• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"The First World War was an Accident of History" Discuss

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"The First World War was an Accident of History" Discuss. The question proposes the idea that statesmen did not intend for their political plans or decisions to consequentially influence or encourage the major conflict within Europe from 1914 to 1918; therefore, implying that no one is to blame for the out-break of the First World War. However, historical evidence suggests that Germany's reputation as a potential threat in Europe dates back since 1870 during the Franco-Prussian War; therefore, Germany holds some responsibility for the Great War. This argument can be verified by exploring long-term causes such as imperialism since 1880; leading to high amounts of tension between colonial powers. Influential causes also include Kaiser Wilhelm the second's antagonistic notion of Weltpolitik after the Fall of Bismarck in 1890, the role of the alliance systems since Bismarck's Dual Alliance in 1879; and finally, the events of the July crisis of 1914 during which Germany handed to Austria-Hungary the "blank-cheque". Imperialism - in this case, the seizing of territory in Africa and Asia overseas - led to significant rivalry between European colonial powers from 1880 to 19141. Tension between imperialist states heightened mainly between Britain, France and Germany as Germany decided to build an empire. ...read more.

Middle

Yet, after forming the Dual Alliance ensuring Austro-Hungarian support of Germany against Russia in case of attack, Bismarck went on to form the League of the Three Emperors in 1873 informally linking Germany, Austria-Hungary and Russia. However, this was not enough for Bismarck, who eventually put an end to the League in 1887 to create the secret Reinsurance Treaty between Germany and Russia. This was a guarantee that neither of the two countries would go to war with one another. In all evidence, Bismarck's intentions were based on a plan of security for Germany within Europe, possibly through fear of war. On the other hand Wilhelm's leadership worked against Germany's reputation. One year later, Wilhelm decided not to renew the Reinsurance Treaty when he came to power in 1888. This demonstrated unreasonable lack of diplomacy on Germany's behalf and encouraged Russia to turn towards France in 1893 in the Franco-Russian Alliance. This Alliance along with the Anglo-Russian Entente of 1907 and the Entente Cordiale formed the Triple Entente between the UK, France and Russia11. The immediate cause of the First World War was the assassination of Archduke Ferdinand, the heir to the throne of the Austro-Hungarian Empire, in Sarajevo on June 28th 1914. ...read more.

Conclusion

and become subordinate to German policy without further territory in Europe being taken from her."15 Grey warned that the British would declare war on Germany should she breach Belgian neutrality to in-danger France. In spite of this warning, German troops invaded Belgium that very day. This reckless behaviour was to lead Britain into war with Germany on the 4th of August, and submit Europe to three traumatising years of war. Fischer, a German historian, develops a thesis accusing Germany of being concious of her par-taking in Europe's decent into the First World War16; therefore associating with the idea of German responsibility. I agree with Fischer's thesis in the sense that Germany should hold a good deal of responsibility for the outbreak of the Great War. Germany's annexations of territory dating back since 1870, as well as her motivations for creating a Weltpolitik prove that Germany's desire to become a great power considerably outweighed her consideration of other countries. The same argument stands when considering Wilhelm's careless decisions during the 1914 July crisis - declaring war on two countries in the space of three days in spite of the pleas of peace from Russia and Britain. At this point, it is fair to assume that Wilhelm was aware of the weight of his actions. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. Compare and contrast the causes of the First World War and the Second World ...

    In one of its clauses it banned the formation of any secret alliances. WWII did not take place because countries were bound to one another in alliance systems, however the failure of appeasement can be seen as a similarity to the alliance system pre-WWI.

  2. Why were the central powers defeated in the First World War

    One of the main reasons for the defeat of the central powers was the USA entering the war. The United States entered as an associated power. Although the USA had one of the smallest armies in the world, it was economically prosperous (food supplies, good equipment, etc...), industrially strong (iron, steel, guns, engines)

  1. Assess critically the causes of world war I

    However, in 1911, the Germans protested against this, but Britain supported France as one of the terms of the Entente Cordiale (1904) and Germany only ended up acquiring a small strip of the French Congo. This colonial rivalry led to even more strained relations between Germany and France, the British

  2. Nazi Germany

    (ignoring crimes committed by Nazi agents, judges and courts controlled by Nazis, and Nazi opponents were mostly sentenced unfairly) Concentration camps - run by SS Death's Head - Jews, Socialists, Communists - anyone who criticised Nazis or wasn't loyal to Hitler was send there Why was there little opposition???

  1. IB History HL, Extended Notes: Russia, the Tsars, the Provisional Govenment and the Revolution.

    Raw materials collected instead of taxes. Low quality. 2. âEstate factories.â Developed by nobles who used the labor of their serfs, those without factories could sell or rent out their serfs. Emancipation ended the work in these noblesâ factories and many were sold or died out although cotton and distillation remained.

  2. Extended Essay - The Role of a UN-Secretary General to Achieve World Peace: The ...

    McCloy, and the Soviet delegation, led by Vasily Kuznetsov, along with U Thant himself, discussed over the issue of dismantling the Cuban missiles. The Security Council meetings from 25th October to 28th October were probably the most significant ones in bringing peace to the crisis.

  1. To what extent were economic conditions the predominant factor in the proliferation and manifestation ...

    Indeed many middle class businessmen viewed the prewar era with immense nostalgia, desiring a return to the times where a strong authoritarian government maintained order by containing the labor movement, and generally pursuing a protectionist agenda for business. They perceived the occurrence of hyperinflation as a direct product of the

  2. To what extent did militarism contribute to the origins of the First World War ...

    in hopes of getting back large parts of their ethnic populations who were still in the Ottoman Empire. The territory that Bulgaria had won in the First Balkan War was lost again in the second Balkan war when Bulgaria attacked its former allies Serbia and Greece because of her dissatisfaction over the division of Macedonia.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work