• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

There were many people who supported the Treaty of Versailles, but there were also many people who opposed it. The one major person who opposed the treaty was Henry Cabot Lodge. He was a Republican Representative in Congress.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The Treaty of Versailles The Treaty of Versailles was signed on June 28, 1919. This treaty officially ended World War I. There were, however, forces in the senate that opposed this treaty. This treaty set up the foundation for the League of Nations. This idea for a league of nations came from President Wilson himself. However, it was the strength of the opposition forces, both liberal and conservative, rather than the ineptitude and stubbornness of President Wilson that led to the Senate defeat of the Treaty of Versailles. There were many people who supported the Treaty of Versailles, but there were also many people who opposed it. The one major person who opposed the treaty was Henry Cabot Lodge. He was a Republican Representative in Congress. He opposed the treaty of Versailles because he felt that by ratifying the treaty it would involve the United States in foreign commitments it could not keep or that it would not keep. Lodge however was not alone in his opposition of the Treaty of Versailles. In Document A, William Borah states that he was against the Treaty of Versailles because he does not want to subject the people of the United States to the matters of controversy which may arise between other nations. ...read more.

Middle

The United States Senate is seen carrying a sheet of paper labeled Constitutional Rights showing that the Senate believed that joining with foreign nations, and sharing their rights would not be allowed. Instead, the United States Senate stayed greedy and demanded that they remain a completely separate nation instead of helping the less successful nations by creating the League of Nations Overall, it was the strength of the opposition forces, both liberal and conservative, rather than the ineptitude of stubbornness of President Wilson that led to the Senate defeat of the Treaty of Versailles. Henry Cabot Lodge, William Boroh, and the Senate all attempted to kill the Treaty, and sadly they succeeded. Wilson's dream of this League of Nations was before its time, and the people were not ready for change. The League of Nations had the potential to stop many of the conflicts which arose later in time, however, the people, were simply not ready for such a change, and like many Americans did not want to share their freedom with other nations, they simply remained greedy, selfish, and foolish. It was President Wilson's own ineptitude and stubbornness that led to the Senate defeat of the Treaty of Versailles rather than the strength of the opposition forces. ...read more.

Conclusion

He stated that if it weren't for Wilson's pigheadedness, the treaty could have worked out to please everyone. It is true that Henry Cabot Lodge and the Republican majority in the Senate were a force in the defeat of the treaty. By holding off the vote and making his own reservations to the treaty, Lodge knew that he was using Wilson's hatred to his advantage. Wilson would have accepted the reservations if they had been proposed by one of his fellow Democrats, but the fact that they had been written by Lodge made Wilson see red. He immediately ordered Democrats to vote entirely against the treaty with the added Lodge reservations. The only possible path to ratification would be to accept the treaty with the new reservations. Wilson chose to block the passing of the treaty by persuading Democrats to vote against it. The blame for the failure of the Treaty of Versailles falls solely into the hands of President Wilson. Rather than allowing the Senate to work through the knots of the treaty, Wilson murdered his own work because of bad blood between Lodge and himself. Wilson's stubbornness destroyed any chances of the treaty's success, and the blame of the matter lies entirely with him. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. Assess the impact of the Treaty of Versailles on Germany, 1919-1930.

    Fleming, Denna F. The Origins and Legacies of World War I. New York: Doubleday, 1968. * The Germans were no longer a threat to the French since German armed forces were considerably reduced in size and there existed a buffer zone.

  2. Condensed Treaty of Versailles

    certain area * Ensure human rights in the countries involved in the League, and those around the world that were involved with the countries in the League. This included fair treatment of natives, trade of arms being looked over by the League, freedom of communication and to step in when

  1. The Treaty of Versailles vs. The Treaty of Vienna. Both the Congress of Vienna, ...

    Finally, the delegates settled the issues which arose after the Napoleonic Era; the delegates were so successful that no one got angry or hateful to the other side, and they established peace throughout Europe until the beginning of the Great War.

  2. hrough an analysis of the consequences of the treaty of Versailles, it is made ...

    defeated, WWI was not fought on German soil, its industries were relatively untouched and since mass media was not as developed as in the 1930s and later on, it was very difficult for the German to believe that Germany had lost the war.

  1. Treaty Versailles Essay

    14 Woodrow Wilson (President of the United States), David Lloyd George (Prime Minister of the United Kingdom), Vittorio Emanuele Orlando (Italy) and Georges Clemenceau (France); these men were the leaders of the major Allied countries and also the four

  2. Appeal to the League of Nations

    of nations during the Wal-Wal incident in December of 1934 -Haile urged the procedure for conciliation and arbitration -A "certain Government" at the time decided that they would rather not interfere, as to not disturb the peace in Europe -Due to this, the independence of Ethiopia was lost -The consequences

  1. Collapse of the League of Nations

    Rhineland and formed an Anschluss in1938 with Austria encouraged him further, to continue his aggressive foreign policy and continues to demand what was taken away by the Versailles Treaty and needed to build a strong German state in Europe which would unite all Germans.

  2. To What Extent was the Treaty of Versailles a fair treaty that could keep ...

    and agricultural products.[6] In addition, Germany was forced to reduce its army to the lowest point compatible with internal security. They were not allowed to have air force, submarines, armored cars or tanks. It was only allowed to have a tiny navy with 6 battleships and a small navy with 100,000 men to provide internal security.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work