Has Canada always been fair when it comes to immigration?

Authors Avatar by megafan101 (student)

History Culminating Essay : Immigration Policies in Canada

Has Canada always been fair when it comes to immigration? Immigration is a term used to describe the migration of people to a new country in search for a better lifestyle (dictionary.com) and is a worldwide occurrence that allows countries to grow both socially and economically. More job opportunities, better education, healthcare and freedom are various pull factors that attract people into Canada whilst poverty, political or religious persecution, disease and discrimination are push factors that shove citizens out of their mother country.  Many well-known Canadians were once immigrants. In fact, Canada’s first Prime Minister John A. Macdonald immigrated to Canada from Scotland many years ago (Nick – 4). Although immigration to Canada has many benefits, Canadian immigration policies in the past have often been prejudicial as well as discriminating. The Canadian government developed useless policies that made it almost impossible for a certain race to immigrate; these policies produced many challenges, obstacles and hardships for many races and ethnicities. Essentially, immigration to Canada in the early 20th century was not always fair because of many discriminating policies including the war measures act of 1914, the continuous journey regulation and the Chinese immigration act.

Many innocent immigrants faced humiliation and difficulties when the War Measures Act was passed. The war measures act was first introduced in 1914 during which Prime Minister Sir Robert Borden and his conservative government held office (Mapleleaf Web). Essentially, the policy expanded the federal government’s power in times of war allowing them to deport, detain and/or arrest “enemy aliens” as well as seize, control or take away their property (Hodge – 23).  An enemy alien was a term used to describe an immigrant living in Canada, originally from a country that was at war (dictionary.com).  So, when WW1 erupted after the shooting of Franz Ferdinand (Bolotta- 37), German, Italian and Austria- Hungarian immigrants in Canada faced discrimination.  This act was extremely unfair, as the government had no right to accuse immigrants because their country of birth was associated with war.  Furthermore, no proof was evident. Canada abolished the immigrant’s freedom, which before acted as a pull factor encouraging people to immigrate to Canada. “Enemy aliens” were forbidden to work, pursue their culture or simply speak in their native language (Mapleleaf Web). Many “enemy aliens” were deported back to their mother country, for they simply looked guilty. In today’s modern society, the term looked guilty is irrelevant; no one may be sentenced guilty without pure evidence, however in the early 20th century it was imprisonment without trial.  If not imprisonment, many immigrants were sent to internment camps where they were watched 24/7 and were forced to follow strict orders (Mapleleaf Web), and immigrants who failed to do so were deported back to their homeland.  Not only did the War measures act effect the immigrants in Canada but it also affected the citizens trying to immigrate.  No “enemy alien” was allowed entry after the act was passed. Many “enemy aliens” tried to immigrate to Canada in search for safety as their country was home to war but, nonetheless, Canada still denied them.  It was said that the war measures act kept Canada safe, but one could argue that it changed the way people looked at Canada as a whole. Other safety measures could have been established to keep Canada safe, as it was not unnecessary to create this discriminating policy. Overall, Canada went against its moral values and this act made people question whether or not Canada truly was a free and democratic country.  

Join now!

Imagine being denied entry into where one was going because of how they got there. Although it seems unfair this was the case for several South Asians. Known to very few today, the continuous Journey Regulation had a major negative aspect on Canadian immigration.  The needless policy, developed in 1907, was used in order to keep South Asian immigrants out of Canada, as the Canadian government felt that the Indians were taking over their economy (Fine- Meyer- 11). However, this statement had no element of truth. In 1900 only 2000 Indians resided in Canada, which was low compared to the ...

This is a preview of the whole essay