• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent can Hitler(TM)s rise to and consolidation of power be considered a Legal Revolution(TM)?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To what extent can Hitler's rise to & consolidation of power be considered a 'Legal Revolution'? The political changes made by Hitler and the NSDAP between 1933 and 1934 were considered to be within the ambit of the consitution, and therefore legal. On the other hand, due to the dramatic results of these modifications we often call them a 'revolution'. However, it is worth questioning how far can we consider Hitler's rise and consolidation to power a 'legal revolution'. Hitler wanted to create a revolution from above. He did this step-by-step and in coordination with the constituion. Both the Enabling Act and the Gleichschaltung had clear references to the constituion and used literal words from it, proving that Hitler gaied executive powers to modify the whole range of political functions within the Reich in a legal manner. Therefore the purging of the bureaucracy of potential opponents, the combination of the chancellor's and the president's power into one and the law against the formation of parties was achieved through legal methods. ...read more.

Middle

With the authority gained from the Enabling Act, he turned Article 48 from something temporary - that was used to preserve democracy- into a permanent weapon against a parliamentary government. Laws issued under the Enabling Act abolished the rights of the L(nder legislatures and subordinated the state Ministers-President to the Ministry of Interior in Berlin. This destabilized the entire federal system which had been a central part of the Weimar consitution. Finally he pushed forward a law against the formation of parties, thus nullifying the purpose of voting, and extended the franchise of men and women over 20. The term of proportional representation lost its meaning under Hitler, something that - again- was a characteristic of the Weimar. Hitler worked constantly to destroy the constitution, and therefore it is absurd to call his political changes legal, when the aim of them was to destroy the meaning of legality. It is not even certain that the Nazis tried to keep in accordance with the constitution, as Hitler's 'legal' changes were accompanied by a considerable degree of mobilised pressure - of the very type that the constitution was originally conceived to prevent. ...read more.

Conclusion

The reason why Hitler tried to get rid of extremist members of the SA during the Night of the Long Knives, wasn't due to his keen desire to protect the standard of legality, but to keep himself safe. In any case, the word 'legal' can hardly be used to describe the methods by which the leaders of the SA were eliminated (unjustified executions). Finally, the Nazi apparatus came to be dominated by a body which was as far from the constitutional apparatus of the Weimar Republic as it is possible to conceive, proving that Hitler's aim was never to follow the priciple of legality, but to alter it according to his needs. He only tried to show a fa�ade of legality at the beginning of his consolidation to power, as he had to be cautious till he gained the SS to his side as well. After this he openly boasted with the fact that he eliminated other parties, showing that he never tried to rise to and consolitade his power in a legal manner, but in a rather pragmatic one. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. To what extent was Stalin's rise to power due to his opponents' mistakes?

    The second reason as to why Stalin rose to power is based on his own political skills. One of his most important attributes was his ability to collect positions in the Party which were seemingly unimportant but which in fact gave him a lot of influence and power.

  2. To what extent can Napoleon be considered the "Son of the Revolution"?

    a message to all French people that sovereignty did not belong to them but to him.

  1. French Revolution and the rise of Napoleon - revision notes

    Vagrants (wl�czedzy) - no laws. After 1740 -> overall industrial production in France rose annually about 2%, but not on the same scale as in Great Britain. Mining became the major industry. It attracted and employed amounts of workers, new manufactures were founded.

  2. Castro's rise to power

    Well this economic and political dependence on the USA was very bad seen and tolerated, especially by the lower middle classes, excluded from the system. It is because of this that they started looking at Castro and his ideas as the replacement of Batista's regime.

  1. IB History HL, Extended Notes: Russia, the Tsars, the Provisional Govenment and the Revolution.

    Judiciary Features 1. 1887 Minister of Justice given the power to hold trials in camera to protect ?the dignity of state power.? 2. 1887 term on volost courts (lower courts) increased to 3 years. 3. 1889 crimes against state officials were to be heard in special courts without a jury.

  2. Discuss the methods used by Hitler to Consolidate Power at 1933 1934

    Even though Hitler had exterminated almost all of his political rivals, ironically, the greatest surviving threat to him and his policies came from within the Nazi's own ranks. The SA were the thugs who Hitler had used to help him come to power.

  1. Mussolini's Consolidation of Power

    The room were the voting took place was filled with Fascist thugs, this people was there in order to intimidate the politicians not to vote against the Fascist Party. This is an example on how Mussolini used violence to gain more power, and it really worked because this way he already has 66% of the seats in the Parliament.

  2. Assess the methods and conditions which enabled Hitler to rise to power.

    Goebbels, minister of propaganda, also helped Hitler rise to power by his use of 'saturation' propaganda. The use of rallies, speeches, lectures and 'airplane campaigns' in certain areas were highly effective in raising the profile of the party. It also increased their votes in the elections, especially during the years

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work