• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extend was Nicholas II prepared to become tsar in 1894?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To what extend was Nicholas II prepared to become tsar in 1894? By Diederik ten Brink, IS11 Nicholas Romanov came to power of the Russian throne in 1894. At this point, the dynasty was under threat. The Russian Empire was under threat by social unrest and was facing the threat of a revolution. Nicholas Romanov had major problems to deal with, which he could still solve if he was well prepared. In this essay it will be discussed to what extend Nicholas Romanov was prepare to become tsar and how he dealt with the important position. Of character, Nicholas was considered to be very shy and childish. Part of this was caused by Nicholas' appearance, because he was quite slender. (Gurko, V. I.) His father, Alexander III called him 'girlie' and thought of him as a weakling (Figes, Orlando). Nicholas' appearance caused his family to call him 'Little Nicky, which resulted in a lack of self-confidence. Even though Nicholas was quite smart, his father thought that he was stupid because of his shyness and low self esteem. ...read more.

Middle

Nicholas had great manners and was very polite (partially caused by his own self image and how he looked up to other people). Politeness and manners are generally considered good for a ruler, however, in Nicholas' case; it came to more extreme levels. Since he was so polite, he didn't dare to speak against someone, even though he didn't agree. During his reign, this caused ministers to think that Nicholas' agreed with their points, meanwhile Nicholas would not agree and send a letter afterwards. Since there were no meetings of the ministers together (Nicholas prevented it), all agreements had to be made on personal meetings between Nicholas and the ministers. There were no debates or arguments, since Nicholas was too polite to oppose the minister's view. Nicholas did however have a very good memory, but this was not of great importance for his position. Nicholas had little practical knowledge about how to lead a country, since he was not well prepared for it. ...read more.

Conclusion

One could almost say that Nicholas was a power vacuum. He didn't trust others to do the job, but was scared to do the job himself. This behavior really caused nothing to get done in the Russian Empire. Nicholas' personality, the way in which he was brought up and his miniaturist way of ruling had major impact on Russia. The impotence of Nicholas caused little reforms to be put through and deepening of the revolutionary crisis. While Nicholas II was very willing and devoted to the autocracy, he was poorly prepared and not up for the scale of the problems in Russia at the time. Nicholas was not prepared for the job because he hasn't had the education required for someone to rule a whole country by himself. Figes, Orlando. A People's Tragedy: The Russian Revolution 1891-1924. London: Random House Group Limited, 1996. Print. Gurko, V. I., Figures and Features of the Past: Government and Opinion in the reign of Nicholas II, Stanford, 1939. Print Chubarov, Alex. "Nicholas, Czar II." Allrussias.com. 2009. Web. 10 Apr. 2012. <http://www.cartage.org.lb/en/themes/biographies/mainbiographies/n/czarnicholas/2.html>. Simkin, John. "Tsar Nicholas II : Biography." Spartacus Educational. Spartacus Educational. Web. 10 Apr. 2012. <http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/FWWtsar.htm>. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. Compare and Contract the policies of Alexander II and Alexander III in Russia?

    Finally, the church was given more control over primary education and was encouraged to set up church schools in the parish, but the amount of pupils attending church schools increased by 900% during his reign. His new legal system, was also seen as successful, as he enforced equality before the

  2. The policies of Alexander II and III of Russia

    The origin of this document is a political document, a manifesto, written by Alexander III, soon after his father's assassination by terroists. The purpose of the document is to inform the people of Russia of his political stance. It is valuable because it is a primary source written by the

  1. To what extent did Alexander Tsar II deserve the title of Tsar Liberator

    With the Crimean War a unique movement of self-accusation was evoked and, according to VV Zenkovsky: the young people began to speak a language which had not previously been heard in Russia1. A time had come when even the aristocratic bureaucracy realized that a pivotal point in history had been

  2. IB History HL, Extended Notes: Russia, the Tsars, the Provisional Govenment and the Revolution.

    Or should such a big issue wait to be solved by an elected government to organize it in a more controlled way? Social Reform 1. Greater power in the workplace, better working and living conditions, etc. 2. How quickly should these reforms be implemented and how far should they go?

  1. To what extent did the reforms of Alexander II achieve his aims

    removed from the ?freedom-of-speech? courts and the Secret State Police could still arrest people without a proper explanation. On balance, though, the legal reforms were highly successful as the positives outweighed the negatives. The new atmosphere of toleration and reforms was also noticeable in education and censorship.

  2. Was Napolean an Heir to the French Revolution?

    Many historians continue to define the revolution as the whole of the period 1789 ? 1799. Historians such as Geoffrey Ellis who points out how Napoleon himself declared at the Coup of Brumaire that: ? ?Citizens the revolution is established on the principles which began it.

  1. Analyse the reason for, and the nature of, opposition to tsardom in Russia between ...

    The central character is Bazarov, he is a classical portrait of the mid-nineteenth century nihilist. Mikhail Bakunin was a political philosopher and anrchist and he preached into overthrowning the regime with violence because he wanted to replace it with a self-government.

  2. Assess the strengths and weaknesses of Alexander II of Russia's reforms.

    Since they had no savings they were offered 100 per cent mortgages, 80 per cent offered by the state bank and 20 per cent by the landlord himself. The peasant now had redemption payments that became a lifelong burden that then had to be handed down on to their children.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work