• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Weimar republic was doomed from the start. Discuss.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐The Weimar republic was doomed from the start because of civilian resentment with the government, a flawed constitution that contained loopholes, the system of proportional representation, economic instability. After the treaty of Versailles was signed in 1919, german civilians were upset because Germany had admitted defeat and been forced to pay overwhelmingly expensive reparation payments to the allies. They felt betrayed by the democrats and November traitors who had signed the treaty of Versailles, associated with dishonor. The Weimar Republic also ended the military?s rule of the country, and placed the power in the people. Civilians were upset with this because they had great admiration for the military. Historian Hannah Vogt said that the men were to pick up the reins of government faced a tremendous, thankless task, exemplifying that the new leaders of Weimar were facing enormous civilian resentment towards the gov. ...read more.

Middle

This loophole doomed Weimar from the start because the leader of Germany could turn the state into authoritarian state with little effort. Proportional representation, which was included in the constitution, also led to weimar?s failure. The german Reichstag was made up of elected citizens and these citizens voted on which political party they wanted to control the government. The percentage of votes political parties got was equivalent to the amount of seats in the Reichstag they got. One political party needed a majority (51% of the votes) to maintain power. There were so many political parties that they had to create coallitons ? which is when two political parties joined together in order to get a majority. The problem with this is that two political parties may not have the same views and are prone to arguing. This doomed Weimar because no one could make decisions in the government, and power changed so many times that the civilians lost faith, and rules and laws were changed so frequently that it led to instability. ...read more.

Conclusion

It was hard for political parties to gain a majority and therefore it was hard for an extremist leader to take control. If there had been less extremist left and right winged parties, they system might have worked. The civilians voted, allowing them to have a voice. In terms of the constitution, it was great, except for article 48. It gave people democratic rights, men and women were equal, armed forces were to be kept at a minimum, there was religious freedom and everyone could vote (over 20). Historian William Shirer argues that the constitution had admirable devices which seemed to guarantee the working of an almost flawless democracy. In spite of this, the social, economic and political situation of Germany after ww1 did not allow for a perfect democracy or cooperation among political parties. The Weimar republic was doomed from the start because of civilian resentment with the government, a flawed constitution that contained loopholes, the system of proportional representation, economic instability. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. The cold war - the conferences and the start of the cCold War

    Thirdly, by the end of the war, the Americans had believed that they deserved a large quid pro quo from the Russians 5) The Russians claimed that the Americans opposed them over dismantling and other issues , but the American view point was that the economies of Europe needed to

  2. Was the Weimar Republic doomed from the start?

    Farmers found that they were also getting little return on their produce, meaning that many were suffering from severe poverty. By having this feeling of aversion to the government, it is hardly surprising that it was not able to become the permanent solution to Germany's problems.

  1. Can the period between 1924-1929 really be called the Golden period for the Weimar ...

    made him an easy prey to his rightist advisors as he was heavily influenced by those surrounding him. Thus the extremist parties were profiting simultaneously from Hindenburg's ineffectiveness, which was an enormous gain for the Nazis. Furthermore, the pubic was unhappy with the electoral system because voters were voting for the party rather than the individual deputy.

  2. u.s. constitution

    There are many other sections to the Fifth Amendment, overall it serves to protect the rights of the people in and out of the courtroom. 6. -1791- Right to Speedy Trial, Confrontation of Witnesses. a. The Sixth Amendment prevents cases from being delayed for an extended period of time, allows

  1. Constitution and New Government

    Organized political opposition arose XIII. The Republican Opposition a. Constitution made no reference to political parties i. Most farmers, and G. Washington, thought that they were evil and should be avoided 1. Most mn wud disagree, but they shudn't lead 2 formation of prmnnt factions b.

  2. Weimar Republic

    Paragraph 2 - Economy Topic Sentence: The period 1923-29 was a period of positive economic advances for Germany because Stresseman had good policies and managed to stabilize the German currency, the industry was booming and Germany became attractive for foreign investments, however, these advances are outweighed by the Welfare state

  1. Waimar Republic - The first years of rule

    Opposition from the left The extreme right was not bound together by the same ideological belief as the left, but they were bound together by separate values that they had in common: Nationalism was probably the foundation of the extreme right.

  2. To what extent can Berlin or Vienna can be held accountable for the start ...

    The Austrian Chief of staff, Conrad von Hotzendorf, who on no fewer than twenty-five occasions between 1913 and 1914 urged war against Serbia "The Monarchy still suffered from the effects of the humiliation of 1866, and that a military victory alone could restore its prestige"1 Senior Habsburg military commanders seconded Conrad's aggressive stance.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work