• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far do you agree that, for the GDR, the results of the building of the Berlin Wall proved to be mainly negative?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How far do you agree that, for the GDR, the results of the building of the Berlin Wall proved to be mainly negative? Introduction Although the wall certainly brought some negative consequences for the GDR government, particularly in terms of the propaganda war with the West, these were far less significant than the positives in terms of increased social and economic stability. On the other hand, the effects for the East German people were mainly negative; they were separated from friends and family in the West and denied the chance to choose where they wanted to live and work. Negative effects of building the Wall There were certainly many negative effects for the GDR of building the Berlin Wall. 1. Propaganda value: o It was clearly built in order to prevent mass migration from East to West Germany, something that was crippling the GDR economy and was providing masses of propaganda for the West and its Allies. ...read more.

Middle

Human costs o Friends and families were divided by the wall overnight o It was difficult, if not impossible, for many people to get to see people on the other side of the wall for at least two years and even after that it remained hard for a long time o The building of the wall, therefore, did nothing for the popularity of the SED government within the GDR, even if the opportunities for open protest were minimal Positive effects for the GDR On the other hand, these negative effects were certainly a price worth paying for the GDR government and, in many respects, the people benefited too. 1. Benefits to the economy: o The wall immediately stopped the flow of emigration (over 3.5 million from 1949-61) of those people the GDR most needed to build its economy. ...read more.

Conclusion

o It allowed the SED to begin building an even more markedly socialist society (e.g. Honecker's demarcation policies in the 1970s) Conclusion On balance, the positives for the GDR government far outweighed the negatives. It allowed them security in terms of controlling the population, planning economic policy and building a more socialist society. For the ordinary people, however, the benefits were more mixed and the evidence is less clear because it is difficult to assess the extent of support for the government during the period. It certainly had some very painful effects in terms of separation from friends and families, but on the other hand it can be argued that they did gain from the increased stability. Overall, the migration before 1961 and the events from 1989 make it difficult to escape the conclusion, that for the East German people, they would prefer the wall had never been built. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. For what reasons, and with what results up to 1963, did the Unites States ...

    In retaliation Stalin severed all road, rail and canal lanes with West Berlin, in attempt to cripple them economically. The USA made a swift decision against the blockade by organizing airlifts of food and fuel supplies to Berlin. Although expensive and burdensome, through the airlifting process the USA managed to

  2. To what extent can Berlin or Vienna can be held accountable for the start ...

    Without the Turkish Empire ruling the Balkans, nationalism and a desire of self-determination grew among the minorities, especially for Serbia to annex Bosnia-Herzegovina (controlled by Austria-Hungary) An armed struggle seemed to be the only appropriate response against the panslavic ambitions of Serbia even before the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand.

  1. The Building of European Supremacy

    Social Distinctions within the Middle Cass i. The middle class grew in power over the aristocracy and some were even appointed as the House of Lords. ii. Only a few people got this aristocratic prestige but most of the middle class had improved lives like professional jobs, elegant homes and extravagant furniture.

  2. FDR and GDR

    Stalin's demands for a naval base in the Mediterranean. SALAMI TACTICS (2 things) 1945-48 'Slice-by-slice', Stalin ensured 7 Eastern European countries had Communist governments. Albania (1945) - the Communists took power after the war without opposition Bulgaria (1945) - the Communists executed the leaders of all the other parties.

  1. McCarthyism's Effect on the Counterculture. To what extent did McCarthyism affect the disillusionment ...

    as portrays them in a thought-out presentation for the reader to follow. The limitations of this book are that it only gives selective information about each movement. D. Analysis Joseph McCarthy's significance and effect on the counterculture of the 1960s and 1970s can definitely be seen.

  2. Which of indoctrination and repression proved most effective for consolidating Hitler's power (1933-1939)?

    Due to the fact that at this time the radio was the mostly used form of entertainment at home, the Nazi wanted to control it. Therefore the first act of Goebbels as ?Reich Minister of popular enlightenment and propaganda? was to set up the ?Reich Radio Company?, to centralize all

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work