• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

There were many people who supported the Treaty of Versailles, but there were also many people who opposed it. The one major person who opposed the treaty was Henry Cabot Lodge. He was a Republican Representative in Congress.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The Treaty of Versailles The Treaty of Versailles was signed on June 28, 1919. This treaty officially ended World War I. There were, however, forces in the senate that opposed this treaty. This treaty set up the foundation for the League of Nations. This idea for a league of nations came from President Wilson himself. However, it was the strength of the opposition forces, both liberal and conservative, rather than the ineptitude and stubbornness of President Wilson that led to the Senate defeat of the Treaty of Versailles. There were many people who supported the Treaty of Versailles, but there were also many people who opposed it. The one major person who opposed the treaty was Henry Cabot Lodge. He was a Republican Representative in Congress. He opposed the treaty of Versailles because he felt that by ratifying the treaty it would involve the United States in foreign commitments it could not keep or that it would not keep. Lodge however was not alone in his opposition of the Treaty of Versailles. In Document A, William Borah states that he was against the Treaty of Versailles because he does not want to subject the people of the United States to the matters of controversy which may arise between other nations. ...read more.

Middle

The United States Senate is seen carrying a sheet of paper labeled Constitutional Rights showing that the Senate believed that joining with foreign nations, and sharing their rights would not be allowed. Instead, the United States Senate stayed greedy and demanded that they remain a completely separate nation instead of helping the less successful nations by creating the League of Nations Overall, it was the strength of the opposition forces, both liberal and conservative, rather than the ineptitude of stubbornness of President Wilson that led to the Senate defeat of the Treaty of Versailles. Henry Cabot Lodge, William Boroh, and the Senate all attempted to kill the Treaty, and sadly they succeeded. Wilson's dream of this League of Nations was before its time, and the people were not ready for change. The League of Nations had the potential to stop many of the conflicts which arose later in time, however, the people, were simply not ready for such a change, and like many Americans did not want to share their freedom with other nations, they simply remained greedy, selfish, and foolish. It was President Wilson's own ineptitude and stubbornness that led to the Senate defeat of the Treaty of Versailles rather than the strength of the opposition forces. ...read more.

Conclusion

He stated that if it weren't for Wilson's pigheadedness, the treaty could have worked out to please everyone. It is true that Henry Cabot Lodge and the Republican majority in the Senate were a force in the defeat of the treaty. By holding off the vote and making his own reservations to the treaty, Lodge knew that he was using Wilson's hatred to his advantage. Wilson would have accepted the reservations if they had been proposed by one of his fellow Democrats, but the fact that they had been written by Lodge made Wilson see red. He immediately ordered Democrats to vote entirely against the treaty with the added Lodge reservations. The only possible path to ratification would be to accept the treaty with the new reservations. Wilson chose to block the passing of the treaty by persuading Democrats to vote against it. The blame for the failure of the Treaty of Versailles falls solely into the hands of President Wilson. Rather than allowing the Senate to work through the knots of the treaty, Wilson murdered his own work because of bad blood between Lodge and himself. Wilson's stubbornness destroyed any chances of the treaty's success, and the blame of the matter lies entirely with him. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. Treaty Versailles Essay

    Raw materials.35 Coal in particular was an economic loss.36 The cost of the war for Germany was approximately $39 billion. In addition to this, the massive losses of lives are also considered. Germany suffered the loss of 1.7 million young men, with another 4.3 million men wounded.

  2. The Treaty of Versailles vs. The Treaty of Vienna. Both the Congress of Vienna, ...

    The decision in Vienna turned out to be a cleverer one as it maintained peace a lot longer time than the other treaty. In both cases after the wars, the conferences redrew the political map of Europe. They made it to stabilize their continent after the atrocious wars.

  1. Woodrow Wilson. The absence of the United States in the League of Nations led ...

    it.20 He saw Article 10 as critical to preventing future wars and that is why he had gone to war in the first place.21 Wilson believed any changes would make the Treaty too weak to be effective. 22 All the conflicts could have been avoided if Wilson agreed to Lodge's reasonable fourteen reservations that strengthen the Covenant.

  2. Assess the impact of the Treaty of Versailles on Germany, 1919-1930.

    * The Treaty formed a buffer zone between France and Germany, by enlarging Poland. o The Rhineland becomes a free city but is under the control of Poland. * All German rivers become international free run-ways and Germany can no longer collect Tariffs on goods.

  1. Collapse of the League of Nations

    However, in order to investigate how important was the fall of the League of Nations for the cause of the WWII the successes and failures of the League of Nations need to be considered. During the 1920s the League was flourishing as it was able to solve most of the conflicts.

  2. The League of Nations - Although the League of Nations had several successes, it ...

    The League telling the member countries not to have any kind of trade relations with the aggressor country was also possible since it bore the intention of pushing the aggressor towards bankruptcy. [8] If economic sanctions did not work, the last thing the League could do was introducing physical sanctions

  1. Peace Treaty Essay

    The final clause I disagreed with was the guilt clause. The Germans had never started the war; a Serbian nationalist group assassinated Franz Ferdinand. Overall do I believe this treaty had been fair? In the eyes of the German people and as my own opinion I do not believe that it was fair.

  2. Appeal to the League of Nations

    had it not been for the Italian forces, and the rebels being stirred by the Italians -Italy was not sincere when they signed the Friendship Treaty -According to Haile, the Italian government had been planning the conquest for the past 14 years, which would mean that it was deceiving the

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work