• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Fall of the Romanovs

Extracts from this document...


Russia in July 1914 was in the midst of a war in which was supposed to rally the masses together and send the great imperial Russia on its way to a great victory like the many in its past (without thinking of the Russo-Japan war). So why instead was the Tsar forced to abdicate in 1917? What ended the three hundred year reign of the Romanov family? The war, as agreed by most historians, was definitely a catalyst toward the speculatively inevitable end to Tsarist Russia and could possibly be the match that lit this 'time bomb'. The war was the cause of acute distress and disenchantment of the Russian people. After suffering heavy defeats in 1914 and 1915 where enormous numbers of Russian soldiers were killed, the Tsar and his government received more anger from the people about their conducting of the war as the government is always blamed if a country is losing a war. As well as this, there were increasingly terrible conditions in large cities with disruptions in the supplying of food, goods, raw materials and so on. Hundreds of factories were closed down and people were left unemployed and destitute, with prices inflating rapidly and food availability was falling drastically. People were also becoming increasingly discontent with conscription of men in their families who hardly returned from the front and the massive losses of animals to the army. ...read more.


There had long been a feeling of discontent among the people of Russia. It seemed every group had something to complain about. In the countryside the peasants held grievances over the increasing need for more land and the high taxes put into place by Witte to aid the economy in becoming a world power could not be paid as there were poor harvests in 1900 and 1902 causing mass starvation and unrest in the countryside. The workers in the towns were also subjected to the harsh policies of Witte, and with the downturn of the economy in 1902 there was a rise in unemployment. The employed held grievances over the terrible working and living conditions as well as wanting more political power for representatives of upcoming parties: the Socialists. As well as this, it seemed the Tsar had no inclination as to the governing of his own country - his government was repressive and denied basic freedoms, such as: freedom of the press, freedom to protest, etc. As well as this he made no concessions in moving toward a constitutional government. The catalyst that caused the revolution though was not only the outbreak but also the terrible defeats obtained by Russia in the Russo-Japanese war on both land and sea. The war put strains on the amounts of food and fuel in towns as well as inflation and unemployment. ...read more.


In the towns, there was an industrial boom from 1906-1914, with large growths in industries. Businessmen and entrepreneurs prospered greatly. However the working class did not receive benefit from this prosperity. Wages did not increase and working conditions did not improve - strikes persisted in growing numbers prior to the First World War as they remained in their position of little economic or political progress. In conclusion, it seemed that although July of 1914 was a date that can be seen as the 'spark' that lit the fuse of the time bomb as the country was fighting war that they were blatantly not in the position to fight. However, the Tsar's position was in critical decline much before this. This is because there were obvious problems with his autocratic government added to the Tsar's stubborn, arrogant character. The reasons for seemed to root farther back than just that date in particular. This can be seen by the routes taken by the Tsar to try and aid his country though these decisions seemed to fail due to outside causes such as the war which certainly did not aid the Tsar in his contemptuously viewed position. Therefore, one can deduce that July of 1914 was not the beginning of problems for Russia but merely a date in which the catalyst of war sent the Tsar and his government into an avalanching decline that couldn't be salvaged. 'In July 1914, Tsarist Russia was a time bomb on a very short fuse.' To what extent is this statement an accurate description? Michelle Davies 12 DSp ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. Russia 1905 revolution

    They believed that the bourgeois revolution should precede the socialist revolution and that they should wait for the liberals to establish a bourgeois government in 1905. Thus they did not make use of the potential revolutionary strength of the masses to capture power from the Tsarist government as soon as the 1905 Revolution broke out.

  2. Was the Tsar to blame for his own downfall?

    The industrial sector of the economy grew considerably, 5% per annum according to Goldsmith. Some historians argue that this economic growth was enough for revolution to take place as by 1914 Russia had the world's largest economy, and modernization encouraged political and social instability and dissolved the cohesion of Russian society.

  1. How far was the Russo-Japanese War responsible for the outbreak of the 1905 Revolution?

    There was therefore little public enthusiasm for the war. Many people felt there was little justification for it: public opinion was not on the side of the war. Moreover, the military was very ill-equipped for the war. This showed to the people of Russia the government's failings, and caused people

  2. To what extent did Alexander Tsar II deserve the title of Tsar Liberator

    society was not changed from above it would change itself by means of revolution from below. As Alexander said in his famous speech to the Moscow nobles in April 1856: It is better to abolish serfdom from above then to wait for the time when it will begin to abolish

  1. Russia in 1682 was under an absolute monarchy with the Tsar adopting a complete ...

    for a ruler in that he'd have the capability to make quick decisions and his position was secured by his complete power. Economically the Tsar would immediately have an advantage in that the royal families had the ability to command monopolies upon businesses which were going through a stage of

  2. Waimar Rebublic - The fall

    Maybe as a result, the Nazi support increased: The German population need new hope in the form of new ruling, and that was exactly what Hitler promised. On table 7.2, page 128, it can be seen how the SPD support felt, while the NSDAP support increased from only 2.6 percent to 18.3 ercent.

  1. IB History HL, Extended Notes: Russia, the Tsars, the Provisional Govenment and the Revolution.

    Nationalities 1. 1863 Polish revolt. Desire for land reform and reestablishing Polish nationhood led to demonstrations killing 200. Planned conscription of Poles into the Russian Army led to armed rebellion in 1863 which lasted a year and was put down by granting land reform. 2.

  2. The Rise and Fall of Civilisations

    These groupings at the beginning were very small, usually only containing of one family. But as humans began to learn, with the innovations of new tools and ideas were formed, as well as the ability to travel in larger numbers emerged.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work