• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How valid is the claim that in 1914 states went to war due to fear rather than motives of gain?

Extracts from this document...


How valid is the claim that in 1914 states went to war due to fear rather than motives of gain? In this essay, I will analyse the reasons why World War I broke out due to fear and motives of gain, and I will evaluate which reason was more of a cause for this global outbreak. Fear was a feeling experienced by all countries in both the Triple Alliance and the Triple Entente. Fear ultimately causes war between countries due to tension as each states question what will happen in the near future and try to avoid this outcome. On the other hand, motives of gain also create tension as one nations gain may conflict with another's gain. An example being Germany and France as both of these countries had an interest in Morocco. The reason of tension was that only one country could colonise Morocco and these two countries had a violent history. An example such as this shows how fear brought two rival nations together and created further hatred towards them. Historians often believe that the Alliance system was a result of fear. After France's defeat in the Franco-Prussian war in 1871, France feared the constantly increasing power of Germany, as did Britain. ...read more.


Tension was also created due to motives of gain through nationalism. Austria-Hungary's aim was to gain land and Russia's aim was to encourage Pan-Slavism. Both of these aims conflicted over the region of the Ottoman Empire. But this reason alone would cause a small war and not a total 'World' War. Russia supported the Slavic's and this created the rising power of Serbia. Russia created a new and more powerful Serbia, hoping that they would eventually become Russia's allies. Austria-Hungary saw Serbia as a great threat. They feared Serbia and knew that they couldn't wait for them to get any stronger. This proves that fear brings risk into play. Austria-Hungary could not take any chances with Serbia so they were looking for any reason to launch an attack on the increasing power of Serbia. Austria-Hungary's fear of Serbia was in fact the trigger that sparked the devastating battle of WWI. Fear was a far greater cause as Austria-Hungary knew that they not only had to defeat Serbia, but destroy it. Serbia was quickly gaining power and Austria-Hungary had to put a stop to this before it was too late. Historians often consider Militarism to be one of the main origins of fear in a country. ...read more.


When comparing these two causes, I believe fear was a more supported answer as compared to motives for gain. As stated before, the fear a country had over another country's rise in military power can cause great amounts of tension. A country with greater power threatens the existence of other countries such as the rapid power gained by Germany posed a great threat to three other countries, Russia, Britain and France, who were all one of the great powers of Europe at the time. In the case of a country like Belgium, they had no fear or motives for gain. They were basically a neutral party that was involved because it was invaded by Germany. Belgium's neutrality was supported by the alliance treaty with Britain. In conclusion, the feeling of fear brings great distress and anxiety in a nation. Gain may cause a minor feud between two nations, but unlike gain, fear can cause terror and anxiety in a country and the only way to remove a feeling of fear, is to get rid of it. No one can take a chance on fear as it could threaten the country's very own existence. This point proves the brutal consequences of fear. Although motives for gain can cause war, it cannot cause a war with a high caliber such as the World War. ?? ?? ?? ?? Sheheryar 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. Causes of WW1. How valid is the claim that in 1914, states went ...

    Austria-Hungary invaded and took over the former Turkish province of Bosnia. This caused tension in Serbia as they felt Bosnia should belong to them. Austria-Hungary viewed Serbia as a threat. This was largely due to Serbia's desire to unite the Slavic people, including those living in the southern parts of the empire.

  2. How valid is to claim that "Europe stumbled into a war in 1914"?

    Moreover, at a German war council in 1912 it was agreed that because war would come eventually, it was better to fight at that moment, with Germany at its peak. In addition, Germany's "Blank Cheque" in 1914 encouraged Austria to attack Serbia.

  1. IB Extended Essay - How where the Conquistadors able to defeat the Incan and ...

    Although the Aztecs began to become weaker they were still wealthy and determined to be a strong force even after the arrival of Hernan Cortes and his Spanish conquistadors. When Cortes was made aware of the great Aztec Empire after landing in Mexico in 1519 he began to make his voyage to the heart of the Aztec Empire; Tenochtitlan.

  2. It was the alliance system in Europe that led to the outbreak of war ...

    There was almost no industrialization and although they had a large army it was inefficient. The whole empire was ready to fall apart. The Balkans were a group of small and unstable countries of different races and religions.

  1. Prohibition: an inevitable failure?

    Similarities and different in consequences: Both sources are believe that Prohibition indisputably caused a great crime wave in America. Source B uses slightly more epidemiology (proving things on the basis of statistics), compared to source A, however both believe that this law ensured widespread crime.

  2. IB History HL, Extended Notes: Russia, the Tsars, the Provisional Govenment and the Revolution.

    Progressive Bloc 1. Kadets, Octobrists, right-wing deputies with a majority in the Duma. 2. Campaigned for traditional liberal demands such as representative government and had the support of the public. 3. Wanted a ministry formed with majority groups in the Duma to include Kerensky (Trudovik), Milyukov (Kadet leader), and Guchkov (Octobrist leader) 4.

  1. To what extent did women gain social equality during the 1920s?

    Women were able to receive higher paying jobs due to the absence of able men at war. Not only were grown women benefiting during the 1920?s, but children were as well. Physical education for every girl &?athletics for all? were strongly endorsed throughout this era.

  2. Notes on the History and Development of the Arab-Israeli Conflict

    It is estimated that the US's GNP would be cut by 13% without Middle Eastern oil; eg. In 1973 the Yamani plan cost the US $10-20 billion and 500 000 jobs through the refusal to sell Israeli-aligned nations oil. Political - Influence of Zionist lobby in America politics.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work