• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

IB, Paper 1: USSR under Stalin, 1924-1941. Analysis of sources.

Extracts from this document...


Beatrice Ferro Paper 1: The USSR under Stalin, 1924 to 1941 1. a) According to source A, Stalin's advantages over his rivals gave him the power of patronage. He had the right to choose any individual to take an important position in the party and government. He also could place his own supporters in key positions. Stalin was always able to out-vote his enemies in various committees. He also had the privilege to fire those who did not support him. b) The message that is being communicated in source D is that of Stalin being a great supporter for Lenin. His position shows how he is assisting Lenin and backing him up. This protection that Stalin is showing in source D also wants to convey the fact the he wishes to be as close to Lenin as possible. 2. In Sources A and C, we can find some of Stalin's methods to weaken his oppositions. Both sources talk about Stalin wanting to isolate his rivals. We can see this in source A where it says: ?individuals who opposed him...he could always out-vote them?. Source C also says that ?the Trotskyites and the right opportunists were politically isolated?. ...read more.


Another limitation is that the conversation was recorded about 60-70 years later, Joffe might have been very young at the time, hence not remembering well what really happened. Also, she could have been affected by knowledge of later events and new interpretations. The origin of source E is from a book on the general history of Russia in the twentieth century, written by Robert Service, a British historian. The purpose of this source is to inform people about what really happened in Russia. This source can be considered valuable as Service is a historian can provide an accessible overview to a topic, by writing objectively. Since this book was published in 1997, there has been enough time to access enough information to then analyze the subject. The limitations are that because this was published in London, the source might be biased and therefore supporting certain kinds of ideas, groups and politicians. Source E is also limited because it's information may lack of important aspects of events, details may not be included. This is because it's a book which covers the whole twentieth century, and not just a short period of time. ...read more.


Stalin's use of political methods were also very important for his rise to power. As source C states, the ?Party was able to awaken and organise the working masses?. This shows how the Party was working together to isolate political oppositions. Although, not only being in control of the Party was important, he also used very smart tactics: he stayed neutral. Stalin was neither left or right wing, this enabled him to switch to whatever policy gained the most votes. This also meant that he could gain allies from both sides of the party. It happened because he never interfered with arguments and always remained in the background, making him seem like a 'peaceful' person; an advantage for Stalin. In conclusion, we can say that not only Stalin's control of the Party lead to his rise to power in 1929, but also for number of other reasons. Luck stopped Lenin's testimonial being published, Dzerzinhsky's death meant he could get control of the Cheka and his political methods were very effective as remaining neutral made him have more supporters. Although, being the General Secretary of the Party meant he could remove opposition and also add more supporters to the Party. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. Comparison between Trotsky's and Lenin's role in the establishment of the USSR

    Both, Lenin and Trotsky were of vital and mutual importance for establishment and consolidation of a communist state in Russia.

  2. Schlieffen Plan - analysis of the sources

    The website is established by John Simkin and was created in 1997; however the date of the publication of the Schlieffen Plan article is not stated.

  1. Historical Investigation IB

    They threw 342 of the crates into Boston Harbour in a boycott of the British retention of the Tea Tax. The colonies decided to take full political action against Britain after the passing of the Coercive Acts and for the first time all 13 colonies met in an official Continental Congress to discuss the future of the Colonies.

  2. The Life and Policies of Brazilian President Getulio Vargas - analysis of sources.

    There was rebellion from the Tenentismo (or lieutenants), who desired autonomy within the government instead of centralization. With elite civilians fear of an outbreak in Civil War there was strong support for a strong unified military. When the Brazilian Military became a federal monopoly, a turning point in Brazilian politics was established.

  1. La Revolucion Mexicana IB Extended essay

    llamadas 'empresas de la demarcaci�n' se crearon para encerrar la tierra com�n y atraer a los colonos extranjeros para trabajar en ella ... las empresas se quedaron con un tercio de las tierras en cuesti�n''(Gilly 14). Porfirio atrajo la inversi�n extranjera mediante la venta de tierras sin due�o a capitalistas

  2. USSR under Stalin

    Also Source B says that Molotov was responsible for the destruction of the kulaks while Source C it does not. The difference between Source B and C is that in Source B the views on collectivisation are expressed in terms of the destruction of the kulaks and in Source C

  1. Why was it possible for Stalin to become the leader of the USSR?

    Stalin rather than his opponents and that Sverdlov and Lenin died at the "right time" for Stalin which makes the story more or less simplistic and mysterious. While this may be true to some limited extent, and they can be indirect causes to Stalin's rise to power, they should not

  2. In what ways and with what results did Stalin modernise the USSR to 1941?

    Millions of peasants were directed into the towns and cities to work in factories and mines, leaving mostly women and children in the countryside. Heavy industries were given high priority in the first Five Year Plan. Thus, consumer industries were neglected and agriculture was restructured to provide for industrial changes.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work