• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Did Germany plan and wage a deliberate war of aggression in 1914?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Did Germany plan and wage a deliberate war of aggression? The fact that Germany is blamed for causing or even planning World War One is a much debated topic, simply because there are no rights or wrong answers. Only answers that have evidence can really be considered straightforward and trustworthy, especially in the circumstances of the time, that everything can be made believable. This is one of the most analyzed; if not the most analyzed event by historians just because there are so many sides one can take. It is impossible to come to a decision for the real cause for the World War. Many historians such as A.J.P Taylor who believe that Germany was the country that sought an aggressive war have a strong argument, but there are other historians like Eric Hobsbawn who also have strong cases. Hobsbawn was a Marxist who believed that the capitalist countries had the blame. He believed that war was inevitable because the opposition was capitalist. When it comes to Germany planning World War One, many agreements and disagreements emerge. However, there is more disagreement on this opinion. Simply because there isn't much evidence that Germany was actually planning for there to be a World war, it was only planning on what it would do in the case of a war, the Schlieffen plan. ...read more.

Middle

Russia also had a colossal rearmament program since 1908. This thesis says that Germany did not cause a European war deliberately because they were expecting another response from Russia. They only expected a conflict between Austria and Serbia. Having said this, there is also the argument that Germany knew all along that Russia would intervene, therefore it would be "obliged" to defend Austria-Hungary. At the circumstances of the time Germany was looking for any solid pretext to go to war. In 1914 Germany was eager to go to war, she was well aware that the Entente powers were advancing in industry and military much faster than her. She also knew that by 1917 Russia would be completely ready to go to war; therefore she needed to use the assassination of Franz Ferdinand as an excuse. Besides, Russia's massive re-armament program would have made the Schlieffen plan useless, because Russia would have had enough time to create the railway, which would have let the enormous Russian army mobilize in days instead of weeks. It wouldn't have worked because the Schlieffen plan depended on Russia's slow mobilization. This means that Germany did start the European war deliberately, because it needed to go to war one way or the other. ...read more.

Conclusion

In order to get these resources they will look for easy/weak countries to take over, many of which were in Africa. I agree with Hobsbawns thesis because after industrialism comes imperialism. To conclude, I believe that Germany did not plan a European war, but it was definitely the main contributor, due to many mistakes made by the leaders. However, I do believe that if all the countries wouldn't have wanted to go to war, then there would have been no war, because they would have all united against Germany thus Germany would have dared attack. Many different events added tension to the situation, like the alliances, Moroccan Crisis, naval arms race, Balkan wars etc. By bearing in mind so many opinions by historians, to accuse Germany of deliberately causing World War One is extremely hard because there are so many sides one can take; it is almost as if none of them is right or wrong. We will never know the real cause of World War One. However, due to many strong evidences I must say that Germany did wage a deliberate war of aggression, BUT she did not plan the war. Industrialism played a major role, because it is what made the powers ambitious to seek resources, which in turn converted into imperialism and from imperialism to militarism and from militarism to World War One. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. The cold war - the conferences and the start of the cCold War

    trying to use Berlin as a means by which the whole question of the future of Germany could be reopened --> very tense situation with a high risk of war o The establishment of NATO and the Federal Republic of Germany (Adenauer as the first Chancellor, and other important political figures)

  2. Nazi Germany

    � when von Kahr was released he turned against Hitler and Ludendorff � 16 Hitler's supporters were killed by Munich police � Munich Putsch failed and they were arrested � Hitler spent only 9 months in prison (wrote his book called 'Mein Kampf')

  1. Prohibition: an inevitable failure?

    The idea that its an addiction. There is a caption at the bottom of the poster saying 'Slaves of the Saloon'. This implies that the men 'have' to go there, which I assume is trying to convey that alcohol is an addiction, and that they will perpetually return to the Saloon.

  2. Why did the World War break out in the summer of 1914?

    However, this was totally ignored by the imperial forces which decided the destiny of the European issues in the Vienna Congress. Many nations which wanted autonomy were submitted to other states or they were divided. The Revolutions and mobilizations of the XIX century, achieved to revoke great part of the impositions accorded in Vienna.

  1. To what extent is there validity to Ilan Pappes argument that the Palestinians were ...

    Plan D as shown in source H is a plan put into action in April of 1948 and was mainly there to "gain control of Hebrew state and defend its borders". Ilan Pappe in source G interprets this as "the occupation and expulsion of the Palestinian population..."

  2. Favorable external and internal circumstances, not Bismarcks diplomatic genius, explain the unification of Germany ...

    In other words, nationalism arose simply, as resentment to French rule and occupation. A substantial example of how German nationalism very well could have resulted in the Unification of Germany, before Prussia became subject to the political influence of Otto von Bismarck, was the potential creation of a constitutional monarchy by the Frankfurt Parliament.

  1. IB History HL, Extended Notes: Russia, the Tsars, the Provisional Govenment and the Revolution.

    Bolsheviks stormed the Winter Palace (PG) that evening but only the Women?s Death Battalion and some military cadets had not fled. No resistance. 5. PG surrendered and the Bolsheviks had control of Petrograd. Causes of the October Revolution and which explain Lenin?s successful seizure of power Long and Mid-term-

  2. Notes on the History and Development of the Arab-Israeli Conflict

    existence - The most significant issue is the lack of direct referral to Palestinian people, except a provision that there should be a solution to the 'refugee problem' - The PLO completely ignored it until 1988, when they began to acknowledge it as a peace basis - It has been

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work