• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Latin American History-Why did independence strengthen the landed aristocracy and the military?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Question 1- Analyze the causes of the economic stagnation that afflicted many of the new states following independence. There were a number of causes for economic stagnation after independence. While some nations such as Brazil, Chile, and Argentina found economic prosperity in industry such as coffee, metal, and hides, many other nations failed to return to the economic success they had before their independence was gained. Some of these nations are: Bolivia, Peru, and Mexico. These specific nations were mostly dependent on mining for economic balance; however, after they gained independence they lost much of their mining capacity. This in turn broke their economies. The causes for economic stagnation after independence included: the failure to gain foreign investment, and the catastrophe of not redistributing income and land throughout each nation. ...read more.

Middle

These cheap products hurt many of the local clothing and craft producers in Latin America. The merchant class was virtually destroyed due to the cheap and easily assessable British goods that began to flood the markets of Latin American nations. The British goods also depleted the new nations of their precious metals (gold and silver). Due to the invasion of British products in Latin America, the wealthy merchant families all the way from Mexico City to Argentina were English; however, Iberian merchants were still prominent and controlled the urban and province to province trade. Once the majority of Latin American countries secured their independence, they failed to act on one necessary issue to achieve economic stability. ...read more.

Conclusion

The return to regionalism intensified due to lack of roads and minimal communications due to natural obstructions like mountains. Caudillos began ruling regions and controlling all of the regional business. Politics and revolution brought about by the caudillos became an economic activity in some Latin American nations. The winners in the revolutions were given control of the customhouse which controlled the collection of taxes on imports/exports. The caudillos could use this advantage to provide jobs, government land, and financial protection to their supporters and themselves. Due to the reliance on politics and military gain, the leaders caused a bloated military and caused resources to be sidetracked from economic development. Also, foreign trade was stressed more than ever which made it so the Latin American nations depended on foreign nations for products, instead of providing for themselves. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. The United States War of Independence had nothing in common with the Latin American ...

    One existing parallel of the American Revolution and the Latin American Revolutions is that both of these revolutions "sought to throw off the rule of a mother country whose mercantilist system hindered the further development of a rapidly growing colonial economy" (Haynes, 166).

  2. A comparative study of two Latin American revolutions exhibits the causes and effects necessary ...

    The slaves cultured and nurtured the idea that "people of color could have decided on their own to overturn the social order established by whites (Popkin 18)" for they refused to settle for anything less than freedom.

  1. Gender Equality in the Military

    At Camp Davis in North Carolina, the women were told by the base commander that the women and planes that they flew were expendable.22 There were also suspected incidents of sabotage that cost two women their lives but investigations were avoided because of the fear that the WASP program would

  2. Argentina v. Chile. Even though these two countries are in different locations in ...

    For about the next twenty years, Argentina was run by military and civilian political administrations until in March 11, 1973 because of years of problems and government instability, they elect Hector Campora into office. Later, Peron took power again and died a year later.

  1. IB History HL, Extended Notes: Russia, the Tsars, the Provisional Govenment and the Revolution.

    Most wanted concessions from the Tsar, not revolution. Left lacked leadership Lenin was in London, Stalin was in Siberia, action uncoordinated. 3. Concessions to peasants and liberals divided opposition. October Manifesto promised a legislative Duma and liberal freedom of expression.

  2. The History and Development of the American Dream

    as well as show-business, sports etc. Having such models in front of their eyes people create for themselves a collection of trappings of the American Dream: success, public recognition and prosperity depending directly on money. And there is little doubt that someone has ever tried to muse on what actually there is behind the phrase American Dream.

  1. Notes on the History and Development of the Arab-Israeli Conflict

    morale, a tremendous sense of achievement, and a confident outlook on the future" - The 1967 Six Day War and the issue of the Occupied Territories was a double edged sword for Israeli nationalism; morale was greatly boosted, however in the long term, its implications and ramifications damaged Israeli confidence.

  2. The role of the aristocracy varied throughout Europe and changed over the course of ...

    The hereditary and military models recognized the idea that poor people could be noble, but the political view usually defined nobles as wealthy. These three contrasting views all remained powerful between the 1400s and 1600s. Europeans admired individuals who combined all three ideals?men from old families who fought in battles and governed.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work