• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The atomic bombs were necessary to end the Second World War. To what extent do you agree with this statement?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

At the end of the Second World War, President Truman decided to use the atomic bombs against Japan in an attempt to end the war. While the use of such force was not technically necessary, it brought an almost immediate end to the war and theoretically saved thousands of lives. Without the atomic bombings, the Japanese leaders might have dragged the war out, refusing to surrender. Moreover, the bombings could be seen as falling in line with the concept of "total war," which was being practiced in the Second World War by both the Allies and the Axis powers. However, the opposite could be argued as well. The second bomb, dropped on Nagasaki, could be seen as an unnecessary follow-through after the first bomb on Hiroshima. One could go as far as saying that both atomic attacks were unnecessary and even immoral. Supporters of the bombings argue that an invasion of Japan by the Allies would have resulted in a much higher death toll. One such person, Winston Churchill, claimed that invading Japan, as opposed to dropping the atomic bombs, would have "sacrificed a million American and a quarter of a million British lives." ...read more.

Middle

Part of Japanese culture is the concept of "bushido" or "the way of the warrior." It involved fighting to the death and refusing to be captured or surrender. It even went so far as to encourage suicide through disembowelment, a ritual called seppuku or harakiri, to prevent oneself from losing one's honor. This was the ideology that made the Japanese resistant to surrender, especially within the military. That proved to be a problem, because the Japanese Supreme War Council would have to reach a unanimous agreement before accepting any peace agreements. As expected, they rejected the demand for an unconditional surrender from the United States. Even after the atomic bombs were dropped, the hard-line militants refused to accept an unconditional surrender; Emperor Hirohito had to intervene to make the necessary peace agreements possible. The idea that the atomic bombings were tied to the total war aspect of the Second World War is also argued by supporters of the bombs. The concept of total war is that the country as a whole is geared toward the military effort. ...read more.

Conclusion

The intent of the second atomic bomb was to indicate to Japan that the United States had the massively destructive ability at its disposal and that the first bomb was not a fluke or a once-in-a-lifetime occurrence. This idea was proven when the Japanese militants attempted to minimize the psychological impact of the first atomic bomb, but were prepared to surrender after the second. However, instead of dropping either bomb, the Allies could have simply continued their more orthodox fire-bombing strategy and followed up with a land-based invasion if the Japanese still refused to surrender. This theory could work under the assumption that the Allies continually increased their fire-bombing efforts. The fact Japan was also willing to accept a conditional surrender supports this idea. The Allies could have saved many more lives by giving Japan a few concessions. While the use of atomic bombs against Japan was not technically necessary to end the Second World War, it did cause the war to end much more quickly. Supporters of the attacks often reference the hundreds of thousands of lives that were theoretically saved by ending the war swiftly with the atomic bombs. Opposition to the atomic bombs generally view the moral aspect behind the acts. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. WW1 Total War

    The centralized power grew even more because the executive authorities could now also expand their influence in areas that were formally known as private. This had a great influence in the civilians daily life. Every factory capable to produce ammunition and other military goods was transformed to a "war factory", and produced only those goods.

  2. Did Truman really save 500,000 American live through dropping the Hiroshima atomic bomb?

    On May 12th 1945, ULTRA intercepts showed that Japan had deployed 246,000 soldiers in Kyushu, U.S. analysts predicted that the total enemy strength would not exceed 350,000 combatants before the schedule invasion. However by August 2nd Japanese correctly predicted where Olympic was to take place and increased deployment to 545,000

  1. The cold war - the conferences and the start of the cCold War

    be put into effect and America did not want to be put in the position of being the only power left to impose the containment policy or to resist Communist aggression - The Brussels Treaty of March 17, 1948 between Britain, France, Luxembourg, Belgium and the Netherlands was a defense

  2. WWI. To what extent can it be argued that the First World War was ...

    (Parkinson, 16) Nationalism played an important role in the final stages of the outbreak of the war, the weakening of the great powers' hold on the smaller states. Nationalism "among various ethnic groups weakened the bonds of the three multiethnic empires of Eastern Europe: Austria-Hungary, Ottoman Turkey, and Russia.

  1. The causes of the second world war

    This was a crucial aspect in Hitler's rise to power, as he used the Great Depression to make his way into power, by claiming that he would 'save' Germany from economic crisis and that he would 'shake off' the Treaty of Versailles.

  2. To what extent were economic conditions the predominant factor in the proliferation and manifestation ...

    Other factors of greater magnitude allowed the Nazis to excel from a fringe party to the largest, most dominant movement in the country. This view is supported by historian Richard J. Evans who regards the policies of Bismarck as a contributory factor, but considers other aspects to be of far more decisive nature.

  1. "The Worst Human Right Abuses occur in LEDCs". To what extent do you agree ...

    Through the invasion of European countries such as Poland, which had a population of two million Jews, he found himself in the power of conducting genocide, so he generated a cult of hatred against the Jews justified by his disgust for them and intolerance against their existence.

  2. Was The Second World War beneficial to the United States of America?

    Four days later Hitler declared war on the United States. President Roosevelt called on Congress for immediate and massive expansion of the armed forces. Twenty years of neglect and indifference, however, could not be overcome in a few days. .

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work