• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent did Alexander II's reforms cause more problems than they solved?

Extracts from this document...


TO WHAT EXTENT DID ALEXANDER II'S REFORMS CAUSE MORE PROBLEMS THAN THEY SOLVED? When Alexander II came to throne in 1956 Russia just emerged as the defeated power from the Crimean War. The country was falling behind its European competitors who were in the beginning of the Industrial Age. Alexander II had a difficult task to do: to reform the whole Russia towards a modernised country and risk his authority or to wait behind -as his father did- and risk both his authority and Russia's influence in the international affairs. It is easy to see that whatever way he would go, he would risk further problems. The question is whether he managed to outweigh in numbers and difficulty the ones that arose by solving the old ones. The first reform of Alexander II was the relaxation of censorship. He freed the Russian press by 1858, allowing the Russians to read about more liberal views. However, after the assassination attempt on the Tsar in 1866, censorship was re-introduced once again - even though it wasn't as restrictive as it had been under Nicholas I. In the beginning, this exposed conservatives to arguments for a more liberal form of emancipation, and many nobles - who were formerly against the freedom of the serfs - began to see the need for a change. ...read more.


The zemstva did for the first time allow initiative from below so ending the administrative monopoly of officialdom. These new local organisations were better suited to respond to local needs and in many places they did important work in education and public healthcare, improving the lives of every-day Russians. It also created the 'Third Element' by appointing often liberal minded professionals, like scientists and teachers. However, these reforms endangered the Tsar's autocracy, as people from the 'Third Element' were the ones who could question Alexander's power and provide alternatives to people. In this way the radical intelligentsia emerged, people dedicated to the idea of creating a fairer, more equal society. Their dedication often expressed itself in uncompromising hatred for the tsarist regime, and in 1881 it led to the Tsar's assassination. Also, due to the heavily biased voting system, very few or no peasants entered the regional zemstva, this increasing the gap between the two social classes and furthermore dividing Russia. Also, attempt at national organisation was stopped. All these arouse government hostility. A reform in the army was absolutely necessary after the shameful defeat in the Crimean War. Alexander II extended conscription to all the classes, not only peasants - with partial exemptions for the educated. Service was reduced from 25 to 6 years, plus 9 in reserve, which could be further reduced according to the educational level of the soldier. ...read more.


Solutions for whom?' It seems that from most of the reforms the peasants benefited little, even after their so called emancipation, they were further flooded in problems as now they even had to pay for their land. However, the nobles gained financially from this reform. The reform of the army and of the education probably brought the peasants some advantages. However, the fact that poorer people could be educated represented a danger for the Tsar, as radical students emerged from campuses. The reform of the local government gave more power to the gentry, but it lessened the Tsar's control over his people. Therefore it is very difficult to assess whether Alexander II's reforms caused or solved more problems. Overall it may seem that Russia was better off, as it reached a certain financial stability, its army and economy improved and there were some important steps made towards a more civilised society. However, politically it was in ruins, the great emancipation was nothing but a reform that changed the lives of the serfs into worse, the army was still defeated in 1905 by Japan and Russia's agriculture was in deterioration as well. A top on this, from 1866 Alexander II started taking back from the freedoms that he allowed, which ultimately caused his death and the end of the Tsarist Russia. The problems that his reforms caused were more far-reaching than the solutions it solved, and therefore we can conclude that his reform caused more problems than it solved. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Compare and Contrast the Policies of Alexander II and Alexander III

    3 star(s)

    Tsar Alexander III furthered this Ukaz in his process of Russification. Under Russification, Russian was the only language taught in schools throughout the Empire. Alexander III was wary of the fact that foreign influences must be kept to the minimal.

  2. To what extent did Alexander II succeed reforming Russian life and institutions?

    inadequacies especially when compared to western administrative systems, in a Russian context theses reforms gave Russia the proper basis of local government for the first time. After the defeat in Crimea it was self evident that Russia needed to modernize their army. The first step was changing the recruitment methods.

  1. To what extent did the reforms of Alexander II achieve his aims

    Even though many times they were oversimplified generalizations, there was still some truth in it. Alexander II eventually decided to abolish serfdom. There were many reasons that persuaded Alexander to do so. First there were simply moral reasons. Since the times of Nicholas I, who described serfdom as ?an evil

  2. IB History HL, Extended Notes: Russia, the Tsars, the Provisional Govenment and the Revolution.

    Launched huge export drive of grain and secured a French loan to fund his industrialization measures. 1892 the Russian state had a budget surplus for the first time (massive social cost). 1881 to 1894 coal output almost doubled and pig iron more than doubled.

  1. Assess the strengths and weaknesses of Alexander II of Russia's reforms.

    The workforce increased from 860,000 to 1,320,000 people by 1887. An increase in workforce meant Russia?s economy would have grown. Alexander had hoped that the liberated peasantry would be thankful to tsar and increased support and make worthier recruits to the army: this was not the case.

  2. Despite his apparently liberal policies, Alexander II was just as conservative as Alexander III. ...

    as not to repeat the mistakes of his father, who allowed critical texts to be published. In this respect, Alexander II was very liberal as unlike his son, he wanted to make huge changes in the censorship of the press.

  1. Why did Alexander II introduce a program of reforms at the beginning of the ...

    Because of their lack of money, this would then move Russian industrialism forward with the increasing numbers of workers. Concerning the education reform, Alexander hoped to decrease the massive illiteracy present in Russia; this was making Russian technology and machinery fall behind the other European powers with an insufficient number of scientists or engineers.

  2. Assess the strengths and weaknesses of Alexander IIs reforms.

    The reform was successful in the sense that corruption and delay were reduced. Also the zemstvo reform of 1864 provided for elective assemblies. The zemstvo provided an area of public service, and was highly successful given their limited resources and the government control over them .This allowed for the upkeep of roads, fire insurance, education and public health.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work