• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Rise of Stalin

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

After the death of Lenin, in 1924, the struggle for leadership which ensued was clearly between Trotsky and Stalin. Many underestimated Stalin and would not have though that by 1929, he would be leader of the USSR. This essay will analyse the methods Stalin used in his successful bid for power including his position in the party as general secretary, the mistakes of his opposition, and his opportunistic nature. Mistakes of opposition and opportunity: Largest mistake- not attending funeral. This could also be seen as cunning on Stalins parts- gave wrong date. Lowered popularity. This also increased S. Popularity. He was at the front carrying L's coffin, and had L's body embalmed and displayed as a sign of respect. Also, in his speech spoke of himself as someone who was going to continue with Lenin's ideologies, which made him popular because everyone loved Lenin. ...read more.

Middle

Eventually since Trotsky stood alone in supporting globalising communism, Trotsky was accussed of going against the party and was forced to step down from his position in 1925. Stalin was clever in that he made sure he supported the side that majority of the public supported. There was a split in the party as to what was best to better the economy. Some supported the NEP whereas others saw the NEP as a backwards policy that wasn't in line with communist beliefs and wanted to instead rapidly industrialise. Stalin saw that most of the people were for the NEP , and so supported him. Kamanev and Ziniviev were now against Stalin because opposed the NEP and were now his greatest opposition. They were were easily voted out of the politburo in 1926 because of Stalin's overwhelming support in the party they were on the unpopular side. ...read more.

Conclusion

At this time, near the end of 1929, Stalin was the unopposed leader of the USSR. Once out of the party, Kamanev, Zinoviev and Trotsky joined to form the United Opposition. However this opposition to Stalin was very temporary because they were expelled from the USSR. Stalin was then able to dispatch his final opposition of Bukarin, Tomsky and Rykov by turning against the NEP and using his support to outvote the three men. At this time, near the end of 1929, Stalin was the unopposed leader of the USSR. Historians have different views on what it was that allowed Stalin to come to power. Liberal believe the mistakes of his opposition enabled him...Structuralists believe that it was stalins position in the party and his ability to garner support that was key in attaining power. In conclusion, Stalin used opportunism, ability to take advantage of other peoples mistakes, and his position in the party to because leader of the USSR. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. To what extent was Stalin's rise to power due to his opponents' mistakes?

    health along with his failed policies made him unsuitable as a leader. As a result of illness, he managed to miss Lenin's funeral which turned out to be a very important moment in Stalin's political career in terms of gaining public support (Simpson).

  2. Analyse the methods used and the conditions which helped in the rise of a ...

    As a result of this, these two men joined in an alliance with Trotsky, the "United Opposition", but it was too late, they intended to criticise the NEP, to involve demonstrations and even to show to the whole world copies of Lenin�s testament, but nothing could help them.

  1. To what extent should the success of Stalin in the leadership struggle between 1924-1930 ...

    the lack of party debate- and completely opposing Stalin on several issues43. Had these leaders not portrayed themselves to be so radical, they may have gained support as opposed to enmity. Finally, Stalin positioned himself so that after Lenin's death he was the moderate party leader, which allowed him to

  2. Obstacles faced during Stalins rise to power

    As Stalin's popularity rapidly increased, Trotsky's fell drastically. Trotsky was adamantly against Lenin's enrolment; therefore, since a majority of the party members now consisted of men completely loyal to Stalin they felt that if they were in support of Trotsky rising to power he would eventually come to the position and remove them from their posts.

  1. USSR under Stalin

    It can be seen that even though it is known that Stalin is very hostile towards the kulaks he does not show his hatred radically in the speech but he has a moderate approach which makes him sound more decisive.

  2. Factors That Helped The Rise of the Nazis

    state?this mass ?market? would not have become available and Hitler would have continued to have been an insignificant minority taste on the lunatic fringes of the political system? (Kershaw, 52). Fromm agrees with Kershaw by stating that the people were unhappy with the Weimar Republic?s failure to economically protect the

  1. He brought his country and his people nothing but harm. To what extent do ...

    Through the policy of collectivisation, there were some successes, with various new plans benefitting the people, as well as Stalin himself. For the peasants, the amenities available at some kolkhozes increased literacy rates, although these were few and far between.

  2. Why did Stalin rather than Trotsky emerge as the leader of the USSR in ...

    These bureaucratic positions were designated to Stalin because he ?posed as a moderate, often a centrist?, seemingly with no idealistic desires other than to follow Lenin, contrasting with other prominent members in the party, including theorists such as Trotsky and Bukharin.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work