• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extend was Nicholas II prepared to become tsar in 1894?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To what extend was Nicholas II prepared to become tsar in 1894? By Diederik ten Brink, IS11 Nicholas Romanov came to power of the Russian throne in 1894. At this point, the dynasty was under threat. The Russian Empire was under threat by social unrest and was facing the threat of a revolution. Nicholas Romanov had major problems to deal with, which he could still solve if he was well prepared. In this essay it will be discussed to what extend Nicholas Romanov was prepare to become tsar and how he dealt with the important position. Of character, Nicholas was considered to be very shy and childish. Part of this was caused by Nicholas' appearance, because he was quite slender. (Gurko, V. I.) His father, Alexander III called him 'girlie' and thought of him as a weakling (Figes, Orlando). Nicholas' appearance caused his family to call him 'Little Nicky, which resulted in a lack of self-confidence. Even though Nicholas was quite smart, his father thought that he was stupid because of his shyness and low self esteem. ...read more.

Middle

Nicholas had great manners and was very polite (partially caused by his own self image and how he looked up to other people). Politeness and manners are generally considered good for a ruler, however, in Nicholas' case; it came to more extreme levels. Since he was so polite, he didn't dare to speak against someone, even though he didn't agree. During his reign, this caused ministers to think that Nicholas' agreed with their points, meanwhile Nicholas would not agree and send a letter afterwards. Since there were no meetings of the ministers together (Nicholas prevented it), all agreements had to be made on personal meetings between Nicholas and the ministers. There were no debates or arguments, since Nicholas was too polite to oppose the minister's view. Nicholas did however have a very good memory, but this was not of great importance for his position. Nicholas had little practical knowledge about how to lead a country, since he was not well prepared for it. ...read more.

Conclusion

One could almost say that Nicholas was a power vacuum. He didn't trust others to do the job, but was scared to do the job himself. This behavior really caused nothing to get done in the Russian Empire. Nicholas' personality, the way in which he was brought up and his miniaturist way of ruling had major impact on Russia. The impotence of Nicholas caused little reforms to be put through and deepening of the revolutionary crisis. While Nicholas II was very willing and devoted to the autocracy, he was poorly prepared and not up for the scale of the problems in Russia at the time. Nicholas was not prepared for the job because he hasn't had the education required for someone to rule a whole country by himself. Figes, Orlando. A People's Tragedy: The Russian Revolution 1891-1924. London: Random House Group Limited, 1996. Print. Gurko, V. I., Figures and Features of the Past: Government and Opinion in the reign of Nicholas II, Stanford, 1939. Print Chubarov, Alex. "Nicholas, Czar II." Allrussias.com. 2009. Web. 10 Apr. 2012. <http://www.cartage.org.lb/en/themes/biographies/mainbiographies/n/czarnicholas/2.html>. Simkin, John. "Tsar Nicholas II : Biography." Spartacus Educational. Spartacus Educational. Web. 10 Apr. 2012. <http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/FWWtsar.htm>. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. Compare and Contract the policies of Alexander II and Alexander III in Russia?

    In 1884, University Statue replaced that of 1863. It established state control over the universities in an attempt to stamp out riots, such as had occurred in 1882 in St Petersburgand Kazan. In 1887 there was an increase in university fees to exclude all but the wealthy, and to keep out the students from local social ranks.

  2. The policies of Alexander II and III of Russia

    Alexander II established Zemstva (local councils) and Dumas (parliament) b. Zemstva established 1864, aimed to give all classes a voice. c. Zemstovs provided medical care and education, hugely increased availability.9 d. Dumas established Alexander II, was pressured by liberal groups e. Alexander III tightened eligibility qualifications to Dumas, allowing only rich noble supporters into parliament; by 1892 only 0.7 percent people Moscow/St Petersburg were eligible.

  1. Was the Tsar to blame for his own downfall?

    What made matters worse was that Russia could no longer expand as it was surrounded by great powers. Without any increase in the amount of land they had and having poor farming techniques, farmers could not respond to this increase in population creating food shortages.

  2. IB History HL, Extended Notes: Russia, the Tsars, the Provisional Govenment and the Revolution.

    Worked to organize the war effort under the Tsar and supported the idea of a decentralized system of government. 2. Milyukov (Minister of Foreign Affairs)- real force in government, originally wanted British-style constitutional monarchy but was forced out of government over disagreement over WWI and then supported a military government so save Russia from the Soviet system.

  1. To what extent did the reforms of Alexander II achieve his aims

    To add to that he helped to set up the state bank in 1860. Also what was improved was the state of Russian railways. During the years 1861 to 1878, the Russian railways system expanded from 1,600 km to more than 22,000 km.

  2. Assess the strengths and weaknesses of Alexander II of Russia's reforms.

    Before 1861, serfs were drafted by their owners for 25 years; morale in the military would have been low. Also, a reform to the military?s recruitment system was vital as serfdom was abolished in 1861. During the period 1862 to 1874, Miliutin introduced military reforms based on the Prussian model.

  1. Analyse the reason for, and the nature of, opposition to tsardom in Russia between ...

    Peasants also resented this reform. Theoretically, each serf was guaranteed a minimum size allotment, at least 80% of the size was considered necessary to feed a peasant family, but more than 72% received allotments which were reduced by 20%. Freed serfs were also to pay the state ?redemption payments? over a course of 49 years.

  2. Why has Afghanistan become such an important issue in the last 10 years?

    helped by the US and other countries like the UK, although the Taliban leader Mullah Omar and Osama Bin Laden were not captured. All of this has meant that the Taliban have been worldwide news especially over the last 10 years mainly because of the involvement of major countries like

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work