• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"The First World War was an Accident of History" Discuss

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"The First World War was an Accident of History" Discuss. The question proposes the idea that statesmen did not intend for their political plans or decisions to consequentially influence or encourage the major conflict within Europe from 1914 to 1918; therefore, implying that no one is to blame for the out-break of the First World War. However, historical evidence suggests that Germany's reputation as a potential threat in Europe dates back since 1870 during the Franco-Prussian War; therefore, Germany holds some responsibility for the Great War. This argument can be verified by exploring long-term causes such as imperialism since 1880; leading to high amounts of tension between colonial powers. Influential causes also include Kaiser Wilhelm the second's antagonistic notion of Weltpolitik after the Fall of Bismarck in 1890, the role of the alliance systems since Bismarck's Dual Alliance in 1879; and finally, the events of the July crisis of 1914 during which Germany handed to Austria-Hungary the "blank-cheque". Imperialism - in this case, the seizing of territory in Africa and Asia overseas - led to significant rivalry between European colonial powers from 1880 to 19141. Tension between imperialist states heightened mainly between Britain, France and Germany as Germany decided to build an empire. ...read more.

Middle

Yet, after forming the Dual Alliance ensuring Austro-Hungarian support of Germany against Russia in case of attack, Bismarck went on to form the League of the Three Emperors in 1873 informally linking Germany, Austria-Hungary and Russia. However, this was not enough for Bismarck, who eventually put an end to the League in 1887 to create the secret Reinsurance Treaty between Germany and Russia. This was a guarantee that neither of the two countries would go to war with one another. In all evidence, Bismarck's intentions were based on a plan of security for Germany within Europe, possibly through fear of war. On the other hand Wilhelm's leadership worked against Germany's reputation. One year later, Wilhelm decided not to renew the Reinsurance Treaty when he came to power in 1888. This demonstrated unreasonable lack of diplomacy on Germany's behalf and encouraged Russia to turn towards France in 1893 in the Franco-Russian Alliance. This Alliance along with the Anglo-Russian Entente of 1907 and the Entente Cordiale formed the Triple Entente between the UK, France and Russia11. The immediate cause of the First World War was the assassination of Archduke Ferdinand, the heir to the throne of the Austro-Hungarian Empire, in Sarajevo on June 28th 1914. ...read more.

Conclusion

and become subordinate to German policy without further territory in Europe being taken from her."15 Grey warned that the British would declare war on Germany should she breach Belgian neutrality to in-danger France. In spite of this warning, German troops invaded Belgium that very day. This reckless behaviour was to lead Britain into war with Germany on the 4th of August, and submit Europe to three traumatising years of war. Fischer, a German historian, develops a thesis accusing Germany of being concious of her par-taking in Europe's decent into the First World War16; therefore associating with the idea of German responsibility. I agree with Fischer's thesis in the sense that Germany should hold a good deal of responsibility for the outbreak of the Great War. Germany's annexations of territory dating back since 1870, as well as her motivations for creating a Weltpolitik prove that Germany's desire to become a great power considerably outweighed her consideration of other countries. The same argument stands when considering Wilhelm's careless decisions during the 1914 July crisis - declaring war on two countries in the space of three days in spite of the pleas of peace from Russia and Britain. At this point, it is fair to assume that Wilhelm was aware of the weight of his actions. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. Why were the central powers defeated in the First World War

    This psychologically destroyed the Germany army. Another vital reason for the central powers were defeated in the First World War was the collapse of Germany's allies. Firstly, was the collapse of Austria-Hungary. Austria-Hungary did well against Italy. However in the end they were defeated by Italy in the battle of Veneto.

  2. the importance of the role of Bismarck in the unification of Germany in 1871

    Although he had to use a lot of skill and German nationalist feelings to convince the southern German states to join the German Empire and to make William I of Prussia the Keiser of Germany, he succeeded in creating a Unified Germany.

  1. Compare and contrast the causes of the First World War and the Second World ...

    who have the benefit of hindsight, are reviewed as being failures and actually understood as being major causes of the two total wars. On the other hand, the fact that appeasement was a result of a reaction towards the ToV, this once more shows that the ToV played a major role in the outbreak of WWII.

  2. Nazi Germany

    carried anti-Nazi message couldn't have been published - Goebbels banned jazz music b/c it's 'Black' and black people were considered as an inferior race - Used radio broadcasting for spreading Nazi ideas and controlled radio stations - He made cheap short range small radios, so everyone could afford it and could listen to Hitler's speeches, etc.

  1. Was the Tsar to blame for his own downfall?

    His incompetent handling of the war exacerbated social and economical disorder. As well, during his leave to handle the war he left Alexandra, who was inexperienced and influenced by Rasputin, in charge of the country. Many believed Alexandra, of German origin to be a traitor thinking the truth for her

  2. The cold war - the conferences and the start of the cCold War

    which could have led to war and a symbolic event which signaled a much stronger separation of East and West Berlin e. To the Soviets, this is a protective shell around East Berlin while the West presented it as prison wall ==> What was the importance of Berlin as a city to the Cold War, 1945 - 1965?

  1. IB History HL, Extended Notes: Russia, the Tsars, the Provisional Govenment and the Revolution.

    Firm supporter of autocracy and admired Alexander III yet had critics among thr aristocracy which contributed to his dismissal in 1903. 4. Recognized urgency of modernization and supported the 1905 movement for political and constitutional reform which he saw as the compliment to his economic modernization.

  2. Extended Essay - The Role of a UN-Secretary General to Achieve World Peace: The ...

    Laurence Chang and Peter Kornbluh, The Cuban Missile Crisis, 1962: A National Security Archive Document Reader, New York: The New Press, 1992. James G. Hershberg, ?Russian Documents,? Cold War International History Project Bulletin, n.p., n.d. Ramses Nassif, U Thant in New York, 1961-1971, A Portrait of the Third UN Secretary-General, C.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work