• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Despite his apparently liberal policies, Alexander II was just as conservative as Alexander III. To what extent do you agree with this statement?

Extracts from this document...


?Despite his apparently liberal policies, Alexander II was just as conservative as Alexander III.? To what extent do you agree with this statement? Alexander II and Alexander III had very different approaches in the way they ruled Russia. Alexander II attempted to put a number of reforms in place, some of which were very successful. His ruling style highly contrasted that of Alexander III who was very repressive. I would therefore argue that Alexander II was much less conservative than his son, Alexander III, and that he was therefore a fairly liberal leader. On of Alexander II?s major reforms was that of the serf emancipation. This reform sought to free the peasants in Russia in order to improve the economy through the hypothetical improvement in farming, to end peasant revolts and most importantly, to create an efficient and effective army after the humiliating defeat in the Crimean War. At the time it was seen to be hugely reformist because in theory it gave the serfs freedom. ...read more.


After the first attempt on Alexander II?s life, he chose to return to a more conservative government that put in place a policy of repression that opposed many of his previous reforms, particularly those in education. For example, he eliminated subjects such as History which encouraged people to think for themselves, in fear of another attempt on his life being made. He did this because his Education Minister blamed the western education children were receiving for spread of revolutionary ideas, These new policies paved the way for Alexander III?s educational counter-reforms and it could therefore be said based on this particular factor that Alexander II was incredibly conservative, much like his son. Despite these two repressive policies, Alexander II put in place a number of reformist policies, one example being the censorship reform. This reform was hugely radical and massively different from anything that Russia had seen before because it allowed people to exercise freedom of speech slightly more than they had previously been able to. ...read more.


This reform under Alexander II?s reign was particularly liberal and on this factor alone it would be said that Alexander II was very dissimilar to his conservative son because this new policy instilled massive change. The educational reform seen under the reign of Alexander II was highly radical and differed highly from the conservative policies put in place after his assassination by his son. Westernised university education was begun to be taught and females now received traditional, non-vocational education. These new policies were perhaps the most dramatically different changes that were enlisted by Alexander II because these changes paved the way for a new way of thinking amongst Russian students. This therefore shows Alexander II to be a liberal rather than a conservative. In conclusion, I believe that although some policies Alexander II put in place could be considered as highly conservative, particularly those after the attempt on his life. However, I believe that especially in comparison with the conservative policies that preceded and succeeded him, Alexander II was a liberal ruler as opposed to a conservative one because his policies differed so dramatically to those of the conservative rulers. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Compare and Contrast the Policies of Alexander II and Alexander III

    3 star(s)

    stopped any conquests or waging of wars by the Russian Empire, unlike his paternal predecessor, Alexander II. Thus, Alexander III Foreign Policy played more of a peacemaking role unlike Alexander II's which was very militarily aggressive. The sphere of judicial policy was also an area where there were big differences between the two Tsars.

  2. To what extent did Alexander II's reforms cause more problems than they solved?

    Also, the government could still hold 'special' courts and 'closed trials'. Also in 1866 -after the assassination attempt - the Tsar changed the Minister of Justice with a more conservative one and trials of Populists were held. The initial openness of the system didn't appeal only to the middle and

  1. The policies of Alexander II and III of Russia

    Alexander III stripped universities of all autonomy, complete reactionary policy. Student organisations shut down, law and philosophy faculties severely censored, result: students and teachers angry about harsh, draconian policy8. 3. Political Polices and Consequences a. Alexander II established Zemstva (local councils)

  2. Bismarck's policies success

    As a result, the Treaty of Saint Stefano was formed which stated that Bulgaria was to be enlarged. This did not please Britain and Austria Hungary. Austria was worried that the Slavs in there would demand freedom similar to the one given to the Slavs in the Ottoman Empire, due to Russia's support.

  1. To what extent did the reforms of Alexander II achieve his aims

    By 1858, the committee was making little progress and so Alexander gave up all secrecy and instead began a personal tour around the country, during which he delivered many speeches in favor of emancipation of the serfs. Alexander wanted to help the serf, seeing their suffering for long generations, but

  2. Assess the strengths and weaknesses of Alexander II of Russia's reforms.

    The motives for this were administrative. The freed serfs now had to pay taxes and the Mir was an effective way to collect them. The Mir was a controlling mechanism for keeping order in the countryside. It kept Alexander II?s government safe from being rebelled against.

  1. To what extent were Stalins economic policies successful up to 1940?

    All traces of capitalism disappeared[14] in the Soviet Union after the abolishment of the NEP, and all industries were placed under state ownership. The proposed ?Five Year Plans? were designed to industrialize the Soviet Union in the shortest possible time, and to quickly catch up to the western nations such as the United Kingdom and the United States.

  2. To what extent can Alexander II be called a liberator

    There was an over loss of land and because of that they had to rent additional lands at higher prices. The volosts did not have full citizen rights. The Mir tended to replace the nobility, controlling the independence and lives of the peasants.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work