• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Congress System was a genuine attempt by the Great Powers(TM) to provide a unified policy but their interests were too diverse for it to succeed. To what extent do you agree with this judgment?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"The Congress System was a genuine attempt by the 'Great Powers' to provide a unified policy but their interests were too diverse for it to succeed." To what extent do you agree with this judgment? The Congress System did represent a genuine attempt by the Great Powers to provide unified policy. However, weather or not the System failed or not, and if those failures were the fault of differences between interested parties is debatable. The major powers of Britain, Austria, Prussia and Russia (and later France) managed to work together to form many policies, and indeed, their impact is still felt today. The Great Powers had many common aims during the conferences. Some of the overarching aims included containing France after the Napoleonic wars, achieve and maintain a power balance between the Great Powers and prevent the rise of a dictatorial figure who could cause another Europe wide war. In these aims, the Congress System was a large success. France continued to be a world power without threatening European security, a highly desirable aim for all involved, due to the economic benefits involved. ...read more.

Middle

Other suggestions such as an international army to enforce borders, and a union of states opposed to revolution were also rejected. These examples show that without a common goal/aim (the defeat/containment of Napoleon, who was interred on St. Helena), the Quadruple Alliance lacked direction and cohesion. Other disputes/differences in objective included Britain and France not sending delegations to the Congress of Troppau, and Austria crushing revolutions in Italy although Britain disagreed with Austria's right to do so. Austria had Russian and Prussian support for these actions. These examples help to show how two separate power blocks were forming within the Congress System, which undermined the Great Powers' ability to function as a cohesive whole to determine and enforce European policy. This helps to show how a difference of interests between the Great Powers led to a weakening of the Congress System, which ultimately led to the demise and collapse of the System. In this sense the quote is proven to apply to the collapse of the Congress System, in that diverse interests did in fact stop the System from achieving its full potential. ...read more.

Conclusion

In this way, the quote doesn't apply to a large extent, as the difference in documents led to the collapse, rather than the diverse interests. However, as the diverse interests were highlighted by the different documents, the quote can be said to apply to a small extent. These arguments all lead to the conclusion that the quote can only apply to the Congress System to a medium extent. Weather or not the Congress System was or wasn't a failure in the first place is highly contentious. This immediately undermines the degree to which the quote can apply. While the diverse interests of the parties involved did definitely play a part in the dissolution of the Congress System, the confusion over which document was the correct "controlling" document would also have played a part. Therefore the 'diverse aspects' part of the quote can only apply to a medium extent. This, combined with the medium extend of the quote to weather the System was a failure or not, results in the quote only being able to be said to apply to a medium extent. ?? ?? ?? ?? Andrew Hutchesson - History The Congress System - 1 - 4/8/2009 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. French Revolution and the rise of Napoleon - revision notes

    It gained dictatorial control over the France. Firstly, the Committee of Public safety consisted of 90 members, then their number decreased into 20. They were elected by the National Convention for one month and obliged to reelection. Leading figure in the Committee (from April to July) was Georges Danton. Georges Danton-> headed the Cordelieres during the Revolution.

  2. Why was Germany unified by Prussia and not by Austria?

    Napoleon III was looking to expand territories and those German states were in a particular weak position. However due to Prussia's military efforts, these states were able to avoid French control and Prussia was able to extend its influence. The Austrian army though, was weak and unorganized.

  1. "To what extent can it be said that the First World War was caused ...

    This motivated the British to launch the Dreadnought, invented by Admiral Sir John Fisher, in 1906. The Russo-Japanese War of 1904-1905 had demonstrated how effective these battleships were. As Britain increased their output of battleships, Germany correspondingly stepped up their naval production, including the Dreadnought.

  2. To what extent can Mussolini(TM)s foreign policy be described as a failure?

    This can be considered a failure simply because Italy was in no way ready for a war anytime soon during this period. In fact, Mussolini even sent a message to Italy saying that although they were willing to fulfil the pact, any war should be postponed for at least three

  1. To what extent did the Prague spring weaken Moscow(TM)s hold over Czechoslovakia, and Eastern ...

    People had the right to form groups and discuss issues, read foreign literature and even leave the country. Dubcek was even set on making reforms within the government. He wanted a more democratic society. He considered Monstesqieu's separation of government (division of government into three sectors legislative, executive, and judicial).

  2. IB History HL, Extended Notes: Russia, the Tsars, the Provisional Govenment and the Revolution.

    Had the support of Milyukov, Guchkov, Rodzianko, and some industrialists and officers from the army and navy, as well as the Allies (finance and transport secretly from Britain). 5. Petrograd Soviet against Kornilov?s appointment which could undermine their authority under Order Number One.

  1. Explain the USAs policy of containment. How successful was this in Korea, Vietnam and ...

    In 1975 communist troop over-ran much of South Vietnam and the capital Saigon fell in April. Neighboring countries Laos and Cambodia were also captured. In 1976, North and South Vietnam were united in a single communist state country run by Ho chi Minh.

  2. To what extent did the reforms of Alexander II achieve his aims

    The government liberal policies transformed universities into centers of students radicalism. As David Saunders, historian specializing on history of Russian Empire, explains: ?The teaching leactures appeared to be serving not only academic and economic purposes but also the promotion of political instability.? This was a potential danger for the autocratic government.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work