• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The USSR under Lenin

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The USSR under Lenin To what extent was the USSR under Lenin an orthodox communist state? From the October Revolution in 1917 until his death in January 1924 Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov, better known as Lenin, ruled Russia via the Communist Party. He justified his rule by a philosophical and political ideology called Marxism-Leninism, an adjusted form of the teachings of Karl Marx. This ideology is usually referred to as Communism. But to what extent was the USSR under Lenin in fact an orthodox communist state? The truth is that Lenin's policies were influenced by his pragmatism almost as much as by his belief in communism. The extent of his adherence to communist doctrine is to be looked into in this essay. An important characteristic of Communism is a strong aversion to religion. Thus already Karl Marx stated that "Religion is the opium of the masses" and was convinced that "The first requisite for the happiness of the people is the abolition of religion." Additionally, the Bolsheviks strongly associated the Orthodox Church with the Tsarist regime and were therefore even more determined to abolish it. The separation of church and state and the ban of the church from owning property in the 'Decree on Freedom of Conscience and on Church and Religious Associations' (1918) was the first step to abolishing the orthodox church in Russia. During the Civil Wars (1918-20) soviets were actively encouraged to remove valuable items from churches. ...read more.

Middle

Still the so called "World Revolution" remained the main priority in Lenin's foreign policy; although the reasons for this were not purely the ideological conviction that communism was the superior social system. The Bolsheviks were also aware of the fact that the position of Russia in international politics was far from secure, and were therefore most eager to help establishing communist governments in other countries, most preferably in the highly industrialised countries of central and Western Europe. To this end the so called "Comintern" under the leadership of Grigory Zinoviev was founded in March 1919. The aim of the Comintern was promote revolutions in industrial countries by sending agents abroad, who were to offer help and advice to local communist movements. The help the Comintern offered was of a mostly financial nature - Lenin himself told an agent of the Comintern in 1918 not to "stint at spending millions for agitation (...)." The countries of most interest to Lenin were Britain, Switzerland and most importantly Germany, being the most industrialised and at the same time most instable of the three, having suffered greatly during the war. Although the work of the Comintern did initially bring about some results - Hungary became a Soviet republic in 1919, and communist parties in Germany and Britain seemed to gain more political influence - the success didn't prove to be long-lived, and most of the communist activities outside Russia were almost completely suppressed by the mid-1920s. ...read more.

Conclusion

All in all it can be said that Lenin's economic policies, just like his foreign policies, were, although based on communist principles, essentially pragmatic. Clear breaks with communist doctrine were accepted for the greater good. All this allows the conclusion that Lenin's economic policy was by all means in no way that of an orthodox communist state. All in all it can be concluded that the USSR under Lenin was only to a limited extent an orthodox communist state. Although certain communist principles such as atheism and the equality of the genders were at least attempted to be adhered to, both the economy and the foreign policy remained to be influenced by Lenin's pragmatism much more than by communist principles. The essay has so far dealt with assessing to what extent the USSR under Lenin was an orthodox communist state. An orthodox communist state has been understood to be a state in which policies are mainly inspired by Marxist ideals. But as soon as a closer look at Marxist theory is taken it becomes clear that such a definition and therefore the investigation itself contains a paradox. One of the most basic principles and ideals of communism, which is understood to be the final stage of the class struggle, is the abolition of the state. Therefore assessing to what extent a state is communist is impossible - as long there is a state we cannot speak of communism. There is no such thing as a communist state! Words: 1.900 ?? ?? ?? ?? History SL Katharina Ziegeler November 2007 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. Comparison between Trotsky's and Lenin's role in the establishment of the USSR

    Lenin couldn't set up the immediate measures necessary for a Bolshevik revolution such as a suitable militia, because he was exiled and could only enter Russia shortly before the Revolution. So in general it is fair to argue that Trotsky did the immediate organisational work, leading to the revolution, although

  2. Compare and contrast the economic and political developments in the USSR and Germany 1918-1924

    Weimar Republic, however, it also meant that a major Imperial Germany institution was left intact and was an element that made the democracy more authoritarian; a similarity of the communist rule of Russia at the time, as both nations used oppressive tactics against opposition.

  1. Compare and contrast the contributions of Lenin and Trotsky to the establishment and consolidation ...

    All these contributions to the set up of the Communist state on behalf of Trotsky were no small achievement since because of his overall charge, holding things together and making organization work effectively, is the reason to why the Reds won the Civil War.

  2. Compare and contrast the policies of the USA and USSR towards Korea between 1945 ...

    China is in a position where political affairs determine much of their economical growth. The conclude, the Korean War has made China more formidable than ever. ? China continued to conduct carefully between the two Koreas, even after normalizing relations with Seoul in August 1992.

  1. Mao - his social and economic policies and his decline and re-establishment of power

    Since 1956, material incentives in the form of pay differentials for skilled and unskilled workers had reappeared. This clashed with the Marxist idea of rewarding each according to his needs. 3. The Five Year Plan focused on capital-intensive projects but the PRC was short of capital to invest in industry, particularly as agricultural productivity was rising only slowly.

  2. IB History HL, Extended Notes: Russia, the Tsars, the Provisional Govenment and the Revolution.

    Worsened plight of citizens, food and fuel shortages and high prices. Plekhanov (socialist leader) said the war ?promises to shatter to its foundations the regime.? 1905 Revolution Causes of the Revolution 1. Bloody Sunday (spark). Peaceful march of 150000 hoping to bring a petition (mostly about hard working conditions and high taxes)

  1. To What Extent Did The Space Race Exacerbate Political Tensions Between The USA and ...

    America would need to do something soon to redeem some sort of ?bragging rights?. Two separate cases of espionage made headlines in 1951, as on March 29th Julius and Ethel Rosenberg were convicted of espionage for the part they

  2. To what extent did women gain social equality during the 1920s?

    They altered what some considered the feminine crown by bobbing their hair, and rejected the traditional dress code that consisted of the ankle-length skirt, high collar, corseted waist. Instead, flappers wore skirts to mid-calf, lowered necklines, &cast off the corset.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work