• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The improvement in Sino-US relations was the main factor promoting dtente between Russia and America in the years 1969-75. How far do you agree with this view?

Extracts from this document...


‘The improvement in Sino-US relations was the main factor promoting détente between Russia and America in the years 1969-75.’ How far do you agree with this view? The Ping Pong diplomacy of 1971 begun a period of rapprochement in Sino-US relations. The ‘Chinese dimension’ to Cold War diplomacy threatened the USSR which feared a military alliance, and the Soviet Union moved to improve relations with the USA, thereby facilitating the process of détente. However, the fear of nuclear war, the escalating cost of the arms race coupled with the grim economic realities of the 1970s and the American withdraw from Vietnam and were also highly significant in promoting détente between Russia and America. The Soviet Union viewed the improvement in Sino-American relations as a threat to its national security, she was now confronted on two fronts and fearing military collusion, the Soviet Union sought improved relations with the USA. ...read more.


By 1969 both sides had achieved relative nuclear parity in weapons and delivery systems, nuclear war would result in Mutually Assured Destruction. The extensive treaty systems both countries held in the third world, could result in small regional conflict developing into full scale nuclear war. Whilst the cost of maintaining this ?balance of terror? came at great economic cost, preventing much needed social reform. In the early 1970s the USA faced double digit inflation and widespread urban rioting in 1968. In contrast, the USSR had failed in its promise to deliver high-quality consumer products and faced falling GNP growth, from 5% in 1966-70 to 3.1% in 1971-75. These factors made it clear to the respective powers that improved relations were necessary to prevent nuclear war, agree on arms limitations and improve trade agreements: President Nixon and his NSC adviser Henry Kissinger?s successful policy of linkage meant the Soviet?s would recognise both superpowers had mutual interests in the Third World and opened up badly needed US technology and investment to the Soviet economy. ...read more.


The Helsinki Agreement of 1975 continued the policy of East-West dialogue over Europe begun by Willy Brandt’s successful policy of Ostpolitik during the late 1960s. The Soviet controlled Warsaw Pact gained official US recognition of the post-ww2 European borders, whilst the US largely unsuccessfully sought concessions over human rights issues from the USSR, which following the agreement were widely ignored. In conclusion, détente was the result of a variety of complex factors, driven by a war-weary United States counting the human and economic cost of militaristic confrontation of Communism in Vietnam. The United States under President Nixon recognised more could be achieved through peaceful diplomacy, whilst both Superpowers recognised that détente offered the opportunity to curtail spiralling defence spending and open up trade links between the nations. The improvement in Sino-US relations added an important Chinese dimension to Cold War diplomacy, but was not the main factor promoting détente between Russia and America in the years 1969-1975. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. How far do you agree the Tet Offensive was a turning point in the ...

    Despite the fact that Tet was a military victory the Offensive "proved to be the turning point of the war" (Hayward). The Americans did not anticipate such a strong attack from the North, "The intensity, coordination and timing of the attacks were not fully anticipated,' adding, 'another major unexpected point'

  2. Interwar Years: 1919-39

    * As a result, the French Prime Minister, Raymond Poincar� decided to send 60,000 French and Belgian troops into the Ruhr in January 1923. * The Ruhr produced 80% of Germany's steel and 70% of its coal. Results * The hyper-inflation crisis caused chaos in Germany and widespread social misery,

  1. Cold War Study Guide - Compare/contrast the Vietnam War policies of Lyndon Johnson and ...

    was not honest with the public, which did no good for his reputation and trust with the public. - The 1970 election in Chile was also a large part of Richard Nixon's foreign affairs. Nixon utilized the CIA, but covered it up so that the public would not find out about his actions.

  2. My research questions: did the United States of America really lose the Vietnam War ...

    The intervening in the war that did not seem such a hard task, was a good befalling for the United States to demonstrate their power and win one more round in the fight with USSR7. On the one hand this goal was completely unsuccessful.

  1. IB History HL, Extended Notes: Russia, the Tsars, the Provisional Govenment and the Revolution.

    1893 peasants were banned from leaving the Mir (shows extent & will to control). Placed a complete restriction on freedom of movement and increased power of the Mir over individual peasants. State power and Repression 1. 1881 Statute of State Security gave government powers to pursue revolutionaries.

  2. History IA: What were American peoples responses to the Vietnam War in 1965 1971?

    US system had failed the black before the Vietnam War highlighted issues of prejudice. Black Americans occupies a quite high percentage in American society, and the evidences above have shown the disappointment of Black Americans about those who led their life to the poverty[28].

  1. Notes on the History and Development of the Arab-Israeli Conflict

    It was humiliated by Syria's inability (using Russian arms) to contain Israel in Lebanon, and frustrated by the failure to protect the Palestinians in Lebanon. - The 1982 invasion of Lebanon was significant because it marked a shift in US-Israeli relations.

  2. History questions on Soviet Russia and its relations with the rest of the World.

    He also noticed that their plan is very weak against logic and intelligence, so it should be easy to take down. He also said their system has not proven worthy yet to bring success. Some things that Kennan suggests to do are to study the situation and be aware of it.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work