• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far was Stalin Responsible for Purges of 1930s

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How far was Stalin responsible for the purges of the 1930s? Stalin was responsible for the great purges of the 1930s to a certain extent. The great purges can be divided into three components: The purge of the party, the purge of the armed forces, and The purge of the people. Of these three segments of the purges, the purge of the party and the armed forces can be attributed to Stalin while the last one, the purge of the people, can instead be attributed to the head of the NKVD, Yezhov. Thus, we can say that Stalin was only partly responsible for the great purges. The great purges can be defined as a cleansing of perceived threats to Stalin's rule, executed on a large scale, through the use of terror. ...read more.

Middle

taking the stand. By the end of the show trials, Stalin had gotten rid of all the old Bolsheviks and had gotten rid of all potential threats within the party. Stalin's hand in the purging of the party can be seen in his signing of the "Decree against terrorist acts", which, under the guise of hunting down Kirov's murderer, he began a purge of the party and his old enemies. Even after that first round of purges, Stalin declared that the Soviet Union was still in "a state of siege". During this time, he also gave the NKVD nearly limitless power to persecute whoever they wanted. In doing so, he alone can be held responsible for the events that took place during the purging of the party. ...read more.

Conclusion

The Yezhovschina involved NKVD squads going into a selected region and dragging off inhabitants to be executed. Unlike the other two purges, Stalin had little involvement in the actual carrying out of the Yezhovschina; here, Yezhov was the overall the co-ordinator of this round of terror. In conclusion, we can see that Stalin was only partly responsible for the great purges. It is true that he started it because of his paranoia and his need to remove all his possible opponents but at the later stages, the purges gained a momentum of their own. The purges began to be used by those who wanted to settle old grudges and those who wished to gain favour with the NKVD; this willingness to denounce others thus increased the number of victims. As such, Stalin cannot be held completely accountable for the terror that was unleashed during that time. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. Stalins Purges

    Memories of the help given by Britain, France, the US and Japan to the Whites during the civil war of 1918-21 seemed to confirm suspicions that the West would wish to invade and destroy communism at some point in the future.

  2. Free essay

    Why did Japan adopt Fascism in 1930s?

    Within Japan, the people accepted Fascism as a better system as it supported anti-imperialism. (Shuter& Kelly, 2007) The Fascist believed that western values dominated the world and their ways were morally wrong. They saw the policy of keeping peace with the west as weak and did not want Japan to be dependent in the west for raw materials.

  1. The Causes and Effects of Chinese-Japanese conflicts in the 1930s

    1931 Manchurian Incident, the League was a centerpiece of Japan's policy to maintain accommodation with the Western powers. In fact, the change in both countries started as early as 1800s when Europe also was experiencing revolutions and changes. Chinese people have to admit that Japan before the war was much stronger than they can estimate.

  2. How far can Britain's colonial legacy be held responsible for Nigeria's problems since independence?

    What one must ask though is how far can Britain's colonial legacy be held accountable for Nigeria's problem since independence? Indeed there seems to be a pattern with former colonies, once they have been granted independence, the countries start to regress and often fall into a state of disrepair.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work