"The achievements of the Nationalist government of China between 1928 and 1937 have been greatly under-estimated." To what extent do you agree with this statement?

Authors Avatar

Gaurav Mishra                                                                                                          16/Feb/09

"The achievements of the Nationalist government of China between 1928 and 1937 have been greatly under-estimated." To what extent do you agree with this statement?

 

        

Chang Kai-shek (October 31, 1887 – April 5, 1975) served as the “Generalissimo” of the nationalist government of the Republic of China. After Yuan Shi-Kai’s failed at ruling China, the country fell into a warlord era’s from 1916-1928. During this time period the nationalist party grew more powerful and by 1928, was in power. For roughly the next 10 years of his reign, many historians including Stacey Foster undermined his achievements. His achievements were minimal and often made no significant affect. I do not agree with this statement.

        As a military man, Chiang Kai-shek underestimated the importance of social and economic reform. He started his economic reform by changing the confusing currency to a much simpler form. His government introduced four national banks to control the countries financial conditions. A national tax was introduced. There was some industrial progress in the light industries such has flour production and chemical materials and imports from the west regarding machinery and other industrial equipment. Also, western powers re-established tariff independence to china and control over salt trade. Economic reforms were not very successful. Most developments that were made were only concentrated in the urban areas. The tax collection was not efficient and corrupt. Rural poverty was still in existence near the cities. Rural income of a normal Chinese person was $26 per year, which was spent on rent and payments on debt.

Join now!

        Social reforms also took place, but made no real significance. This was because the base of the KMT’s power was in the more urban area’s, Chang spend most of his attention on these area’s. The social problems in the countryside were not dealt with. Laws were past that restricted farm rents to exceed 37.5% of the crop yield at most. Yet, these laws didn’t work because many of the government officials were rich landowners. The land rent continued to be as high as 50-70% of the crop yield. The government provided no real welfare, health or social service. 5000 ...

This is a preview of the whole essay