• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far do you agree that, for the GDR, the results of the building of the Berlin Wall proved to be mainly negative?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How far do you agree that, for the GDR, the results of the building of the Berlin Wall proved to be mainly negative? Introduction Although the wall certainly brought some negative consequences for the GDR government, particularly in terms of the propaganda war with the West, these were far less significant than the positives in terms of increased social and economic stability. On the other hand, the effects for the East German people were mainly negative; they were separated from friends and family in the West and denied the chance to choose where they wanted to live and work. Negative effects of building the Wall There were certainly many negative effects for the GDR of building the Berlin Wall. 1. Propaganda value: o It was clearly built in order to prevent mass migration from East to West Germany, something that was crippling the GDR economy and was providing masses of propaganda for the West and its Allies. ...read more.

Middle

Human costs o Friends and families were divided by the wall overnight o It was difficult, if not impossible, for many people to get to see people on the other side of the wall for at least two years and even after that it remained hard for a long time o The building of the wall, therefore, did nothing for the popularity of the SED government within the GDR, even if the opportunities for open protest were minimal Positive effects for the GDR On the other hand, these negative effects were certainly a price worth paying for the GDR government and, in many respects, the people benefited too. 1. Benefits to the economy: o The wall immediately stopped the flow of emigration (over 3.5 million from 1949-61) of those people the GDR most needed to build its economy. ...read more.

Conclusion

o It allowed the SED to begin building an even more markedly socialist society (e.g. Honecker's demarcation policies in the 1970s) Conclusion On balance, the positives for the GDR government far outweighed the negatives. It allowed them security in terms of controlling the population, planning economic policy and building a more socialist society. For the ordinary people, however, the benefits were more mixed and the evidence is less clear because it is difficult to assess the extent of support for the government during the period. It certainly had some very painful effects in terms of separation from friends and families, but on the other hand it can be argued that they did gain from the increased stability. Overall, the migration before 1961 and the events from 1989 make it difficult to escape the conclusion, that for the East German people, they would prefer the wall had never been built. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. The European partition of Africa cannot be explained in economic terms alone. How far ...

    turn France's attention away from seeking revenge with Germany; in addition, he also used overseas expansion as a tool to seek political gain and popularity within the country, as he remarked: "all this colonial business is a sham but we need it for the elections."

  2. To what extent can Berlin or Vienna can be held accountable for the start ...

    would deter any possibility of 'serious European complications' (diplomatic euphemism for war). In consequence, Vienna first resolved for war, sought German assurances and then exploited them once received igniting a world war. Germany, on the other hand, was given the perfect opportunity "to secure and thereafter to enhance its borders of 1871"3 (primary aim of Weltpolitik)

  1. For what reasons, and with what results up to 1963, did the Unites States ...

    This was done by setting a condition that most of the money for the goods needed to rebuild Europe be spent on Amenrica itself. Thus the Marshall plan represented a huge government subsidy to American business, labour and agriculture and played a vital role in refueling the post-war bloom in the US.

  2. The Building of European Supremacy

    Soon, service jobs were created and the decreasing prices for food let them spend money on consumer goods and services. 3. The Middle Classes in Ascendancy i. Before the WWI, the middle class were able to make some changes.

  1. FDR and GDR

    Stalin's demands for a naval base in the Mediterranean. SALAMI TACTICS (2 things) 1945-48 'Slice-by-slice', Stalin ensured 7 Eastern European countries had Communist governments. Albania (1945) - the Communists took power after the war without opposition Bulgaria (1945) - the Communists executed the leaders of all the other parties.

  2. Notes on the History and Development of the Arab-Israeli Conflict

    It would not give up its control of the territories that Israel had captured after the 1967 war. - In July 1984, Israel indicated a loss of confidence in the Likud party in the election, and as a result Labour and Likud were forced to create a national unity government.

  1. McCarthyism's Effect on the Counterculture. To what extent did McCarthyism affect the disillusionment ...

    McCarthy's attack on liberal groups was severe; the communist party dwindled into insignificance and all the organizations associated with it disappeared. The destruction of the front groups and the left-led unions may well have had a more impact on American politics than the decline of the party itself.

  2. Which of indoctrination and repression proved most effective for consolidating Hitler's power (1933-1939)?

    the broadcasting in Germany; To accomplish this he fired roughly 13 per cent of the staff by using political or racial origin as a pretext and replaced them with those who were in accordance with the Nazis. Unfortunately it wasn?t every household that could afford radios; in fact it was about 25 percent of the German Households (4.5 million)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work