• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The atomic bombs were necessary to end the Second World War. To what extent do you agree with this statement?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

At the end of the Second World War, President Truman decided to use the atomic bombs against Japan in an attempt to end the war. While the use of such force was not technically necessary, it brought an almost immediate end to the war and theoretically saved thousands of lives. Without the atomic bombings, the Japanese leaders might have dragged the war out, refusing to surrender. Moreover, the bombings could be seen as falling in line with the concept of "total war," which was being practiced in the Second World War by both the Allies and the Axis powers. However, the opposite could be argued as well. The second bomb, dropped on Nagasaki, could be seen as an unnecessary follow-through after the first bomb on Hiroshima. One could go as far as saying that both atomic attacks were unnecessary and even immoral. Supporters of the bombings argue that an invasion of Japan by the Allies would have resulted in a much higher death toll. One such person, Winston Churchill, claimed that invading Japan, as opposed to dropping the atomic bombs, would have "sacrificed a million American and a quarter of a million British lives." ...read more.

Middle

Part of Japanese culture is the concept of "bushido" or "the way of the warrior." It involved fighting to the death and refusing to be captured or surrender. It even went so far as to encourage suicide through disembowelment, a ritual called seppuku or harakiri, to prevent oneself from losing one's honor. This was the ideology that made the Japanese resistant to surrender, especially within the military. That proved to be a problem, because the Japanese Supreme War Council would have to reach a unanimous agreement before accepting any peace agreements. As expected, they rejected the demand for an unconditional surrender from the United States. Even after the atomic bombs were dropped, the hard-line militants refused to accept an unconditional surrender; Emperor Hirohito had to intervene to make the necessary peace agreements possible. The idea that the atomic bombings were tied to the total war aspect of the Second World War is also argued by supporters of the bombs. The concept of total war is that the country as a whole is geared toward the military effort. ...read more.

Conclusion

The intent of the second atomic bomb was to indicate to Japan that the United States had the massively destructive ability at its disposal and that the first bomb was not a fluke or a once-in-a-lifetime occurrence. This idea was proven when the Japanese militants attempted to minimize the psychological impact of the first atomic bomb, but were prepared to surrender after the second. However, instead of dropping either bomb, the Allies could have simply continued their more orthodox fire-bombing strategy and followed up with a land-based invasion if the Japanese still refused to surrender. This theory could work under the assumption that the Allies continually increased their fire-bombing efforts. The fact Japan was also willing to accept a conditional surrender supports this idea. The Allies could have saved many more lives by giving Japan a few concessions. While the use of atomic bombs against Japan was not technically necessary to end the Second World War, it did cause the war to end much more quickly. Supporters of the attacks often reference the hundreds of thousands of lives that were theoretically saved by ending the war swiftly with the atomic bombs. Opposition to the atomic bombs generally view the moral aspect behind the acts. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. WW1 Total War

    The centralized power grew even more because the executive authorities could now also expand their influence in areas that were formally known as private. This had a great influence in the civilians daily life. Every factory capable to produce ammunition and other military goods was transformed to a "war factory", and produced only those goods.

  2. Wars frequently begin ten years before the first shot is fired. To what extent ...

    And lastly, Kaiser being the nephew of Britain's Queen Victoria greatly admired and envied Britain's naval power, he was worried about his lack of prestige in comparison with Britain's empire and thus it wanted to equal Britain. The last reason was a more personal reason as compared to the other four reasons.

  1. Did Truman really save 500,000 American live through dropping the Hiroshima atomic bomb?

    On May 12th 1945, ULTRA intercepts showed that Japan had deployed 246,000 soldiers in Kyushu, U.S. analysts predicted that the total enemy strength would not exceed 350,000 combatants before the schedule invasion. However by August 2nd Japanese correctly predicted where Olympic was to take place and increased deployment to 545,000

  2. The cold war - the conferences and the start of the cCold War

    The building of the wall was a desperate measure by East Germany and was called for less by Khrushchev than by the pitiless East German Leader Walter Ulbricht 3) October 1961; access to East Berlin had been guaranteed to the allies since 1945 so the building of the wall created a major crisis.

  1. WWI. To what extent can it be argued that the First World War was ...

    (Parkinson, 16) Nationalism played an important role in the final stages of the outbreak of the war, the weakening of the great powers' hold on the smaller states. Nationalism "among various ethnic groups weakened the bonds of the three multiethnic empires of Eastern Europe: Austria-Hungary, Ottoman Turkey, and Russia.

  2. For what reason and with what results did the Second World War allies ...

    Meanwhile, around those periods, USA was practicing isolationism (sometimes argued to be non-interventionism rather than isolationism) cutting them from the West therefore having little contact with its near future war allies. The United Kingdom and France were both recovering from the First World War as best as they could, and having were both sorting out their post-war problems.

  1. Was The Second World War beneficial to the United States of America?

    It began to expand its armed forces, build defense plants, and give the Allies all-out aid short of war. On December 7, 1941, while German armies were freezing before Moscow, Japan suddenly pushed the United States into the struggle by attacking the American naval base at Pearl Harbor, Hawaii.

  2. The Potsdam Conference marked the end of the wartime alliance and laid the foundations ...

    to deal with Stalin and the expansion of communism and just pursued an aggressive foreign policy toward Stalin. This upset the soviet leader and once the news arrived that America had just tested its first Atomic bomb, Stalin was shocked.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work