• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far was Stalin Responsible for Purges of 1930s

Extracts from this document...


How far was Stalin responsible for the purges of the 1930s? Stalin was responsible for the great purges of the 1930s to a certain extent. The great purges can be divided into three components: The purge of the party, the purge of the armed forces, and The purge of the people. Of these three segments of the purges, the purge of the party and the armed forces can be attributed to Stalin while the last one, the purge of the people, can instead be attributed to the head of the NKVD, Yezhov. Thus, we can say that Stalin was only partly responsible for the great purges. The great purges can be defined as a cleansing of perceived threats to Stalin's rule, executed on a large scale, through the use of terror. ...read more.


taking the stand. By the end of the show trials, Stalin had gotten rid of all the old Bolsheviks and had gotten rid of all potential threats within the party. Stalin's hand in the purging of the party can be seen in his signing of the "Decree against terrorist acts", which, under the guise of hunting down Kirov's murderer, he began a purge of the party and his old enemies. Even after that first round of purges, Stalin declared that the Soviet Union was still in "a state of siege". During this time, he also gave the NKVD nearly limitless power to persecute whoever they wanted. In doing so, he alone can be held responsible for the events that took place during the purging of the party. ...read more.


The Yezhovschina involved NKVD squads going into a selected region and dragging off inhabitants to be executed. Unlike the other two purges, Stalin had little involvement in the actual carrying out of the Yezhovschina; here, Yezhov was the overall the co-ordinator of this round of terror. In conclusion, we can see that Stalin was only partly responsible for the great purges. It is true that he started it because of his paranoia and his need to remove all his possible opponents but at the later stages, the purges gained a momentum of their own. The purges began to be used by those who wanted to settle old grudges and those who wished to gain favour with the NKVD; this willingness to denounce others thus increased the number of victims. As such, Stalin cannot be held completely accountable for the terror that was unleashed during that time. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. Free essay

    Why did Japan adopt Fascism in 1930s?

    (Tan, 2010)They felt that the government did not care about them and joined groups such as the militarist which gave them more attractive ideas which please them. From 1868, the Japan had been governed by an emperor and parliament but the government which very inefficient as it had limited power.

  2. Stalins Purges

    Memories of the help given by Britain, France, the US and Japan to the Whites during the civil war of 1918-21 seemed to confirm suspicions that the West would wish to invade and destroy communism at some point in the future.

  1. The Causes and Effects of Chinese-Japanese conflicts in the 1930s

    The imperialism produced an empire but also brainwashed their people which could be effective now a day. There was one emperor that made the main contribution to the found and prosperity of The Empire of Japan who was called Emperor Meiji.

  2. How far can Britain's colonial legacy be held responsible for Nigeria's problems since independence?

    However, for me to be able to justify this belief, I will carry out an investigation, looking at Britain's role in Nigerian affairs from colonisation to the years after granting the state independence. However, to form a balanced argument, I will also look at the roles of the Nigerian people

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work