• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent can Alexander II be called a liberator

Extracts from this document...


?To what extent did the Alexander II deserved his title of the ?Tsar Liberator??? Born in Moscow on April 29, 1818 and died in St. Petersburg on March 13, 1881, was Tsar of the Russian Empire from the March 3, 1855 until his assassination in 1881.During his youth he showed his real skills, until the time of its advent in 1855, few imagined that it would be known as a leader who implement the most difficult reforms in Russia. During the thirty-six years he was heir to the atmosphere of St. Petersburg was unfavorable to the development of any intellectual or political innovation. All the principles of freedom of thought and private initiative were, as far as possible, suppressed. Personal and official censorship, the criticism of the authorities were seen as a serious crime. This was also considered as one of the reasons that led to his murder. Russia Before Alexander II To have a better idea of what was Alexander II was liberating we need to understand the circumstances of Russia before Alexander II became Tsar. Nicholas I ruled Russia and he has been known as the most reactionary[1] Russian monarch. Nicholas I was determinate to control Russian society to prevent the spread or culmination of liberty ideas that could question his absolutism. ...read more.


At the end, in my opinion mostly no one was freer or less free, it was just a new lifestyle within new rules but the same kind of injustice to say it like that. Judicial The judicial system before Alexander II was full of corruption was illogical, arbitrary and cruel. Was abusive in general, the new reforms Alexander II involved included the separation of judicial and administrative powers, public tribunals, the right to appeal to a conference of justice as well as showing evidence and try to defend yourself, and what I considerate a very important one, judges better trained, among many others. These reforms made a less corruptive Russia and helped the modernization of the country. According to H. Seton-Watson, ?it raised general moral and even political standards?? ?for a long time the court-room was the one place in Russia where real freedom of speech prevailed, and its main champion was the lawyer?. The new system has really good statements, but it did not work at all, the country was used to all the irregularities and at the beginning where some problems with the lawyers because only a few where trained, some people still was excluded of all the new reforms, to only mention a few anomalies. ...read more.


All the reforms until certain point was useful but in the end everything change, he returned to a conservative atmosphere and a lot of repression. He accused universities of spreading liberating ideas and because of that he suppressed subjects like history, science, and modern languages because they ‘encourage independent ideas’. Also he censured any bad comment against the government. People were not free of expression again. The reforms of Alexander II mostly where not well applied and maybe that’s why many people were dissatisfied with them. Nevertheless speaking about the abolishing of serfdom were a lot of injustices, I think that reform was the least liberating and the less successful measure. Whereas the education reforms lend people the capacity of thinking which makes the most successful measure. Even though it was all censored again, young people had conscience of their rights and they fight for them. Calling the Alexander II “the Tsar Liberator” is a bit too much; I think a more proper name for him could be a reactionary tsar. He changed from a non-liberal country to a freer of opinion one, but then he transformed to a conservative one, so he established an anterior state to the present. “To what extent did the Alexander II deserved his title of the ‘Tsar Liberator’?” Renée Alejandra Becerra León ________________ [1] Term referring to ideologies to those who aspire to establish anterior state to the present. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. To what extent did Alexander II's reforms cause more problems than they solved?

    The disillusioned peasants caused multiple riots in the countryside and began asking for a 'Second Emancipation'. The country's political stability was declining and the Tsar's wellbeing was endangered as well. The reform of the Judiciary in 1864 was the next step towards a more civilised society.

  2. The policies of Alexander II and III of Russia

    The political policies of Alexander II and Alexander III may appear completely different, however for both their aim was to preserve autocracy. The establishment of the Zemstva and the Duma were major turning points in the history of Russia. The Zemstva were established in 1864, their aim to give all classes a voice in how their area was governed35.

  1. Compare and Contract the policies of Alexander II and Alexander III in Russia?

    Policies were pursued which reflected growth of national liberation movements and the fear of further Polish revolts. Anti Semitism increased with restrictions on where Jews could live and what jobs they could hold. Pogroms (killings of the Jews) became more frequent with the government actively encouraging murderers.

  2. IB History HL, Extended Notes: Russia, the Tsars, the Provisional Govenment and the Revolution.

    How did Lenin establish/consolidate political control? Ended the war 1. Despite the losses of Brest-Litovsk the largely-peasant army was grateful. Elections 1. The Bolsheviks had criticized the PG for delaying elections for the Constituent Assembly. They had been scheduled in November and because of their previous attitude the Bolsheviks had them in November.

  1. To what extent did the reforms of Alexander II achieve his aims

    either pay 49 year redemption tax to the state at 6% interest, collected by the local mir, or continue working 30 to 40 days a year on the lord?s land. This new cooperation between the state and the landowners was a huge achievement.

  2. Notes on the History and Development of the Arab-Israeli Conflict

    This transfer gave the Palestinians very limited control: o The areas they controlled were separated o Water supplies in some areas were under Israeli control o Israeli troops retained the right to enter these areas if necessary o Palestinian police could not arrest Israelis o A Palestinian executive was to

  1. Assess the strengths and weaknesses of Alexander II of Russia's reforms.

    In order to fill these new administrative roles he called upon the local people. In 1864, new governing bodies were created called zemstva, zemstvo singular. The members were chosen by three electoral colleges, representing the peasants, townspeople and the gentry.

  2. Despite his apparently liberal policies, Alexander II was just as conservative as Alexander III. ...

    by different people due to the huge redemption taxes which prevented movement throughout Germany, and did not have the facilities to be able to create a surplus of crop to improve the German economy. It can therefore be argued that although the emancipation of the serfs was supposedly reformist, it

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work