• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

In order to achieve and retain power a leader of a single-party state needed to be ruthless, blind to human suffering and yet charismatic. To what extent do you agree with this assertion?

Extracts from this document...


Question #8: "In order to achieve and retain power a leader of a single-party state needed to be ruthless, blind to human suffering and yet charismatic." To what extent do you agree with this assertion? Thesis: The above statement is to an extent correct, because in order for both Lenin and Stalin to achieve and retain power they used ruthless methods of suppressing the opposition and both were blind to human suffering as their enforced economic policies led to severe famine and the death of millions. However, while Lenin can be considered charismatic, Stalin depended much more on the use of force and greatly relied on Lenin's charismatic image to boost his own. Analysis/Argument: POV#1 - The use of brutality when suppressing the opposition can be seen in both Lenin and Stalin's Soviet Russia as they both used the Cheka or the NKVD to eliminate those who were against their economic, political and social policies. * Lenin used ruthless methods of suppression to deal with the opposition. * October Revolution, Lenin and the army he had organized tool control of public services and buildings. o For example they took control of the distribution of water. * Lenin with the help of Trotsky built the Red Army to fight against the counter-Revolutionaries or the Whites o Using the Cheka and the Red army, Lenin ruthlessly used terror in order to suppress any opposition. * Despite Lenin's defeat during the elections, he ignored the election and seized power anyways. ...read more.


New York: Longman, 1996. * Collectivization was strongly supported by Stalin and does who did not agree with the system of Collective farms was killed or their farms were destroyed. * "Peasant opposition was dealt with brutally, by using military force, deportation or expulsion." * The Great Purge or Great Terror which took place under the rule of Stalin was the prosecution of people who Stalin considered to be anti-revolutionaries. o In reality Stalin used the purge as a mechanism of eliminating certain dissident figures from the Bolshevik party and in doing so strengthen his authority. POV#2 - After the Russian Civil War, Lenin realised that he needed to improve the conditions of the people by replacing War Communism with the NEP; however, Stalin decided to keep a blind eye to the famine that was a result of his economic policies and instead accused the Kulaks of hoarding grain and executed many. However, neither leader took any considerable actions to prevent human sufferings. Wood, Anthony. The Russian Revolution. New York: Longman, 1986. * By 1920, when the armistice was signed with the Poles, the Reds had survived all attacks by the whites but it was clear that Russia was in a state of ruin. There were minimal industrial output; the economy was mainly being run by a system of barter while the railway rolling stock was rundown. * "To avoid requisitioning, the peasantry were sowing secretly in distant scattered strop - as much as 50 million hectares, it was reckoned by 1920 - and the failure of any satisfactory system of distribution was soon to lead to an appalling famine in the south." ...read more.


* For example, children were taught by their mothers that Stalin was "the wisest man of the age". * Other examples included the revision of photographs and history books, so that Stalin was displayed as the hero of the Russian Revolution. * This included the obliteration of names such as Trotsky, purged people. * Stalin censored things such as poems, statues, radio, texts, newspapers, and paintings to brainwash the people of Russia. o He even replaced religious statues with statues of himself and Lenin to win support for communism. * Stalin even altered his statues so that he appeared to be taller and good looking. * He also controlled what was written about his roles in the Bolshevik Revolution and made sure that they were exaggerated. * He named events, towns and many other things after himself and Lenin * However, it is important to note that an appealing personality or charisma did not aid Stalin or Lenin in retain power, because the Bolshevik party was not favoured among the majority of the population. It was because of Stalin's and Lenin's ruthless methods of suppressing that they were able to retain power. o Lenin's charismatic personality was not sufficient enough to unite the Bolshevik Party but terror. Conclusion: In order to achieve and retain power both Lenin and Stalin used the Cheka and the NKVD to ruthlessly suppress the opposition and throughout the suffering of their people both took very little or no action. Considering all these, Lenin was still charismatic, while Stalin lack any sort of charisma and mainly depended on the use of force and always associated himself with Lenin to boost his image. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. Analyze the methods used and the conditions which helped in the rise to power ...

    The Fuhrer's ability to never give up shows another quality which allowed him to finally reach his goal. Most people would have given up after the Putsch's failure, or the first election, but Hitler's conviction of having been chosen by God to save Germany drove him to be determined until the end.

  2. Analyse the methods used and the conditions which helped in the rise of a ...

    Basically every decision passed through his hands. In 1922, Stalin was appointed for this job, between other important and clue jobs, which enabled him in the future to defeat his opposition, and influence on the party organisation. It was certainly a lot of power for Stalin, but the only one

  1. To what extent was the Soviet Union under Stalin a totalitarian state?

    The citizens were forced to think the same way Stalin did so they were only limited to focus on communism. Therefore, Stalin had total control over the cultural and artistic life as he was able to have all citizens have the same mindset.

  2. Italian Unification Revision Notes. Italian Politics in 1815

    Issued an ultimatum, which was rejected. � On 29 April Austria declared war on Piedmont. Few Italians outside Piedmont rallied to the cause and Piedmont could raise only 60,000 men. However, Napoleon III kept his word and declared war on Austria. Over 100,000 French troops, ineptly led by Napoleon III, crossed the Alps.

  1. Compare and contrast the contributions of Lenin and Trotsky to the establishment and consolidation ...

    to maintain food supply to the cities and the army in the conditions of economic collapse. That involved Red Guard units (which were directed by Trotsky) to forcibly take supplies from the peasantry for little or nothing in exchange. This caused outrage amongst the peasant cause a series of unfortunate

  2. Stalin's rise to power, his policies and how he consolidated his grip on power.

    * There was also criticism of the regime among the city-dwellers and so Stalin resorted to terror of the purges in order to control people, with these purges providing gulags with slave labour which helped to provide money for foreign exports to buy Western technology.

  1. Stalin was a necessary evil for the Soviet Union With regard to this statement ...

    A comparison can be made between Hitler's scheme in 1933 when he became chancellor, he introduced autarky in an attempt to improve Germany's economy (especially in the weapons field) to prepare Hitler's idea of Nazi dominance over Europe. This coincides with Stalin's plans of autarky in the field of collectivisation to improve Russia's economy.

  2. IB History HL, Extended Notes: Russia, the Tsars, the Provisional Govenment and the Revolution.

    Rights declined. 5. Especially in the Black soil and middle Volga provinces with high pressure for land. Serfs worse off after emancipation here. 6. Communal fields went to the Mir which continued to distribute allotments, regulate dues, and accept tax responsibility. Tied to Mir.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work