• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent do you agree with the assessment that Alexander II proved to be a disappointing liberal?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To what extent do you agree with the assessment that Alexander II proved to be a 'disappointing liberal'? Whether Alexander II is considered a disappointing liberal or a successful one is much debated. It is a very controversial topic because he can appear to be a disappointing liberal in the opinion of the people who expected more from him. However, he might be a successful liberal to the people who didn't expect him to bring much change. People who expected Alexander II to be like the rest Tsars, narrow-minded. In the following commentary I will analyze Alexander IIs main reforms such as the judicial reforms, the emancipation of the serfs, the creation of the Zemstvos and the educational reforms. The emancipation of the serfs in 1861 agrees with the statement that Alexander II was a disappointing liberal. The serfs were given pieces of land, however, the land that was given to them was often infertile, and therefore it was of no use to them. By making it communal landowning, the serfs couldn't leave their land because they couldn't afford it. ...read more.

Middle

This means that the emancipation proves Alexander II to be a disappointing liberal. The creation of the Zemstvos in 1864 gave more democracy and freedom to the Russian population. The Zemstvos was a rural elected assembly to provide social and economic services, which in turn became a liberal influence in imperial Russia. The assemblies were represented by the peasant village communes and the land proprietors, which gave power to the people. They expanded education, local welfare, improved roads, provided health care, among others. The Zemstvos had the authority to impose limited taxes on real estate and business. This gave the population more freedom because they could vote among themselves now, they now had a voice. On the other hand there are also arguments that show Alexander II to be a disappointing liberal for he didn't make more drastic changes when he had the opportunity to. There was still a great deal of inequality even in the voting system; it was separated into three areas the landowners, wealthy townspeople and the peasant. This separation meant that the votes had a different value, meaning that the vote of a landowner didn't have the same importance as that of the peasant. ...read more.

Conclusion

Secondary education was also available, however this was very 'dangerous' for the Autocratic system. It was unsafe because if people were given superior education they would start inquiring whether Russia's system was adequate. He was also more liberal for allowing the universities to present lectures on topics concerning law and government. This was an extremely good reform because education was no longer available only for the rich; the peasants had better opportunities due to this reform. It also created a more liberal mindset in the students, because they were allowed to express their opinion without having the fear of being persecuted. To conclude I believe Alexander II proved to be a 'disappointing liberal' up to a certain extent because we must also take into account that the education and judicial reforms restored a significant amount of equality in Russia. However I do deem that Alexander could have achieved more than what he did, he could have promoted more equality through more effective reforms. Alexander could have made some of the existing reforms more significant by giving the peasants a more significant role. He should have made reforms that would have optimistically affected the grand majority of the population, not only the nobility. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. To what extent did Alexander II's reforms cause more problems than they solved?

    Moreover the Tsar was now able to reform other critical parts of the system, such as the army, finance and education, which without the emancipation of the serfs couldn't have been possible. In other words, it opened the door to the modernisation of the country.

  2. History internal Assessment (The subsidiary role of women in Nazi society)

    As Flagship states, married women were banned from legal and medical professions and even from the civil service. Interest-free loans were made available to newlyweds who undertook that the wife would not seek employment22. The obsession of birth rate conducted to enforcing anti-abortion laws and financial support for third, fourth, fifth child.

  1. The policies of Alexander II and III of Russia

    He stripped universities of all autonomy. Student organisations shut down, the law and philosophy faculties were severely censored34. As a result, students and teachers became angry about harsh, draconian measures. The evidence is overwhelming that the policies of Alexander II and Alexander III differed greatly on education and censorship.

  2. Internal Assessment: Camp David and Oslo Accords

    of both parties' legitimacy and the right to exist Camp David Peace Talk (2000) * Mediator : US * Place: Catoctin Mountains of Maryland, on July 11 near the end of Clinton's presidency * Focus of negotiation * Final settlement of Palestinians and Israel * Palestinian right of return *

  1. IB History HL, Extended Notes: Russia, the Tsars, the Provisional Govenment and the Revolution.

    1889 volost Justice of the Peace (minor crimes) abolished, duties transferred to (Ministry of Justice appointed) city judges in cities and shared between the uezd member of the provincial assembly and the Land Captain in rural areas (control). 5.

  2. To what extent did the reforms of Alexander II achieve his aims

    The emancipation of the serfs also opened the door to modernization and further reforms in legal system, the army, local government, education and the Church. Nevertheless, the Emancipation Edict must be considered as unsuccessful. After the emancipation, the peasants were given very little land and the one they received was of poor quality.

  1. Assess the strengths and weaknesses of Alexander II of Russia's reforms.

    Inevitably, the police influenced the judge?s decision greatly. This process was also painfully slow. In November 1864, the Tsar published the reforms of the legal system: ??to establish in Russia courts of justice that are swift, fair, merciful, and equal for all our subjects, to raise the authority of the

  2. To what extent can Alexander II be called a liberator

    Applying an unequal using of the legislation, he left a lot of peasants with out lands, while others ex peasants became the landowners of their provinces. I think this was a kind of an ?exchange of restrictions? serfs weren?t serfs anymore, they could do more things than before but at

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work