• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Stalin struggle for leadership

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Using these sources and your own knowledge, explain to what extent you agree with the assertion that Stalin was able to become leader after the death of Lenin because of Trotsky's weaknesses. The few tactical mistakes that Trotsky did in the struggle for leadership after Lenin's death against Stalin caused him his total lost of power in the Party. Trotsky's main weakness of being inactive and not enough counterattacking to Stalin's taunts helped Stalin to take power over the Soviet Union. As in all of the five sources Trotsky's ''exceptional abilities'' of being either a great statesman or an excellent theorist can be seen, it can be concluded that he had all the qualities to lead the Soviet Union. However, his main weakness that Stalin played on to make his way to the ''ultimate power'' was that Trotsky had more a reactive then a proactive attitude towards Stalin's actions. During the struggle for power there were few occasions that Trotsky missed in order to attack Stalin and destroy his reputation. ...read more.

Middle

This low level of action made him an easy opponent for Stalin. Trotsky's good knowledge of Marxism was a strength that he had over Stalin who had ''weak theoretical grounding'' according to source B. But it seems as it did not help him to win over Stalin as it even caused him further deterioration in his position in the Party. After Lenin's death Trotsky stated that the NEP (New Economic Policy) should be replaced as it was against Marxist values due to the freedom of enterprise and private farms it allowed. For a true Marxist as Trotsky this was more of a capitalistic idea so he took the side of the left communists. However, Stalin considered this as Party disloyalty and exposed it to the rest of the Party members as betrayal towards Lenin's position. In this way Stalin used Trotsky's NEP attitude to undermine him. But Trotsky again did not make a massive reply or attack him back. ...read more.

Conclusion

Trotsky inefficient actions are also proven by source D which claims '' Often at the most critical moments of struggle he left the arena. Once when the Politburo was reviewing his position, he was on a hunting trip.'' Trotsky had a major weakness which was his inefficient actions against his opponent -Stalin. He had all the qualities of a good leader and politician but he just did not react strong enough against Stalin's tactics. His behaviour is almost not understandable as he had a few great chances to destroy Stalin particularly during the Georgian problem and with Lenin's testament. When he decided to oppose to Stalin by uniting with Kamenev and Zinoviev it was pointless as they themselves have already lost positions in the Party. Trotsky's incapability to counterattack Stalin's almost elementary tactics was the only reason that enabled Stalin to took power over the Soviet. Or the argument should not be about Trotsky's weaknesses that allowed Stalin to take power but about Stalin's too revolutionary behaviour as Trotsky was not the only one from Politburo that had a chance to take power over the Soviet and did not show enough resistance. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    How far do Trotsky(TM)s own misjudgments account for his failure in the power struggle ...

    4 star(s)

    Furthermore, none of the contenders regarded Stalin as a major threat at first, he was referred to as Comrade Card-Index, and a "dull, grey slate."

  2. USSR under Stalin

    Source B emphasizes more that the main enemies of collectivization were the kulaks whether Source C claims that everyone who imposed to give its land was considered for an enemy of the state and called a kulak. The contrast is that Source B and Source C give different explanation for kulak.

  1. To what extent should the success of Stalin in the leadership struggle between 1924-1930 ...

    * Zinoviev believed himself the next leader of the party; saw Trotsky as primary threat, not Stalin4. * Trotsky attacked Kamenev and Zinoviev in "Lessons of October"5, o They formed a stronger alliance with Stalin6. (Appendices 3) * Trotsky made several mistakes - adding to his unpopularity.

  2. The USSR under Lenin

    Lenin's policies of liberalisation of the female sex, however, remained relatively unsuccessful. The relaxed divorce laws resulted in many young men divorcing their wives as soon as they became pregnant, leaving these women unable to sustain their children or themselves - criminality and prostitution were the results.

  1. Stalin's Power Struggle

    They knew it was essential that the party stick together if it were to accomplish the huge task of transforming an unwilling population into good socialists. They therefore did not want a leader who might cause divisions among the different wings of the party. Again, it was Trotsky they feared.

  2. Hitler vs. Stalin: Who is a more destructive leader in terms of religious groups?

    Several of these examples will be used. Some will be from people who Stalin effected and some will be from people who Hitler effects. All of these examples will be compared and contrasted to help determine who was a more destructive leader.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work