• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extend was Nicholas II prepared to become tsar in 1894?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To what extend was Nicholas II prepared to become tsar in 1894? By Diederik ten Brink, IS11 Nicholas Romanov came to power of the Russian throne in 1894. At this point, the dynasty was under threat. The Russian Empire was under threat by social unrest and was facing the threat of a revolution. Nicholas Romanov had major problems to deal with, which he could still solve if he was well prepared. In this essay it will be discussed to what extend Nicholas Romanov was prepare to become tsar and how he dealt with the important position. Of character, Nicholas was considered to be very shy and childish. Part of this was caused by Nicholas' appearance, because he was quite slender. (Gurko, V. I.) His father, Alexander III called him 'girlie' and thought of him as a weakling (Figes, Orlando). Nicholas' appearance caused his family to call him 'Little Nicky, which resulted in a lack of self-confidence. Even though Nicholas was quite smart, his father thought that he was stupid because of his shyness and low self esteem. ...read more.

Middle

Nicholas had great manners and was very polite (partially caused by his own self image and how he looked up to other people). Politeness and manners are generally considered good for a ruler, however, in Nicholas' case; it came to more extreme levels. Since he was so polite, he didn't dare to speak against someone, even though he didn't agree. During his reign, this caused ministers to think that Nicholas' agreed with their points, meanwhile Nicholas would not agree and send a letter afterwards. Since there were no meetings of the ministers together (Nicholas prevented it), all agreements had to be made on personal meetings between Nicholas and the ministers. There were no debates or arguments, since Nicholas was too polite to oppose the minister's view. Nicholas did however have a very good memory, but this was not of great importance for his position. Nicholas had little practical knowledge about how to lead a country, since he was not well prepared for it. ...read more.

Conclusion

One could almost say that Nicholas was a power vacuum. He didn't trust others to do the job, but was scared to do the job himself. This behavior really caused nothing to get done in the Russian Empire. Nicholas' personality, the way in which he was brought up and his miniaturist way of ruling had major impact on Russia. The impotence of Nicholas caused little reforms to be put through and deepening of the revolutionary crisis. While Nicholas II was very willing and devoted to the autocracy, he was poorly prepared and not up for the scale of the problems in Russia at the time. Nicholas was not prepared for the job because he hasn't had the education required for someone to rule a whole country by himself. Figes, Orlando. A People's Tragedy: The Russian Revolution 1891-1924. London: Random House Group Limited, 1996. Print. Gurko, V. I., Figures and Features of the Past: Government and Opinion in the reign of Nicholas II, Stanford, 1939. Print Chubarov, Alex. "Nicholas, Czar II." Allrussias.com. 2009. Web. 10 Apr. 2012. <http://www.cartage.org.lb/en/themes/biographies/mainbiographies/n/czarnicholas/2.html>. Simkin, John. "Tsar Nicholas II : Biography." Spartacus Educational. Spartacus Educational. Web. 10 Apr. 2012. <http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/FWWtsar.htm>. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. Compare and Contract the policies of Alexander II and Alexander III in Russia?

    The very fact he separated the judicial and administrative powers making a more independent judiciary. Before Alexander the II, the accused never saw the judges; evidence was submitted in writing and considered according to a rigid guidline of rules based on its acceptability, e.g a confession, or collaborating statements of two independent witnesses.

  2. Was the Tsar to blame for his own downfall?

    They believed that the land belonged to the people and they should not have to pay for something that was strictly theirs. As well, an increase in the population, that had doubled between 1869 and 1914 made land problems worse as peasants now had to feed more mouths and this increased land hunger.

  1. IB History HL, Extended Notes: Russia, the Tsars, the Provisional Govenment and the Revolution.

    Or should such a big issue wait to be solved by an elected government to organize it in a more controlled way? Social Reform 1. Greater power in the workplace, better working and living conditions, etc. 2. How quickly should these reforms be implemented and how far should they go?

  2. To what extent did the reforms of Alexander II achieve his aims

    The government liberal policies transformed universities into centers of students radicalism. As David Saunders, historian specializing on history of Russian Empire, explains: ?The teaching leactures appeared to be serving not only academic and economic purposes but also the promotion of political instability.? This was a potential danger for the autocratic government.

  1. Analyse the reason for, and the nature of, opposition to tsardom in Russia between ...

    The central character is Bazarov, he is a classical portrait of the mid-nineteenth century nihilist. Mikhail Bakunin was a political philosopher and anrchist and he preached into overthrowning the regime with violence because he wanted to replace it with a self-government.

  2. Why has Afghanistan become such an important issue in the last 10 years?

    helped by the US and other countries like the UK, although the Taliban leader Mullah Omar and Osama Bin Laden were not captured. All of this has meant that the Taliban have been worldwide news especially over the last 10 years mainly because of the involvement of major countries like

  1. Assess the strengths and weaknesses of Alexander II of Russia's reforms.

    Russia is becoming a new forward thinking nation. Western Europe is more likely to ally itself with this new modern Russia. Alexander II saw that Russia?s new population of ?free? people was under governed, having fewer civil servants than Britain.

  2. Was Napolean an Heir to the French Revolution?

    It is claimed that they had been motivated by political ideology inspired by the enlightenment and the fact their economic wealth did not reflect their share of power. The declaration of the rights of man on the 24th August 1789 and the abolishing of the feudal system are often pointed

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work