• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent do you agree with the assessment that Alexander II proved to be a disappointing liberal?

Extracts from this document...


To what extent do you agree with the assessment that Alexander II proved to be a 'disappointing liberal'? Whether Alexander II is considered a disappointing liberal or a successful one is much debated. It is a very controversial topic because he can appear to be a disappointing liberal in the opinion of the people who expected more from him. However, he might be a successful liberal to the people who didn't expect him to bring much change. People who expected Alexander II to be like the rest Tsars, narrow-minded. In the following commentary I will analyze Alexander IIs main reforms such as the judicial reforms, the emancipation of the serfs, the creation of the Zemstvos and the educational reforms. The emancipation of the serfs in 1861 agrees with the statement that Alexander II was a disappointing liberal. The serfs were given pieces of land, however, the land that was given to them was often infertile, and therefore it was of no use to them. By making it communal landowning, the serfs couldn't leave their land because they couldn't afford it. ...read more.


This means that the emancipation proves Alexander II to be a disappointing liberal. The creation of the Zemstvos in 1864 gave more democracy and freedom to the Russian population. The Zemstvos was a rural elected assembly to provide social and economic services, which in turn became a liberal influence in imperial Russia. The assemblies were represented by the peasant village communes and the land proprietors, which gave power to the people. They expanded education, local welfare, improved roads, provided health care, among others. The Zemstvos had the authority to impose limited taxes on real estate and business. This gave the population more freedom because they could vote among themselves now, they now had a voice. On the other hand there are also arguments that show Alexander II to be a disappointing liberal for he didn't make more drastic changes when he had the opportunity to. There was still a great deal of inequality even in the voting system; it was separated into three areas the landowners, wealthy townspeople and the peasant. This separation meant that the votes had a different value, meaning that the vote of a landowner didn't have the same importance as that of the peasant. ...read more.


Secondary education was also available, however this was very 'dangerous' for the Autocratic system. It was unsafe because if people were given superior education they would start inquiring whether Russia's system was adequate. He was also more liberal for allowing the universities to present lectures on topics concerning law and government. This was an extremely good reform because education was no longer available only for the rich; the peasants had better opportunities due to this reform. It also created a more liberal mindset in the students, because they were allowed to express their opinion without having the fear of being persecuted. To conclude I believe Alexander II proved to be a 'disappointing liberal' up to a certain extent because we must also take into account that the education and judicial reforms restored a significant amount of equality in Russia. However I do deem that Alexander could have achieved more than what he did, he could have promoted more equality through more effective reforms. Alexander could have made some of the existing reforms more significant by giving the peasants a more significant role. He should have made reforms that would have optimistically affected the grand majority of the population, not only the nobility. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. History internal Assessment (The subsidiary role of women in Nazi society)

    The next aspect of unfair discrimination is visible in politics: Women were excluded from key positions in Nazi politics; there was not a single female Nazi deputy in the Reichstag and a party regulation of 1921 excluded women from all senior positions"21.

  2. The emancipation of the serfs in Russia was the only genuine reform introduced by ...

    Another area of Alexander II reforms, education, similarly to abolition of serfdom, fulfilled its main aims, however later on it was followed by unexpected consequences, that threatened Tsar's position, and then even his life. Changes in Russian education first of all meant the increased number of schools and the right

  1. To what extent did Alexander II's reforms cause more problems than they solved?

    The Mir collectively owned peasant land and was responsible for: collecting redemption payments, taxation, recruitment and order. Overall Alexander II managed to go through this revolutionary transition without upsetting the nobles too much, who were actually advantaged economically by this reform.

  2. The policies of Alexander II and III of Russia

    In rural areas, the local zemstov was tasked with primary education under the statute of 186427. The quality and number of primary schools increased, from 8000 in 1858 to 23, 000 in 188028. Secondary education also was reformed, the classist rules of his predecessors were removed, allowing anyone who could

  1. Compare and Contract the policies of Alexander II and Alexander III in Russia?

    Their curriculum aimed to 'strengthen religious and moral notions and to spread basic knowledge'. Secondary schools grew both in terms of numbers and in an extention to include women (1864) resulting in a doubling of numbers to 800,000 during the 1860s.

  2. To what extent did Alexander II succeed reforming Russian life and institutions?

    Although the serfs were given freedom from noble interference and control of their lives the Mir, or peasant commune, tended to replace the gentry in terms of controlling the lives of peasants. Furthermore, the serfs were freed from feudal dues and payments, however these were replaced by higher tax burdens,

  1. English Commentary - Postcards

    Must be all growed up now' indicates to the audience that his age is similar to Starr's age. His character also reference when Loyal 'he would sleep on the daybed' to eliminate any awkward situations which could have arisen which indicate to the audience the good character he has, Starr

  2. IB History HL, Extended Notes: Russia, the Tsars, the Provisional Govenment and the Revolution.

    Revolutionary activity increased between 1873 and 1877 and 1611 Populists (15% women) were arrested. Trial of the 50 and Trial of 193 held, ?mild? sentences passed down so the regime exiled the defendants to Siberia. 2. 1877-1878 trials. 30% noble, 13% official, 21% priest 25% worker/peasant.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work