• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extend was Nicholas II prepared to become tsar in 1894?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To what extend was Nicholas II prepared to become tsar in 1894? By Diederik ten Brink, IS11 Nicholas Romanov came to power of the Russian throne in 1894. At this point, the dynasty was under threat. The Russian Empire was under threat by social unrest and was facing the threat of a revolution. Nicholas Romanov had major problems to deal with, which he could still solve if he was well prepared. In this essay it will be discussed to what extend Nicholas Romanov was prepare to become tsar and how he dealt with the important position. Of character, Nicholas was considered to be very shy and childish. Part of this was caused by Nicholas' appearance, because he was quite slender. (Gurko, V. I.) His father, Alexander III called him 'girlie' and thought of him as a weakling (Figes, Orlando). Nicholas' appearance caused his family to call him 'Little Nicky, which resulted in a lack of self-confidence. Even though Nicholas was quite smart, his father thought that he was stupid because of his shyness and low self esteem. ...read more.

Middle

Nicholas had great manners and was very polite (partially caused by his own self image and how he looked up to other people). Politeness and manners are generally considered good for a ruler, however, in Nicholas' case; it came to more extreme levels. Since he was so polite, he didn't dare to speak against someone, even though he didn't agree. During his reign, this caused ministers to think that Nicholas' agreed with their points, meanwhile Nicholas would not agree and send a letter afterwards. Since there were no meetings of the ministers together (Nicholas prevented it), all agreements had to be made on personal meetings between Nicholas and the ministers. There were no debates or arguments, since Nicholas was too polite to oppose the minister's view. Nicholas did however have a very good memory, but this was not of great importance for his position. Nicholas had little practical knowledge about how to lead a country, since he was not well prepared for it. ...read more.

Conclusion

One could almost say that Nicholas was a power vacuum. He didn't trust others to do the job, but was scared to do the job himself. This behavior really caused nothing to get done in the Russian Empire. Nicholas' personality, the way in which he was brought up and his miniaturist way of ruling had major impact on Russia. The impotence of Nicholas caused little reforms to be put through and deepening of the revolutionary crisis. While Nicholas II was very willing and devoted to the autocracy, he was poorly prepared and not up for the scale of the problems in Russia at the time. Nicholas was not prepared for the job because he hasn't had the education required for someone to rule a whole country by himself. Figes, Orlando. A People's Tragedy: The Russian Revolution 1891-1924. London: Random House Group Limited, 1996. Print. Gurko, V. I., Figures and Features of the Past: Government and Opinion in the reign of Nicholas II, Stanford, 1939. Print Chubarov, Alex. "Nicholas, Czar II." Allrussias.com. 2009. Web. 10 Apr. 2012. <http://www.cartage.org.lb/en/themes/biographies/mainbiographies/n/czarnicholas/2.html>. Simkin, John. "Tsar Nicholas II : Biography." Spartacus Educational. Spartacus Educational. Web. 10 Apr. 2012. <http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/FWWtsar.htm>. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. Compare and Contract the policies of Alexander II and Alexander III in Russia?

    However there were briberies of the witnesses and the accused has no opportunity to challenge evidence. So Alexander II, allowed evidence to be considered in the open, and a defence counsel was allowed. Trial was by a jury for criminal cases, etc.

  2. To what extent did Alexander Tsar II deserve the title of Tsar Liberator

    society was not changed from above it would change itself by means of revolution from below. As Alexander said in his famous speech to the Moscow nobles in April 1856: It is better to abolish serfdom from above then to wait for the time when it will begin to abolish

  1. Was the Tsar to blame for his own downfall?

    Moreover, as capitalism began to grow land owners were in relative decline. The problem was that the Tsar depended on land owners. Additionally, there was discontent in the countryside. Peasants were unhappy that they had to pay redemption payments, that had been established under the rule of Alexander III father of Nicholas II after the liberation of the serfs.

  2. The policies of Alexander II and III of Russia

    Secondary schools accessible to all classes, no class distinctions, teaching was modernised, textbooks hugely improved, created huge increases in class equality.6 d. University autonomy re-established7, free to teach all areas, rectors elected, teachers still needed permission to be appointed, increased freedom of intellectual class (Apendices3)

  1. IB History HL, Extended Notes: Russia, the Tsars, the Provisional Govenment and the Revolution.

    Worked to organize the war effort under the Tsar and supported the idea of a decentralized system of government. 2. Milyukov (Minister of Foreign Affairs)- real force in government, originally wanted British-style constitutional monarchy but was forced out of government over disagreement over WWI and then supported a military government so save Russia from the Soviet system.

  2. To what extent did the reforms of Alexander II achieve his aims

    Daily newspapers and books (over 160 pages) no longer had to be submitted for censorship prior to publication. For the first time in Russian history, the newspapers were able to discuss both international and domestic politics. Information and ideas circulated more freely than ever before.

  1. Assess the strengths and weaknesses of Alexander II of Russia's reforms.

    Russia is becoming a new forward thinking nation. Western Europe is more likely to ally itself with this new modern Russia. Alexander II saw that Russia?s new population of ?free? people was under governed, having fewer civil servants than Britain.

  2. Analyse the reason for, and the nature of, opposition to tsardom in Russia between ...

    This clearly explains the way these people thought at that time and had no will to follow any rules. This quote was written in the book ?Father's and Sons?. The novel creates a picture of the older generation of Russia, which was unwilling to accept reforms, and the idealistic youth.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work