• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extend was Nicholas II prepared to become tsar in 1894?

Extracts from this document...


To what extend was Nicholas II prepared to become tsar in 1894? By Diederik ten Brink, IS11 Nicholas Romanov came to power of the Russian throne in 1894. At this point, the dynasty was under threat. The Russian Empire was under threat by social unrest and was facing the threat of a revolution. Nicholas Romanov had major problems to deal with, which he could still solve if he was well prepared. In this essay it will be discussed to what extend Nicholas Romanov was prepare to become tsar and how he dealt with the important position. Of character, Nicholas was considered to be very shy and childish. Part of this was caused by Nicholas' appearance, because he was quite slender. (Gurko, V. I.) His father, Alexander III called him 'girlie' and thought of him as a weakling (Figes, Orlando). Nicholas' appearance caused his family to call him 'Little Nicky, which resulted in a lack of self-confidence. Even though Nicholas was quite smart, his father thought that he was stupid because of his shyness and low self esteem. ...read more.


Nicholas had great manners and was very polite (partially caused by his own self image and how he looked up to other people). Politeness and manners are generally considered good for a ruler, however, in Nicholas' case; it came to more extreme levels. Since he was so polite, he didn't dare to speak against someone, even though he didn't agree. During his reign, this caused ministers to think that Nicholas' agreed with their points, meanwhile Nicholas would not agree and send a letter afterwards. Since there were no meetings of the ministers together (Nicholas prevented it), all agreements had to be made on personal meetings between Nicholas and the ministers. There were no debates or arguments, since Nicholas was too polite to oppose the minister's view. Nicholas did however have a very good memory, but this was not of great importance for his position. Nicholas had little practical knowledge about how to lead a country, since he was not well prepared for it. ...read more.


One could almost say that Nicholas was a power vacuum. He didn't trust others to do the job, but was scared to do the job himself. This behavior really caused nothing to get done in the Russian Empire. Nicholas' personality, the way in which he was brought up and his miniaturist way of ruling had major impact on Russia. The impotence of Nicholas caused little reforms to be put through and deepening of the revolutionary crisis. While Nicholas II was very willing and devoted to the autocracy, he was poorly prepared and not up for the scale of the problems in Russia at the time. Nicholas was not prepared for the job because he hasn't had the education required for someone to rule a whole country by himself. Figes, Orlando. A People's Tragedy: The Russian Revolution 1891-1924. London: Random House Group Limited, 1996. Print. Gurko, V. I., Figures and Features of the Past: Government and Opinion in the reign of Nicholas II, Stanford, 1939. Print Chubarov, Alex. "Nicholas, Czar II." Allrussias.com. 2009. Web. 10 Apr. 2012. <http://www.cartage.org.lb/en/themes/biographies/mainbiographies/n/czarnicholas/2.html>. Simkin, John. "Tsar Nicholas II : Biography." Spartacus Educational. Spartacus Educational. Web. 10 Apr. 2012. <http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/FWWtsar.htm>. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. The policies of Alexander II and III of Russia

    autocrat himself that reveals his aims for the future and views on his duty as a Tsar. The limitations of this document are that it is has little perspective, the Tsar's perspective. It does not show the other perspective, the perspective of people who do not share his grief.

  2. Was the Tsar to blame for his own downfall?

    Three years of total war damaged the Russian economy greatly bringing a contraction in the economy, inflation and a decline in the living conditions of Russians. Russia's blocked trade routes only aggravated the situation as Russia could not export her grain.

  1. Compare and Contract the policies of Alexander II and Alexander III in Russia?

    Finally, the church was given more control over primary education and was encouraged to set up church schools in the parish, but the amount of pupils attending church schools increased by 900% during his reign. His new legal system, was also seen as successful, as he enforced equality before the

  2. To what extend does the number of deaths and debt during the construction of ...

    So the President sized the opportunity to support Panama's revolution in a military and political standpoint. (Rosenberg) The US military send the USS Nashville to delay the movement of troops between Colombia to Panama. (Sass and Wiegand, 167)The troops were forced to slow down as they disembark.(Sass and Wiegand, 167)

  1. IB History HL, Extended Notes: Russia, the Tsars, the Provisional Govenment and the Revolution.

    3. Local peasant disturbances spread. 3000 needed the army to put down and around 30m rubles of damage were caused. 4. Railways workers almost brought the economy to a standstill 2.7m workers had been on strike by the end of 1905.

  2. Assess the strengths and weaknesses of Alexander II of Russia's reforms.

    Russia is becoming a new forward thinking nation. Western Europe is more likely to ally itself with this new modern Russia. Alexander II saw that Russia?s new population of ?free? people was under governed, having fewer civil servants than Britain.

  1. Analyse the reason for, and the nature of, opposition to tsardom in Russia between ...

    This clearly explains the way these people thought at that time and had no will to follow any rules. This quote was written in the book ?Father's and Sons?. The novel creates a picture of the older generation of Russia, which was unwilling to accept reforms, and the idealistic youth.

  2. Why has Afghanistan become such an important issue in the last 10 years?

    convicted murders and adulterers and amputations of those found guilty of theft. Men were required to grow beards and women to cover up in a burka. In November 2001 the Taliban were overthrown by the British and American armed forces, as well as Afghan fighters (from a group called the Northern Alliance).

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work