• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent did Alexander II's reforms cause more problems than they solved?

Extracts from this document...


TO WHAT EXTENT DID ALEXANDER II'S REFORMS CAUSE MORE PROBLEMS THAN THEY SOLVED? When Alexander II came to throne in 1956 Russia just emerged as the defeated power from the Crimean War. The country was falling behind its European competitors who were in the beginning of the Industrial Age. Alexander II had a difficult task to do: to reform the whole Russia towards a modernised country and risk his authority or to wait behind -as his father did- and risk both his authority and Russia's influence in the international affairs. It is easy to see that whatever way he would go, he would risk further problems. The question is whether he managed to outweigh in numbers and difficulty the ones that arose by solving the old ones. The first reform of Alexander II was the relaxation of censorship. He freed the Russian press by 1858, allowing the Russians to read about more liberal views. However, after the assassination attempt on the Tsar in 1866, censorship was re-introduced once again - even though it wasn't as restrictive as it had been under Nicholas I. In the beginning, this exposed conservatives to arguments for a more liberal form of emancipation, and many nobles - who were formerly against the freedom of the serfs - began to see the need for a change. ...read more.


The zemstva did for the first time allow initiative from below so ending the administrative monopoly of officialdom. These new local organisations were better suited to respond to local needs and in many places they did important work in education and public healthcare, improving the lives of every-day Russians. It also created the 'Third Element' by appointing often liberal minded professionals, like scientists and teachers. However, these reforms endangered the Tsar's autocracy, as people from the 'Third Element' were the ones who could question Alexander's power and provide alternatives to people. In this way the radical intelligentsia emerged, people dedicated to the idea of creating a fairer, more equal society. Their dedication often expressed itself in uncompromising hatred for the tsarist regime, and in 1881 it led to the Tsar's assassination. Also, due to the heavily biased voting system, very few or no peasants entered the regional zemstva, this increasing the gap between the two social classes and furthermore dividing Russia. Also, attempt at national organisation was stopped. All these arouse government hostility. A reform in the army was absolutely necessary after the shameful defeat in the Crimean War. Alexander II extended conscription to all the classes, not only peasants - with partial exemptions for the educated. Service was reduced from 25 to 6 years, plus 9 in reserve, which could be further reduced according to the educational level of the soldier. ...read more.


Solutions for whom?' It seems that from most of the reforms the peasants benefited little, even after their so called emancipation, they were further flooded in problems as now they even had to pay for their land. However, the nobles gained financially from this reform. The reform of the army and of the education probably brought the peasants some advantages. However, the fact that poorer people could be educated represented a danger for the Tsar, as radical students emerged from campuses. The reform of the local government gave more power to the gentry, but it lessened the Tsar's control over his people. Therefore it is very difficult to assess whether Alexander II's reforms caused or solved more problems. Overall it may seem that Russia was better off, as it reached a certain financial stability, its army and economy improved and there were some important steps made towards a more civilised society. However, politically it was in ruins, the great emancipation was nothing but a reform that changed the lives of the serfs into worse, the army was still defeated in 1905 by Japan and Russia's agriculture was in deterioration as well. A top on this, from 1866 Alexander II started taking back from the freedoms that he allowed, which ultimately caused his death and the end of the Tsarist Russia. The problems that his reforms caused were more far-reaching than the solutions it solved, and therefore we can conclude that his reform caused more problems than it solved. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Compare and Contrast the Policies of Alexander II and Alexander III

    3 star(s)

    Tsar Alexander III furthered this Ukaz in his process of Russification. Under Russification, Russian was the only language taught in schools throughout the Empire. Alexander III was wary of the fact that foreign influences must be kept to the minimal.

  2. Compare and Contract the policies of Alexander II and Alexander III in Russia?

    Alexander III learnt from the Crimean war that Russia was needed to be modernised. The creation of more railways because an important customer of the iron and steel industries, accounting for 60% of total production by 1890s. The contrasted large amounts of railways was to help speed up travel around Russia which would in turn help trade and the army.

  1. The Backdrop for the Emancipation of the Serfs under Alexander II, 1861

    The outdated system, however, floundered in its every aspect; the primitive means of production gave off too small a yield to fully support the needs of the entire population; each bad harvest, resulting from crude reliance upon the vacillating weather, was often fatal for millions and Russia's speedy population increase,

  2. The policies of Alexander II and III of Russia

    The text is valuable because it is written by a reputable scholar of in this area, he has written a number of books on Russian history. The text however is limited as it was written in 1958, this was before the Soviet Union collapsed and opened its archives to foreign

  1. Was the Tsar to blame for his own downfall?

    This created anger in the Russians towards the Tsar and there was a wide disapproval to the Tsarist system. In 1914, once again Russia saw herself involved in a massive war that had exploded in Europe: the First World War that made matters for the Tsarist regime worse.

  2. IB History HL, Extended Notes: Russia, the Tsars, the Provisional Govenment and the Revolution.

    Celebrated as peacemaker. 2. Peace in the short term but a fragile illusion in the long term. Repression caused growth of further and more extreme opposition to the Tsarist regime. Execution of Lenin?s brother drove him towards radicalism and revolutionary Marxism. 3. Economic improvements at massive social cost.

  1. To what extent did the reforms of Alexander II achieve his aims

    Even though many times they were oversimplified generalizations, there was still some truth in it. Alexander II eventually decided to abolish serfdom. There were many reasons that persuaded Alexander to do so. First there were simply moral reasons. Since the times of Nicholas I, who described serfdom as ?an evil

  2. To what extent can Alexander II be called a liberator

    They were in right to married who ever they wanted, travel, have a legal status and to own a property and a business. They where also allowed to buy land from the landowners. It was the end of feudal dues and payments; some peasant had more land holding, as well

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work