• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"The fact that Stalin became the dominant leader of Russia by 1929 indicates that he was a more skilful politician than Trotsky." How far do you agree with this statement?

Extracts from this document...


"The fact that Stalin became the dominant leader of Russia by 1929 indicates that he was a more skilful politician than Trotsky." How far do you agree with this statement? After the death of Lenin in 1924, the new leader of the Soviet Union was uncertain. There were many struggling for power, the two which outstood the most were, Joseph Stalin and Leon Trotsky. In this ardent power race, political intelligence would not be enough to win. In order to prove this, there is a need to view each man's actions and compare them, in order to prove that although both men were capable of leading the USSR, Stalin out ran Trotsky through manipulation and luck, not only political skill. Stalin was a cunning, tough, intelligent man. He knew what he wanted and although it is not to argue that he was politically intelligent, he not only used political skills to work to the top and become leader of the USSR, he as well took advantage of "lucky" events. ...read more.


Stalin's powerbase was not his only advantage to Trotsky, many events which took place as well aided him. After Lenin's death in January 1924, Stalin, Kamenev, and Zinoviev together governed the party, placing themselves ideologically between Trotsky (on the left wing of the party) and Bukharin (on the right). He took Lenin's death as a way to demonstrate his loyalty and doing a tribune to him in order to gain popularity. He as well tricked Trotsky into not showing up to the funeral by giving him a wrong date which affected Trotsky's reputation. An example of political strategy used by Stalin's to his rise to power is the way that he manipulated his opponents and played them off against each other in order to eliminate each one. His first target was the left wing. Together with Zinoviev and Kamenev, Stalin outdid Trotsky by campaigns questioning his loyalty to Lenin, this breaking up the left wing. When Trotsky was finally rid of, Stalin then turned on Kamenev and Zinoviev and joined Bukharin and Rykov (right wing) ...read more.


Trotsky was beaten by Stalin in the struggle for power due to his many weaknesses. Amongst these was the fact that he was ill and since a Jewish, Stalin created the image of Trotsky of being an isolated figure, a posturing Jewish intellectual whose international revolution threatened the security of the USSR. Another disadvantage Trotsky had was that he kept quiet in many occasions, such as when Lenin's Testament was not made public and was overran by opponents instead of overrunning them such as Stalin did. He as well was feared of becoming a dictator because of his position in the Red Army, his policy of "Permanent Revolution" and his arrogance. In conclusion, although both Trotsky and Stalin to a certain point were both politically skillful, Stalin outmaneuvered Trotsky in many aspects due to many events he had luck on and many situations which he took advantage of. Stalin demonstrated on being more quick witted than Trotsky in the sense that he was willing to step on who ever was needed to, and doing what was needed to reach the top, unlike Trotsky. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. In order to achieve and retain power a leader of a single-party state needed ...

    Furthermore, the peasants were allowed to trade their surpluses. * The New Economic Policy helped the Soviet Union to make an economic recovery. * In contrast to Lenin, Stalin did not pay much attention to human suffering and blindly initiated the Five Year Plan. o This plan was intended to strengthening the economy of Soviet Russia and in a way making the nation industrially and military self-sufficient.

  2. The European partition of Africa cannot be explained in economic terms alone. How far ...

    Since the balance of powers was "deadlocked" in Europe, to seek revenge, France looked to compensate loss of honor from the defeat from the war with Prussia by gaining success overseas. Bismarck, a natural opportunist, took advantage of the imperial movement and used it in the Berlin Conference, hoping to

  1. Assess the effect of the creation of the Bolshevik Party on Russia up to ...

    Most Bolsheviks and other communists had no intention of removing the provision government. o It is important to note that Lenin was able to very quickly change the minds of majority of the communists. * Those who opposed Lenin publicly were disliked by the majority of the population.

  2. USSR under Stalin

    His speech is concerning the kulaks as he explains how they have tonnes of surplus food that should be taken away from them. Its aim is to force the peasant party activists against the kulaks who are slowing down the collectivisation process.

  1. Why was it possible for Stalin to become the leader of the USSR?

    be taken as a solid foundation for the analysis because the death of Lenin and Sverdlov could be potentially beneficial to any of the contenders for leadership not only Stalin and that because Lenin and Sverdlov would die at some point anyhow plus the question being addressed is "why was

  2. why did stalin, instead of trotsky, become the USSR leader?

    Stalin came up with the theory of Socialism in One Country. He said that they should focus on the USSR only. The rest of the world would come later. The Communists should concentrate on building up the economy of the USSR, not waste money on helping revolutionary groups abroad.

  1. The Nature of Revolutions Leon Trotsky once remarked that if poverty was the ...

    The Russian Revolution was a revolution against economic oppression; it started out as a revolution for democracy. However this is not always the case, the basis of any revolution initiates from motivation for change. This motivation is found when society is unsatisfied with the circumstances or status that they are given, therefore the basic revolution conditions are similar.

  2. IB History HL, Extended Notes: Russia, the Tsars, the Provisional Govenment and the Revolution.

    The Organization was the most important. Started at Moscow University in 1863 and aimed to mould public opinion to accept a general rebellion. 1. Revolutionary developments divided educated Russia, many liberals became conservatives. 2. Alexander blamed the educational system and replaced those who had carried out the ?Great Reforms? with outspoken reactionaries.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work