• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Long term and short causes of the Russian Revolution of 1905.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Long term and short causes of the Russian Revolution of 1905. The Russian revolution of 1905 was the product of more than a century of discontent shown by the Russian people (http://www.thecorner.org/hist/russia/revo1905.htm). The revolution was a burst of anger bottled up by the people of Russia for over 50 years, starting with the rule of Alexander the II. I believe, all three Tsars' - Alexander II, Alexander III and Nicholas II were the cause of the 1905 revolution. Alexander III was known to history as a liberal autocrat. He came to power only a year after the Crimean war, in which Great Britain, France, the kingdom of Sardinia and the Ottoman Empire defeated Russia. This highlighted the backwardness of the Russian Empire; hence, Alexander II started liberal reforms all over Russia. The most important of those reforms was emancipation of the serfs - Alexander II thought he gave freedom to the Serfs (slaves). ...read more.

Middle

The Tsar wanted a large-scale Russification; this caused problems because people were meant to learn Russian and a lot of the population spoke a different language. Anti-Semitism was a policy in the government. Nicholas II reign caused fast growth in the industrial section. Although this came in a price, many workers still had very bad living conditions, usually working 15 hours a day. Even though it was illegal, workers organized strikes and a little of that bottled up anger leaked into the air. The strikes main aim was to making working conditions better but in later years, their aims changed to over-throwing the government. When it think of the causes of the Russian revolution of 1905, I imagine that a room is filled with gunpowder, the gunpowder is a metaphor for the three czar's and the match that blew the whole thing up is the short causes like the Russo-Japanese war and Bloody Sunday. ...read more.

Conclusion

The petition included political and economic demands. Political demands were the calling of an elected duma, freedom of speech and assembly, guarantee of fair trials and an amnesty for political prisoners. Economic demands were more labor legislation, the eight-hour day, a reduction in indirect taxes and the introduction of a graduated income tax. The petition also demanded to end the war immediately. (http://www.thecorner.org/hist/russia/revo1905.htm). The Czar's army open fire on the peaceful crowd. Men, women and children lay dead on the floor - about 200 of them. Many others injured. The people of Russia were not happy with Czars' way of ruling, so after January 22, 1905. The anger of the people of Russia became very visible and started becoming disloyal to the czar. Different groups tried their hardest to over throw the czar. Although the czar still stayed in power. This is because the different parties were not united. There is no central leadership and most of the army remained loyal. Gaurav Mishra History 11th September 2008 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. Discuss the short and long term consequences of the Indian Mutiny 1857

    Tilac and Beasent, leaders of the two home rule parties created in 1916, gained lots of success. But home rule was still not considered as an option by the British. The radicals were willing to repeat the mutiny and wanted direct action to show the British that they were not satisfied with being ruled by Britain.

  2. To what extent did Alexander II's reforms cause more problems than they solved?

    This resulted in a quicker and more efficient communications system, which benefited every citizen of Russia, especially as the prices between different cities were equalised - for example the price of rye in St Petersburg relative to its price in the rye-growing regions fell by as much as 66%).

  1. Revision notes - Causes of the French Revolution and the Development of the Revolution ...

    of the Third Estate as it did not want to see the control passing from the Second Estate to the bourgeois leaders of the Third Estate. Parlement essentially represented upper class and was very wary of the power of the Third Estate.

  2. What were the causes of the French Revolution?

    The king and the queens' arrogance were shown here as they did not perform any action to stop this great fear. So we can clearly see that the economic crisis played a vital role in the start of the revolution as because there was inflation and there was also shortage of food supply.

  1. Analyse the political causes of the Mexican Revolution of 1910

    Faithful to its bargain, the church turned a deaf ear to the complaints of the lower classes and taught complete submission to the authorities." (Davis, 93) Consequently, the peasantry were extremely upset with their current state of being and therefore wished to target their aggression towards Porfirio Diaz.

  2. IB History HL, Extended Notes: Russia, the Tsars, the Provisional Govenment and the Revolution.

    2. Decided to set up zemstva. Zemsta 1. Elected rural local councils at district and provincial level. Elected by 3 groups (nobles, townspeople, and peasants). 2. Dominated by the nobility, allowed them to preserve local authority to make up for losses from emancipation. 3. Had limited powers to approve local projects (roads, prisons, public health, etc).

  1. To what extent did the reforms of Alexander II achieve his aims

    To add to that the police was still controlled centrally and the provisional governor could always overrule the zemstva decisions. The last major reforms were the financial and economic ones. The Crimean defeat showed that economic modernization was a must.

  2. Assess the strengths and weaknesses of Alexander II of Russia's reforms.

    After Russia?s humiliating defeat in the Crimean War, it was obvious there needed to be reform to the military. Alexander II put Dmitrii Miliutin in charge are reforming the military. Three areas had to be tackled to avoid another defeat: recruitment, organisation and education.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work