• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

There were many people who supported the Treaty of Versailles, but there were also many people who opposed it. The one major person who opposed the treaty was Henry Cabot Lodge. He was a Republican Representative in Congress.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The Treaty of Versailles The Treaty of Versailles was signed on June 28, 1919. This treaty officially ended World War I. There were, however, forces in the senate that opposed this treaty. This treaty set up the foundation for the League of Nations. This idea for a league of nations came from President Wilson himself. However, it was the strength of the opposition forces, both liberal and conservative, rather than the ineptitude and stubbornness of President Wilson that led to the Senate defeat of the Treaty of Versailles. There were many people who supported the Treaty of Versailles, but there were also many people who opposed it. The one major person who opposed the treaty was Henry Cabot Lodge. He was a Republican Representative in Congress. He opposed the treaty of Versailles because he felt that by ratifying the treaty it would involve the United States in foreign commitments it could not keep or that it would not keep. Lodge however was not alone in his opposition of the Treaty of Versailles. In Document A, William Borah states that he was against the Treaty of Versailles because he does not want to subject the people of the United States to the matters of controversy which may arise between other nations. ...read more.

Middle

The United States Senate is seen carrying a sheet of paper labeled Constitutional Rights showing that the Senate believed that joining with foreign nations, and sharing their rights would not be allowed. Instead, the United States Senate stayed greedy and demanded that they remain a completely separate nation instead of helping the less successful nations by creating the League of Nations Overall, it was the strength of the opposition forces, both liberal and conservative, rather than the ineptitude of stubbornness of President Wilson that led to the Senate defeat of the Treaty of Versailles. Henry Cabot Lodge, William Boroh, and the Senate all attempted to kill the Treaty, and sadly they succeeded. Wilson's dream of this League of Nations was before its time, and the people were not ready for change. The League of Nations had the potential to stop many of the conflicts which arose later in time, however, the people, were simply not ready for such a change, and like many Americans did not want to share their freedom with other nations, they simply remained greedy, selfish, and foolish. It was President Wilson's own ineptitude and stubbornness that led to the Senate defeat of the Treaty of Versailles rather than the strength of the opposition forces. ...read more.

Conclusion

He stated that if it weren't for Wilson's pigheadedness, the treaty could have worked out to please everyone. It is true that Henry Cabot Lodge and the Republican majority in the Senate were a force in the defeat of the treaty. By holding off the vote and making his own reservations to the treaty, Lodge knew that he was using Wilson's hatred to his advantage. Wilson would have accepted the reservations if they had been proposed by one of his fellow Democrats, but the fact that they had been written by Lodge made Wilson see red. He immediately ordered Democrats to vote entirely against the treaty with the added Lodge reservations. The only possible path to ratification would be to accept the treaty with the new reservations. Wilson chose to block the passing of the treaty by persuading Democrats to vote against it. The blame for the failure of the Treaty of Versailles falls solely into the hands of President Wilson. Rather than allowing the Senate to work through the knots of the treaty, Wilson murdered his own work because of bad blood between Lodge and himself. Wilson's stubbornness destroyed any chances of the treaty's success, and the blame of the matter lies entirely with him. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. The Treaty of Versailles vs. The Treaty of Vienna. Both the Congress of Vienna, ...

    The treaties are disparate for their point of view of the defeated countries. For instance, Germany did not participate in decision-making in the Treaty of Versailles, whereas France joined the alliance after completing her payments of war indemnities. The French existence was valuable for the victorious powers since they appreciated her existence in decision-making for Europe's future.

  2. Woodrow Wilson. The absence of the United States in the League of Nations led ...

    it.20 He saw Article 10 as critical to preventing future wars and that is why he had gone to war in the first place.21 Wilson believed any changes would make the Treaty too weak to be effective. 22 All the conflicts could have been avoided if Wilson agreed to Lodge's reasonable fourteen reservations that strengthen the Covenant.

  1. Assess the impact of the Treaty of Versailles on Germany, 1919-1930.

    POV#2 - Before and during the Great War, Germany was proud to have the strongest army in Eastern Europe. However, following the end of the war, the Treaty of Versailles limited the German army to a very minimal size while making countries surrounding Germany stronger, but eventually Germany successfully evades these military clauses.

  2. Treaty Versailles Essay

    The payments, called reparations would be paid monthly to the Allies and would total �6600 million. This figure was agreed upon by the Allies after the signing of the treaty.34 Not only was Germany responsible for paying money but also Germany had lost some of the most precious sources of

  1. Appeal to the League of Nations

    Have the signatures appended to a Treaty value only in so far as the signatory Powers have a personal, direct and immediate interest involved? -At a time when my people are threatened with extermination, when the support of the League may ward off the final blow, may I be allowed

  2. Collapse of the League of Nations

    Sudetenland and he forced the Czechoslovakian government to give Germany the demanded area. However, Hitler wanted to use each opportunity so he demanded an immediate invasion and additional areas from Hungary and Poland. Disappointed from Hitler's behaviour Chamberlain refused and was ready to prepare for a serious conflict with the Reich.

  1. Condensed Treaty of Versailles

    The League believed that these countries were not strong enough to survive in the "modern world" and therefore it was the duty of the League to "take care of them". An annual report of the country/region, was to be handed in to the council by the country in-charge of the

  2. To What Extent was the Treaty of Versailles a fair treaty that could keep ...

    and agricultural products.[6] In addition, Germany was forced to reduce its army to the lowest point compatible with internal security. They were not allowed to have air force, submarines, armored cars or tanks. It was only allowed to have a tiny navy with 6 battleships and a small navy with 100,000 men to provide internal security.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work