• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15
  16. 16
  17. 17
  18. 18

History Essay (Bismarck's Influence on the German Unification

Extracts from this document...


History SL History Essay History Essay Discuss the following statement: “Favorable external and internal circumstances, not Bismarck’s diplomatic genius, explain the unification of Germany” William Frisch Møller History SL (2uhiS1) Bent Egaa Kristensen (BK) October 9, 2012 ________________ Table of Contents ________________ Introduction Internal Circumstances The Zollverein The Growth of Nationalism The Decline of the Austrian Empire Sub-Conclusion External Circumstances The International Situation Sub-Conclusion Otto von Bismarck The Schleswig-Holstein War The Austro-Prussian War The Franco-Prussian War Sub-Conclusion Conclusion Bibliography Introduction This essay will focus upon how the Unification of Germany was established by 1871, more specifically, a discussion of the following statement: “Favorable external and internal circumstances, not Bismarck’s diplomatic genius, explain the unification of Germany” In order to tackle this statement, it will be necessary not only to look at the significance of internal circumstances, such as the decline of Austria’s power as well as the growth of nationalism, and the external circumstances being the international situation at the time, but also to interpret Bismarck’s influence and true role in bringing about the unification. In other words, the essay will start by discussing whether or not unification would have been possible before 1850 (i.e. before Bismarck’s political influence). The essay will then take analyze the importance of Otto von Bismarck’s diplomatic actions, and thus conclude upon the above statement based on the presented arguments. Internal Circumstances This chapter will deal with various internal circumstances, which not only laid the foundations upon which the German Unification was based, but also present the possibility of unification before 1850, and hence the true influence of Otto von Bismarck. The circumstances presented in this chapter will be viewed upon as internal in terms of the German Confederation of 1815. The Zollverein One could argue, that the most significant internal circumstance in terms of creating a unified Germany was the creation of the Zollverein. Not only was the enlarged Prussian Customs Union an important factor in strengthening Prussia economically, but it also served as a foundation for the development of nationalism among other German States, and ultimately the Unification of Germany as a whole. ...read more.


Austria Throughout the 19th century, Austria adopted a wavering diplomatic policy. Sometimes Austria would side against Russia, such as in the Polish Revolt of 1863, and other times against Britain and France[8]. By 1856 Austria, due to her neutrality in the Crimean War, had lost her friendship with Russia without obtaining that of Britain and France. In other words, Austria had no allies at the time of the Austro-Prussian War, and helped Bismarck acquire an easy victory. France The neutrality of France during the Schleswig-Holstein and Austro-Prussian War, could be viewed upon as a diplomatic accomplishment of Otto von Bismarck, and will hence be discussed in the next chapter[9]. Sub-Conclusion Conclusively, the international situation at the time of Otto von Bismarck?s ascendancy can be viewed upon as important evidence in support of the initial statement. The passivity of the Great Powers, in terms of all three Wars of Unification, could point towards Bismarck being more of an opportunist rather than a diplomatic genius. Otto von Bismarck This chapter of the essay will tackle the evidence that contradicts the initial statement of how favorable internal and external circumstances were the primary cause of the German Unification. Or rather, analyze whether Bismarck?s political actions had an impact on the process of unification. The chapter will be divided chronologically into the Three Wars of Unification, as this will give a clearer indication of Bismarck?s political and diplomatic genius. It can be argued, that Bismarck was a crucial factor in bringing about the Unification of Germany, as he was, through diplomatic means, capable of isolating his enemy, which was a crucial factor in terms of winning the Three Wars of Unification. Otto von Bismarck became Minister-President of Prussia in 1862, as a result of the Constitutional Crisis. Due to the disastrous mobilization during the North Italian War in 1859[10], one of Frederik William?s main concerns was to strengthen the army. ...read more.


