• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

He brought his country and his people nothing but harm. To what extent do you agree with this assessment of Stalins domestic policies in the USSR between 1929 and 1953?

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐Lereculey Peran Enora History 19.04.2012 ?He brought his country and his people nothing but harm.? To what extent do you agree with this assessment of Stalin?s domestic policies in the USSR between 1929 and 1953? Stalin?s domestic policies between 1929 and 1953 did bring the Russian population great harm; nevertheless, Stalin did bring economic achievements that allowed USSR to take a leading role in the world. Stalin gained power in the Soviet Union by 1929. He created the command economy that drove forward the programmes of industrialisation and collectivisation. After the war, he made the key choices internally and externally, which made the USSR a superpower. Kevin McDermott, in his biography of Stalin, puts it thus: ?Stalin stamped his ugly personality on Soviet state and society?. Even though great economic achievements were made during Stalin?s dictatorship, the social conditions in which they were done were terrible. Stalin?s industrialisation programme was one of his most successful domestic policies. Through rapid industrialisation, Stalin hoped to increase military strength as well as becoming self-sufficient by increasing grain supplies. He also hoped to improve standards of living. ...read more.


Agriculture did become more mechanised but not enough resources were devoted to this sector. Stalin was never very interested in the well-being of the peasants and made no real attempts to provide them with incentives. This was particularly evident after the war and resulted in disastrous levels of production, which worried other Soviet leaders. Stalin saddled the USSR with an inefficient agricultural system. Indeed, it could be argued that the failure of the collectivisation programme brought more harm than good to the Russian people. Against any of Stalin?s achievements has to be set the dark side of Stalin?s Russia. The terror that reigned over Russia during Stalin?s dictatorship brought an incredible level of harm to the Russian people. Josef Stalin probably wielded more power than any other tyrant in history. He ruled be means of terror and through a government apparatus that he dominated. He tolerated no threat to his power, real or imaginary, and his leadership was unquestioned. Lust for power, personality defects and paranoia are important in explaining Stalin?s brutal actions and personal politics but he was also motivated by ideas. ...read more.


Training courses meant they could improve their qualifications and position, pay and prospects. In conclusion, Stalin brought harm to his people but he also brought achievements. The extent to which the quote ?he brought his country and his people nothing but harm? seems quite extreme: Stalin?s achievements allowed Russia to take a leading role in world relations. It is true that the deaths of over 20 million Soviet citizens in the forced collectivisation programme of the 1930s (which created the famine in 1932) and the Great Terror of the late 1930s is the best example to show that he did bring much harm. However, the Great Terror was also the policy which brought all the domestic policies together and allowed Russia to modernise to become one of the leading countries. Furthermore, the main claim for Stalinist achievement is the transformation of the USSR into a modern state with industry capable of providing the armaments that enabled the USSR to defeat Germany in the Second World War. Nevertheless, barely 60 years after the dictator?s death, I think it is too early to make an objective assessment of his legacy to the Russian people. John Keep believes so as he wrote ?In the mid-1990s, the defects of the Stalinist regime looms larger than its successes. The perspective may change in decades to come.? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. To What Extent Was Stalin's Regime Based On Terror

    However, others dismiss this theory, such as Moshe Lewin who describes it as 'crap, rubbish'. Despite Stalin's use of terror in the agricultural domain, he also made use of propaganda and positive support. One of Stalin's most famous publications was his 'Dizzy With Success', which he slyly used to persuade

  2. Comparison between Trotsky's and Lenin's role in the establishment of the USSR

    It should then let them sell the rest of their produce at free market price. The idea was simple and it promised to end popular discontent and restore grain transport to the towns. This policy would mean ending War Communism and a partial return to capitalism, a fact that didn't suit many party members.

  1. History internal Assessment (The subsidiary role of women in Nazi society)

    Let me do the analysis of the other sources and points of view to proof the manipulation in the primary sources exists. Even Evans and Jenkins, rather mild in marking the family ideology describe in their book: This separate spheres' ideology was based on the theory that a woman's place

  2. Internal Assessment - How effective were the policies implemented by the U.S. during the ...

    * Food shortage in Japan made demobilization of the Japanese "war machine" difficult. (Hanneman) * MacArthur attempted to avoid officials with military affiliates from being in power. (Hanneman) * "Japan was isolated from normal contacts with the outside world for most of the period concerned."

  1. To what extent was the Soviet Union under Stalin a totalitarian state?

    Nevertheless, the Soviet Union was not entirely totalitarian as Stalin did have failures of controlling people who were committed to keeping traditional structures and values. When Stalin first introduced his idea of collectivization, many peasants had negative reactions to it and refused to give their land.

  2. A comparison about Mussolinis and Hitlers domestic policies.

    Fascist was the only party that was allowed in Italy and the Nazis was the only party that was allowed in Germany. An example of the consequences to break this rules is for example what happened to the socialists Giacomo Matteotti and Giovanni Amendola, whom were both beaten to death by fascist thugs.

  1. Stalin was a necessary evil for the Soviet Union With regard to this statement ...

    The evilness can be identified by the mass starvations, historian Geoffry Wheatcroft estimates that 4-5 million died from famine in one year as a result of farmers not achieving their quotas set from the government or those sent into labour camps from rebelling.

  2. History Internal Assessment - Stalin's propaganda during the war

    Another relevant factor to consider is religion; even though Stalin grew up in the Georgian Orthodox Faith, he was an atheist[3]. He followed Lenin?s idea that religion needed to be removed and substituted with the ideal communist society.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work