• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Evaluate the successes and failures of one ruler of a single-party state

Extracts from this document...


Evaluate the successes and failures of one ruler of a single-party state A single-party state is a form of government whereby there is only one political party that is in charge of the government, as well as the absence of other opposition parties. It is largely similar to a dictatorship, which often sees the banning of opposition parties, like in the case of Nazi Germany, or the forced removal of perceived sources of opposition or threats, like in the case of Stalinist USSR. This essay will thus be looking at Stalin as the ruler of the single-party state that was the USSR, and attempt to evaluate his successes and failures. Stalin's term as General Secretary of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union was one that spanned 31 years, commencing in 1922, till his death in 1953. However, it could be said that he only gained true control of the party in 1924, after Lenin's death, though some argue that his consolidation of power occurred later still, in 1928, after the expulsion of all perceived threats to his position from the Politburo, including Leon Trotsky, Grigory Zinoviev, Lev Kamenev and Nikolai Bukharin. During the course of his rule, Stalin implemented a vast number of policies, including collectivization, five-year plans (rapid industrialization) and socialism in one country, as well as carrying out what became known to be the purges/the terror and the signing of the Nazi Soviet non aggression pact. This essay will hence look at the various actions carried out under Stalin's rule, evaluating their successes and failures, before concluding with a assessment of Stalin's rule as a whole. ...read more.


We must make good this lag in ten years. Either we do it, or they crush us!2". It shows Stalin's desire to catch up with the industrialized West, as well as his fear of being attacked by the West. The Western powers had shown to oppose communism, from their supporting the Whites in the Russian Civil War, to their appeasement of Hitler, which Stalin had perceived as an attempt to gang-up on Russia, and thus depict the premise of which the five-year plans were based on. In the course of the first five-year plan, oil production nearly doubled, from 11.7 million tons to 21.4 million tons, even surpassing the target of 19 million tons! While other industries had failed to meet their targets, they also made tremendously leaps in production, nearly all of the doubling production in a short span of five-years. By 1932, the USSR had surpassed the world manufacturing output share of both Germany and the UK, second only to the US. This was achieved through harsh policies aimed at keeping discipline and very regimented lifestyles, so while there was virtually no unemployment, the quality of life was dismal. Workers also died in the midst of major projects stemming from appalling conditions and safety accidents. The five-year plans and the seemingly miraculous achievements they had made were hence shown to have mastodonic human cost behind them, though all that being said, the modernization that had been brought about by Stalin had saved it from defeat at the hands of Hitler when Hitler invaded in 1941 during the 1941. ...read more.


This weakness when compared to the German therefore precipitated in the huge losses suffered by the Soviets at the start of Operation Barbarossa. Also, within 3 months, the Germans had been able to push to within 90 miles of Moscow, due to the inefficacy of the Russian army despite their superior technological numbers. The German army was eventually slowed greatly by the onset of Russian winter, which gave Russia a chance to consolidate it's forces and launch a counter-offensive. Thus Stalin's purges had greatly reduced the Red Army's ability to repel the German offensive, which could hence be taken as a failure. In conclusion, one can see how through the carrying out and implementation of various policies and actions undertaken, Stalin had his share of hits and misses, with some succeeding and others failing. Successes include his five-year plans, usage of propaganda and socialism in one country, while failures include collectivization and the purges. Though Stalin brought about large social and human costs, he had also aided the developments and betterment of Russia, elevating it to the status of a world superpower, leading me to say that Stalin, as a ruler, had more successes than failures. 1Lenin,V.I, The Immediate Tasks of the Soviet Government by V.I. Lenin, 1918, Lenin' Collected Works 4th English Edition, Progress Publishers, Moscow, 1972 Volume 27, pages 235-77 2 http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/Embassy/7557/bio.html 3 Fainsod, Merle, How Russia is Ruled, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1965, p. 541 4 Rappaport, Helen, Joseph Stalin: A Biographical Companion, ABC-CLIO, 1999,p. 53 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. How did collective security develop, in particular between WWI and WWII?

    whether to support the League, since they didn't have the US to back them up. This made the British more cautious and less willingly to enforce the League's policies. There was a major difference in attitude towards the League, the French saw the League as an enforcer to enforce the

  2. Analyse the factors that led to the rise of the Communist party in China.

    Communist policies enabled him to do so. He would probably have succeeded in establishing communism anyway. The KMT also defeated the warlords, but the communists had a lot of supporters, and could have had more without the KMT around, and probably would have managed. They could have even combated the Japanese, as they would not have been attacked.

  1. Analyze the methods used and the conditions which helped in the rise to power ...

    Such change made Hitler's name even more popular among Germans which saw his posters displaying his picture and the eye catching symbol of the swastika. After the failure of the Munich Putsch in 1923, Hitler gets sentenced to spend 5 years in prison.

  2. Stalins Purges

    The disruption of the First World War and the civil war had damaged Russia's industrial infrastructure, and essential services such as distribution remained haphazard. Soviet production figures were still far below the modern industrial economies of Western Europe. State control under the Five Year Plan would enable the government to

  1. Rise of Castro and Stalin

    of the Democratic government and thus prevent the Democratic government from fulfilling the aims of the revolution. Castro then denied all accusations of having any power. Thus both men used their pre-power positions to weaken the government and increase their support.

  2. Causes of WWII

    The west saw Hitler as a buffer between them and the USSR and the lesser of two evils. Review of Causes Britain * Signed the Anglo-German naval agreement underminded the Stresa Front. * Did not attempt to use the League of Nations in response to the series of crises in the 1930's.

  1. IB History HL, Extended Notes: Russia, the Tsars, the Provisional Govenment and the Revolution.

    Censorship 1. Attempts to limit the circulation of ?harmful ideas.? Education came under further government control to limit opposition and spreading of revolutionary ideas. Universities lost independence they had received under Alexander II and school fees were raised to deliberately keep poor children out of primary and secondary education.

  2. What were the Aims and Achievements of Stalins Foreign Policy between 1928 and 1941?

    However, the 1939 Nazi-Soviet Non-Aggression Pact was a very different settlement to previous Russo-German agreements. According to Service, ?if there was ever proof that Stalin was willing to take risks, the Nazi-Soviet Pact provided it?; however, it was more the fact that Stalin had no other alliance to pursue after

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work