• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The League of Nations was a failure. How far do you agree with this statement? Explain your answer.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

'The League of Nations was a failure'. How far do you agree with this statement? Explain your answer. [Paper 1, (c), /8] In the 1920s and 1930s, the League demonstrated that it can be both successful and a failure. In my opinion, overall, the League was more of a failure. The League certainly has a number of failures. First of all, the League didn't command its own army, thus it had to rely on member countries to contribute troops. In cases where the member countries were reluctant to send troops, the League would be rendered helpless; for example, at Vilna in 1920, the League was not able to stop the takeover of Vilna by the Poles, as the French didn't want to upset Poland (they saw Poland as a possible ally) and the British were not prepared to act alone. Secondly, the Corfu incident wasn't fully successful, as there were many loopholes in the League's actions. For example, although Italy withdrew from Corfu (violence was altogether prevented), Greece had to pay them compensation and apologise, even though it wasn't Greece's fault that Tellini and his team were killed. ...read more.

Middle

After the events unfolded, the League made up excuses to cover up its inadequacy in dealing with the Manchurian Crisis; the League said that Japan was so far away, that it was a special case, and that Japan did have a point when it said that China was itself in the grip of anarchy. We can agree that the League was powerless if a strong nation decided to pursue an aggressive policy and invade its neighbours. The Disarmament Conference in 1932 produced resolutions to prohibit bombing of civilian populations, limit the size of artillery, limit the tonnage of tanks and prohibit chemical waste. However, there was very little to show how these limits would be achieved, for example, bombing was prohibited but there was no attempt at abolishing planes capable of bombing. Moreover, Germany complained that it was the only country which had disarmed and wanted for all countries to disarm to its level; when the Conference failed to agree to the principle of 'equality', the Germans walked out. ...read more.

Conclusion

On the other hand, the League was quite successful in some of its operations. The League allowed for member countries to voice their opinions in the Assembly. At the Aaland Islands in 1921, Sweden and Finland wanted control of the Aaland Islands - they appealed for the League's help and accepted the League's ruling, so war was avoided. Another example can be Upper Silesia in 1921, when both Germany and Poland wanted control of the industrial region. In 1920, a plebiscite was organised for the Silesians to vote on which country they wished to join, and French and British troops were sent to keep order at the polling booths. The League used the results from the poll to divide the region, but built in many safeguards to prevent future disputes - violence was avoided. Bulgaria (1925) was successful to an extent, as violence was avoided and the aggressive country did leave from the country they invaded. The League had a number of commissions and committees that were set up to improve people's living and working conditions around the world. ?? ?? ?? ?? Mai Pham Thanh 11D 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. Free essay

    May the League of Nations be considered a complete failure? Answer this question and ...

    On the other hand though, even if the international organization was mainly a product of what had once been American beliefs and politics, the United States refused to join the League and also rejected the agreements which had been made at Versailles, choosing to revert to a policy of isolation and preserve their own affairs.

  2. The European partition of Africa cannot be explained in economic terms alone. How far ...

    accumulation theory by Hobson and the monopoly capitalism theory by Lenin, proving economic expansion was not the ultimate explanation for the scramble for Africa and Asia in Europe. Although various eminent historians and theorists, including Lenin, agreed that "Hobson gave a very good and accurate description of the fundamental economic and political traits of imperialism", William L.

  1. Appeal to the League of Nations

    his people -He also stated that he was the defender fo teh cause -In the October of 1935, 52 nations of the League, reassured Haile that Italy would not triumph -Reminds the nations of the policy and the faith Haile put into them -Even the inferiority of his weapons, the

  2. Collapse of the League of Nations

    As long as the German takeover of Austria, France and Britain did not do anything as they thought this would be Hitler's last demands for expansion. However, Hitler was an opportunist and he used every chance he had to fulfil his philosophy for building a great state.

  1. The League of Nations - Although the League of Nations had several successes, it ...

    [7] The League's reaction to the Italian invasion of Abyssinia (nowadays Ethiopia) in 1935-1936 is a perfect example of such objection to the idea of collective security. Although France and Britain had to protect the weaker and smaller country,

  2. Ancient Greece revision notes

    Oligarchy: A form of government in which power rests with a few people (i.e. Sparta) Direct democracy: A form of government in which the people participate directly rather than through representatives Tyrant (tyranny): A cruel or unjust ruler, usually with absolute power.

  1. Was the League of Nations doomed to fail?

    needed to have significant and immediate success handling complicated international affairs if it was going to survive. A failure to orchestrate international disarmament also contributed to the death of the League of Nations; this was largely due to the fact that they had no mechanisms for following through on decrees,

  2. Terrorism is very hard to define; there is no single universally accepted definition for ...

    Even though both the Zealots and the Assassins operated before the middle ages, they are relevant today; firstly they are the forerunners of modern terrorists in aspects of organization, targeting, and goals. Secondly, although both didn?t work out, the fact that they are remembered hundreds of years later, demonstrates the deep psychological impact they caused (History of Terrorism).

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work