• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month


Extracts from this document...


To what extent was the fall of tsar influenced by Russia's joining of WWI? Russia has maintained its tsarist regime for hundreds of years, and at one point, had been the largest empire in the world. Therefore, it is to no surprise that the fall of the tsarist regime be indicated as one of the most significant events of the twentieth century. There have been many speculations about the chief causes of the tsar's downfall. However, among all reasons, Russia's joining of WWI seems to have revealed to the public many of the tsar's irresponsibility and imprudence, which consequently led to his abdication. Russia's entering of WWI, although treated with great enthusiasm at first, eventually revealed the tsar's imprudence as a leader, for it brought the nation tremendous economic hardships. To begin with, less than two years after Russia joined the Great War, the Russian Railway system virtually collapsed. This was a very important event, since transport systems were crucial in transporting supplies across the nation -especially in large grounds such as Russia. ...read more.


In fact, Russia had the largest and one of the most competent soldiers at the time. However, despite the government controlling the transport system, with poor planning, the military was as much a victim of lacking supplies as the civilian population. By 1916, evident shortages began to occur. In such cases, over two million of the six million men were disarmed in battles. Furthermore, not only were soldiers lacking artilleries, but they were also lacking basic food supplies. This evidently was a result of the tsar's poor planning in entering the war in the first place. In fact, the representative of the State Duma, Rodzyanko, indicated that the strong central leadership which the war effort desperately needed was not being provided. This view became increasingly widespread in Russia, especially with the continuation of discouraging news from the war front that provoked much resentment. Consequently, the revelation of the tsar's incompetence as a leader became evident as Russia's entering of WWI brought continuous news of defeat from the war front --what started out with enthusiasm, ultimately ended up with pessimism and defeatism. ...read more.


And, after being pressured by an unofficial group of politicians from the Duma, Tsar Nicholas finally abdicated on March of 1917 and brought an end to the tsarist regime. The main reason for the tsar's downfall laid in his failure to realize that his people could only take so much. Russia's joining of WWI brought-about many hardships for the country, which constantly fed discontent to its people. The lacking supply of food, the absence of a stable government in its most-needed times, let alone the continuous news of lost lives from the war front all aggravated its people. The tsar's indifference and refusal to cooperate with his own supporters gave them little reason to support his regime as well, for they no longer had faith as an effective system for ruling the country. Therefore, it is reasonable to suggest that the main cause of the tsar's downfall was Russia's joining of WWI, which aroused much social unrest, and proved the failure of the competence of a tsarist government. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. Britain in WWI

    Neutrality of 1839 and thus could not be trusted in any other treaties, alliances and promises. The public of course was much more motivated by this statement than the otherwise possible "Germany is building ship docks closer to us" statement or "we need to prove ourselves stronger and eliminate them".

  2. Italy before WWI - poverty and migration.

    The left winged stood highly towards democracy, but when they finally got into power, they immediately changed their views to monarchical. The left winged ministry removed obligatory study of religion in schools and also removed all church land for which they received about 500 million lyres.

  1. Was the Tsar to blame for his own downfall?

    Although some parties were more radical than others and wanted to see the complete disappearance of the Tsarist system, in general they all wanted reforms. Additionally, the "great spurt" also encouraged economic growth with the building of railways so that by 1881 21228 kilometres of railway had been built.

  2. History Before WWI

    divine right of the tsar to rule and exhorted believers to obey the tsar as the agent of God - Conservative Opposition to the tsars - Opposition included revolutionary populist movements like People's Will (planned to bring down the gov't through terrorist acts)

  1. The loss of lives was the most significant result of WWI, discuss.

    This means that civilian casualties (subtracting the earlier number of 8 million soldiers) made up more than a quarter of all deaths in WWI! The devastation and destruction of various property and facilities can also have been said to have indirectly compounded the effect of the Spanish Flu pandemic, which

  2. Technoligical advancements during WWI

    Early tanks made by the British were based on the catapillar track which could cross an 8 foot wide trenchand an internal combustion engine. In addition, these tanks were fitted with Lewis guns3 and armour plating. Their use since 1917 provided more opportunities to break the stalemate and inspired the generals to develop new tactics suitable for the tans.

  1. Waimar Rebublic - The fall

    Maybe as a result, the Nazi support increased: The German population need new hope in the form of new ruling, and that was exactly what Hitler promised. On table 7.2, page 128, it can be seen how the SPD support felt, while the NSDAP support increased from only 2.6 percent to 18.3 ercent.

  2. IB History HL, Extended Notes: Russia, the Tsars, the Provisional Govenment and the Revolution.

    Worked to organize the war effort under the Tsar and supported the idea of a decentralized system of government. 2. Milyukov (Minister of Foreign Affairs)- real force in government, originally wanted British-style constitutional monarchy but was forced out of government over disagreement over WWI and then supported a military government so save Russia from the Soviet system.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work