• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The effectiveness of political compromise during the period of 1820-1861

Extracts from this document...


The effectiveness of political compromise during the period of 1820-1861 was ultimately seen as impotent in its final goals. In effect the political compromise did not reduce sectional tension during this time period. Due to the political unrest between the northern and southern states, the final outcome of these sectional tensions was the Civil War. Some compromises that were enacted to relieve this sectional stress were the Missouri Compromise, the Compromise of 1850, and The Crittenden Compromise. The Missouri compromise was overall ineffective towards the issue of relieving sectional tensions between the northern and southern states. The Missouri Compromise was a plan to relieve the aggression that faced both the pro and anti slavery factions by creating a borderline for both factions to follow. ...read more.


This created disunity and eventually led to the aggravation of the south. The Compromise of 1850 was also a cause for the increased tensions between both northern and southern states. The root of this tension stemmed form the admission of California to the Union. This infuriated the southerners because not only did the north gain California, they outlawed slavery in Washington DC. However, with the admission of California the southern states gained the Fugitive Slave Law. With this particular law it became a federal crime to aid a runaway slave. This ultimately lessened the strain of sectional tensions between the north and south. This shows that the compromise was somewhat effective in the relief of sectional pressure. ...read more.


However, this compromise did not gain popularity in the senate because it favored the southerner's interests rather than the desires of the north. In effect this act further alienated the southern citizens of the United States showing that the northerners had a larger influence on the government. This Compromise in reality further separated the south from the north and further increased sectional tension within the United States. Overall, the compromises that were enacted in order to stop the sectional tension within the United States were ultimately fruitless. This can be seen in the various political movements such as the Missouri Compromise, the Compromise of 1850, and The Crittenden Compromise. These actions ultimately created more tension between both the northern and southern factions which in effect lead to the separation of the union. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. Can the period between 1924-1929 really be called the Golden period for the Weimar ...

    The Germans believed in military strength to regain power rather than international political relations. Additionally, the Allied troops still occupied much of the west bank of the Rhine and the Weimar Republic had not made much progress in overturning the Treaty of Versailles.

  2. The Missouri Compromise. The fear of politicians was that if Missouri was admitted ...

    Even though slavery was illegal in the north, northerners still lent money to southerners so they could buy slaves and land to produce cotton. Politically, the compromise appeared to want to maintain balance.

  1. Analyse the political factors involved in the unification of Italy up to 1861

    Farmer describes the contributions and attacks made by the Carbonari in Piedmont, Modena, Parma and Papal States, and talks about the failures during 1821. In Piedmont the Carbonari rapidly mainly university students, army officers and liberals came together to establish a revolutionary government in the town Alessandria, and wanted the 'Kingdom of Italy,'declaring war on Austria.

  2. American Political Parties: Past and Present

    central government should be the head of the nation, not individual state sovereignties. Federalists also believed that a large republic would be the best safeguard for personal freedoms, meaning that a larger, centralized government can be better to protect the rights of the citizens.

  1. The North, The South, and Slavery

    Ownership of American enterprise was moving away from individuals and families and toward many stockholders, each owning small proportion of total iv. $$$ and tech.- crucial factor in advancement of industrialization i. Industrial capitalists soon became ruling class (aristocrats) of NE i. Secured dominance and often reached political influence ii.

  2. Law and Order in the Medieval Period Assigment - Year 8

    1. Who were the Normans The Normans of France the Vikings established a very strong base. In 911 the leader of the Normans Hrolf defeated Charles the simple (a descent from Charlemagne) forcing the Franks to pay heavy penalties. But the Frankish king came to an agreement with Hrolf.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work