• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent did Alexander II succeed reforming Russian life and institutions?

Extracts from this document...


To what extent did Alexander II succeed reforming Russian life and institutions? Tsar Alexander II came to power during the Crimean war in 1855 and ruled Russia until his assassination in 1881. Historians believe that he may have been the "best prepared heir-apparent ever to have ascended the Russian throne" as Alexander II had been heir for most of his boyhood and received a special education preparing him to rule Russia. As well prepared as he may have been he inherited a difficult position from his father, Nicholas I. His nation was isolated in Europe, on the verge of defeat, which made it dangerously weak. In terms of domestic policy, he was left and intact autocracy that repressed all western influenced political thinking and practices. Finally, as Russia's economic and social progress had been extremely limited under Nicholas I, particularly in comparison to the rapidly industrializing western European powers, Alexander II inherited a relatively "backwards" Russia. The new tsar was aware of Russia's weakness and recognized the necessity to introduce reforms to preserve his autocratic system of government. Alexander II is best known for his first reform, the emancipation of the serfs in 1861. There were two large obstacles that he had to overcome before he could complete this reform. Firstly the gentry and nobility were hostile to the destruction of serfdom, they feared chaos and unrest in the short term and loss of status and wealth in the long term. ...read more.


Before 1864, the local government consisted of the landlord fulfilling the state requirement for taxation and recruitments with the occasional intervention of troops to put down peasant disturbances. New structures had to be devised to replace the old local government and take on the new responsibilities. The choice to create elected assemblies was a cheep way of extending the bureaucracy, fulfilling the needs of the people without creating more jobs and salaries, which Russia could not afford to pay. The introduction of zemstva, Russian for local assembly, was ground breaking as it endorsed the elective principle as opposed to the autocratic and bureaucratic principles in Russian politics. The dumy was the urban equivalent of the zemstva. These local assemblies implied that Russia could have a representative political system as the assembly officials were elected every year. This was the beginning of proper local governments. The zemstva operated on a two-tier system, district and the higher-level provincial guberniya zemstva. Although they may have seemed democratic, they were actually a concession to the local gentry and had no intention of being remotely democratic. The votes were heavily weighted towards the local landowners they had 42% of the seats in the lower tier and 74% in the upper tier while the peasants had 38% and 10.5% respectively. Furthermore, although they were elected annually they only met for long enough to elect a standing council to undertake local administration Although the zmestva and dumy have been criticized for their ...read more.


The government abolished the ancient, inefficient system of tax farming where financiers could 'farm' taxes, collecting them in whatever quantity they saw fit and giving the government only the money it required and pocketing the surplus. This was replaced with an excise tax, the equivalent of the British value added tax (VAT). Finally, a state bank was founded in 1860 followed by municipal banks and savings banks in hopes of stabilizing the rouble With little private capital or western entrepreneurship to fall back on, the Minister of finance was able to establish momentum and revolutionize the Russian economy. After his assassination in 1881, Alexander II was given the title of 'Tsar Liberator' in recognition of his emancipation of the serfs. Throughout his rein Alexander II, well aware of the need to modernize Russia, put forward several reforms. His first reform, the emancipation of the serfs, legally changed the status of Russian peasants however very little changed in terms of their lifestyle or freedom. A similar example of this was the education reform; the government gave the universities freedom only to attempt to take it away when subversive ideas began to form. However not all the reforms failed in changing Russian life and institutions. Alexander II was able to revolutionize the justice system in Russia, give Russia the proper base of local government for the first time and completely modernize the army. In essence, the 'Tsar Liberator' succeeded in reforming some aspects of Russian life and institutions and fell quite short of the mark for others. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. To what extent did Alexander II's reforms cause more problems than they solved?

    This eventually led to the Tsar's assassination in 1881. Another important reform was in the local government, where this time power was given to the localities themselves through elected assemblies. The new assemblies, known as zemstva, were a concession to the gentry, as so the votes heavily favoured them.

  2. The policies of Alexander II and III of Russia

    In rural areas, the local zemstov was tasked with primary education under the statute of 186427. The quality and number of primary schools increased, from 8000 in 1858 to 23, 000 in 188028. Secondary education also was reformed, the classist rules of his predecessors were removed, allowing anyone who could

  1. Compare and Contract the policies of Alexander II and Alexander III in Russia?

    Zemstva continued to carry out improvement in the village. This meant that there was a rejection of any prospect of constitutional government and that the autocracy was upheld. Also there was growth in the provision of primary education. Alexander III pushed the policy of Russification throughout Russia during the 1870s, to ensure that the population because Russian in the terms of their language, culture, religion, legal system.

  2. Analyse the short and long term causes of the 1917 Feb/March Russian Revolution

    The presence of Rasputin, added to the disrepute of the royal couple. Alexandra and Rasputin's influence proved disastrous for they advised Nicholas against making any concessions. A bigger cause for the Russian Revolution, were the succession of ineffectual ministers contributing to the government's instability.

  1. IB History HL, Extended Notes: Russia, the Tsars, the Provisional Govenment and the Revolution.

    Composed of representatives from moderate socialist parties, the Mensheviks, and social revolutionaries and had the support of the working class. 2. Controlled railways, post and telegraph offices, and the army. More real power than the PG. Means whereby the views of the people could be represented in the absence of political parties.

  2. To what extent did the reforms of Alexander II achieve his aims

    This was seen as unfair to many peasants. They believed that, because they had worked the land for such long time, it should now belong entirely to them without paying any redemption taxes. This led to many peasant uprisings such as Bezdna Unrest in 1861.

  1. Assess the strengths and weaknesses of Alexander II of Russia's reforms.

    judiciary, to give it the independence that befits it.? Juries were soon introduced into courts of law, a western idea. They were however selected from lists of propertied people, prepared by the zemstva. This means that it was most likely the gentry making the jury, which would have not worked in a peasant?s favour if he were innocent.

  2. To what extent can Alexander II be called a liberator

    they were not afraid of being forced to join the military service. As a consequence of this, a new class of peasants emerged, the Kulaks, they where private owners. This is not a fairytale story were everyone ended up happy, at the end there where more looses than gains.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work