• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Discuss the involvement of the United States in the Vietnam War. Was our involvement justified? Explain why or why not. Use evidence to support your thesis

Extracts from this document...


________________ Discuss the involvement of the United States in the Vietnam War. Was our involvement justified? Explain why or why not. Use evidence to support your thesis. Throughout military history, the United States can be considered as one of the most successful countries. But the ?loss? in Vietnam can also be considered as one of the major setbacks for the US historically. Many historians including HR McMaster can agree with the famous aphorism that said ?the war was lost on the home front and not on the battlefield?. This famous phrase may be considered true by some however, not during the war itself. At the time, US troops being sent to Vietnam was certainly a good idea. Anti-war factions in the US were forgetting to take many other factors into consideration. They were forgetting about the US? strong foreign relations and policies with other countries. They were also forgetting how big of a threat communism was at the time even after witnessing countries such as Cuba, China, North Korea, etc?give in to Soviet ambitions. Therefore, US involvement in Vietnam was justified at the time due to their strong commitment to their foreign alliances and organizations, their strong commitment to their strict foreign policies against communism, and their overall fear of rising communism in vulnerable countries. ...read more.


Due to the long course of US policies and doctrines that opposed communism, the US felt obliged to join the South Vietnam forces in fighting Ho Chi Minh and his guerrillas. For example, the famous anti-communist policy of ?Containment? was one of the US? motives when decided to join this war. The idea was to ?contain? Ho Chi Minh and his guerillas by not allowing to them to spread communism into South Vietnam or anywhere else in Southeast Asia. The doctrines of both Truman and Eisenhower were also very strict anti-communist as they both agree both targeted Soviet expansionism. The US was not going to tolerate watching anymore countries submit to communism and they felt as though war was inevitable. This aggression and intolerance towards communism in the world motivated the President to send troops and join the war. These strong policies against communist expansions all help justify the US involvement in Vietnam. At the time, US involvement in the war was justified because the expansion of communism in the world would be a major threat to national security in the US. ...read more.


As a result, US involvement in Vietnam was justified due to them being a world power which causes them to commit to their alliances and their promises to other nations. US involvement and Vietnam was also justified because of the dangers that communist nations placed on Capitalist world. The Administrations of Kennedy, Eisenhower, and Johnson were right for not giving in to the request of the anti-war factions until later in the war. Once again the US lost the war ?on the home front and not the battlefield? which implies they could have won if they stayed longer. Even though the US lost this war, not getting involved would not have been the right thing to do because it would have made the US look weak. Not getting involved would have encouraged Ho Chi Minh and his guerillas to continue expanding west along with the help of the Soviets. This would have created a much bigger problem for the US and the Capitalist world. Therefore, US involvement in the Vietnam was justified because it essentially saved the world from communist regimes. Was US involment in Vietnam justified? James Ehahoun August 30th, 2012 IB History of the Americas ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. The Fear of Communism and its Effects on Australia in the 1950s and 60s. ...

    Despite the spared lives, Australia was fortunate enough to have not been taken over by the communists and their efforts in each of the Asian country they fought in really did pay off. Source: Holt calling Cartoon by John Frith The Herald, June 1968 Courtesy of the National Library of

  2. US and the Vietnam War

    The source's purpose is to educate and inform the readers with the detailed knowledge of the Vietnam War with interviews of soldiers and civilians, statistics and photographs. The values of this book include giving the historians an easier understanding of the historical context of the war as there are primary

  1. The cold war - the conferences and the start of the cCold War

    John F. Kennedy visited Berlin in 1963 and made a speech next the Berlin wall. He said this, "There are some who say that in Europe and elsewhere we can work with the communists. Let them come to Berlin". He also said "Ich bin ein Berliner" (I am a Berliner)

  2. Cold War Study Guide - Compare/contrast the Vietnam War policies of Lyndon Johnson and ...

    weapons, training, and advice - could then gradually take over the burden of fighting their own war" (Kennedy 1004). - Nixon wanted to win the war without further "spilling of American blood" (Kennedy 1004). - Nixon hoped that by his Vietnamization, the Vietnam war would turn into a civil war between the North and the South.

  1. My research questions: did the United States of America really lose the Vietnam War ...

    In his speech he assumed that Communism had destroyed freedom in India, Tibet and thus must be thwarted. At the end of his speech he made his thoughts and objectives clear: "Our objective is the independence of South Vietnam, and its freedom from attack."3 The Americans feared that the domino

  2. Explain the USAs policy of containment. How successful was this in Korea, Vietnam and ...

    Douglas MacArthur made an amphibious landing, which forced the North Korean army to retreat and by the end of September the South had been recaptured. This shows how USA were successful with their policy of containment as if they had stopped here they would have been able to successfully prevent the spread of communism in South Korea.

  1. Notes on the history of Communist China

    He also detested intellectuals 7. Thought control programs emerged for all educators Role of education: 1. educational system reorganized and expanded Role of the Media/ propaganda: 1. CCP tried to build a base for mass urban support by means of prop conveyed through newspapers, the theatre, cinema, radio, and group meetings 2.

  2. History IA: What were American peoples responses to the Vietnam War in 1965 1971?

    Moreover, he is an American, inevitably, he can bias about national history when talking about the face of America in Vietnam War. Overall, this a good source because the information inside the book is really concise with full analysis and evidence.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work