Simon Bolivar. Known as the liberator, Simon Bolivar played such a monumental role in the liberating of South American countries from Spanish rule.

Authors Avatar

                                                    Zaza

Known as the “liberator,” Simon Bolivar played such a monumental role in the liberating of South American countries from Spanish rule. Throughout the course of his whole lifetime he was able to free almost all of northern South America, and at this point he was known as “El Liberator.” When studying South American independence efforts, it is physically impossible to bypass Simon Bolivar because of his prevalence in all countries. He was able to weave himself into the independence efforts of many countries, including Venezuela, Ecuador, Colombia, Peru, and Bolivia. He was able to free these countries through a multitude of ways and had significant effects on these countries, even to the extent that he is still revered as “El Libertador” today.

One of the most powerful political figures in existence, Simon Bolivar was born into a wealthy creole family on July 24, 1783. Unfortunately, three years later his dad died, and shortly after that his mother also died. His uncle took him in and exposed Bolivar to many enlightenment ideas stemming from that of Voltaire and Rousseau. At the young age of 16, Bolivar was sent to Spain to complete his education and on the way he stopped and was able to take in all of the excitement from the French and American Revolutions. Within 3 months, his wife died and never remarried. He was blessed with immense charm, a persuasive personality and confidence along with great leadership, and intelligence. Being familiar with Enlightenment ideas allowed him to vow in 1805, that he would free his homeland from Spanish rule. Six years later, in July, the congress saw Bolivar’s vision, and in response to it declared independence (Skidmore 30).

As historians all know, the creoles were the first people to physically start the revolution. This was due to many reasons, the first being that the peninsulares had ultimate dominion over the creoles. Being born in America was looked upon as a bad thing, and being born on the Iberian peninsula was a plus. Being born on Spanish soil, amidst Europe, automatically placed that person over the creoles, even though the creoles were there children in America. The distance between the two grew as the intendant system was installed. This made the peninsulares royal officers, giving them more power because they were associated with the king of Spain. They were able to report all affairs to the king, and this intendant system placed in by the Bourbons really put a wrinkle on the creoles. It took power away from them, and added more hatred toward the monarch and peninsulares (Chasteen 87).

Join now!

Another reason why his creole background would contribute to his role in independence would be the questioning of hegemony. Hegemony is being content with the social bracket you are in. Mestizoes, mulattoes, indigenous, and African slaves didn’t have many problems with this, but the creoles did. They were sick of the fact that they couldn’t move up in the social ladder, and that they were stuck being second in line. With hegemony came a sort of domination that made people be content with where they were in society (Chasteen 66). However, now the rulers weren’t legitimate, meaning that they didn’t ...

This is a preview of the whole essay