• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"The fact that Stalin became the dominant leader of Russia by 1929 indicates that he was a more skilful politician than Trotsky." How far do you agree with this statement?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"The fact that Stalin became the dominant leader of Russia by 1929 indicates that he was a more skilful politician than Trotsky." How far do you agree with this statement? After the death of Lenin in 1924, the new leader of the Soviet Union was uncertain. There were many struggling for power, the two which outstood the most were, Joseph Stalin and Leon Trotsky. In this ardent power race, political intelligence would not be enough to win. In order to prove this, there is a need to view each man's actions and compare them, in order to prove that although both men were capable of leading the USSR, Stalin out ran Trotsky through manipulation and luck, not only political skill. Stalin was a cunning, tough, intelligent man. He knew what he wanted and although it is not to argue that he was politically intelligent, he not only used political skills to work to the top and become leader of the USSR, he as well took advantage of "lucky" events. ...read more.

Middle

Stalin's powerbase was not his only advantage to Trotsky, many events which took place as well aided him. After Lenin's death in January 1924, Stalin, Kamenev, and Zinoviev together governed the party, placing themselves ideologically between Trotsky (on the left wing of the party) and Bukharin (on the right). He took Lenin's death as a way to demonstrate his loyalty and doing a tribune to him in order to gain popularity. He as well tricked Trotsky into not showing up to the funeral by giving him a wrong date which affected Trotsky's reputation. An example of political strategy used by Stalin's to his rise to power is the way that he manipulated his opponents and played them off against each other in order to eliminate each one. His first target was the left wing. Together with Zinoviev and Kamenev, Stalin outdid Trotsky by campaigns questioning his loyalty to Lenin, this breaking up the left wing. When Trotsky was finally rid of, Stalin then turned on Kamenev and Zinoviev and joined Bukharin and Rykov (right wing) ...read more.

Conclusion

Trotsky was beaten by Stalin in the struggle for power due to his many weaknesses. Amongst these was the fact that he was ill and since a Jewish, Stalin created the image of Trotsky of being an isolated figure, a posturing Jewish intellectual whose international revolution threatened the security of the USSR. Another disadvantage Trotsky had was that he kept quiet in many occasions, such as when Lenin's Testament was not made public and was overran by opponents instead of overrunning them such as Stalin did. He as well was feared of becoming a dictator because of his position in the Red Army, his policy of "Permanent Revolution" and his arrogance. In conclusion, although both Trotsky and Stalin to a certain point were both politically skillful, Stalin outmaneuvered Trotsky in many aspects due to many events he had luck on and many situations which he took advantage of. Stalin demonstrated on being more quick witted than Trotsky in the sense that he was willing to step on who ever was needed to, and doing what was needed to reach the top, unlike Trotsky. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. The European partition of Africa cannot be explained in economic terms alone. How far ...

    Since the balance of powers was "deadlocked" in Europe, to seek revenge, France looked to compensate loss of honor from the defeat from the war with Prussia by gaining success overseas. Bismarck, a natural opportunist, took advantage of the imperial movement and used it in the Berlin Conference, hoping to

  2. Hitler vs. Stalin: Who is a more destructive leader in terms of religious groups?

    Hitler is known for his treatment of the Jews. Stalin is known for his treatment of the Bolsheviks. What is know so well known is that these two leaders were very destructive to all religions. Both of these leaders touched the Jews, the Bolsheviks, the Russian Orthodox religion, the Muslim faith, and the Roman Catholic faith.

  1. The USSR under Lenin

    This Treaty re-established normal diplomatic relations between the two countries. On top of this reconciliation with other European powers was achieved - in 1921 an Anglo-Soviet agreement was signed, which made trade between the Britain and the USSR possible again.

  2. The Nature of Revolutions Leon Trotsky once remarked that if poverty was the ...

    The desire for change has clearly been exemplified by the occurrences in the Russian Revolution, and more recently in the current events in the Middle East and Northern Africa, the movement towards democracy indicates a progression and desire in the direction of change.

  1. IB History HL, Extended Notes: Russia, the Tsars, the Provisional Govenment and the Revolution.

    Never a crisis as the bureaucracy, police, and army remained loyal. Only when the army withdrew support (1905 and 1917) did revolution become possible. Russian expansion 1. Expanded into central Asia. 2. Alexander hoped it would restore Russia?s military and political prestige after the Crimean War but it brought Russia into conflict with Britain.

  2. Is there any suspicion with regard to the death of Vladimir Lenin, the undisputed ...

    critic and rival at that time, Joseph Stalin, who later on went on to become the man in charge of the entire Socialist state(Mail). This concept is strongly held by historians and experts of such cases like Lev Lurie. Autopsy report: The autopsy conducted reveals that there was no major health issue as such.

  1. He brought his country and his people nothing but harm. To what extent do ...

    figures that, in the opinion of Lee, ?showed collectivisation to be a disaster? as the grain harvest declines from the already modest 73.3 million tonnes in 1928 to 67.6 by 1934. By 1929, only 20% of the population had been collectivised, which prompted Stalin to use a force so harmful

  2. Why did Stalin rather than Trotsky emerge as the leader of the USSR in ...

    As a ?skilful politician with a superb grasp of tactics? according to M. McCauley, Stalin steadily promoted those who supported him into more prominent positions; therefore, by the time of Lenin?s death Stalin was ?assured of his majority beforehand? in important Politburo meetings and governmental business according to I. Deutscher.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work