• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Hitler and Mussolini

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

If power is defined as political or social authority or control, particularly that exercised by a government, then Hitler and Mussolini had similarities in their rise to power (Hitler in 1934 and Mussolini 1924) with the way in which they were both helped and could therefore exploit the circumstances of their socio-economic problems caused by the current governments equally well, as well as their methods of violence and intimidation to deter and obstruct political opposition (used to a larger extent by Mussolini), but however had differences with their approaches towards gaining support from the church (more important for Mussolini), as well as gaining support from industrialists and the petty bourgeoisie (more important for Hitler). The circumstances of the socio-economic problems caused by the governments of both Hitler and Mussolini made it very easy for them to rise to power, as they created widespread dissatisfaction with their current governments and provided a more attractive alternative to that government and thus, led the civilians to be more inclined to accept one party leadership. The dominant socio-economic problem caused by the Weimar republic was the Welfare state. As German economic historian 'Borchhardt' argues "The state was living beyond its means, with both subsidies and redistribution of wealth harmful to economic growth". This is because the regime suffered from exaggerated expectations. ...read more.

Middle

The Justice and Liberty leader was killed in 1973 on government instruction, and sometimes people would be assaulted by OVRA or militia simply to remind them that its best to conform. All these acts of violence and aggression made it nearly impossible for any form of opposition to get in his way of power as it intimidated a lot of opponents. In order to deter political opposition, Mussolini implemented many laws. After the Matteoti crisis, press censorship and meetings of political parties were banned in July 1924. In July 1925, the 'leggi fascistissime' was passed, banning opposition parties and Free trade Unions. All these laws ensured that opposition was prevented. The fascists also wanted to present themselves as defenders of law and order, thus gaining support from various social groups. In July 1922, he used violence to do this by limiting the strikes' effect. This impressed the conservative middle classes and convinced them that fascism could be trusted. Historian Mack Smith states "liberals allowed themselves to be convinced that only a Fascist presence in the government could crush the socialists". This is further reinforced by the time a social deputy was beaten up on the floor of the chamber. This use of violence was successful because the liberals did not take a stand against the fascists. ...read more.

Conclusion

However, they also had a 1929 leaflet directed to small producers, traders etc... promising to get rid of "the treacherous leaders of Marxism". Using contradictory messages in their propaganda helped the Nazis gain support of these two groups and more. However, historian Brustein argues that a lot of Germans voted Nazi for their rational economic reasons. Evidence of this is shown between 1930-33 when the Nazis put forward a series of economic policies, offering a third way between Marxism and Laissez-faire capitalism. They advocated public investment in industry to boost the economy, they employed financial controls to protect those in debt and they promised Economic Autarky to put the Germans interests above those of foreigners. This can be further substantiated by the fact that 65% of Nazi party members surveyed stated that their reason for joining the Nazi party was anti-Marxism. Therefore, these policies and promises helped gain the support of both industrialists and the petty bourgeoisie. In conclusion, Mussolini and Hitler had very similar ways of rising to power. The conditions that they exploited at their time of rising to power were similar as well as their methods of violence. However, the way in which they gained support from various power groups was slightly different. I also believe that their rise in power was more intentionalist than structuralist, as it depended greatly on their manipulation skills and methods. Words: 1738 Compare and Contrast the rise to power of Hitler and Mussolini 5/8/11 3:19 PM 5/8/11 3:19 PM 5/8/11 3:19 PM ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. China's socio-economic changes under Deng Xiaoping

    Soon after its introduction the responsibility system was adopted by numerous farm units in all sorts of areas. This system was successful enough to allow Deng in 1983 to lift limits on consumption of many agricultural goods that were instated during the Mao Era due to scarcity.

  2. Italian Unification Revision Notes. Italian Politics in 1815

    Nevertheless, Denis Mack Smith, in his biography (1994) has provided a convincing analysis of his ideas. � Mazzini insisted that he had 'one overriding aim' and that was 'the brotherhood of people'. He believed in the equality of human beings and of races. He had contempt for xenophobia and imperialism.

  1. Women and Communal Strikes in the Crisis of 1917 - 1922 & The ...

    With continuing defeats on the Eastern Front, many soldiers joined the ranks of the strikers. Eventually male revolutionaries managed to gain hold of the movement and politicized it into forcing the overthrow of the Tsar and its supporters. Similar strikes in regards of their goals occurred in Turin, Malaga, and Veracruz though the results differed.

  2. A look at the Differing Views of Jimmy Hoffa by the Government, the Public, ...

    a result of Hoffa and the Teamster?s tactics of intimidation, and opportunistic organizing. For example, in several cases Hoffa and the Teamsters would wait outside of warehouses with baseball bats, clubs, and other weapons to prevent trucks from leaving until the workers agreed to organize (Russell 32).

  1. Evaluate the factors that enabled Mussolini to rise to power.

    was not in the best interest of the Italian people but just in the interest of a selfish group of already privileged members that did a lot in order to stay in power. Mussolini was a contrasting figure. He was a sensational journalist which gathered a group of thugs with the mission to restore Italian glory of the Roman Empire.

  2. History Essay (Bismarck's Influence on the German Unification

    In other words he hoped to achieve conservative ends by liberal and nationalists means, which ultimately lead to the German Unification. The Schleswig-Holstein War The Schleswig-Holstein War presents us with evidence of Otto von Bismarck?s true political intellect, in his potential planning of a foundation to the war with Austria, as a result of defeating the Danish nation.

  1. Factors That Helped The Rise of the Nazis

    As unemployment increased from 1930 to 1932, many of the unemployed being students, Hitler?s support among youth groups rose (Johnson, 281). Kershaw, disagreeing with Shirer?s opinion that ?Hitler was an organizer as well as a spell-binder? (Shirer, 170), stated that ?without the Depression, the worsening crisis of the government and

  2. Notes on the History and Development of the Arab-Israeli Conflict

    - Palestinians in Jordan began to turn against King Abdullah (who was assassinated) and later King Hussein The development of Pan-Arab Nationalism: Nasser and his influence: - Arguably the most influential Arab leader of the century - Attended secondary school in Cairo and in 1938 graduated from the Royal Military

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work