• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Stalin's Rise to Power

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Stalin, the "Man of Steel" is known for his use of terror during his legendary rule, the kind of leader that would stop at almost nothing to accomplish his goals. Ruthless, ambitious and cunning are among words commonly used to describe him. However, despite the fear he invoked among the people of Russia he did indeed start jump the economy and force the backward economy of Russia into the modern world of technology. With the two underlying themes of collectivization and industrialization he was able to give Russia the push which it lacked for so many years. The question of Stalin's adequacy as a state leader still remains. Even though there were drastic improvements in terms of the economy, the population of Russia was still quite distraught. During his rule there was famine, propaganda, poor living conditions and massive terror. This was due to the "iron fist" method of rule Stalin incorporated in his system of government. But why was it Stalin who took over control in Russia in the first place, at the time where Russia's policy and economy struggled the most? The Bolsheviks were not quite yet familiar with the aspects of controlling a government in 1917, when they found Russia in their hands. Lacking a firm structure Lenin needed organization within the party. ...read more.

Middle

This was unfortunate, for the organization in terms of the Party was a leading factor for Stalin's victory over Trotsky. Although he is described as being among "intellectuals, inspired theoreticians, brilliant writers" Trotsky still lost the battle in the end. Despite these qualities which Trotsky possessed in abundance he failed to apply them correctly, because he did not manage to excel on political terms. Trotsky seemed aware that he was not quite designed for the role of Party leader and the work it demanded. This is where Stalin took advantage, being used to hard work and using his ability, not his intelligence to excel, he was able to take the lead from Trotsky. However, Trotsky hesitated to publish Lenin's testament until he finally decided to use it as a weapon against Stalin, which turned out to be a big mistake, and it ended up working against him in the end. After Lenin's death, Trotsky ignored how important public appearance was - his declining of the opportunity to make a major speech at Lenin's funeral in January 1924 was nothing compared to his actual failure to attend at all. This absence was like a direct insult to Lenin, and the party. Stalin's oration at the funeral implicated that the people of Russia saw Stalin as a supreme man who was true to Lenin until the bitter end. ...read more.

Conclusion

After concealing Lenin's testament, nothing and no one could stop Stalin's rise of power anymore. After drawing all findings together, Stalin's cunning policy and his careful thought and manipulation of situations by far simply gave him advantage to excel over Trotsky. He was aware of the qualifications and steps required in the gaining of power over the Party and he took those required steps to achieve his goal. This is where Trotsky had failed, with all his intellect and organizational skills. He was an educated man but however, the Party was in need of control, stability and a firm ruler, which Trotsky could not provide. Stalin excelled in his modest, hardworking and reliable appearance in his early year, which allowed him to build up supporters within the Party. Furthermore his loyalty to Lenin and his personality cult put Stalin in the position of trust and support among Russia's population. Stalin noticed his affect on the majority of the people and utilized it to accomplish his own ideas. These essentials and the fact, that Stalin was in the position of the General Secretary, Stalin managed to excel Trotsky, even though he surpassed with his intellect and military skills. Therefore, it was Stalin, who took control of the entire state and became one of the most significant and feared leader in both world and Russian history. ( Word Converter - nicht registriert ) http://www.word-converter.net ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    How far do Trotsky(TM)s own misjudgments account for his failure in the power struggle ...

    4 star(s)

    I was deceived... The conspirators surmised correctly that I would never think of verifying it." Whether Trotsky's account of the deception is reliable or not is of course, an issue of debate, however whether it be his decision not to attend or his decision not to verify his information, Trotsky

  2. Castro's rise to power

    for his regime was characterized by the ruthlessness with which it was being conducted. This, of course made people want to have another leader; someone who would actually defend their country, fight for them: Fidel Castro. The fact that Batista favored economic interests of American industries and the Cuban elite

  1. Stalin's Rise to Power2

    patriotism", but also "created a climate of opinion in which he was to exploit the utmost in his struggle against his rivals."11 For instance, he directly attacked Trotsky's position that the Russian Revolution could not succeed without an International Revolution.

  2. Stalin's rise to power, his policies and how he consolidated his grip on power.

    the total transformation of industry at the expense of the peasantry-the programme of Trotsky, in effect, minus the spreading of revolution to the rest of Europe. * This was strongly opposed by Bukharin, Rykov and Tomsky and they became more outspoken as Stalin gradually introduced measures against the wealthy peasantry, or "kulaks".

  1. IB History HL, Extended Notes: Russia, the Tsars, the Provisional Govenment and the Revolution.

    Overcrowding and competition due to insufficient land and large population growth. Wanted social change. 3. Urban workers and industry: 58% were literate (twice the national average) which meant they could articulate their ideas. Low wages and high death rate from accidents and health issues.

  2. Notes on the History and Development of the Arab-Israeli Conflict

    Palestinian's causing trouble - By mid-1975, the 'high-wire act' that was Lebanon slipped into full-scale civil war. Syria entered the situation and soon had thousands of troops in the country attempting to bring peace though more likely trying to impose Syrian influence - Two interpretations can be placed on the

  1. Account for the Rise of Power of Mao Zedong

    the CCP?s guerrilla tactics, where Communist agents infiltrated the GMD hierarchy to hold prominent positions, such as Wei Lihung, a Communist GMD Commander in Manchuria, who made his unit stay well past the point of hopelessness to gain maximum damage.

  2. The Rise of Julius Caesar

    A warm response was elicited from the population, aiding his popular election to consul and dictator. Additionally when Caesar was appointed to praetorship in 70 B.C. one of the first things he did to win favour was propose a land reformation, which removed power from the wealthy and distributed it

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work