• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Latin American History-Why did independence strengthen the landed aristocracy and the military?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Question 1- Analyze the causes of the economic stagnation that afflicted many of the new states following independence. There were a number of causes for economic stagnation after independence. While some nations such as Brazil, Chile, and Argentina found economic prosperity in industry such as coffee, metal, and hides, many other nations failed to return to the economic success they had before their independence was gained. Some of these nations are: Bolivia, Peru, and Mexico. These specific nations were mostly dependent on mining for economic balance; however, after they gained independence they lost much of their mining capacity. This in turn broke their economies. The causes for economic stagnation after independence included: the failure to gain foreign investment, and the catastrophe of not redistributing income and land throughout each nation. ...read more.

Middle

These cheap products hurt many of the local clothing and craft producers in Latin America. The merchant class was virtually destroyed due to the cheap and easily assessable British goods that began to flood the markets of Latin American nations. The British goods also depleted the new nations of their precious metals (gold and silver). Due to the invasion of British products in Latin America, the wealthy merchant families all the way from Mexico City to Argentina were English; however, Iberian merchants were still prominent and controlled the urban and province to province trade. Once the majority of Latin American countries secured their independence, they failed to act on one necessary issue to achieve economic stability. ...read more.

Conclusion

The return to regionalism intensified due to lack of roads and minimal communications due to natural obstructions like mountains. Caudillos began ruling regions and controlling all of the regional business. Politics and revolution brought about by the caudillos became an economic activity in some Latin American nations. The winners in the revolutions were given control of the customhouse which controlled the collection of taxes on imports/exports. The caudillos could use this advantage to provide jobs, government land, and financial protection to their supporters and themselves. Due to the reliance on politics and military gain, the leaders caused a bloated military and caused resources to be sidetracked from economic development. Also, foreign trade was stressed more than ever which made it so the Latin American nations depended on foreign nations for products, instead of providing for themselves. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. Was the American Revolution Revolutionary?

    The Sons of Liberty and Daughters of Liberty resisted British control by boycotting acts and avoiding British products. They also convinced others to join in to resist the weakening British control. Furthermore, Levine discusses the pamphleteer, Thomas Paine, who was not of the American elite but spread his ideas in the most efficient and effective way as a pamphleteer.

  2. A comparative study of two Latin American revolutions exhibits the causes and effects necessary ...

    The slaves cultured and nurtured the idea that "people of color could have decided on their own to overturn the social order established by whites (Popkin 18)" for they refused to settle for anything less than freedom.

  1. League of Nations

    Do you think your results suggest that the League was a complete waste of time? I wouldn't say that my results suggest that the League was a complete waste of time, because after all, the League managed to increase the welfare across several borders which were one of the League's main aims.

  2. How far can Britain's colonial legacy be held responsible for Nigeria's problems since independence?

    Britain's main reason for colonial invasion was to increase their commercial interests as well the wish to expand its Empire to trump that of the other European powers. Therefore, the British invaded various parts of Africa and began to draw its borders without consideration of the inhabitants of this continent.

  1. Analyse the factors that led to the growth of independence movements in any one ...

    The British placed many demands on the Indian soldiers including having them serve far away from their homes. For Brahmins, it was a taboo to cross the sea. Thus for them, serving overseas meant losing their caste. Along with this they were not promoted to high ranks in the army,

  2. IB History HL, Extended Notes: Russia, the Tsars, the Provisional Govenment and the Revolution.

    Most wanted concessions from the Tsar, not revolution. Left lacked leadership Lenin was in London, Stalin was in Siberia, action uncoordinated. 3. Concessions to peasants and liberals divided opposition. October Manifesto promised a legislative Duma and liberal freedom of expression.

  1. Notes on the History and Development of the Arab-Israeli Conflict

    and Likud (Vitzhak Shamir), the country was further divided as no political consensus could be formed on the occupied territories. - The Israeli response to the lntifada disgraced them worldwide with Rabin's 1988 'Iron Fist' policy of "the first priority is to use might, power and beatings to restore order" attracting much condemnation with its killings of over 600 youths.

  2. The role of the aristocracy varied throughout Europe and changed over the course of ...

    The hereditary and military models recognized the idea that poor people could be noble, but the political view usually defined nobles as wealthy. These three contrasting views all remained powerful between the 1400s and 1600s. Europeans admired individuals who combined all three ideals?men from old families who fought in battles and governed.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work