• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent can Hitler(TM)s rise to and consolidation of power be considered a Legal Revolution(TM)?

Extracts from this document...


To what extent can Hitler's rise to & consolidation of power be considered a 'Legal Revolution'? The political changes made by Hitler and the NSDAP between 1933 and 1934 were considered to be within the ambit of the consitution, and therefore legal. On the other hand, due to the dramatic results of these modifications we often call them a 'revolution'. However, it is worth questioning how far can we consider Hitler's rise and consolidation to power a 'legal revolution'. Hitler wanted to create a revolution from above. He did this step-by-step and in coordination with the constituion. Both the Enabling Act and the Gleichschaltung had clear references to the constituion and used literal words from it, proving that Hitler gaied executive powers to modify the whole range of political functions within the Reich in a legal manner. Therefore the purging of the bureaucracy of potential opponents, the combination of the chancellor's and the president's power into one and the law against the formation of parties was achieved through legal methods. ...read more.


With the authority gained from the Enabling Act, he turned Article 48 from something temporary - that was used to preserve democracy- into a permanent weapon against a parliamentary government. Laws issued under the Enabling Act abolished the rights of the L(nder legislatures and subordinated the state Ministers-President to the Ministry of Interior in Berlin. This destabilized the entire federal system which had been a central part of the Weimar consitution. Finally he pushed forward a law against the formation of parties, thus nullifying the purpose of voting, and extended the franchise of men and women over 20. The term of proportional representation lost its meaning under Hitler, something that - again- was a characteristic of the Weimar. Hitler worked constantly to destroy the constitution, and therefore it is absurd to call his political changes legal, when the aim of them was to destroy the meaning of legality. It is not even certain that the Nazis tried to keep in accordance with the constitution, as Hitler's 'legal' changes were accompanied by a considerable degree of mobilised pressure - of the very type that the constitution was originally conceived to prevent. ...read more.


The reason why Hitler tried to get rid of extremist members of the SA during the Night of the Long Knives, wasn't due to his keen desire to protect the standard of legality, but to keep himself safe. In any case, the word 'legal' can hardly be used to describe the methods by which the leaders of the SA were eliminated (unjustified executions). Finally, the Nazi apparatus came to be dominated by a body which was as far from the constitutional apparatus of the Weimar Republic as it is possible to conceive, proving that Hitler's aim was never to follow the priciple of legality, but to alter it according to his needs. He only tried to show a fa´┐Żade of legality at the beginning of his consolidation to power, as he had to be cautious till he gained the SS to his side as well. After this he openly boasted with the fact that he eliminated other parties, showing that he never tried to rise to and consolitade his power in a legal manner, but in a rather pragmatic one. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. To what extent was Stalin's rise to power due to his opponents' mistakes?

    The Party decided to let Stalin keep his position in the Party instead of following Lenin's advice and replace him (MacDonald 66). Their mistakes and failures were ultimately very consequential in Stalin's rise however they were not the sole cause of it.

  2. To what extent can Napoleon be considered the "Son of the Revolution"?

    Even taxation, which was a massive issue in the revolution, was not equal in Napoleon's France. He increased indirect taxation in a large scale, consuming good such as tobacco, playing card and alcohol were overwhelming expensive and taxation was absurd.

  1. Analyse the factors that contribute to Hitler(TM)s rise to power.

    became ingrained in the German mind. The idea of democracy... did not sprout in Germany". As a result of this, the German people could not get used to the idea of a democracy and thus did not look up to the Weimar government as a legitimate form of government in the first place.

  2. Stalin's rise to power, his policies and how he consolidated his grip on power.

    benefited from plants which had been set up during the first plan and now on stream. * By 1937, the USSR was virtually self-sufficient in machine making and metal working with transport and communications growing rapidly. Weaknesses * Consumer goods industries were still lagging, although they were showing signs of recovery.

  1. Castro's rise to power

    It was because of this that the M-26-7 succeeded while the prior movements failed. This was a major leadership skill in his path to power. We can not left aside, Castro's ability of exploiting the country's miserable political and economic conditions as a significant leadership skill in his path to power.

  2. Assess the methods and conditions which enabled Hitler to rise to power.

    Goebbels, minister of propaganda, also helped Hitler rise to power by his use of 'saturation' propaganda. The use of rallies, speeches, lectures and 'airplane campaigns' in certain areas were highly effective in raising the profile of the party. It also increased their votes in the elections, especially during the years

  1. Discuss the methods used by Hitler to Consolidate Power at 1933 1934

    In this way, Hitler could eradicate all of his political opponents and consolidate his power. Another policy introduced by Hitler in order to consolidate his power was the Gleichschaltung, which was the process by which the whole of the organized life of the German nation was to be brought under the single control of the Nazi party.

  2. IB History HL, Extended Notes: Russia, the Tsars, the Provisional Govenment and the Revolution.

    Britain got Cyprus 3. Russia kept gains in Bessarabia. 4. Bosnia Herzegovina continued to be under Austrian administration 5. Serbia and Montenegro still independent but lost some land 1. Results 1. Britain successfully propped up the Turkish Empire. War again in 1912 and then eventually World War One though. 2.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work