Stalin brought to his people nothing but harm.' To what extent do you agree with this assesment of Stalin's policies up to 1939

Authors Avatar by franciss09 (student)

'Stalin brought to his people nothing but harm.' To what extent do you agree with this assesment of Stalin's policies up to 1939?

Joseph Stalin - the biggest landlord of the USSR, but was he really the best?

    Joseph Stalin completely subdued the country by creating his own system.The ideology alsified reality and forced everyone to take part in this Everything was false: elections, government, culture. Only the police was authentic. Stalin presented his politics as a struggle for peace and progress in the world. Hereferred to the general social interest. His 'truth', however, was a repressive tool of the crime for many milion of people. Psychiatric stigma that 'red car' left behind, allows me to conclude that such a man as Stalin has not done anything good for their citizens, because he never respected their will. He murdered all his opponents and locked in prisons and labour camps on a massive scale. Joseph Stalin was not a good landlord for the people in his country.

    Vladimir Lenin appointed, in 1922, Joseph Stalin as his successor - the Secretary General of the Bolshevik Party.However, shortly before his death,in his testament, Lenin wrote that Stalin is 'too violent' and that 'concentrated too much power in his hands' in the struggle for succession after the leader of the revolution.

Lenin suggested that Stalin was moved away from power and rule. It follows that Lenin foresaw the danger that threatened his countrymen, when the man like Stalin would  continue the ideas of socialism.  From the very beginning, Stalin was a ruthless, rough intriguer that " created his name, nationality, education and all of his past himself in order to change  the course of history ... 'Stalin was also a man capable of anything which means dangerous, therefore he could not do anything good for his Russian population.

Join now!

   Collectivization of agriculture, which, Joseph Stalin began in 1929, was the policy of cruelity, organized with the reckoning. It did not bring any benefit to the citizens of the USSR. The purpose of this policy was to have all  holdings and farms of peasnats under country's control.The result of this policy was a famine, which destroyed million of lives, especially in Ukraine.  Those who did not want  hand over voluntarily the farm voluntarily  or those who protested were treated very brutally and ruthlessy by Stalin's 'people. Some people had to die, others were deported to labor camps or to ...

This is a preview of the whole essay