• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Metternich and the Austrian Empire 1815-48

Extracts from this document...


Metternich and the Austrian Empire 1815-48 This essay is a Pr�cis on Chapter 7 of Aspects of European History 1789-1980, by Stephen J. Lee: Lee, Stephen J.. Aspects of European History 1789-1980. Routledge, 1982. Clement von Metternich is considered by most historians to be the most significant conservative statesman in Europe in the 19th Century. He was both Minister of Foreign Affairs of Austria and Austrian State Chancellor during the first half of the 19th Century. He was, in all ways, an absolutist who sought for the retainment of full monarchical powers. He believed in a careful and well-ordered evolutionary social and political development which he feared was being jeopardized by the liberal minority that pushed for a more violent and brisk form of change. These unproductive ways of thinking, he explained, were caused by man's inability to deal with technical progress. He further stated that liberalism was fostering revolution in Europe in 1815 and the only way to counter this was by reimposing equilibrium in the monarchies. In his opinion this had to be done internally through the use of responsible policies and externally by joint action from all monarchs. He did this in an effort to re-establish order which, as he put it, produced equilibrium. Through this order (an extension of police powers and increased censorship) he sought to very cautiously improve the conditions of the people and of the functioning of the administration. Unfortunately, he was not considered to be much of a reformer for any one in his time period because of his lack of achievement. ...read more.


Nonetheless, Metternich always considered himself to be better at the diplomatic level than at the domestic one. He tried projecting his policies to the outside world, hoping to provide a European formula for equilibrium. The way he saw it, Austria was the most moderate central European power because it stood between a more conservative Russia and a more liberal France. Overall, Metternich displayed a slight inability in adapting to change and analyzing political situations which required a certain degree of moderate reform. Clearly, Metternich was faced with serious difficulties which rendered any efforts he made towards steady progress useless. Although he had the constant support of the Emperor Francis and consequently Ferdinand I, the latter proved to be totally incompetent. The Empire was governed by the Conference of State under which most of the authority went to the chairman Archduke Ludwig and the remaining was split amongst Archduke Francis Charles, Kolowrat and Metternich. This group of three was Metternich's most difficult problem as conflict was always present and consensus was nearly impossible to achieve. Particularly damaging to consensus were Metternich's clashes with Kolowrat. Metternich disliked the fact that Kolowrat was left in charge of most of the internal matters because Kolowrat, he claimed, was devoting his limited energies to disrupting Metternich's own plans. The two major clashes between these two were Kolowrat's proposal to limit Austria's military estimates and his demands to build the Empire's first railway lines in Bohemia (his homeland). ...read more.


Metternich better at diplomatic level than at domestic level i. European formula for equilibrium ii. France - Austria - Russia III. Metternich vs. the rest of Austria a. Emperor Francis i. Conference of State, never reaches consensus 1. Chairman archduke Ludwig a. Archduke Francis Charles, Kolowrat and Metternich b. Metternich vs. Kolowrat i. Kolowrat wants to limit Austria military, Metternich wants strong military to remain strong in Europe ii. Kolowrat wants first railway lines in Bohemia, Metternich wants to connect the Austrian High Command to the vulnerable provinces of Northern Italy c. Metternich vs. Emperor i. Wants to replace traditional colleges with modern ministries ii. Sets up Kommerzdirektorium to co-ordinate economic planning iii. Submitted to several memoranda on reform concerning: 1. State Council 2. State Conference 3. New regional chancelleries. iv. All left behind by 1830 1. "This is no time for change"- Emperor Francis d. Zollverein i. Met. Tried to secure membership ii. Had to lower Empire's tariff barriers iii. Kolowrat and other archdukes quickly tell Met. economic matters are not of his concern. IV. Metternich- Conclusion a. Metternich fighting to prevent collapse of old order b. Old Europe comes to end, "New Europe has not yet even begun its existence, and between the beginning and the end there will be chaos." c. Conservatism in England i. Becomes more popular ii. Ideas of Burke re-emerge d. Metaphors i. England: (Burke) living organism ii. Austria: (Metternich) house threatening to collapse e. Metternich considers himself anachronism i. Wishes he had lived during a different era ?? ?? ?? ?? 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. History Internal Somme

    However, this proved to be very ineffective and after some time General Haig conceded that his tactics were not effective and the new tactic of attrition was used. This tactic meant that the troops would no longer attempt huge breakthroughs but rather try to slowly break down the enemy.

  2. Italian Unification Revision Notes. Italian Politics in 1815

    � Others think that such a state is pure fantasy How effective a political activist was Mazzini? � He was not only a thinker but also a doer. � When Charles Albert finally became King of Piedmont on 1831, Mazzini wrote to him about t the coming revolution and invited him to become its leader.

  1. Thinking Through Qin Shihuang and His Empire. The emperor Qin Shihuang, also called the ...

    He recounted Chinese history from the time of the Yellow Emperor until his own time. As the first systematic Chinese historical text, the records profoundly influenced Chinese historiography and prose. This encyclopedia is written in four small topics. Ying Zheng's personal life, his ancestry and Surname, the country he unified, and how the emperor's belief in matters spiritual or occult.

  2. History Internal Assesment

    The League of Nations did not physically intervene. In September 1931 the Japanese held control of the South Manchurian Railway. The Japanese then claimed that the Chinese sabotaged the railway and occupies Manchuria, renaming it Manchukuo. The League of Nations found Japan to be guilty and demanded it give Manchuria back to China.

  1. Architectural Masterpieces in England

    The cathedral has the tallest church spire in the United Kingdom (123m/404 ft). It was one of the last parts of the cathedral to be completed, in about 1330. It has undergone repair several times during the following centuries, the most famous occasion being when Sir Christopher Wren was commissioned to undertake an architectural survey.

  2. Bismarck's policies. While when he was Chancellor, Bismarcks main aim will have been to ...

    By 1871 Bismarck created the "German Empire", which consisted of four Kingdoms, 18 lesser states, the territory of Lorraine and three city states. The creation of the German Empire was a success for Bismarck because it meant that Bismarck had achieved his aim as Prussian Minister President as he had

  1. IB History HL, Extended Notes: Russia, the Tsars, the Provisional Govenment and the Revolution.

    How far did the Dumas solve long-term political problems? Yes 1. Put the Tsar in a stronger position Duma provided a place where the opposition (SD, SR, liberals, etc) could argue and become more divided. 2. Coupled with Stolypin?s violent suppression of opposition this marginalized opponents after 1905 No 1.

  2. Notes on the History and Development of the Arab-Israeli Conflict

    Arafat existsed a mid-1998 target rate of withdrawal instead of the existing September 1997 one, and Netanyahu agreed to the timetable for withdrawal. - Agreement signed Jan 15 1997, ratified by PLO, the Israeli cabinet and Knesset. - Dershowitz argues: "No matter what steps Israel takes towards peace and the

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work