaking role unlike Alexander II's which was very militarily aggressive. The sphere of judicial policy was also an area where there were big differences between the two Tsars.

  2. To What Extent Were Hitlers Policies the Cause of World War II?

    This not only gave him an excuse for his actions, but also at first conveyed European public sympathy as they empathized with the German people and agreed that their treatment had been unfair. Finally the last major factor which enabled the outbreak of the war was the failed policy of appeasement.

  1. Compare and Contract the policies of Alexander II and Alexander III in Russia?

    and coal tripled whilst oil produced 30 times more than ever before. Rapid industrialisation leads to dreadful living and working conditions: prisons for illegal striking, overcrowded dormitories, and there was a decline in wages in 1890s, long working hours, drunkenness, and harsh factory discipline.

  2. To what extent did the reforms of Alexander II achieve his aims

    For these reasons, it was better to have serfdom dismantled. In 1857, believing that ?it is better to abolish serfdom from above, than to wait for it to abolish itself from below?, Alexander set up a secret committee to abolish serfdom under the chairmanship of Prince Alexei Orlov.

  1. Which of indoctrination and repression proved most effective for consolidating Hitler's power (1933-1939)?

    The Länder: The Länder also known as the provinces was one of the last vestiges of the Weimar republic. The provinces had a considerable amount of political autonomy. Which had been done on purpose by the Weimar constitution to restrain the central government from getting too strong.

  2. To what extent were Stalins economic policies successful up to 1940?

    The confiscation of crops and the exile of opposing peasants caused no crops to be harvested thus causing a massive famine in the countryside.[12] The confiscated grain was never released to the starving peasants, and were exported to foreign nations to earn foreign currency.

  1. To what extent were the social changes in Germany between 1865 and 1890 the ...

    I am interested in displaying how it had a new, complex model of governance and how it solved the two main challenges: the weakness of liberal political forces in their struggle for power and the smoldering social conflict between the ruling classes and the industrial workers.

  2. "The Worst Human Right Abuses occur in LEDCs". To what extent do you agree ...

    They are considered the worst because it eventually leads on to penal sentences that last decades. These extensive penal sentences can degrade a human being?s psychological state and cause high expenses to a nation?s criminal section budget. Additionally, it can also lead on to even more deaths, therefore causing a continuous cycle of violence amongst human individuals or organizations.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work