Sub-Conclusion The above chronology substantiates the true diplomatic genius in terms of isolating France and Austria, as well as his ability to manipulate and thereby outmaneuver various states, demonstrated in his engineering of the Ems telegram. However, this control over international affairs, as well as internal matters, was not alone due to Bismarck?s political and diplomatic ?supremacy?, but rather the favorable internal and external circumstances at the time. In other words, Bismarck was an opportunist who through hard determination created a unified Germany based upon the given circumstances. Conclusion Based on the chronology of events leading to the German Unification in 1871, one could conclude that Otto von Bismarck was indeed capable of diplomatically outmaneuvering Austria and France, and with astute political moves increased support for unification at home. However, on the contrary, the unification would not have been a possibility if not for the internal circumstances within the German Confederation, as well as external circumstances present in the rest of Europe. In other words, Bismarck was an opportunist rather than the master planner throughout the process of completing the unification of Germany. Bismarck achieved the goal by taking advantages in internal and external circumstances, such as the fortunate international situation, strength of Prussia (economically and militarily), increasing nationalism, and the decline of Austria, rather than creating his own: ?Bismarck's greatness lay not in mastering events, but in going with events so as to seem to master them. He had no rigidly defined programme when he became Prime Minister in 1862[19].? Hence, the statement by which this essay is structured upon, namely ?Favorable external and internal circumstances, not Bismarck?s diplomatic genius, explain the unification of Germany,? is only partially true. It may be accurate to state that German nationalism may have brought about the unification independent of Bismarck, but the fact is, that Bismarck through realpolitik as well as his ability to grasp favorable opportunities was capable of unifying the German states and can hence not be completely disregarded as an important contributory factor. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. The cold war - the conferences and the start of the cCold War

    In 1967, the Stalinist leader of Czechoslovakia resigned. Alexander Dubcek became the leader of the Czech Communist Party - Dubcek favored; a) Less censorship and more freedom of speech b) Less secret police activity c) To lessen the number of restrictions imposed by Communism - Dubcek seemed to have learnt the lessons of the Hungarian revolt.

  2. To what extent was Napoleon III responsible for the unification of Italy?

    failed to support its only ally, Russia, and had also failed to deliver appropriate military cooperation as promised to Britain and France. This gradual decline of Austrian power meant it would eventually no longer be able to restrain Italy from independence.

  1. The Unification of Germany

    These feelings and events had nothing to do with Bismarck. Moreover, there were the economical aspects that led to unification. The most important aspect was the Zollverein which was extremely significant at the time. It was a voluntary customs union that basically got rid of the barriers of trade that were present between the 39 German states.

  2. Articles of Confederation Essay

    The colonists pioneered to establish a state government with democratic tendencies. Taken from the Articles of Confederation, they adamantly insisted on electing, " ...members of the committee of the United States." to participate in Congress. Before 1774, the colonists were held under oppression by the British.

  1. Italian Unification: True Father of Italy

    For this reason, he found parliamentary debate sterile, and preferred more direct contact with the masses, amongst whom he was know as il padre dell' Italia (Lee 1992, 80). The origin of Piedmont-Sardinia's agenda of unifying Italy came from a romantic figure named Giuseppe Mazzini.

  2. Why had Prussia, rather than Austria, emerged as the dominant German power by 1871?

    Instead of scientist only coming from high classes, there could now also come scientists from lower class people. Not only were the schools made public, the way of teaching also changed. Although the main purpose still was to make people intellect, it was also to make children more obedient and less revolting.

  1. the importance of the role of Bismarck in the unification of Germany in 1871

    The Zollverein, however, did not only create a basis for a unified Germany, but also greatly increased Prussia's economic strength, which was to become the means by which Bismarck was able to finance the three wars that directly lead to the German Unification.

  2. To what extent did the Prague spring weaken Moscow(TM)s hold over Czechoslovakia, and Eastern ...

    As time went on Brezhnev grew more belligerent in his approach towards Dubcek and 'accused Dubcek of "outright deceit"'28 Moscow was initially unable to act because of opposition from a number of Politburos, but continued with the invasion.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work