• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Stalin's Power Struggle

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The Power Struggle Finding a successor to Lenin was never going to be easy. He had played a unique role in holding the party together and giving it direction after the revolution. For the five years after 1924, a power struggle took place in the USSR. The struggle was not just about which person should become leader, it was also about the policies the party should follow. The person who emerged in 1929 as the victor of this struggle was Joseph Stalin. What were the main issues in the leadership struggle? In order to understand the power struggle that took place, we have to look at the issues that were uppermost in people's minds when the struggle was taking place. The nature of the leadership (Collective or Single person) Many party members did not want to see one person running the party and the government; they favoured "collective leadership" or rule by committee as this it was thought that a collective leadership would be a more socialist way of running the state. ...read more.

Middle

This entailed squeezing the peasants to get more grain out of them to pay for industrialization. The right wing of the party, led by Bukharin, wanted to keep the NEP going and to encourage peasants to become richer, so that they would spend more on consumer goods and this would lead to the growth of manufacturing industry. They believed that conflict with the peasants might lead to economic collapse. 'Permanent Revolution' versus 'Socialism in One Country' Another important issue was the overall policy the party should develop for the future. Trotsky and Stalin developed different lines on this: Trotsky believed in 'Permanent Revolution'. He was convinced that the communist revolution in Russia could not really succeed because the Russian working class was too small and the economy underdeveloped; it needed the support of the working class in the more industrialized countries of Europe. He felt that the Russians should put energy and money into helping the working class in other countries to carry out their own revolutions. He wanted to achieve a world communist revolution by applying measures such as forcing peasants into collective farms. ...read more.

Conclusion

A new alliance emerged between Stalin and Bukharin, supporting the NEP. Zinoviev and Kamenev attacked Stalin and the NEP, but Stalin's control of the party was so complete that they lost every vote. They then joined Trotsky and tried to organize demonstrations in Moscow. As a result, they lost their positions of power and were expelled from the party. Stalin turned against the NEP and Bukharin and attacked the right wing. He now adopted the policies the very policies he smashed (industrialization). Bukharin found himself outvoted by Stalin's supporters. Stalin rose as the winner of the power struggle and the successor of Lenin. Summary of points: * The main contenders were Stalin and Trotsky. * Key issues like leadership, NEP, policies were as important as the personalities involved. * It was a struggle over power rather than a struggle for power. Contenders were keen on preventing rivals from coming to power. * Party members tended to support Stalin's policies (Socialism in One Country). * Stalin's control of the party was a crucial factor in his success. * Stalin was a skillful politician who outmaneuvered his opponents. He was also very lucky. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    How far do Trotsky(TM)s own misjudgments account for his failure in the power struggle ...

    4 star(s)

    Furthermore, none of the contenders regarded Stalin as a major threat at first, he was referred to as Comrade Card-Index, and a "dull, grey slate."

  2. To what extent should the success of Stalin in the leadership struggle between 1924-1930 ...

    * 1927; all three were removed from party16. 4. The Fall of the Right * 1927 grain crisis (good season with little grain bought) - party attacked grain hoarders. o "article 107" made grain hoarding a crime17. * Bucharin, Tomsky and Rykov argued NEP continue for many years.

  1. USSR under Stalin

    Stalin often uses the secret police and terror to spread his policies so he tries to create of himself a fair image in front of the peasant party activists and pursue them that he would deal with the kulaks

  2. The Nature of Revolutions Leon Trotsky once remarked that if poverty was the ...

    The desire for change has clearly been exemplified by the occurrences in the Russian Revolution, and more recently in the current events in the Middle East and Northern Africa, the movement towards democracy indicates a progression and desire in the direction of change.

  1. Bolsheviks In Power

    Also, the allies were infuriated by Russia's signing of the treaty; the allies felt betrayed. The Treaty of Brest Litovsk allowed Germany to focus and concentrate its war efforts only on the western front since the eastern front no longer existed.

  2. IB History HL, Extended Notes: Russia, the Tsars, the Provisional Govenment and the Revolution.

    How far did the Dumas solve long-term political problems? Yes 1. Put the Tsar in a stronger position Duma provided a place where the opposition (SD, SR, liberals, etc) could argue and become more divided. 2. Coupled with Stolypin?s violent suppression of opposition this marginalized opponents after 1905 No 1.

  1. Which of indoctrination and repression proved most effective for consolidating Hitler's power (1933-1939)?

    elements “were taken from libraries and bookshops and burned by Nazi activists.”[8] in Berlin. More than 20,000 books were banned by Nazis. Literature and art were now to be promoting Nazi’s ideals and thus promote their values. Anti-semist values promoting Aryan superiority, nationalism, militarism and cult to the Fürher.

  2. Notes on the History and Development of the Arab-Israeli Conflict

    - The Zionist Perspective: The 'Pre-Emptive Strike' - Israel was threatened with superior numbers and warlike rhetoric; their only action was to attack first - The Palestinian and Arabic Perspective: The 'Pre-Meditated Attack' - That the Arab rhetoric was empty, and Israel knew this.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work