• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"The fact that Stalin became the dominant leader of Russia by 1929 indicates that he was a more skilful politician than Trotsky." How far do you agree with this statement?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"The fact that Stalin became the dominant leader of Russia by 1929 indicates that he was a more skilful politician than Trotsky." How far do you agree with this statement? After the death of Lenin in 1924, the new leader of the Soviet Union was uncertain. There were many struggling for power, the two which outstood the most were, Joseph Stalin and Leon Trotsky. In this ardent power race, political intelligence would not be enough to win. In order to prove this, there is a need to view each man's actions and compare them, in order to prove that although both men were capable of leading the USSR, Stalin out ran Trotsky through manipulation and luck, not only political skill. Stalin was a cunning, tough, intelligent man. He knew what he wanted and although it is not to argue that he was politically intelligent, he not only used political skills to work to the top and become leader of the USSR, he as well took advantage of "lucky" events. ...read more.

Middle

Stalin's powerbase was not his only advantage to Trotsky, many events which took place as well aided him. After Lenin's death in January 1924, Stalin, Kamenev, and Zinoviev together governed the party, placing themselves ideologically between Trotsky (on the left wing of the party) and Bukharin (on the right). He took Lenin's death as a way to demonstrate his loyalty and doing a tribune to him in order to gain popularity. He as well tricked Trotsky into not showing up to the funeral by giving him a wrong date which affected Trotsky's reputation. An example of political strategy used by Stalin's to his rise to power is the way that he manipulated his opponents and played them off against each other in order to eliminate each one. His first target was the left wing. Together with Zinoviev and Kamenev, Stalin outdid Trotsky by campaigns questioning his loyalty to Lenin, this breaking up the left wing. When Trotsky was finally rid of, Stalin then turned on Kamenev and Zinoviev and joined Bukharin and Rykov (right wing) ...read more.

Conclusion

Trotsky was beaten by Stalin in the struggle for power due to his many weaknesses. Amongst these was the fact that he was ill and since a Jewish, Stalin created the image of Trotsky of being an isolated figure, a posturing Jewish intellectual whose international revolution threatened the security of the USSR. Another disadvantage Trotsky had was that he kept quiet in many occasions, such as when Lenin's Testament was not made public and was overran by opponents instead of overrunning them such as Stalin did. He as well was feared of becoming a dictator because of his position in the Red Army, his policy of "Permanent Revolution" and his arrogance. In conclusion, although both Trotsky and Stalin to a certain point were both politically skillful, Stalin outmaneuvered Trotsky in many aspects due to many events he had luck on and many situations which he took advantage of. Stalin demonstrated on being more quick witted than Trotsky in the sense that he was willing to step on who ever was needed to, and doing what was needed to reach the top, unlike Trotsky. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. The European partition of Africa cannot be explained in economic terms alone. How far ...

    by many other reasons and purposes; two of the mains ones were diplomacy and the prestige promised from overseas expansion illumined by many imperial powers in Europe during the time. As perceived by the European powers during the Post-Franco-Prussian war (1870-71), the risk of war in Europe was too great; therefore rivalries were transferred to Asia and Africa.

  2. Why was it possible for Stalin to become the leader of the USSR?

    be taken as a solid foundation for the analysis because the death of Lenin and Sverdlov could be potentially beneficial to any of the contenders for leadership not only Stalin and that because Lenin and Sverdlov would die at some point anyhow plus the question being addressed is "why was

  1. The USSR under Lenin

    There was however another aspect to Russian foreign policy - an aspect most prominently promoted by a man called Georgi Chicherin, who had succeeded Leon Trotsky as Commissar for foreign affairs in 1918. The aim of Chicherin's policy was to normalise the relations to the central European countries, in order to enable trade and to avoid armed conflicts.

  2. The Nature of Revolutions Leon Trotsky once remarked that if poverty was the ...

    Revolution's occurred because a class of category of people are considered inferior, and are downtrodden by members of a higher autonomous stance. Whether this sense of dissatisfaction arouses from lack of food, like in Russia, or respect and equality, like in the American Civil Rights movement, basic human needs need to be met so that society can run harmoniously.

  1. USSR under Stalin

    Also Source B says that Molotov was responsible for the destruction of the kulaks while Source C it does not. The difference between Source B and C is that in Source B the views on collectivisation are expressed in terms of the destruction of the kulaks and in Source C

  2. Hitler vs. Stalin: Who is a more destructive leader in terms of religious groups?

    about Hitler's health problems: "One thing that became borne in on me very early was the absence of a vital factor in Hitler's existence. He had no normal sex life...It was part of hidden complexes and a constitutional insufficiency which may have been congenital and may have resulted from a syphilitic infection during his youth in Vienna."

  1. Compare and Contrast the foreign/domestic policies of one right wing and one left wing ...

    Such a charge would lead to prison. o farm machinery fell to pieces when used o thousands of workers were injured after working long hours o Steel produced by the backyard furnaces was too weak o Backyard production had taken many workers away from their fields o Desperately needed food was not being harvested.

  2. IB History HL, Extended Notes: Russia, the Tsars, the Provisional Govenment and the Revolution.

    Never a crisis as the bureaucracy, police, and army remained loyal. Only when the army withdrew support (1905 and 1917) did revolution become possible. Russian expansion 1. Expanded into central Asia. 2. Alexander hoped it would restore Russia?s military and political prestige after the Crimean War but it brought Russia into conflict with Britain.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work