• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Examine the impact of foreign intervention on the Spanish Civil War

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐Examine the impact of foreign intervention on the Spanish Civil War Foreign intervention played a significant role in influencing the ultimate outcome of the Spanish Civil War. One of the main reasons why the Republicans were defeated was due to the extent that foreign powers provided the Nationalists with weapons, soldiers, military advisers and economic support. On another note, the establishment of the Non-Intervention Committee, which was signed by Britain, France and the United States, banned international support, apart from the International Brigades and the USSR, reaching the Republicans, thus, the unbalanced situation between the two fronts amplified the support the Nationalists were achieving from Germany and Italy. In the following, I shall analyse the significance of foreign intervention on the Spanish Civil War and to what extend did it affect the ultimate outcome of the war. Both the Republicans and the Nationalists were being supported by foreign powers during the period 1936 to 1939 in the Spanish Civil War. As aforementioned, although foreign support was received on both fronts, there was an unbalance of foreign support. ...read more.


The unbalance of foreign intervention was caused by the fact that both Germany and Italy provided great amount of support: men, tanks and aircrafts. The involvement of the most modern aircraft and the Condor Legion services, which was Hitler?s best fighting force, further catalyzed the ultimate defeat of the Republicans. Hence, several historians have noted the supply of the German Condor Legion, most notably the bombing of Geurnica as the most efficient and influential assistance in the Spanish Civil War. In addition, although France was determined to participate in the civil war as well, Britain urged her ally that the establishment of the Non-Intervention Committee in the key to prevent an outspread European War. Hence, the formation of the Non-Intervention Committee, which was signed by Britain, France and the United States, prevented resources from reaching the Republicans, hence, in an indirect manner, the weakening of the Republicans led to the Nationalists being strengthened. Furthermore, although Germany and Italy had also signed the agreement, supplies were still sent to the Nationalists, which increased the power of the Nationalists as it provided them with an unlimited amount of resources and support for the Nationalists. ...read more.


support from foreign powers for the Republicans led to a weak front, leading to its ultimate defeat at the end of the civil war. To conclude, the role of foreign intervention led to an unbalanced of power between the two fronts, which played a critical part in the ultimate defeat of the Republicans. It should also be noted that, obviously, powers such as Germany, Italy and the USSR provided its support by being involved in the fighting and battles of the civil war, yet, the endeavours of Britain and the United States also played a vital role in the war as well, as it indirectly strengthened the Nationalists and weakened the Republicans. The unbalance of forces stems from the formation of the Non-Intervention Committee, it prohibited international support from reaching the Republicans, apart from the USSR and the International Brigades. Furthermore, the Nationalists were supported by various international powers, namely, Germany, Italy and the United States. The unlimited supply of soldiers, armaments and oil for the aircrafts and tanks provided by its foreign powers allowed the Nationalists to fight more effectively, and ultimately capture Madrid on March 1939, the defeat of the Republicans. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. George Orwell in the Spanish Revolution

    were even nationalized), abolishing revolutionary local committees, abolishing worker's patrols in favour of the pre-was and pro-capitalist police forces. Most importantly, they disbanded the militias such as the POUM in favour of a new Popular Army. And so, trade unions lost more and more power and people to the government.

  2. Industry vs Agriculture: The Economics Leading to the Civil War

    Divided on the views of slavery, tariffs, and industry, which were defined by the very economies of Northern and Southern states. As Abe Lincoln said, "I believe this government cannot endure permanently half slave and half free. I do not expect the Union to be dissolved; I do not expect

  1. the causes and consequences of the spanish civil war

    These conditions bred support for Anarchism, the creation of a world where those who worked the land owned it. General Miguel Primo de Rivera caused a lot of problems in Spain and contributed to increased political tension. He was given vast powers by King Alfonso to restore order after the Moroccan fiasco.

  2. What were the intentions of President Harry S. Truman and General Douglas MacArthur regarding ...

    by Ridgway 23) and on June 30, he gave Douglas MacArthur "full authority to use the ground forces under his command" (23) with 2,000 American soldiers. As the CIA report of June 28 states, the United States believed that "the invasion of the Republic of Korea by the North Korean Army was undoubtedly undertaken at Soviet direction" (Hastings 58)

  1. To what extent was the Spanish Civil war caused by the actions of Mola ...

    This resulted in inflation that struck the poor whilst the rich were able to cope with it. However the rich did not like the idea of high taxes and the army did not have the money to stay on his side, Primo de Rivera therefore lost all support and was forced to resign.

  2. Evaluate the impact on Italy of Mussolini's domestic and foreign policies between 1922 and ...

    Mussolini had almost no social guarantees - there were almost no signs of the health insurance not even talking about unemployment and other social guarantees. Also there was a huge corruption in the government instances so very often the money for good intentions just went into the pockets of many corrupted officials.

  1. Analyse the causes of the Spanish Civil War

    these were divided because they argued over what reforms should take place. The other major political groups in Spain were the anarchists; they were the ones who demanded the redistribution of the land, which was popular within the peasants. Their trade union was the CNT and organized strikes and protests.

  2. Causes of the Spanish Civil War

    Spain, as a largely agrarian economy was rife with endemic poverty hindering growth and industrialization. The socio-economic divide between the rich and the poor continued to expand and the poor?s hunger for land continued. Abysmal working conditions, led to the increase of trade unionism as a means to bring about change.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work