• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

There were many people who supported the Treaty of Versailles, but there were also many people who opposed it. The one major person who opposed the treaty was Henry Cabot Lodge. He was a Republican Representative in Congress.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The Treaty of Versailles The Treaty of Versailles was signed on June 28, 1919. This treaty officially ended World War I. There were, however, forces in the senate that opposed this treaty. This treaty set up the foundation for the League of Nations. This idea for a league of nations came from President Wilson himself. However, it was the strength of the opposition forces, both liberal and conservative, rather than the ineptitude and stubbornness of President Wilson that led to the Senate defeat of the Treaty of Versailles. There were many people who supported the Treaty of Versailles, but there were also many people who opposed it. The one major person who opposed the treaty was Henry Cabot Lodge. He was a Republican Representative in Congress. He opposed the treaty of Versailles because he felt that by ratifying the treaty it would involve the United States in foreign commitments it could not keep or that it would not keep. Lodge however was not alone in his opposition of the Treaty of Versailles. In Document A, William Borah states that he was against the Treaty of Versailles because he does not want to subject the people of the United States to the matters of controversy which may arise between other nations. ...read more.

Middle

The United States Senate is seen carrying a sheet of paper labeled Constitutional Rights showing that the Senate believed that joining with foreign nations, and sharing their rights would not be allowed. Instead, the United States Senate stayed greedy and demanded that they remain a completely separate nation instead of helping the less successful nations by creating the League of Nations Overall, it was the strength of the opposition forces, both liberal and conservative, rather than the ineptitude of stubbornness of President Wilson that led to the Senate defeat of the Treaty of Versailles. Henry Cabot Lodge, William Boroh, and the Senate all attempted to kill the Treaty, and sadly they succeeded. Wilson's dream of this League of Nations was before its time, and the people were not ready for change. The League of Nations had the potential to stop many of the conflicts which arose later in time, however, the people, were simply not ready for such a change, and like many Americans did not want to share their freedom with other nations, they simply remained greedy, selfish, and foolish. It was President Wilson's own ineptitude and stubbornness that led to the Senate defeat of the Treaty of Versailles rather than the strength of the opposition forces. ...read more.

Conclusion

He stated that if it weren't for Wilson's pigheadedness, the treaty could have worked out to please everyone. It is true that Henry Cabot Lodge and the Republican majority in the Senate were a force in the defeat of the treaty. By holding off the vote and making his own reservations to the treaty, Lodge knew that he was using Wilson's hatred to his advantage. Wilson would have accepted the reservations if they had been proposed by one of his fellow Democrats, but the fact that they had been written by Lodge made Wilson see red. He immediately ordered Democrats to vote entirely against the treaty with the added Lodge reservations. The only possible path to ratification would be to accept the treaty with the new reservations. Wilson chose to block the passing of the treaty by persuading Democrats to vote against it. The blame for the failure of the Treaty of Versailles falls solely into the hands of President Wilson. Rather than allowing the Senate to work through the knots of the treaty, Wilson murdered his own work because of bad blood between Lodge and himself. Wilson's stubbornness destroyed any chances of the treaty's success, and the blame of the matter lies entirely with him. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. The Treaty of Versailles vs. The Treaty of Vienna. Both the Congress of Vienna, ...

    Another similarity was the defeated sides must pay for their defeat in terms of money and lands. From both France and, especially, Germany huge amounts of money were demanded for war indemnities. They had to sacrifice some of their lands in order to gratify the desires of the victorious powers.

  2. Woodrow Wilson. The absence of the United States in the League of Nations led ...

    it.20 He saw Article 10 as critical to preventing future wars and that is why he had gone to war in the first place.21 Wilson believed any changes would make the Treaty too weak to be effective. 22 All the conflicts could have been avoided if Wilson agreed to Lodge's reasonable fourteen reservations that strengthen the Covenant.

  1. Treaty Versailles Essay

    Germany encountered large territorial losses. The provinces of Alsace-Lorraine returned to France, Eupen and Malmedy were given to Belgium; North Schleswig was given to Denmark. Land was also taken from Germany and given to Czechoslovakia and Poland. 30 But it wasn't just in Europe that Germany suffered territorial losses.

  2. Assess the impact of the Treaty of Versailles on Germany, 1919-1930.

    Fleming, Denna F. The Origins and Legacies of World War I. New York: Doubleday, 1968. * The Germans were no longer a threat to the French since German armed forces were considerably reduced in size and there existed a buffer zone.

  1. The League of Nations - Although the League of Nations had several successes, it ...

    [11] Several examples of its success were solving the conflicts between following countries: Bulgaria and Greece in 1925, Iraq and Turkey from 1925 to 1926, and Poland and Lithuania in 1927.

  2. Appeal to the League of Nations

    to speak with complete frankness, without reticence, in all directness such as is demanded by the rule of equality as between all States Members of the League? -Apart from the Kingdom of the Lord there is not on this earth any nation that is superior to any other.

  1. Collapse of the League of Nations

    Then the British send a politician Lord Runciman to negotiate with the Czechoslovakian government and force it to draw a settlement between her and Germany. However, Lord Runciman was in favour of Germany to receive the Sudetenland. After days of negotiation Chamberlain agreed for a peaceful German takeover of the

  2. Condensed Treaty of Versailles

    The League believed that these countries were not strong enough to survive in the "modern world" and therefore it was the duty of the League to "take care of them". An annual report of the country/region, was to be handed in to the council by the country in-charge of the

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work