• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Industry vs Agriculture: The Economics Leading to the Civil War

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Patrick Finnegan February 9, 2010 Industry vs Agriculture: The Economics Leading to the Civil War 1. Opening Statement (Emily Boney) The basis of this argument is founded upon the fact that Northern states (The Union) was an industrial society and supported tariffs on imported goods from Europe because they wanted Americans to buy goods made in the United States. The Southern culture, however, was to buy things made in Europe, therefore they were against these tariffs. i. Introduction a. Ladies and gentlemen of the court, today my team and I will defend the theory that the Civil War began due to economic differences between the North and the South. ii. Thesis: The North and South were divided primarily by issues regarding slavery, tariffs and differences in industry. iii. Reason for guilt a. Slavery: North was against slavery, South was for it. Buying and selling slaves large part of Southern economy, depended on slaves to produce cotton. (Economics of the Civil War) b. Tariffs: North liked tariffs, people bought American. South disliked tariffs, wanted luxury goods from Europe. North tried to impose tariffs on South, tariffs alone were one of the main reasons for Southern secession. (476) c. Different economies: South = cotton agriculture, North = industry and factories (Economics of the Civil War). iv. Weaknesses in other trials a. ...read more.

Middle

I do not expect the Union to be dissolved; I do not expect the house to fall; but I do expect that it will cease to be divided. It will become all the one thing or all the other" (Norton, Roger). Q: But why would a simple difference in economies trigger such a catastrophic war? A: The thing is to the people of this time the economic variations were something that could not be avoided or shoved in the background. As soon as they realized that they were on paths of creating a successful nation by different means they sought change through war. It troubled the South that the North was industrialized while they stayed in the farming era. By moving forward with industry and non-slave labor the North put out he message that they were against the South's way of maintaining a successful economy. When a states economy is threatened craziness pursues. Money meant everything to the Southern states so when the North was found to be more successful through means of industry the South was automatically against them (EH.Net Encyclopedia: Economics of the Civil War). Q: How did tariffs add to the economic differences that led to the war? A: First off, Tariffs created money for the government by creating taxes on imported goods. ...read more.

Conclusion

And in the nation's attempt to: establish or abolish slavery, regulate tariffs, and create industries that could coexist with one another, our nation became divided in a political and physical Civil War. Leading me to why we are gathered here today in this courtroom, I will no doubt find the economic differences of the Northern and Southern States guilty for causing the Civil War! 4. Cross-examination Questions i. Slavery- Slavery is a guilty cause to the civil war. However, do you agree that the Southern economies were formulated around slave labor, making the issue of slavery detrimental to the economy? ii. Culture- What defines culture? The jobs in an area bring and establish culture, the urban sprawl caused by the types of work found in the North and the South is the leading cause of the Civil War. iii. Election of Abe Lincoln- What was Abe Lincoln's platform that caused him to be elected? iv. State's Rights- "A house divided against itself cannot stand. I believe this government cannot endure permanently half slave and half free. I do not expect the Union to be dissolved; I do not expect the house to fall; but I do expect that it will cease to be divided. It will become all the one thing or all the other." Many politicians believed that federal rights preceded state's rights, in a nation that is defined by it's very economy, how can our determination to create a singularity reflect upon the state's rights? 5. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. the causes and consequences of the spanish civil war

    Historian Shlomo Ben-Ami dismisses the simplistic view of some historians that, due to this divide, the break down of Spanish democracy was inevitable. He argues that 'The Republic's failure was not irreversibly conditioned. It was caused by policies, some obviously bad and highly inadequate, and the reaction to them.'

  2. The Chinese Civil War

    the outcome of the war was not what everyone thought to be due to many reasons. However, soon after the first year of fighting, KMT's weaknesses began to provoke. Not only because "eight years of war with Japan had drained the strength and morale of the Nationalists forces" (Tamura 180)

  1. The cold war - the conferences and the start of the cCold War

    There was an extensive program of social benefits given to workers in Western Germany with high taxation h. The Federal Republic was so called because of the existence of the various landers such as Hanover, Bavaria and North Rhine- Westphalia, which retained important rights over education and other aspects of administration.

  2. Analyse the causes of the Spanish Civil War

    Overall it was a fail, they managed to take parts of north Spain and Andalusia, but not Madrid nor industrial areas. On the other hand, half of the army remained loyal to the republic. In conclusion, my belief is that without external support such as Gil Robles, Franco, Mola and Africanistas, the republicans would have won.

  1. Notes on the Causes of the American Civil War

    Slave labor was ideal Abolitionists 1. Most abolitionists at the beginning of the 19th Century believed in gradual emancipation. 2. Slave owners should receive compensation 3. Also that freed slave should be encouraged to go Africa 4. In 1822, the USA purchased Liberia on the West coast of Africa as a base to return ex-slaves 5.

  2. Notes on the History and Development of the Arab-Israeli Conflict

    Yet, these left many issues unresolved: - Israel refused to return to the borders laid out in the UN partition resolution, occupying 20% more of Palestine than the UN had agreed on. - The Arab states and Palestinians refused diplomatic recognition to Israel and would not acknowledge the Jewish state's right to exist.

  1. In the early years of slavery before 1830, many things shaped African and African ...

    The north had significantly less slaves than the south. Social stratification began with the perceptions of the slaveholders on the slave society. Some slaveholders would import Africans, convert them to Christianity, and justify the act of holding them in slavery.

  2. The Chinese Civil War - Background and Main Events

    In his period as leader, he did little to solve China?s economic and political problems. However, he had abandoned the antique imperial system, experimented with the representative principle, resolved to drive out the foreigner and given hope to the Chinese.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work