• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The atomic bombs were necessary to end the Second World War. To what extent do you agree with this statement?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

At the end of the Second World War, President Truman decided to use the atomic bombs against Japan in an attempt to end the war. While the use of such force was not technically necessary, it brought an almost immediate end to the war and theoretically saved thousands of lives. Without the atomic bombings, the Japanese leaders might have dragged the war out, refusing to surrender. Moreover, the bombings could be seen as falling in line with the concept of "total war," which was being practiced in the Second World War by both the Allies and the Axis powers. However, the opposite could be argued as well. The second bomb, dropped on Nagasaki, could be seen as an unnecessary follow-through after the first bomb on Hiroshima. One could go as far as saying that both atomic attacks were unnecessary and even immoral. Supporters of the bombings argue that an invasion of Japan by the Allies would have resulted in a much higher death toll. One such person, Winston Churchill, claimed that invading Japan, as opposed to dropping the atomic bombs, would have "sacrificed a million American and a quarter of a million British lives." ...read more.

Middle

Part of Japanese culture is the concept of "bushido" or "the way of the warrior." It involved fighting to the death and refusing to be captured or surrender. It even went so far as to encourage suicide through disembowelment, a ritual called seppuku or harakiri, to prevent oneself from losing one's honor. This was the ideology that made the Japanese resistant to surrender, especially within the military. That proved to be a problem, because the Japanese Supreme War Council would have to reach a unanimous agreement before accepting any peace agreements. As expected, they rejected the demand for an unconditional surrender from the United States. Even after the atomic bombs were dropped, the hard-line militants refused to accept an unconditional surrender; Emperor Hirohito had to intervene to make the necessary peace agreements possible. The idea that the atomic bombings were tied to the total war aspect of the Second World War is also argued by supporters of the bombs. The concept of total war is that the country as a whole is geared toward the military effort. ...read more.

Conclusion

The intent of the second atomic bomb was to indicate to Japan that the United States had the massively destructive ability at its disposal and that the first bomb was not a fluke or a once-in-a-lifetime occurrence. This idea was proven when the Japanese militants attempted to minimize the psychological impact of the first atomic bomb, but were prepared to surrender after the second. However, instead of dropping either bomb, the Allies could have simply continued their more orthodox fire-bombing strategy and followed up with a land-based invasion if the Japanese still refused to surrender. This theory could work under the assumption that the Allies continually increased their fire-bombing efforts. The fact Japan was also willing to accept a conditional surrender supports this idea. The Allies could have saved many more lives by giving Japan a few concessions. While the use of atomic bombs against Japan was not technically necessary to end the Second World War, it did cause the war to end much more quickly. Supporters of the attacks often reference the hundreds of thousands of lives that were theoretically saved by ending the war swiftly with the atomic bombs. Opposition to the atomic bombs generally view the moral aspect behind the acts. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. American Response to the Bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki

    In an interview, Elaine Tyler May discussed the concept of nuclear numbing: "After the shock and horror of what these bombs had wrought in Japan, Americans gradually just came-became numb to what atomic power could actually do... These are weapons that are out there, but, uh, presumably they're only going to be there for deterrence."

  2. WW1 Total War

    The centralized power grew even more because the executive authorities could now also expand their influence in areas that were formally known as private. This had a great influence in the civilians daily life. Every factory capable to produce ammunition and other military goods was transformed to a "war factory", and produced only those goods.

  1. The cold war - the conferences and the start of the cCold War

    Decisions were mostly taken in Moscow and COMECON conferences, which gave the appearance of free negotiation usually followed the COMECON lead - The system favored the USSR more than other members: a) The USSR was given a market to sell its goods b)

  2. The causes of the second world war

    Another reason that is often regarded as a major war cause is Hitler's Master Plan. The nations' desire for revenge over the Treaty of Versailles and Hitler's personal desires influenced greatly his Foreign Policy and his aims, which in turn, were very decisive in the steps to war.

  1. What were the intentions of President Harry S. Truman and General Douglas MacArthur regarding ...

    had only 98,000 men, of which only about 30 percent possessed individual weapons (Appleman 35). Because of the ROK Army's lack of preparation, by August KPA could push the ROK Army to Pusan, the extreme southeastern part of Korea1. To protest, the US Army destroyed the passage lines of military supplies to KPA.

  2. WWI. To what extent can it be argued that the First World War was ...

    (Parkinson, 16) Nationalism played an important role in the final stages of the outbreak of the war, the weakening of the great powers' hold on the smaller states. Nationalism "among various ethnic groups weakened the bonds of the three multiethnic empires of Eastern Europe: Austria-Hungary, Ottoman Turkey, and Russia.

  1. To what extent were economic conditions the predominant factor in the proliferation and manifestation ...

    and liberalism, and would contribute to an insufficient political foundation for the Weimar Republic from which the Nazis profited immensely. An additional aspect of Bismarcks political agenda that when regarded in retrospect contributed to the climate of political fragmentation and incoherence present in the 1920?s was his active hindrance of the emerging labor movement.

  2. "The Worst Human Right Abuses occur in LEDCs". To what extent do you agree ...

    Mass murders have killed hundreds of millions of human beings in wars such as the Two World Wars, but they are not the worst kind of violation of article number 31 of the UDHR. They are more serious when they target large groups of people from a particular ethnic class or nation.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work