• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent do you agree with the assessment that Alexander II proved to be a disappointing liberal?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To what extent do you agree with the assessment that Alexander II proved to be a 'disappointing liberal'? Whether Alexander II is considered a disappointing liberal or a successful one is much debated. It is a very controversial topic because he can appear to be a disappointing liberal in the opinion of the people who expected more from him. However, he might be a successful liberal to the people who didn't expect him to bring much change. People who expected Alexander II to be like the rest Tsars, narrow-minded. In the following commentary I will analyze Alexander IIs main reforms such as the judicial reforms, the emancipation of the serfs, the creation of the Zemstvos and the educational reforms. The emancipation of the serfs in 1861 agrees with the statement that Alexander II was a disappointing liberal. The serfs were given pieces of land, however, the land that was given to them was often infertile, and therefore it was of no use to them. By making it communal landowning, the serfs couldn't leave their land because they couldn't afford it. ...read more.

Middle

This means that the emancipation proves Alexander II to be a disappointing liberal. The creation of the Zemstvos in 1864 gave more democracy and freedom to the Russian population. The Zemstvos was a rural elected assembly to provide social and economic services, which in turn became a liberal influence in imperial Russia. The assemblies were represented by the peasant village communes and the land proprietors, which gave power to the people. They expanded education, local welfare, improved roads, provided health care, among others. The Zemstvos had the authority to impose limited taxes on real estate and business. This gave the population more freedom because they could vote among themselves now, they now had a voice. On the other hand there are also arguments that show Alexander II to be a disappointing liberal for he didn't make more drastic changes when he had the opportunity to. There was still a great deal of inequality even in the voting system; it was separated into three areas the landowners, wealthy townspeople and the peasant. This separation meant that the votes had a different value, meaning that the vote of a landowner didn't have the same importance as that of the peasant. ...read more.

Conclusion

Secondary education was also available, however this was very 'dangerous' for the Autocratic system. It was unsafe because if people were given superior education they would start inquiring whether Russia's system was adequate. He was also more liberal for allowing the universities to present lectures on topics concerning law and government. This was an extremely good reform because education was no longer available only for the rich; the peasants had better opportunities due to this reform. It also created a more liberal mindset in the students, because they were allowed to express their opinion without having the fear of being persecuted. To conclude I believe Alexander II proved to be a 'disappointing liberal' up to a certain extent because we must also take into account that the education and judicial reforms restored a significant amount of equality in Russia. However I do deem that Alexander could have achieved more than what he did, he could have promoted more equality through more effective reforms. Alexander could have made some of the existing reforms more significant by giving the peasants a more significant role. He should have made reforms that would have optimistically affected the grand majority of the population, not only the nobility. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. History internal Assessment (The subsidiary role of women in Nazi society)

    As Flagship states, married women were banned from legal and medical professions and even from the civil service. Interest-free loans were made available to newlyweds who undertook that the wife would not seek employment22. The obsession of birth rate conducted to enforcing anti-abortion laws and financial support for third, fourth, fifth child.

  2. Compare and Contract the policies of Alexander II and Alexander III in Russia?

    In 1884, University Statue replaced that of 1863. It established state control over the universities in an attempt to stamp out riots, such as had occurred in 1882 in St Petersburgand Kazan. In 1887 there was an increase in university fees to exclude all but the wealthy, and to keep out the students from local social ranks.

  1. The emancipation of the serfs in Russia was the only genuine reform introduced by ...

    On one hand, as it was assumed at first, all private serfs were freed and given personal rights; e.g. there was freedom of marriage, possibility to own properties. On the other side, which actually seems much wider, village-people were burdened with many new problems.

  2. To what extent did Alexander Tsar II deserve the title of Tsar Liberator

    This was the wrong action for the government to take as it increased resentment and led to the zemstvo becoming lively centres of political disturbance. A lot of discontent might have been dissolved if the Tsar had agreed to the establishment of a central representative body in which the problems inherent in every reform could have been publicly addressed.

  1. IB History HL, Extended Notes: Russia, the Tsars, the Provisional Govenment and the Revolution.

    1889 volost Justice of the Peace (minor crimes) abolished, duties transferred to (Ministry of Justice appointed) city judges in cities and shared between the uezd member of the provincial assembly and the Land Captain in rural areas (control). 5.

  2. To what extent did the reforms of Alexander II achieve his aims

    either pay 49 year redemption tax to the state at 6% interest, collected by the local mir, or continue working 30 to 40 days a year on the lord?s land. This new cooperation between the state and the landowners was a huge achievement.

  1. Assess the strengths and weaknesses of Alexander IIs reforms.

    The reform was successful in the sense that corruption and delay were reduced. Also the zemstvo reform of 1864 provided for elective assemblies. The zemstvo provided an area of public service, and was highly successful given their limited resources and the government control over them .This allowed for the upkeep of roads, fire insurance, education and public health.

  2. Assess the strengths and weaknesses of Alexander II of Russia's reforms.

    The workforce increased from 860,000 to 1,320,000 people by 1887. An increase in workforce meant Russia?s economy would have grown. Alexander had hoped that the liberated peasantry would be thankful to tsar and increased support and make worthier recruits to the army: this was not the case.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work