• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Backdrop for the Emancipation of the Serfs under Alexander II, 1861

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The Backdrop for the Emancipation of the Serfs under Alexander II, 1861 The Edict of Emancipation, a manifesto issued in March 1861, ended, with its "Statutes Concerning Peasants Leaving Serf Dependence", over two centuries of Russian feudalism and was thus the single most consequential element of Russian history from the time of Peter the Great to the revolutions of 1917. In this essay, I shall examine the factors surrounding the purposes behind this monumental reform that fully satisfied no one. Tsar Alexander II (1855-81), was born to a leader renowned for his reactionary policies and had been heir to the throne from the day of his birth. Though not initially anti-progressive, he was a conservative man well trained for his position as autocratic ruler unrestricted by constitution. While the "Modern Era" flourished in the West, his Russia was a country seemingly caught in the Middle Ages, notoriously backward in comparison. The humiliating and economically strenuous defeat in the Crimean War (1853-56), set Russia as the defeated power for the first time since 1712 [Cowie, Wolfson], highlighting this state of underdevelopment. To retain Russia's position as a world power, reformation was inescapable and so began Alexander II's momentous relationship with domestic affairs. ...read more.

Middle

These were the main reasons for the edict; the humanitarian question was clearly neglected given, among other effects, the unfair redistribution of the land and 495 years of debt through redemption payments that were to accompany the "freedom" which the edict promised the peasants. Though peasant unrest is generally considered a major factor toward the creation of the edict, the slightly rising numbers of peasant disturbances, classified as "refusal to fulfill obligations", were far from out of the ordinary. Considering the vastness of the Russian Empire and her stereotypical tendency toward alcohol abuse, 108 [Curtis, data for 1860, p50] instances of disobedience in a year are next to none, especially given the fast circulation of rumors about the serfs' proposed autonomy from their landlords [Curtiss p51]. Even half a century later, during the 1905 revolution, the people were not ready to overthrow their "Little Father" for there was a severe lack of political awareness among peasants. The Decembrist conspiracy of 1825 is an ideal example in which the crowds calling for "Constantine and Constitution" believed that the latter was the wife of Grand Duke Constantine. Each peasant lived his life in his own limited world, few venturing beyond the next village in their entire lifetime. ...read more.

Conclusion

Where he was prepared to acquiesce to his people, it was not enough, or not in the correct manner. On March 1, 1881, he was assassinated by revolutionary terrorists. Despite their many consequences (be they negative or positive depend entirely on the viewpoint), Alexander's reforms caused the empire to step forward in terms of the formulation of ideas and ideologies and paved a rickety but hard-wearing path toward future development. They allowed for much of the thought that caused later revolt and revolution. The Emancipation had changed the legal status of the serfs but little else, for the same agricultural practices were kept. Industry, with a small influx of "freed" serf workers, improved but failed to keep up with the West. The army grew seemingly stronger and the Russo-Turkish War of 1877 was won. The war with Japan in 1904 and the First World War were not. As Marx wrote, war is the midwife of progress. Following the Crimean war, Alexander II instituted "liberalization" processes, attempting to please all, yet Russia's diversity ensured this to be impossible. Instead, all remained dissatisfied. Despite his later reactionary policies, radicalism grew steadily as the steam had been let out of the pot. Overall, his failure to create sufficient political change became the basis for future uprisings. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Compare and Contrast the Policies of Alexander II and Alexander III

    3 star(s)

    In addition, universities were not able to hire their own professors and legislation was passed to create new syllabi for the school. In addition to these repressive measures, history was not allowed to be taught unless given prior permission by the Minister of Education.

  2. The emancipation of the serfs in Russia was the only genuine reform introduced by ...

    The Great Emancipation Statute, announced in 1861 was aiming to give freedom to the serfs, keeping the satisfaction of nobles and landlords at the same time. However, as it soon turned out, the changes weren't very efficient and in many aspects the serfdom remained.

  1. Italian Unification Revision Notes. Italian Politics in 1815

    The rebels in these regions set up provisional governments and sought fusion with Piedmont. � For Napoleon III, however, events were moving too fast. Anxious about the heavy losses, the lack of support for the war in France, the threat of a Prussian army mobilising on the Rhine, apparently in

  2. To what extent did Alexander II's reforms cause more problems than they solved?

    After the 1867 university clampdown, students were outraged even more and the growth of radical movement increased and remained a feature of the Russian society well into the 20th century, when in 1917 Tsarist rule was finally abolished. After the defeat in the Crimean War, Alexander II tried to restore

  1. Analyse the political factors involved in the unification of Italy up to 1861

    by the professional classes who didn't want to be under the oppressive rule of the Church authorities. The papal government put up a new government called 'The Government of the Italian Provinces' which was made in Bologna in February 1831.

  2. The policies of Alexander II and III of Russia

    intention, the task of ruling, with faith in the strength and truth of autocratic power. We are summoned to reaffirm that Power and preserve it for the benefit of the people from any encroachment.' This excerpt has been taken from Alexander III's 'Manifesto of Unshakeable Autocracy'.

  1. Compare and Contract the policies of Alexander II and Alexander III in Russia?

    In 1882, Kakhanov Commission set up to consider reform of administration at Volost and village levels (abolished in 1885). He also proposed to reconvene a zemsky sobor, and Assembly of the Land. Zemstva continued to carry out improvement in the village.

  2. IB History HL, Extended Notes: Russia, the Tsars, the Provisional Govenment and the Revolution.

    Only those who went to gimnaziya could progress to universities, the rest went to technical schools. 5. Did increase the number of teacher training colleges and (although he was against it) he was forced to allow Moscow University to accept women.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work